Hosted by: Funded by: Working Paper 64 July 2011 Personalisation: what will the impacts be for carers? Dr Mary Larkin and Dr Helen Dickinson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY Performance audit and evaluation: common ground with Internal Audit ? The UK National Audit Office experience Jeremy Lonsdale.
Advertisements

What, when and how?: The context for User-Led Organisations Rich Watts Department of Health January 2010.
Lincolnshire and Rutland Public Sector Compact – Christmas Celebration Event “Our Achievements in 2008 and looking ahead to 2009” A presentation by Nigel.
Community Pharmacy – Call to Action Derbyshire / Nottinghamshire Area Team.
Delivering effective enterprise education: the role of learning design and technology Professor Pauric McGowan University of Ulster Dr Richard Blundel.
Open Public Services Listening Exercise Summary November 2011.
NOMS Grants Programme 2014/15
Third sector strategy Dave Hill Director Children, Schools and Families Daniel Moore Project manager: third sector strategy.
Involving partners in evidencing impact David Young – North Lanarkshire Council.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PROFESSIONAL PEER SUPERVISION ADSHE Professional Peer Development Day 22 nd September 2013 Shirley Dow, Janet Skinner, Julia Tait.
Putting Research Evidence to Work Research Seminar 14 th January 2009.
Equality impact assessments: a tool for change? Ellen Pugh Senior policy adviser.
Getting research into health care practice: General lessons and the case of genetics Sue Dopson Saïd Business School Templeton College.
© The Association for Dementia Studies Advantages and disadvantages of different models of Housing with Care schemes for people living with dementia HDRC.
Person-centred Care & Patient Activation Richard Owen NHS England Dr Natalie Armstrong University of Leicester.
The Torbay Model – meeting people’s needs and expectations Dr Carol Tozer People Commissioner.
1 Simon Bradstreet: SRN Allison Alexander: NHS Education for Scotland/SRN Scottish Recovery Indicator.
Tackling health inequalities – Scottish Government perspective Tony Rednall Creating Health Team: Public Health Division.
Business research methods: using questions and active listening
A Skills and Learning Observatory for Wales Building on best practice A review of Observatory development in the UK and beyond.
Stuart Hollis Where are we now? An exploration of the provision of teacher training programmes for the Learning and Skills Sector following the 2007 Workforce.
Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Bill. Health and Social Care Integration Not a new concept - policy goal for UK governments over the last few.
The impact of public involvement Sarah Buckland Director INVOLVE
Invention for Innovation (i4i) Bev Luchmun Industry Lead NISCHR
Health inequalities post 2010 review – implications for action in London London Teaching Public Health Network “Towards a cohesive public health system.
The Value for Money & Policy Review of Disability Services Presentation to Inclusion Ireland Conference 15th April 2011 Bairbre Nic Aongusa, Director Office.
KT-EQUAL/ CARDI Workshop: ‘Lost in Translation’ 23 June 2011 Communicating research results to policy makers: A practitioner’s perspective.
A forgotten partnership? The carer-service user partnership and personalisation Mary Larkin.
Learning Outcomes of the SCPHN Programme & How they Link to Practice.
Making room for ‘former carers’ Dr Mary Larkin, The Open University.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
SSRG Annual Workshop 2008 SCIE’s role in making a difference Julie Jones Chief Executive, SCIE 9 April 2008.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
Student volunteers and the volunteer- involving community organisations vinspiredstudents research.
Dr Mary Larkin De Montfort University 24 October 2013.
In partnership with PwC Technology for learning in the FE and Skills sector Cathy Ellis, Director, Improvement, Becta on behalf of Becta and LSC BETT 08.
Bridge over Troubled Water? Collaboration to Improve Collaboration across the Nonprofit/Government Sectoral Divide Ben Cairns and Margaret Harris
We help to improve social care standards June Kathryn Chamberlain Area Officer Eastern.
PEPE 23 Jan 2008 Making a framework for good practice in social care Patricia Kearney, SCIE Karen Jones, University of the West of England Mike Fisher,
Personalisation and its implications for work and employment in the voluntary sector Dr Ian Cunningham and Professor Dennis Nickson, Strathclyde University.
SEN and Disability Reform Partner Supplier briefing event December 2012.
Helping Families update Scrutiny Select Committee Meeting March 2013 Nick Page.
Teaching in teams: lessons from systematic review training NCRM Training the Trainers Event 4 th June 2007 Angela Harden and Karen Bird MRS Node EPPI Centre,
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
‘EFFECTIVE PARTNERSHIPS BETWEEN VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS FOR CARERS AND ACADEMIA IN AN ERA OF PUBLIC SPENDING CUTS'. Julia Tabreman, Chief Executive Carers.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Induction toolkit 2. WHAT DOES MY TRUST LOOK LIKE? © GovernWell
Improving skills and care standards in the support workforce: a realist synthesis of workforce development interventions Jo Rycroft-Malone, Christopher.
A Delivery Framework for Adult Rehabilitation in Scotland Scottish Executive, February 2007 Scottish Executive, February 2007.
People lives communities Coproduction and older people Sharing ideas and experience about services led by older people 27 November 2013 Helen Bowers, Head.
Creating an evaluation framework to optimise practice returns: Process & progress within a large community sector organisation Australasian Evaluation.
Future Council Programme Update to the Birmingham Smart City Commission 17 June 2015 Page 1.
A Common Assessment Framework for Adults – Development 12 February 2008 Carl Evans Social Care, Local Government and Care Services Directorate Department.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
1 Establishing the West Midlands Regional Forum on Ageing Chris Eade Assistant Director : Worklessness and Later Life Government Office West Midlands.
Review of Social Marketing South East Region Presentation to Department of Health South East 5 August 2009 Hannah Corbett (South East.
Operational Assessment of Service Delivery
Strategic Advisor for Social Work and Social Care Research
Partnership Coordinator
Name Job title Research Councils UK
Poster 1. Leadership Development Programme : Leading Cultures of Research and Innovation in Clinical Teams Background The NHS Constitution is explicit.
Participatory Action Research (PAR)
A programme of policy and practice support for providers
Housing and Ageing Linking strategy to future delivery for Scotland 2030.
Peer Element of ODDESSI
Connecting Policy with Practice
Housing and Ageing Linking strategy to future delivery for Scotland 2030.
BELFAST HEALTHY CITIES 25th ANNIVERSARY LECTURE SERIES
Presentation transcript:

Hosted by: Funded by: Working Paper 64 July 2011 Personalisation: what will the impacts be for carers? Dr Mary Larkin and Dr Helen Dickinson

INTRODUCTION Personalisation potentially has profound implications for carers lack of knowledge about the outcomes of personalisation for carers, and a limited evidence base on which the third sector can draw when addressing carers’ needs a body of research is required to help the third sector understand the implications of the changes this paper therefore aimed to: -review the existing evidence base available to the third sector about the impact of personalisation on carers -identify those areas of further research required to inform practice across the third sector - identify issues that local and national policy makers will need to consider in relation to service delivery as personalisation evolves

WORKING PAPER 64 OUTLINE overview of the main features of the personalisation agenda review of the evidence base on the impact of personalisation on carers evidence required by the third sector in order to support carers as the personalisation agenda progresses reflection on gathering the evidence identified and the implications for the next stage in the TSRC’s research programme into personalisation

MAIN FEATURES OF THE PERSONALISATION AGENDA Personalisation ‘become a unifying theme and a dominant narrative across public services in England’ (Needham, 2011: pg. 54) Broad aims and a potentially malleable concept. Significant history but potential ambiguity allows it to serve multiple different agendas Search for a clear and consistent policy programme – and be implication an evidence-base underpinning this agenda – may not be entirely fruitful Important that third sector organisations understand the agenda and possible implications Not yet clear if personalisation will deliver a step change in services and outcomes. This will depend on implementation of this agenda and carers play an important part in this process, yet we know little about the impact of personalisation on carers

REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE BASE ON THE IMPACT OF PERSONALISATION ON CARERS 1 the personalisation agenda impacts at organisational and personal levels the importance of carers to the successful implementation of the personalisation agenda is consistently acknowledged ….but carers have received relatively little attention compared to some other groups the majority of the findings about carers and personalisation have emerged from studies into the different forms of self- directed support which show there are both positive and less positive outcomes to optimise the outcomes of personalisation for carers a more comprehensive evidence base about the impact of personalisation on carers is required

EVIDENCE REQUIRED BY THIRD SECTOR ORGANISATIONS TO SUPPORT CARERS AS PERSONALISATION PROGRESSES self-directed support initiatives are likely to have the most significant implications for carers within personalisation examples of evidence required by the third sector to provide carers with the support they need in order to maximise the benefits of self-directed support - Skills e.g. those associated with being an employer - Service design e.g. up-to-date information about the full range of specialist support services within their locality - Emotional impacts e.g. role changes - Ways of supporting carers e.g. approaches that work best - Policy development e.g to feed back into policy about the impacts of personalisation in practice

TAKING THE AGENDA FORWARD obtaining evidence in the areas identified is complex and raises methodological and ethical dilemmas need to establish how to conduct efficacious research into the issues about carers and personalisation hence this event bring together leading academics, practitioners and policy makers to set the future research agenda in relation to the role of the Third Sector in supporting carers in an age of personalisation

....for discussion are the issues raised in the paper correct? are there important issues that are not considered? other evidence/sources not included?

FUTURE RESEARCH PRIORITIES what research is currently underway? future research priorities to develop a body of knowledge that can be used to inform third sector practice and support a commissioning environment which can provide carers with support in an era of personalisation?