TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE COOPERATIVE PURCHASING NETWORK THE NETWORK PRESENTED BY: CHARLIE OBERRENDER, CPPB DIRECTOR OF COOPERATIVE PURCHASING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Advertisements

Program Controls Systems & Processes Board of Trustees Workshop October 11, 2005.
APRIL 3-6, 2013, LONG BEACH, CA Cooperative Purchasing Programs APRIL 3-6, 2013, LONG BEACH, CA.
Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.
Rosemarie Day Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Thursday, May 8, 2008 Operations Report Current Priorities and Future Plans.
Governmental/Public Affairs Randy Long, Director, Legislative and Government Affairs Beth Allman, Sr. Manager Cyndi Andrews, Court Services Specialist.
Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing Group (ICPG) – Portland Metro Area Who We Are What We Do Benefits of the ICP Group Questons?
1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee November 2007 Recommendations Public Forums.
Decisions, Decisions, and still more Decisions Tom MayerDirector State of Alaska Jason SozaCPO State of Alaska Paul MashAsst. Director State of Utah Steve.
Who We Are  A Cooperative Purchasing Network for government agencies in the State of Missouri  Sponsored by the MARE in Missouri and Region 8 Education.
Procurement Reform 2SHB 2452 Procurement for the State of Washington East Side Vendor Training June 20, 2012.
AzMERIT Arizona’s Statewide Achievement Assessment for English Language Arts and Mathematics November 20, 2014.
Cooperative Purchasing and the Questionnaire Larry Weeks, Director – YEMMC Yvonne Volpe, Procurement Specialist-TUSD.
Instructional Materials Process and Progress Update Chief Academic Officer Quarterly Meeting November 13, 2012.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
Community Facility Loans/Grants Architect Flow Chart Owner has need for project. RD Area Office is contacted. RD visits project site and discusses project.
Ad Hoc Steering Committee for WPA Report on Writing Programs Outcomes from first meeting, August 26 Reviewed results from priority-setting activity Decided.
THE NC CHILD NUTRITION PROCUREMENT ALLIANCE WHO WE ARE…
Klein ISD Education Foundation Grant Writing Workshop
1 Procurement Reform Project January 14, 2009 Presented by: Christine Warnock, CPPO, CPPB State Purchasing Agent.
Railroad 101 Equipment April 9, Next Generation Corridor Equipment Committee  Established by Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement.
Working Toward a Statewide Information System to Track the Effectiveness of Student Aid Financial Programs in Maryland Michael J. Keller Director of Policy.
Texas Department of Information Resources Information Resources/Technology Initiatives.
Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014.
F LORIDA A TLANTIC U NIVERSITY B OARD OF T RUSTEES.
How to Become a BuyBoard Vendor and What Are the Benefits.
Cooperative Purchasing Who’s Looking Out for Your Interests? Tony Des Chenes, Director Commodities Division Purchasing Operations.
PROCUREMENT POST REVIEW OF WORLD BANK FINANCED PROJECTS IN INDIA October 11, 2007.
ALDINEISD How to Do Business with Aldine ISD. ALDINEISD If you desire an opportunity to do business with Aldine ISD, you must first register in the district’s.
U.S. General Services Administration Term Contracts Drand Dixon Sales Contracting Officer Federal Acquisition Services Drand Dixon Sales Contracting Officer.
Bolton Economic Development Committee Why? 1.Master Plan, Sustainable Village Center Study (UMass study) refer to economic development. 2.Proactive approach.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Workshop Tuesday, March 20, 2012.
Avoiding Technical Corrections Qualified Allocation Plan Forum September 5, 2012.
1 Doing Business with the University of North Texas System September 2015.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
How to Complete a Matching Grant Application. Learning Objectives Overview of the MG process Preparing to complete an application Completing application,
Proposal to Establish the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item 14.
Overview of DIR Sourcing Initiatives Sherri Parks Director Contracting and Procurement Services Texas Department of Information Resources LONE STAR CHAPTER.
EBCC Meeting December 8, Benefits Fair  Well attended  Positive feedback on Benefits Fair vendors  Continued concerns about parking  Logistical.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
EXPLORING TEXAS ADULT EDUCATION DISTANCE LEARNING CURRICULA Distance Learning Academy Optional Module 2 May be used as stand alone training at any time.
TEXAS ARKANSAS PURCHASING SYSTEM. TIPS/TAPS History  Original Name – Texas Interlocal Purchasing System  Hosted by Region 8 Education Service Center.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Appropriation # 2 Workshop Thursday, April 2, 2009.
Click to add text Dealer Pre-Qualification Information Session STATE OF MICHIGAN Department of Technology, Management and Budget Purchasing Operations.
An overview of the MARPA Shared Services Best Practices Guidebook and Regionalization Best Practices Website BEST PRACTICES for SHARED SERVICES Merrimack.
Federal Aviation Administration By: Giles Strickler, UCS Program Manager Procurement Policy (AJA-A11) Date:September 22, 2010 Unified Contracting System.
Cost Recovery Procedures for County Extension Agents 1.
Steering Committee Virtual Meeting February 27, 2012 Washington, DC NETWORK COMPONENT Ismael FOFANA AGRODEP Network Coordinator.
NEW CoEs STRATEGY. CoE CoEs Network Why? Changing sector environment New capacity building responses When? WTDC-10 Resolution 73 What? New CoEs strategy.
Community College Instructional Costs and Productivity: The Kansas Study The Kansas Study is supported by the Fund for the Improvement.
2014–2018 State Strategic Plan Survey Results Technology Planning, Policy, and Governance.
R ESOLUTION P ROCESS. Intro to Resolutions A conservation district supervisor should understand the importance of participating in the state and national.
Overview of Proposed Educator Evaluation Regulations August 1, 2012.
Presented to presented by An Overview Florida Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council July 23, 2015 Carmen Monroy, Florida Department of Transportation.
For Presentation at 28 th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada Walter Kulyk Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit.
HOW THE STATE CAN LEVERAGES PURCHASING VOLUME AND RESOURCES Cooperative Purchasing.
Health IT Product Information and Disclosures Under the 2015 Edition Final Rule Joint Health IT Policy and Standards Committee Certified Technology Comparison.
State Center Community College District Willow International Center Center-to-College Status Naming Process & Timeline.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
What is BuyBoard? Overview  BuyBoard is a Purchasing Cooperative  16 year history  Meets all Missouri bid laws  Gains members access to a wide range.
Fleets for the Future Aggregated Alternative Technology Alliance
Statewide Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) Program
BuyBoard Member Training Cesar Lopez & Angel Magallanes
Implementing the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program
Food Procurement Program
PACE Purchasing Cooperative
Statewide Title III Consortium:
Student Branch Documentation
Presentation transcript:

TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE COOPERATIVE PURCHASING NETWORK THE NETWORK PRESENTED BY: CHARLIE OBERRENDER, CPPB DIRECTOR OF COOPERATIVE PURCHASING

BENEFITS OF THE NETWORK  Pool buying power of the 50 community college districts…  Utilize the best specifications developed by the various colleges…  Gear contracts towards the specific needs of community colleges…  Reduce duplication of effort by 50 different purchasing offices…  Generate revenue from vendor contracts to benefit the members of TACC…

Successful Network Advisory Committee Guides Efforts Contracts Solicited Based on Member Priorities Network and Members Partner to Solicit Contracts Solicited Statewide Executive Committee Awards Contracts Contracts Made Available to Members for Use Vendors Pay Fee to TACC

THE NETWORK Existing Members Adopt New Resolution Execute New Interlocal Agreement New Members Adopt Resolution Execute Interlocal Agreement Process

OPERATIONAL TIMELINE Members Partner with their Solicitations Network Solicits Priority Bids Executive Committee Awards Contracts Distribute Contract Information to Members TACC Website Expansion Network Today… Early Fall

HOW REVENUES ARE GENERATED  A service fee is charged to each vendor based on the volume of purchases made by the members from the Network’s awarded contracts.  Vehicles sales will not be charged the service fee. Instead, a flat fee will be charged to the vendor by the Network. This applies to all automobiles, trucks, trailers, or any other titled vehicle.  A copy of the purchase order is submitted to the Network for tallying of service fees to be charged to the participating contract vendor.  The Network will calculate the service fees and invoice vendors on a monthly basis. Revenue

PURCHASING PROCESS  Members may suggest vendors to include in solicitation notices so as vendors in all areas of state participate.  A college may be the lead on a particular solicitation and partner with the Network by including cooperative purchasing language in its documents.  Members assist in specification development in order to meet unique needs of community colleges.  Required advertisements posted by TACC.  Bid distribution through statewide bid service.  Responses received and opened by TACC in Austin office. Solicitation

AWARD PROCESS  Tabulation and Evaluation by Director of Cooperative Purchasing  Advisory Committee input on award recommendation  Award recommendation submitted to Executive Committee  Awards made by TACC geographic regions Award

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS  Vendors notified of awards  Contract details sent to members & posted on TACC website  Members begin ordering from contracts  Contract usage tracked by TACC  Vendors invoiced for service fees. Utilization

NETWORK PROGRESS  AprilAdvisor Committee established  MayMember needs surveyed  JunePrepare & advertise initial solicitations  June-JulyOpen responses to initial solicitations  SeptemberTACC Network awards first contracts  SeptemberFirst purchase orders are issued by members  OctoberBegin periodic invoicing of vendors for service fees  DecemberFirst revenue received from service fees Timeline

EXPECTATIONS  First contract awards by mid summer  Average 3-5 solicitations issued per month  Award first contracts in September 2013  Six month review of operations November 2013 Growth

QUESTIONS & COMMENTS ?