Developing a School Division/School Implementation Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Part 2: The Co-Teaching Partnership Programming Codes: o IEP.
May 22, Today is a chance to... - look at the provincial report card template - understand the new process -inform a decision about implementation.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
Implementing the Provincial Report Card Interlake School Division ACCURATE, MEANINGFUL, and CONSISTENT.
Orientation to the Planning 10 IRP  How does Planning 10 fit into the 2004 Graduation Program?  How was Planning 10 developed?  What’s the difference.
CAPA California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) Presented by Contra Costa SELPA with information provided by California Department of Education.
Creating the Annual Comprehensive School Counseling Program (CSCP)Plan
The process. Personalized Placement Learning Plan PPLP Identifies: Curriculum expectations of related course that describe the knowledge and skills student.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
1 Ministry of Education, 2009 Individual Education Plans (IEPs) 101 Slide Deck No. 2.
Understanding the IEP Process
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
Closing the Loop UNLV School of Nursing BSN Program Susan Kowalski, RN, PhD November 6, 2008 Academic Assessment Symposium.
Consistency of Assessment
Professional Development: Components for Technology Integration  Vision  Planning  Technology Skills Training  Evaluation & Assessment.
Analysing the Vision for the New Curriculum. Overall aims? Methods of delivery? How do students learn? How should they be assessed? How do you know that.
Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Orientation to the Health and Career Education K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
NTIP Nov 10, 2009 Judi Kochanka Kim Slomka Special Education: Secondary Panel.
Orientation to the Civic Studies 11 Integrated Resource Package (IRP) 2005.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
This session will begin with a discussion of strategies to ensure appropriate identification and interventions for ELLs as well as teacher resources. Strategies.
Community Care and Wellness for Seniors
Orientation to the Health and Career Education 8 and 9 IRP 2005.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Are We making a Difference
Welcome to the Physical Education/Health Education Framework Orientation Session Heather Willoughby Physical Education/Health Education Consultant Manitoba.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students w/ Learning Problems.
1 Kindergarten to Senior 4 Physical Education/Health Education Manitoba Curriculum Framework of Outcomes for. Active Healthy Lifestyles
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
PUT TITLE HERE The Ontario Curriculum Presented by: Curriculum and Assessment Policy Branch Ministry of Education.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Chapter 11 Referring and Evaluating for Special Education.
Office of Special Education: Vision Statements Parent Advisory Council – Specialized Services November 05, 2012 Gina Ross - Elementary Megan McCullough.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
This presentation:  is “ready-to-use” for presentations to school division administrators, board members, library personnel, teachers, etc.  incorporates.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Framework Overview. K-12 PE 1981 Develop physical well being Develop desired movement patterns through the neuromuscular system Express ideas, thoughts,
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Assessing Very Low-Achieving Children with Disabilities Using Large Scale Assessments Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Individual Education Plans.
Building Collaborative Relationships Supporting Early Childhood Education Programs.
2006 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 31, 2006 Pip Campbell Tracy Gray Chuck Hitchcock Preston Lewis.
Individual Program Plan (IPP)
PURPOSES OF CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
Overview of the IEP as a tool in order to access, participate, and make progress in the general curriculum 1.
Alignment as a Systemic Tool Classroom Instruction.
Including all Students in FSL FSL educators, Special Education teachers, school administrators.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
American Institutes for Research
Managing Risks Related to Physical Activity
Active Healthy Lifestyles Health Education
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Reproductive Health and Safety Education: Making It Stick in NC
The Race For Physical Fitness
Physical education, IF it is TAUGHT properly, is just as important as any other subject in the curriculum and can make just as valuable a contribution.
Presentation transcript:

Developing a School Division/School Implementation Plan

Expectations n School divisions/districts are to determine best delivery model based on best practices for overall implementation of the Framework n A planning process must be used to determine local policy related to potentially sensitive content n Schools must seek parental involvement and provide a parental option prior to implementation of potentially sensitive content

Current Implementation Plan

Part A: Overall Implementation of the Framework n Timetabling n Delivery/Staffing Choice n Programming for non-sensitive outcomes that require special consideration n Programming for potentially sensitive outcome n Selection of Learning Resources for non- sensitive outcomes and potentially sensitive outcomes n Teacher Training

Overall Implementation of the Framework (continued) n Safety Guidelines n Programming for Students with Special Needs n Programming for Students with Medical Problems n Parental/Community Involvement n Extracurricular program n Healthy school environment and services n Other (e.g. budget, facilities, equipment) n Assessing/Evaluating/Reporting

Manitoba Education and Youth Guidelines for Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting

Reporting Guidelines (p.197 Framework) n Review/develop assessment and reporting policies to align with new integrated PE/HE curriculum at local level n Final marks on report cards are stated as percentages for Grade 6 and up

n Marks/grades are based on the learning outcomes (the 5 GLO’s) n Weighting of marks is determined by the school/teacher with a higher weight on skills n Reporting on student learning outcomes that are potentially sensitive is a local decision

n Information that is not reflective of the learning outcomes such as punctuality, attendance, dress and attitude should be reported separately n Behaviour can be part of the mark when it is: –an integral part of the specific student learning outcomes –observable and measurable –a performance descriptor

n Fitness testing should not begin before Grade 4 n Results or scores of fitness tests are reported separately and are not to be part of the final mark

n for students with significant cognitive disabilities, use modifications (Individual Education Planning: A Handbook for Developing and Implementing IEP’s, Early to Senior Years 1998) n for students with special needs and medical problems, use adaptations or accommodations to help students achieve the learning outcomes

Senior Years Delivery Model Options

Potential Decision Areas For School Division/District Planning (p. 205)

Potentially Sensitive Outcomes Analysis Tool

Roles and Responsibilities

Manitoba Education and Training n Produce framework document(s) n Produce implementation documents n Evaluate learning resources n Support implementation of the Framework (e.g., Framework Orientation sessions for the educational partner groups and school divisions/districts)

School Divisions/Districts n Form a Divisional PE/HE Implementation Team n Identify local needs in relation to the 5 health risks n Develop divisional policy and guidelines for Part A and B of SDDPP n Develop an Action Plan n Implement Action Plan n Provide professional development

School Community n Form School PE/HE Implementation Team n Develop school-based plan based on divisional plan n Implement plan n Include components as part of annual School Plan

Divisional /School Planning n What’s your next step? n Personal or Group Action Planning n Then and Now Chart

Vision Physically Active and Healthy Lifestyles for All Students