Break Out Session on Infrastructure and Technology: A Report Vipul Kashyap AOS Workshop, Rome, 15 November 2001

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
Advertisements

Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
1 Ontolog OOR Use Case Review Todd Schneider 1 April 2010 (v 1.2)
August 6, 2009 Joint Ontolog-OOR Panel 1 Ontology Repository Research Issues Joint Ontolog-OOR Panel Discussion Ken Baclawski August 6, 2009.
1/ 26 AGROVOC and the OWL Web Ontology Language: the Agriculture Ontology Service - Concept Server OWL model NKOS workshop Alicante,
Alexandria Digital Library Project Integration of Knowledge Organization Systems into Digital Library Architectures Linda Hill, Olha Buchel, Greg Janée.
Controlled Vocabularies in TELPlus Antoine ISAAC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam EDLProject Workshop November 2007.
A Stepwise Modeling Approach for Individual Media Semantics Annett Mitschick, Klaus Meißner TU Dresden, Department of Computer Science, Multimedia Technology.
SEVENPRO – STREP KEG seminar, Prague, 8/November/2007 © SEVENPRO Consortium SEVENPRO – Semantic Virtual Engineering Environment for Product.
T.Sharon - A.Frank 1 Internet Resources Discovery (IRD) Classic Information Retrieval (IR)
Semantic Web and Web Mining: Networking with Industry and Academia İsmail Hakkı Toroslu IST EVENT 2006.
A Review of Ontology Mapping, Merging, and Integration Presenter: Yihong Ding.
Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Oscar Corcho Mariano Fernandez-Lopez Asuncion Gomez-Perez Presenter:
MUSCLE WP9 E-Team Integration of structural and semantic models for multimedia metadata management Aims: (Semi-)automatic MM metadata specification process.
OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web D. Fensel, F. van Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. L. McGuinness, P. F. Patel-Schneider Presenter: Cristina.
Building Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Semantic web technologies for secure interoperability and.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
MAHI Research Database Project Status Report August 9, 2001.
Chapter 5 Business Intelligence: Data Warehousing, Data Acquisition, Data Mining, Business Analytics, and Visualization.
February Semantion Privately owned, founded in 2000 First commercial implementation of OASIS ebXML Registry and Repository.
Knowledge Management in Geodise Geodise Knowledge Management Team Liming Chen, Barry Tao, Colin Puleston, Paul Smart University of Southampton University.
1/ 27 The Agriculture Ontology Service Initiative APAN Conference 20 July 2006 Singapore.
Information Integration Intelligence with TopBraid Suite SemTech, San Jose, Holger Knublauch
Data Management Turban, Aronson, and Liang Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems, Seventh Edition.
Ihr Logo Chapter 5 Business Intelligence: Data Warehousing, Data Acquisition, Data Mining, Business Analytics, and Visualization Turban, Aronson, and Liang.
Universität Stuttgart Universitätsbibliothek Information Retrieval on the Grid? Results and suggestions from Project GRACE Werner Stephan Stuttgart University.
EXCS Sept Knowledge Engineering Meets Software Engineering Hele-Mai Haav Institute of Cybernetics at TUT Software department.
Knowledge based Learning Experience Management on the Semantic Web Feng (Barry) TAO, Hugh Davis Learning Society Lab University of Southampton.
Pat Hayes Thomas C Eskridge Raul Saavedra Thomas ReichherzerMala Mehrotra Dmitri Bobrovnikoff Collaborative Knowledge Capture In Ontologies.
WebODE and its Ontology Management APIs. April 8th © Ontology Engineering Group WebODE and its Ontology Management APIs Ontology Engineering Group.
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis -- Issues Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
Information System Development Courses Figure: ISD Course Structure.
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
EU Project proposal. Andrei S. Lopatenko 1 EU Project Proposal CERIF-SW Andrei S. Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
Registry Services Bringing Value to US EPA, States, and Tribes Exchange Network Vendors Meeting April 24, 2007 Cynthia Dickinson EPA/OEI/OIC Data Standards.
Ihr Logo Chapter 5 Business Intelligence: Data Warehousing, Data Acquisition, Data Mining, Business Analytics, and Visualization Turban, Aronson, and Liang.
1 Open Ontology Repository: Architecture and Interfaces Ken Baclawski Northeastern University 1.
, 1/21, © Library and Documentation Systems Division 21 st APAN Meeting Tokyo, January 2006 AGROVOC and AOS, Margherita Sini, FAO From.
IST Programme - Key Action III Semantic Web Technologies in IST Key Action III (Multimedia Content and Tools) Hans-Georg Stork CEC DG INFSO/D5
1 © 1999 Microsoft Corp.. Microsoft Repository Phil Bernstein Microsoft Corp.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
AOS Participation Proposal Raphael Volz Knowledge Management Group Institute AIFB University of Karlsruhe Knowledge Management Group FZI Research Center.
A Short Tutorial to Semantic Media Wiki (SMW) [[date:: July 21, 2009 ]] At [[part of:: Web Science Summer Research Week ]] By [[has speaker:: Jie Bao ]]
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
Christoph F. Eick University of Houston Organization 1. What are Ontologies? 2. What are they good for? 3. Ontologies and.
© Geodise Project, University of Southampton, Knowledge Management in Geodise Geodise Knowledge Management Team Barry Tao, Colin Puleston, Liming.
APAN AG-WG Bangkok Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN Library and Documentation Systems Division Margherita Sini Slide Sustainable.
PHS / Department of General Practice Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Knowledge representation in TRANSFoRm AMIA.
GEMET GEneral Multilingual Environmental Thesaurus leading the way to federated terminologies Stefan Jensen, Head of information services group with input.
Working with Ontologies Introduction to DOGMA and related research.
© 2006 Altova GmbH. All Rights Reserved. Altova ® Product Line Overview.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
Service Brokering Yu-sik Park. Index Introduction Brokering system Ontology Services retrieval using ontology Example.
1 Ontolog OOR-BioPortal Comparative Analysis Todd Schneider 15 October 2009.
1 Open Ontology Repository initiative - Planning Meeting - Thu Co-conveners: PeterYim, LeoObrst & MikeDean ref.:
Soon Joo Hyun Database Systems Research and Development Lab. US-KOREA Joint Workshop on Digital Library t Introduction ICU Information and Communication.
Jens Hartmann York Sure Raphael Volz Rudi Studer The OntoWeb Portal.
OASIS ebXML Registry Standard Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries 10:30 – 11:15 January 20, 2003 Kathryn Breininger The Boeing Company Chair, OASIS.
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST Project Review Meeting, 11 th March, WP2: Tools Raphael Volz Universität.
Enable Semantic Interoperability for Decision Support and Risk Management Presented by Dr. David Li Key Contributors: Dr. Ruixin Yang and Dr. John Qu.
Selected Semantic Web UMBC CoBrA – Context Broker Architecture  Using OWL to define ontologies for context modeling and reasoning  Taking.
Integrated Departmental Information Service IDIS provides integration in three aspects Integrate relational querying and text retrieval Integrate search.
5/29/2001Y. D. Wu & M. Liu1 Content Management for Digital Library May 29, 2001.
The Agricultural Ontology Server (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Food and Agriculture Organization.
WP1: Plan for the remainder (1) Ontology –Finalise ontology and lexicons for the 2 nd domain (RTV) Changes agreed in Heraklion –Improvement to existing.
Dr.S.Sridhar,Ph.D., RACI(Paris),RZFM(Germany),RMR(USA),RIEEEProc.
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
Phil Bernstein Microsoft Corp.
Knowledge Based Workflow Building Architecture
Database Management Systems
Presentation transcript:

Break Out Session on Infrastructure and Technology: A Report Vipul Kashyap AOS Workshop, Rome, 15 November 2001

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 2 Outline  A “Template” Architecture for the AOS System  Components of the Architecture  Tools, Techniques, Algorithms and Software for the Architecture  Recommendations: Priorities

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 3 User Query/ Information Request User Query/ Information Request User Query/ Information Request... DATA REPOSITORIES... DATA REPOSITORIES Information System 1 Information System N Integration Infrastructure (J2EE, Agents) Inter-Ontology Relationships Manager Ontology Server Ontology Server A “Template” Architecture for the AOS System

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 4 Components of the Architecture  Tools and Techniques for Ontology Building  Tools and Techniques to associate ontologies with underlying data  Technologies for Distributed Query Processing/Search  Tools and Techniques Distributed Ontology Integration/Interoperation  Tools and Techniques for Ontology Maintenance and Versioning  Integration Infrastructure  Back end technologies to store data and information repositories  User Interface Issues

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 5 Tools and Techniques for Ontology Building  Tools and Process for build ontology from scratch  Data Model Specific, e.g., EER, Object Oriented, RDF(S), DAML+OIL)  InfoSleuth Ontology Editor, OKBC Editor, Protégé, OntoEdit (Free and commercial), Ontology Builder  I-logix, Uniting Software Design, Tigris (UML based tools)  Open source tools available from  Enhancement of Existing KOSs into domain specific ontologies  Enhancement of database schemas (relational, object oriented) to ontologies  ERWin: generates E-R models from database schemas  Enhancement of thesauri, glossaries, subject headings, controlled vocabularies, classification lists to develop ontologies  No known software tools  Design a process of inter-agency collaboration for building AOS based on existing KOSs –Process designed in the context of the EDEN System

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 6 Tools and Techniques to associate ontologies with underlying data  Tools for mapping ontological concepts to database schemas  OR mapping tools (J2EE suite)  InfoSleuth/EDEN mapping tools, Kaon-Reverse,  Tools for annotating documents (and fragments) with ontological concepts and relationships  IKA class of software, Onto-Mat  Tools for dealing with multi-lingual ontologies  E.g., OntoEdit, Kaon-Soep  Tools for annotating images with ontological concepts  No known software  Generation of Websites from Ontology  E.g., Semantic Miner  Data Mining/Classification/Ontology Learning Tools  E.g., Decision Tree based algorithms, C4.5, e.g., Whizbang!  Neural Networks, Statistical Clustering, Latent Semantic Indexing  Learning based annotation of documents  E.g., TextToOnto

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 7 Technologies for Distributed Query Processing/Search  Distributed indexing, meta-search –AGRIS multi-host search engine  Ontology-based, multi-resource distributed query processing (pull) –Federated database technology, e.g., Carnot, Mermaid, InfoSleuth/EDEN, Interbase  Ontology-based event notification and subscription (push) –E.g., InfoSleuth/EDEN agent-based approach, Oracle Triggers  Multimedia Search: e.g., specify query using image, get images, text documents, etc. –E.g., IBM, Virage

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 8 Tools and Techniques Distributed Ontology Integration/Interoperation  Tools for Mappings between various Thesauri and enabling their convergence –No Known Software  Tools for Ontology Brokering –No Known Software  Identification of inter-ontology terminological relationships –E.g., 20 candidate subject relationships for information retrieval  Identify the unit of re-use: –Inclusion of sub-ontologies, concepts, aggregations/reifications  Integration of community partner subject ontologies with the AOS ontology, tools for managing a federated ontology structure –No Known Software  Algorithm for query processing by re-using the above relationships (query re- writing) –E.g., ONION (Stanford), OBSERVER project –E.g., Protégé (Manual Merging for Ontologies, Stanford)

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 9 Tools and Techniques for Ontology Maintenance and Versioning  No Known Software  Tools and Techniques for maintenance of inter-ontological relationships –No Known Software

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 10 Integration Infrastructure  Component based technologies: –E.g., J2EE,.NET, COM  Agent based Systems –E.g., InfoSleuth/EDEN, FIPA  Markup/Representation languages –Agent-based, E.g., OKBC, KIF, KQML –Web-based, E.g., XML, RDF(S), DAML+OIL, DRDFS (based on conceptual graphs)  Web Services Technology –E.g., WSDL + UDDI + SOAP, ebXML  Important Criteria for evaluation: –Scalability, Performance, Fail Over, Recovery

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 11 Back end technologies to store data and information repositories  Structured Data –Relational Databases  E.g., Oracle, DB2, MySQL, SQL Server –Object Oriented Databases  E.g., ObjectStore, Versant, Poet  Textual Data –E.g., Verity, Documentum, Isis, Basis  Web Sites and Related Development Tools –Template driven websites, ASPs, JSPs…  Knowledge Bases for Ontology Storage and Inferencing –ICS-FORTH (RDF Suite, No inference), SESAME, 4SUITE, RDF-DB –E.g., KL-ONE Systems, CLASSIC, BACK, … –E.g., Allegra (Common Lisp based) –Object Oriented Databases –Relational Databases  Repositories for managing vocabularies and thesauri –E.g.. LEXICON, MultiTes, Knowledge Map

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 12 User Interface Issues  Type of Users –Browsing, Ontology-based Navigation, keywords –Exposure to query language. Eg.. SQL, DL?, TQML  Visualization –Ontologies  E.g., FRODO –Queries –Results

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 13 Priorities for Various Components  T&T for Ontology Building (1)  T&T for associating ontologies with underlying data (2)  User Interface and Visualization (3)  T&T for Multi-ontology interoperation (4)  T&T for Ontology (and Inter-Ontology Relationships) Maintenance and Versioning (5)  T&T Distributed Query and Search (6)  Underlying Integration Infrastructure (7)  Back End Technologies (8)

Knowledge Acquisition Workshop – 14 Criteria  Transaction/Scalability/Performance  Classification Accuracy  Open Source, Internationalization  Industry Standards/Interoperability  Easy to make future extensions –Multimedia –Other ontologies