Subtransmission Reliability Criteria

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Southwest Rhode Island Transmission Supply Study Long Term Needs and Solutions.
Advertisements

Houston Region Import Capacity Project Planning for Reliable Power.
March 6, 2008 Technical Advisory Committee Luminant Energy & Oncor Tyler Grande Autotransformer Addition and 138 kV Line Upgrade Project Jay Teixeira Manager,
Building A Smarter Grid Through Distribution Automation DOE Projects OE & OE April 2013 Copyright © 2012 Consolidated Edison Company of New.
Vermont’s eEnergy Smart Grid Initiative Presentation to AEIQ.
0 Addison Natural Gas Project Hinesburg Selectboard May 21, 2012.
Arrowhead  Weston Transmission Line Project Dave Van House Minnesota Power.
Nelson Hydro Downtown Conversion July 26, 2010 Project Overview.
KURTEN SWITCH PROJECT (BRYAN/ COLLEGE STATION AREA UPGRADES) Technical Advisory Committee December 1, 2005 Transmission Services.
THE POWER OF POSSIBILITY Electric Transmission System Development in Alberta Neil J. Brausen, P. Eng., Director System Planning APEGGA Calgary Branch Luncheon.
1 1 Substation Asset Strategy Kevin Dasso, Senior Director Engineering and Operations IEEE/PES Annual Substations Committee Meeting April 7, 2008.
MARCH 31, 2014 Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
Midwest Energy, Inc. Transmission Planning and Expansion
January 5, 2012 TAC Cross Valley 345 kV Project Jeff Billo Manager, Mid-Term Planning.
BRAZOS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Dobbin 345 Project David Albers, P.E. Manager – System Planning.
NOVEMBER 11, 2014 PUBLIC VERSION Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
AUGUST 19, 2014 PUBLIC VERSION Maine 2014 Outage Coordination CONTAINS CRITICAL ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE INFORMATION – DO NOT RELEASE.
Presentation to WECC TSS May 8, 2015
Economic Impact of Poor Power Quality on Industry Nepal Adopted from The Internet for Educational Purpose Sudaryatno Sudirham October 2003.
1 Green River Utah Area Transmission and Distribution System – January 16, 2009.
Economic Transmission Case Study: Champlain Wind Link Vermont System Planning Committee March 10, 2010.
Jan 13, 2012 RPG Meeting El Campo – Vanderbilt 69 kV Project – Status report Ehsan Ur Rehman Planning Engineer ERCOT.
Transmission planning in Vermont Past, present and future Docket 7081 workshop By Dean LaForest 9/19/05.
U.S. Transmission Capacity & Reliability Are we willing to do what it takes to preserve the transmission option? David R. Nevius - NERC.
1 Docket 7081 Transmission Planning Information Workshops Third Workshop September 30, 2005 Shaping Demand-Side Resources To Address Transmission Constraints.
CITY OF LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT A Look at our Electric Utility A Plan For The Future.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Electricity Network Connectivity Between the GCC Countries Presented By: Adnan I. Al-Mohaisen May 17, 2005.
Charles Hosken, General Manager Imperial Irrigation District
JACKSBORO TO WEST DENTON 345-kV PROJECT Presentation to Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2004 Transmission Services Operations.
Presentation to Energy & Technology/Planning & Development Committees Considerations on Establishing Municipal Utilities Joint Informational Forum Legislative.
Clean Energy and the Smart Grid Renewable Energy Vermont Distributed Generation Conference May 19, 2010 George Twigg, Deputy Policy Director.
Central Vermont Public Service Recognized by Forbes as One of the Most Trustworthy Companies in America Lessons Learned Interconnecting Distributed.
The Need for Electric Transmission Improvements in Dane County.
Lyndonville Electric Department Feasibility Analysis Review December 2,
Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc Vermont’s eEnergy Smart Grid Initiative Kerrick Johnson Vice President for External Affairs.
Rocky Mountain Power Five Year Study Findings and Kick Off Meeting December 2013.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
January 2009 SEMO Ice Storm Extreme Measures IEEE-PES St Louis Chapter Meeting June 18, 2010 Presented by David Wakeman Vice President, Energy Delivery.
IRP in Vermont Docket 7081 Workshop Sept. 13, 2005.
NARUC Energy Regulatory Partnership Program The Georgian National Energy Regulatory Commission and The Vermont Public Service Board by John D. Burke, Board.
Congressional Briefing Winter, Who is Mid-West? Over 250 consumer-owned, not-for-profit electric utilities in the Upper Great Plains Our members.
Jones Creek Project Submitted to RPG on July 7, 2014 July 22, 2014 Regional Planning Group Meeting.
WEST LEVEE TO NORWOOD 345-kV PROJECT Presentation to Technical Advisory Committee April 8, 2004 Transmission Services Operations.
1 1 1 Central Maine Power Local System Plan Presentation Planning Advisory Committee Meeting November 19, 2008.
Order 1000 Implementation in PJM – Challenges and Opportunities Jodi L. Moskowitz Senior Director – Transmission Development & Strategy October 13, 2015.
Puerto Rico Electric Power
EECE 887 Distribution System Engineering CHAPTER 1 Power Delivery Systems.
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
Distribution Systems-General
TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS — Current Projects — The Center for the New West “ The Sun Valley Energy Roundtables 2006” November 30 – December.
Update on the North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative January 30, 2007 For the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the North Carolina Public.
Power distribution and utilization Lecture 2 Instructor :Kashif Mehmood.
June 26, 2008 Technical Advisory Committee American Electric Power Service Corporation Presidio Area Reliability Improvements Project James Teixeira Manager,
UM 1751 Energy Storage Workshop #3 May 9, UM 1751 Workshop #3 Topics Most viable and beneficial applications (HB 2193 time frame: ) Emerging.
Douglas Bowman, PE, PMP Project Manager Entergy Corporation New Projects and Processes Ensure Power Transfer for Northeast Arkansas Customers.
PJM ©2007 NERC LTRA Workshop August 16, 2007 Paul McGlynn Manager, Transmission Planning Department.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
Fall River Electric Infrastructure in Island Park Bryan Case, CEO.
Utility Needs and Smart Grid for Major Storm Events
Electric Utility Master Plan Update
Overhead Distribution Systems
Modifications to Planning Charter
Subteam 1a Competitive Solicitations Framework Working Group Meeting
Ensuring Security of Supply in Estonian Transmission Grid
I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project
The Transition to a High DER Future
Agenda Provide a recap of primary northern route alternatives for the MPRP Describe basis for selected route N5 Overview of analyses performed Description.
NERC LTRA Workshop August 16, 2007
Presentation transcript:

Subtransmission Reliability Criteria Informational Workshop Investigation into Least-Cost Integrated Resource Planning for the Vermont Electric Power Company Steve Litkovitz Department of Public Service September 19, 2005

What is the Vermont subtransmission system? Vermont’s medium voltage transmission lines and devices, most commonly at 34.5 kV, 46 kV, and 69 kV, primarily supplied by VELCO high voltage substations. Most subtransmission systems are owned and operated by CVPS, GMP, and VEC. Primary function is to provide reliable supply to Vermont’s 225 distribution substations.

Why consider subtransmission reliability in a VELCO context? The subtransmission systems are supplied by VELCO substations. VELCO planning occurs in step with its subtransmission “customers.” Subtransmission system reliability needs can, at times, be met by VELCO upgrades. Docket No. 6839, Tafts Corner substation Future: Tafts Corner substation expansion? Future: Southern Loop upgrades?

What is the reliability criteria applied to Vermont subtransmission? No Board Order, Board Rule, or state-wide utility standard that establishes a single subtransmission system reliability criteria. However, examination of existing utility practices, recent upgrades, and Board Orders reveal a “tempered N-1” standard for subtransmission reliability.

Tempered N-1 Standard Under normal situations, lines are not overloaded, voltages hold steady, and loads are served. (This criteria is met virtually all of the time.) After a first contingency (N-1), the remaining lines are not overloaded above their emergency ratings, voltages are adequate, and substation loads are served following required switching. (This criteria is met most of the time.)

Why not meet N-1 all of the time? The N-1 criteria appears to be tempered by the following: Radial lines Cost considerations Load levels Environmental considerations

- Radial Lines Ideally, substations are supplied by at least two subtransmission feeds in a looped configuration. If one feed is lost to contingency, supply to the substation can be maintained by the alternate feed. However, approximately 30% of Vermont substations are supplied by only one subtransmission line, i.e., supplied radially.

- Cost Considerations Providing looped subtransmission service to substations may not be the most cost-effective use of limited capital dollars. Example: WEC Maple Corner substation in Calais has a radial subtransmission supply and serves 800 customers. Looping would require at least 12 miles of new 34.5 kV subtransmission costing approximately $2 million. This results in a cost of $2,500/customer to cover just the subtransmission contingency.

- Load Levels Situations exist in which N-1 coverage is provided most of the time, but is not provided at the highest load levels. Example: Docket No. 6794, CVPS St. Albans area upgrades: N-1 coverage is significantly enhanced through relatively modest investments in the 34.5 kV subtransmission system. Total N-1 coverage, available with a 115 kV option, was rejected as “being unlikely to be cost-effective in terms of its incremental cost and benefits.” (Order at page 4.)

- Environmental Considerations Transmission projects can have environmental impacts. The Board stated that 30 V.S.A. Sec. 248 is a “strong statement that the natural environment … [is] of great importance and that [it] should be impaired only if absolutely necessary.” (Docket No. 4782, Order at page 41.) In Docket No. 6860, a proposed loop feed to Vergennes was rejected and replaced by a subtransmission radial feed to address aesthetic concerns.

N-1 Is Met Most of the Time Despite the impediments described above, Vermont’s subtransmission systems have evolved to the point that an N-1 supply criteria to most substations is met most of the time. Example: Docket No. 6823, rebuilding GMP’s 34.5 kV line in South Burlington to provide first contingency coverage at all load levels

Summary VELCO planning is conducted in concert with the requirements of the underlying subtransmission systems. Examination reveals a “tempered N-1” subtransmission reliability criteria. Despite impediments resulting from configuration, cost, load, and environmental considerations, an N-1 supply criteria is met for most substations most of the time.