Todd Campbell Policy Advisor, USDA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Institute of Local and Global Consequence Future of Biofuels in Alabama Larry Fillmer Auburn University.
Advertisements

Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
George Boersma Center for Shared Solutions and Technology Partnerships September 18, 2009 Broadband in Michigan Make the Connection!
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energyeere.energy.gov 1 Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov The Future of Biomass-Based Energy: The DOE Perspective.
Farm Bill Overview Bradley D. Lubben, Ph.D. Extension Assistant Professor, Policy Specialist, and Director, North Central Risk Management Education Center.
ICAO Symposium on Aviation and Climate Change, “Destination Green”, 14 – 16 May 2013 Destination Green Commercial Issues/How Aviation Can Drive Alternative.
Page 1 SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVE FUELS FOR AVIATION ICAO Secretariat.
NIFA Biobased Energy Programs Peter Arbuckle National Institute of Food and Agriculture Program Specialist- Biobased Energy and Products.
Renewable Fuels in Minnesota Commissioner Gene Hugoson.
Economic Models of Biofuels and Policy Analysis John Miranowski,* Professor of Economics Iowa State University *With Alicia Rosburg, Research Assistant.
Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding Agriculture’s Contribution to the Energy Supply Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte University of Tennessee.
The Energy Bill, Biofuel Markets and the Implications for Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chesapeake College, Wye Mill, MD February 21, 2008 University.
Biodiesel Production: Government Regulations (IL) Barry Latham, M.A.Ed. Biodiesel Production & Curriculum Chemistry & Physics Instructor Chicago Heights,
The New World of Biofuels: Implications for Agriculture and Energy Keith Collins, Chief Economist, USDA EIA Energy Outlook, Modeling, and Data Conference.
State and Federal Policy Update New Programs, Funding News and a Look at Things to Come September 28, 2010 Jessica Eckerlin.
USDA’s Bio-Economic Initiative Algae Biomass Summit San Diego, CA Oct 01, 2014.
Future of the Bioeconomy and Biofuels: Overview, Industry, and Agriculture? Dan Otto Chad Hart John A. Miranowski Iowa State University.
COSTS AND BENEFITS OF A BIOMASS-TO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY IN CALIFORNIA Pat Perez- Energy Commission May 8, rd Symposium on Biotechnology for.
Federal Aviation Administration CLEEN (Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise) Program Technologies Development AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Jim.
Mid-Shore CEDS Committee Meeting January 6, 2010.
1 Sustainable Communities Leadership Summit North Little Rock, AR October 16, 2013.
John McDougall, President 10 th Annual Re$earch Money Conference, 11 May 2011.
Presentation to Southern Bioenergy Summit Jim Decker Decker Garman Sullivan, LLC.
Supported by Public-Private Partnerships for the Bioeconomy: The Bio-Based Industries Joint Initiative: Connecting Biobased Value Chains and Networks in.
2007 Farm Bill: Implications for US & Global Bio-Energy Production Vincent H. Smith Biofuels: Boom or Bust for Montana Producers Hilton Garden Inn, Bozeman.
United States Department of Agriculture Renewable Energy Programs Advance Biofuels Leadership Conference 2011 USDA’s Support For The President’s Clean.
Renewable Energy Programs. Advancing Investments and Innovation in the Recovery of Renewable Technologies Expanding Renewable Energy and Efficiency February.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses Harry S. Baumes, Ph. D. Associate Director Office of Energy Policy and New Uses Presented.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses Harry S. Baumes, Ph. D. Director Office of Energy Policy and New Uses Advanced Biofuels.
Forest Biomass Sustainability: Policy Themes & Research Needs Alan A. Lucier, Ph.D. Senior Vice President, NCASI FIA User Group Meeting & Biomass / Bioenergy.
US Forest Service GHG and Energy Modeling Climate and Energy Policy: The Role of Forests Rob Doudrick US Forest Service Research and Development.
The BioPreferred SM Federal Procurement Preference Program.
Purpose of the USDA  Established in 1862 by President Abraham Lincoln  Back then, more than half of the Nation’s population lived and worked on farms.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses Harry S. Baumes, Ph. D. Associate Director Office of Energy Policy and New Uses The.
USDA – Strategies for Promoting the Production of Advanced Biofuels Chavonda Jacobs-Young, Ph.D. Advanced Biofuels Leadership Conference April 27, 2010.
The 2007 Farm Bill: Status Quo or Status Shifted? Bradley D. Lubben Extension Public Policy Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln Ag econ information.
The Status and Future of Transportation Fuel Technologies for Wisconsin Maria Redmond Wisconsin State Energy Office 2013 Sustainability Summit and Exposition.
Bioeconomy Summit Food, Feed, and Fuel Working Session November 28, 2006 Food, Feed, and Fuel: How do we balance the three for optimal growth? By Chad.
Biomass: New Market for Farmers and Ranchers Roger Johnson, President National Farmers Union USDA Ag Outlook ForumFebruary 25, 2011.
1 Bioenergy Development at West Virginia University West Virginia is the third most forested state in the US West Virginia is the third most forested state.
America’s 21st Century Transportation Fuel Ethanol From Biomass.
Wisconsin Biomass as a Sustainable Energy Resource Green Innovations Symposium 2009 Joe Kramer.
National Forest Restoration Working Partnership Grant Multi-collaborative effort to explore the use of woody biomass for cellulosic ethanol development.
Governors’ Ethanol Coalition Recommendations: Current Status and Next Steps Farm Bill 2007.
UPDATE ON USDA PROGRAMS PRESENTER: DAVID THIGPEN, NC STATE OFFICE APRIL 21, 2015 USDA Rural Development.
Copyright © 2015 Boeing. All rights reserved. Boeing and sustainable aviation biofuel development Richard Mills Strategy Director Boeing UK October 2015.
Intelligent Biofuels Fulcrum BioEnergy, Inc. Advanced Biofuels Leadership Conference Commercialization of Waste-to-Ethanol is a Reality April 19, 2011.
National Institute of Food and Agriculture – USDA Catalyzing Partnerships in Renewable Aviation Fuel Production Systems CAAFI Biennial General Meeting.
Policies Supporting Cellulosic Ethanol Production Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University September 27, 2006 Legislative.
Family Farmers: Leading the Way with Biofuels. NFU Membership.
Todd Campbell Policy Advisor, USDA Rural Development WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CLEANTECH WORKSHOP JANUARY 20TH, 2016.
How to organize the Governance in the Bio-Economy Role of Bio-based industries JU 13 April 2016 Philippe Mengal Executive Director.
Forest Knowledge Know-how Well-being Luke’s and VTT’s joint research and innovation programme 2012–2016.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Biofuel Report Summary Biofuels Team - David Terry Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop Denver,
Wisconsin Biodiesel Blending Program 3 February 2011 Integrated Biorefineries Platform David Jenkins Wisconsin Office of Energy Independence This presentation.
Tim Maker, Senior Program Director Biomass Energy Resource Center ENSURING FOREST SUSTAINABILITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF WOOD BIOENERGY IN THE US Pocantico.
National and International Bioenergy Use & Policy Sarah Ashton, Southern Regional Extension Forestry.
Bioenergy Policies Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University June 23, 2008.
United States Department of Agriculture Renewable Energy Programs Designing Law and Policy for the Transition to Sustainable Energy: The Case Study of.
Developing a Bioenergy Crop Supply Chain: Contracts and Policy ` Madhu Khanna University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
US Bioenergy Incentives and Programs
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Budget Overview
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications
Local Government Priorities National League of Cities
Kelly Zering Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics
DuPont Biofuels: Building a Sustainable Future
Beyond Ethanol Siouxland Bankers Meeting Storm Lake, Iowa
U.S. Agriculture: A Private/Public Partnership
Presentation transcript:

Todd Campbell Policy Advisor, USDA Establishing a Repository for Feedstock Readiness Level Evaluations with Farm to Fly 2.0 Todd Campbell Policy Advisor, USDA Advanced Bioeconomy Feedstock Conference June 10th, 2015

Bioeconomy Definition The bioeconomy is defined as: The global industrial transition of sustainably utilizing renewable aquatic and terrestrial biomass resources in energy, intermediate, and final products for economic, environmental, social, and national security benefits. --From 2014 Report commissioned by USDA BioPreferred: Why Biobased? Opportunities in the Emerging Bioeconomy

The Bioeconomy Concept Revenue and economic growth Broad spectrum of new jobs Rural development Advanced technologies and manufacturing Reduced emissions and Environmental Sustainability Export potential of technology and products Positive societal changes Investments and new infrastructure The global industrial transition of sustainably utilizing renewable aquatic and terrestrial biomass resources in energy, intermediate, and final products for economic, environmental, social, and national security benefits.

Determining Biomass Availability in 2030 Based on the U.S. Billion-Ton Update, modified to use the 2013 USDA Long-Term Forecast. Modified biomass supply curves to include transportation, preprocessing, and storage/handling. Used an average cost of $60 per dry ton to the mouth of the convertor. Included all feedstock types as well as “currently used” and “potential.” Applied a 10% loss factor.

2011 DOE Biomass Program Review Supply Curve Results 2012 Baseline scenario at $80 per dry ton RD&D Project Presentation Template

2011 DOE Biomass Program Review Supply Curve Results 2030 Baseline scenario at $60 per dry ton RD&D Project Presentation Template

Opportunities across the Supply Chain

Agricultural Act of 2014 - Title IX – Energy and Beyond Biobased Markets Program (9002) Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and Biobased Product Manufacturing Program (9003) Repowering Assistance Program (9004) Bioenergy Program for Advanced Biofuels (9005) Biodiesel Fuel Education program (9006) Rural Energy for America Program (REAP - 9007) Biomass Research and Development (9008) Feedstock Flexibility Program (9009) Biomass Crop Assistance Program (9010) Community Wood Energy Program (9012)

Establishment, Harvest, Storage, Transportation Risk Mitigation for Growers Through the Biomass Crop Assistance Program, USDA has incentivized more than 800 producers on over 47,000 acres across 188 counties in 12 states to establish and produce seven different dedicated energy crops since 2009, $8M for 2015 existing expansion; NEW Project Area Proposals this summer with submission period through November In 2014, Farm Service Agency county offices supported BCAP contract approvals for $4.4M to deliver approximately 220,000 dry tons to 19 facilities in 10 states, $11.5M through December 2015 USDA offers insurance coverage for farmers growing biofuel crops like switch grass and camelina and we are helping identify farmland most suitable for energy crops. Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program expanded in 2014 Farm Bill for bioenergy crops not covered under crop insurance program. USDA invested $332M since 2009 to accelerate research under NIFA AFRI ranging from genomic research on bioenergy crops, to development of conversion processes and costs/benefit analysis -Providing matching payment signups of up to $11.5 million this summer. Facility applications are being taken through June 12th at Stat FSA offices. -Posting a Request for NEW Project Area Proposals this summer with an submission period that runs through November. -Offering and allocating $8 million toward a project area producer signup expansion and enhancement opportunity in select EXISTING project areas in late summer.

Construction and Fuel Production Helping to Power the Military Rural Development supporting efforts to build six new pioneer plants, in addition to two existing facilities previously supported by the 9003 Program; New regulation due out in near future To encourage the production of advanced biofuels, USDA has made payments through the Advanced Biofuel Payment Program for over $286M to over 300 companies in 47 states since 2009. Updated Rural Energy for America Program Regulation make ~$280 million available with Loan Guarantees up to $25M open year round; partnered in over 4 billion gallons capacity since 2003 In 2010, USDA partnered with the DOE and Navy to speed the development of domestic, competitively-priced drop-in diesel and jet fuel substitutes, Agencies jointly committed up to $510M Three award made under Defense Production Act for $70M each, 100MMG Capacity; Farm to Fleet program announced Dec. 2013, makes biofuel part of regular bulk fuel purchase and use. Maximum REAP Loan Amount $25 million- Total eligible project costs > $33.4 million

USDA Institutes for Biobased Manufacturing Innovation Bolstering New Markets President’s 2016 Budget includes $80M for USDA public-private partnerships to establish two Innovation Institutes which engage industry, leverage funding, and facilitate tech transfer. BioManufacturing- Building the scientific foundation, processes, and workforce capacity to move bioenergy and biobased product research from development to deployment and commercialization. Nanocellulosics- Focused on utilization of cellulose to be turned into a renewable supply of industrial materials, ensuring that the United States is the leading global source of commercial cellulosic nanomaterials research, innovation, production, and commercialization. $100M to boost infrastructure for renewable fuel use, seeking to double number of higher blend renewable fuel pumps; June NOSA USDA is strengthening markets for biobased products with ~2,000 products carrying the BioPreferred label, 150 more in process; Represents companies in over 40 countries on six continents

--Economic, Energy and Resource Security, Environmental Benefits --An initiative needs a boldly articulated goal, a coordinated policy approach with agency alignment (need to get EPA on board early and often to be a partner in commercialization), and a strong industry component. Highlights from July 2014 Public Bioeconomy Workshop developing the BRD Board White Paper Bioeconomy should be inclusive and part of the ‘all of the above’ energy strategy. Industry will need to find balance between what is ‘technically feasible’ versus ‘economically viable.’ The future self-sustaining bioeconomy needs to include energy return on investment, and capital intensity. An expansion of the bioeconomy will rely on certainties: Government policy Sustainable feedstock supply Market demand Bioeconomy will need to allow for increased feedstock diversity, including wastes, algae, rotation crops, etc. Future expansion of the bioeconomy will require detailed analysis and further consideration on impact on entire ecosystem and related sectors. Increased attention in bioproducts and renewable chemicals will have a major impact on the success of the bioeconomy.

Farm to Fly 2.0 (F2F2) USDA has forged a partnership with the commercial aviation enterprise to enable, commercially-viable aviation biofuel supply chains that are able to support one billion gallons of production capacity, use by 2018. DOE formally joined effort in 2014 Regional and state level, connecting partners to develop successful supply chains and bring product to market. Market beginning to develop with multiple airlines having flown domestic flights powered by biofuels; established offtake agreements with fuel suppliers; Military biofuel testing, bulk fuel solicitation and use.

F2F2 FSRL Subteam Goals: Benchmark current feedstock readiness status Create repository of FSRL evaluations Create guidance for executing FSRL evaluations Potential users: Policy makers and R&D funding organizations identifying gaps that require additional R&D funding or incentives; Fuel purchasers (e.g., airlines) looking to evaluate proposals for fuel procurement; Fuel producers looking to identify feedstock options. The Farm2Fly 2.0 team is requesting evaluations of various feedstocks that can be used for alternative jet fuel production. The evaluations received will be placed in a publicly accessible repository and the results will also be summarized in tables and worksheets. The evaluations are intended to be used for two purposes: first, to enable stakeholders to identify gaps where further research, development or investment may be needed to facilitate readiness of a particular feedstock for a given conversion process, and second, to allow parties interested in developing alternative fuel facilities to understand what feedstocks may be available in the near term in a particular region.

Feedstock Readiness Level (FSRL) Tool Components Feedstock Readiness Level (FSRL) Components Fuel Readiness Level (FRL) Feedstock Readiness Level # FSRL Description (1) PROD (2) MARK (3) POLY (4) LINK Conversion Process FSRL uses the same Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale as the Fuel Readiness Level (FRL) tool FSRL descriptions are parallel with FRL (fuel conversion process readiness level) FSRL is described by four readiness components: (1) Production; (2) Market; (3) Policy; and (4) Linkage - The Feedstock Readiness Level (FSRL) uses the same scale as the Fuel Readiness Level Tool, - and the descriptions for the FSRL are in parallel with those for conversion technology and fuel readiness levels. - The FSRL is comprised of four components: (1) Production readiness – which address only biological factors, those that related to the growing of the feedstock; (2) Market readiness – those factors that deal with the movement of feedstocks to conversion facilities and their utilization; (3) Program Support and Regulatory Compliance (Policies) – those factors that help to incentivize or discourage the availability of feedstocks for use in the production of advanced biofuels; and (4) Linkage - for FSRL evaluations, the feedstock is explicitly linked to a specific conversion process to call out the steps for mutual development to optimize fuel products – in the case of CAAFI, it has been focused on jet fuel production, but since many processes produce multiple fuels (i.e., diesel, jet, etc.) many of the same linkages will apply to jet fuel as diesel, for example FSRL tool modeled after and designed to complement the CAAFI Fuel Readiness Level (FRL) tool. FSRL developed jointly by USDA/CAAFI (FAA/Volpe) at CAAFI’s request

Summary table FSRL Checklist Specific to feedstock, conversion process, region Two checklist versions Dedicated crops and woody species Agricultural and forest residues Summary table Includes current and anticipated FSRL status Provides opportunity to describe rationale for rating for each component Fornax, 1988 Because the FSRL is intended to evaluate a feedstock in conjunction with a specific fuel production technology, the user should score each element of the FSRL Market, Policy, and Linkage columns in the context of the particular end use. Production, however, may be evaluated independent of the particular end use if large scale production is already under way for other uses, as it is possible that such production might be redirected. In such cases, an estimate of current total production/availability would be helpful.

FSRL Checklist Structure Instructions Sheet FSRL Checklist for Dedicated Crops and Woody Species FSRL Checklist for Agricultural and Forest Residues Summary Table Template FSRL Checklist Example (filled out) Summary Table Example (filled out)

FSRL Checklist Structure Instructions Seet FSRL Checklist for Crops and Woody Species FSRL Checklist for Agricultural and Forest Residues Summary Table Template FSRL Checklist Example (filled out) Sumary Table Example (filled out)

Request for Evaluations Please contact us if you would like help performing or sharing an evaluation: Kristin Lewis Volpe National Transportation Systems Center kristin.lewis@dot.gov 617-494-2130

For more information on USDA Energy and Bioeconomy Programs, visit: Thank you! For more information on USDA Energy and Bioeconomy Programs, visit: www.usda.gov/energy todd.campbell@osec.usda.gov