Joint Capability Areas presented to WJTSC 10-2 20 September 2010 Mr Steve Brown Joint Staff J-7, JFDID 703.695.9124

Agenda Time Topic/Subject Briefer 0800 - 0815 Welcome CDR Fleming 0815 - 0830 JCA 101 / Status Update Mr. Brown 0830 - 0915 UJTL / JCA Mapping Initial Staffing Results Mr. Brown 0915 - 0945 Break All 0945 - 1045 JCA Refinement 2010 & Way Ahead Mr. Brown 1045 - 1130 Wrap up / Closing Remarks CDR Fleming 1130 - 1300 Lunch

QDR and SPG re-affirmed them… JCA Lineage JCA Refinement Tiers 1 – 7 approved For our purposes, Joint Capability Areas began with the “Aldridge Study Report”. The purpose of the Aldridge Study was “...to examine how DoD develops, resources, and provides Joint capabilities.” And while the central recommendation of the Study was DoD adopt a capabilities-based process for identifying needs, creating choices, developing solutions and providing capabilities, it specifically articulated the need for a new framework of joint capability categories as an essential common lexicon to support the services contributions to joint warfighting and enterprise support. SPG 04 tasked the CJCS to identify, describe, and prioritize the capabilities necessary to achieve the Defense Strategy. Last May, the SecDef approved the results of the 8 month “Operational Availability – ’05” JFCA sub-study approving 21 Tier 2 JCAs and directed further Tier 2 refinement and appropriate implementation across the department. In March 07, the DepSecDef directed the JROC’s recommendation to conduct a JCA Baseline Reassessment. Phase 1 of the reassessment, the “functional” reorganization to the new 9 tier 1 JCA, was approved by the JROC in July 07. The results of phase 2, the decomposition of the tier 1s to tier 2 and 3 was approved by the JROC in Dec 07, the DAWG in Jan 08, and the DepSecDef on 14 Feb 08. 12 Jan 09 Jan 09 DSD Memo 14 Feb 08 15 Jan 08 DAWG approved Tiers 1 – 3 Jan 08 DSD directed Baseline Reassessment… 15 Mar 07 Jan 07 22 Mar 06 QDR and SPG re-affirmed them… 6 Feb 06 Jan 06 SECDEF directed them… 6 May 05 Jan 05 Aldridge Study Jan 04 OSD asked for them… Mar 04 Dec 03 Aldridge Study recommended them…

Capabilities Based Approach Bottom-Up Threat Based Top-Down Capabilities Based Partially Interoperable Capabilities Strategic Direction Joint Concepts Late Integration Historically DOD employed a threat-based planning construct to develop forces, systems, and platforms. Requirements were often developed as stand alone solutions to counter specific threats or scenarios, and weren’t necessarily joint. The shift to a capabilities-based approach required a significant change in focus from “bottom-up threat based” requirements to a strategy-driven, top-down approach that facilitates “born joint” capabilities developed with an integration factor from the beginning. Joint Experimentation, Assessment & Selection of Solutions Service Acquisition Service Experimentation, Assessment & Selection of Solutions Sponsors Build DOTMLPF Solutions Fielded Joint Capabilities Service Requirements

Background Study Guidance Joint Defense Capabilities Study (“The Aldridge Study”) – Jan 04 The Joint Defense Capabilities Study (“The Aldridge Study”), published in January 2004, first proposed the notion of identifying capability categories that span functional, operational, and enterprise activities. “This hierarchy of capability categories,” the study claimed, “would support cross-service trades, strategy-guidance articulation, capability gap analyses, and assessment of program execution” as some of the many applications. Clearly the Aldridge Study recommendations were a major factor in the FY 06-11 SPG which provided our charter under the OA Study…specifically to “identify, organize, and prioritize the capabilities required for the Defense Strategy.” FY 06-11 Strategic Planning Guidance (Mar 04) Joint Force Capabilities Assessment (JFCA) Sub-Study language: “identify, organize and prioritize capabilities required for the Defense Strategy.” (S: 30 Jan 05) OA-05 Study

JROC Approved & DAWG Endorsed Tier 1 JCAs Force Application The ability to integrate the use of maneuver and engagement in all environments to create the effects necessary to achieve mission objectives. Command & Control The ability to exercise authority and direction by a properly designated commander or decision maker over assigned and attached forces and resources in the accomplishment of the mission. Battlespace Awareness The ability to understand dispositions and intentions as well as the characteristics and conditions of the operational environment that bear on national and military decision-making. Net-Centric The ability to provide a framework for full human and technical connectivity and interoperability that allows all DOD users and mission partners to share the information they need, when they need it, in a form they can understand and act on with confidence, and protects information from those who should not have it. Building Partnerships The ability to set the conditions for interaction with partner, competitor or adversary leaders, military forces, or relevant populations by developing and presenting information and conducting activities to affect their perceptions, will, behavior, and capabilities. Protection The ability to prevent/mitigate adverse effects of attacks on personnel (combatant/non-combatant) and physical assets of the United States, allies and friends. These are the nine tier 1 JCAs that were approved 14 June. The decomposition and their definitions that you have in front of you is the result of a lot of hard work by communities of interest that include your staffs, tremendous involvement by OSD, and thoughtful inputs from the COCOMs and Combat Support Agencies. Next slide. Logistics The ability to project & sustain a logistically ready joint force through the deliberate sharing of national and multi-national resources to effectively support operations, extend operational reach and provide the joint force commander the freedom of action necessary to meet mission objectives. Force Support The ability to establish, develop, maintain and manage a mission ready Total Force. Corporate Management & Support The ability to provide strategic senior level, enterprise-wide leadership, direction, coordination, and oversight through a chief management officer function.

Post Preliminary Mapping Statistics FS BA FA Log C2 NC Prot BP CMS

What Problem Does JCAs Address? DOD processes previously talked in five different languages (some still do)… Policy talked in terms of strategic priorities Programming talked in terms of appropriations and PEs Planning talked in terms of force packages Acquisition talked in terms of cost, schedule and performance parameters Requirements talked in terms of capabilities and gaps You cannot have an enterprise-wide capabilities-based strategy-to-task discussion without a common language The original JCAs provided a rudimentary language which had some traction, but fell short of being …. DoD’s Capabilities-Based Planning “Rosetta Stone”

Capability Role in Strategy-to-Task Cooperative Security Strengthen US Security Posture in Region US Legitimacy is Improved in Region Building Partnerships Shape Partner w/ Gov & Inst OP 4.7 2 Conduct Civil Military Operations (CMO) in the JOA OP 4.7 5 Conduct Civil Military Operations (CMO) in the JOA Units / Platforms Units / Platforms

Capability to Task Linkage Force Application JCA Tiers 1 - 3 Feb 08 Maneuver Engagement Kinetic Means Non-Kinetic Means Fixed Target Stationary Target Moving Target JCA Tier 4 and below Jan 09 ST 3.2 Attack Theater Strat Targets OP 3.2 Attack Opnl Targets Current Effort UJTL Tasks OP 3.2.6 Provide Firepower in Support of Opnl Maneuver OP 3.2.1 Provide Close Air Spt Integ for Surface Forces DDG-51 155mm SP Bn GMLRS Unitary 120 mm Mtr Plt AV-8B F/A-18 Sqdn A-10 Sqdn F-16 Sqdn B-52 Sqdn NTA 3.2.8 Conduct Fire Spt AFT 4.2.1.2 Conduct Close Air Spt F/A-22 Sqdn F-35 Sqdn Excaliber 5"/62 Gun/ ERGM ART 3.3.1.1 Conduct Surface-to-surface Atk NTA 3.2.8 Conduct Fire Spt Service Tasks MCTL 3.2 Conduct Indirect Fires ART 3.3.1.2.2 Employ Close Air Spt MCTL 3.4.1.4 Coord Naval Surface Fire Spt MCTL 3.2.2 Employ Close Air Spt Programs Units / Platforms Units / Platforms Programs

JCAs are the Foundation “… the Department’s capability management language and framework.” “…streamlined, functionally-based JCA structure with reduced overlap to improve capabilities-based planning processes.” Joint Capability Area Tier 1s Force Application Battlespace Awareness Command & Control Net-Centric Force Support Protection Building Partnerships Logistics Corporate Management & Support “The Director, Joint Staff, and the Principle Deputy, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy were key players in the JCA baseline reassessment. They will continue to collaborate in developing a Departmental JCA management plan, further refining the JCAs, deploying an authoritative JCA data base, and providing an update to the DAWG in 10 months.”

Capability Portfolios UNCLASSIFIED Capability Portfolio Management February 7, 2008 Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum Civilian and Military leads for each CPM 4 original “test cases” now formalized Experiment w/ remaining 5 portfolios Nine portfolios aligned to Joint Capability Area taxonomy DCMO Capability Portfolios Force Application Battlespace Awareness Command & Control Net-Centric Force Support Protection Building Partnerships Logistics Corporate Management & Support

Quadrennial Roles & Missions National Defense Strategy National Military Strategy Strategy Homeland is Defended Long War is Won Security is Promoted Conflict is Deterred Nation’s Wars are Won Strategic End States JOCs Mil Contrib to Coop Security HD/CS Deterrence MCO Irregular Warfare Mil Spt to SSTRO Core Mission Areas Broad to Specific Priorities Force Application Command & Control Battlespace Awareness Net-Centric Building Partnerships Protection Force Support Logistics Corp. Mgmt & Support JCAs Broad to Specific Responsibilities Functions (DoDD 5100.1) Roles (Title 10) Competencies Core Competencies Core USAF Air Transport 6.6.3.2.6 Tier 1 Supporting Rapid Global Mobility Air Refueling Air Lift NAVY Tier 2 Deploy & Distribute Strat Sealift 6.6.2.2.9 Sea Lift Tier 3 Move the Force Strategy Based Demand USMC Amphib Ops 6.6.2.2.3.1 Expeditionary Lift Strategically Move the Force Tier 4 Air Lift Operationally Move the Force ARMY Capabilities Supply of Capabilities Ground Lift 6.6.1.2.9 Tactical Air Lift Ground Lift Sea Lift JOCs and JCAs are part of DOD’s Existing planning framework Functional Lens

JCA Usage Examples DoD Guidance & Reports Quadrennial Roles and Missions (QRM) Report to Congress Guidance for Developing the Force (GDF) Capability Portfolio Management (CPM) Business Processes / Policies Joint Capabilities Integration Development System (JCIDS) Functional Capability Boards (FCBs) Joint Combat Capability Assessment (JCCA) Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS) Linking Plans to Resources (LPTR) Joint Capability Requirements Manager (JCRM) Enterprise Architectures DoD Architectural Framework (DoDAF) 2.0 DoD Architecture Registry System DON Architectures Army Enterprise Architecture Framework Defense Intelligence Enterprise Architecture BA and ISR Segments Joint C2 Architectures and Capability Assessment Enterprise (JACAE) Other Visual C2 Capability Analysis and Tradeoff Suite Joint Concept Development & Experimentation Campaign Plan (JCD&E C-Plan) Defense Threat Reduction Agency Science & Technology Plan USAF Electronic Warfare Roadmap Naval Investment Management System Dependence on Contractor Support in Contingency Operations Task Force

JCAMS Web-based Hosted on JDEIS & JS J-7 JETCD sites JCA taxonomy JCA definitions Oracle database ColdFusion front end Taxonomy visualization tree Search capability Browse capability Links to key JCA documents Clickable JCA team email contact Supports up to 10 tier levels Codifies JCA business rules Codifies JCA “comments” Clickable “bread crumb” navigation Basic reports generator

Mapping from a JCA Perspective JCA and its definition Click UJT for its description

Mapping from a UJTL Perspective

Mapping for DDR&E QDR Key Mission Area (KMA) mapping to JCAs Defense Technology Areas

PE Mapping “To facilitate DSD's desire to integrate portfolio management into POM-10, all PEs are mapped to at least one (new) tier 1 JCA” “Where PEs overlap two or more JCAs, a "lead" JCA has been designated…” “The "lead" designation is merely an effort to pin the rose on someone to ensure coordination among all of the mapped JCAs for a given PE and to ensure that there are no orphans. CPMs will be accountable for all PEs for which they are designated as lead and will be expected to cover the capabilities they represent (broadly speaking) in their assessments….” PE – CPM Distribution FA – 633 C2 – 414 BA – 1073 NC – 332 BP – 259 Prot – 265 Log – 504 FS – 2036 CMS – 856

Future Development Establish JCA linkages to: Doctrine JOC hyperlinks DPS / MSFD Systems / platforms IPLs JCDs Joint Lessons Learned Readiness reporting SWARF determined JCA attributes Web-service data sharing capability (Joint Universal Messaging (JUM))

Questions?