Cold Hit Statistics NRC I How does it work? Searches are done with a subset of available loci. A second set of different genetic markers are used to confirm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNA Identification: Mixture Weight & Inference
Advertisements

New York State Police TrueAllele ® Casework Developmental Validation Cybergenetics © New York State DNA Subcommittee March, 2010.
Combining DNA Evidence for Greater Match Information
The DNA Information Pathway TrueAllele ® Workshop April, 2013 Leicestershire, United Kingdom Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA.
Finding Truth in DNA Mixture Evidence Innocence Network Conference April, 2013 Charlotte, NC Mark W Perlin, PhD, MD, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA.
Statistical Weights of DNA Profiles Forensic Bioinformatics ( Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.
Establishing parameters for objective interpretation of DNA profile evidence Forensic Bioinformatics ( Dan E. Krane, Wright State.
Forensic DNA profiling workshop
Forensic DNA profiling workshop
Biology Basics Cellular Biology for Lawyers Elementary Science in pictures.
Familial searches and cold hit statistics Forensic Bioinformatics ( Dan Krane Wright State University, Dayton, OH
Juror Understanding of Random Match Probabilities Dale A. Nance Case Western Reserve University August, 2007.
What is necessary (and unnecessary) for analyses of offender databases Forensic Bioinformatics ( Jason R.
Peak Height Ratios in Forensic STR Analyses: Pattern of Occurrence & Effects of Concentration Data from: Illinois State Police Laboratory Illinois State.
How they make a scrimillion copies of the DNA Amplification Capillary Electrophereses Interpretation.
Things that can muck up a DNA Profile
Elementary Statistics for Lawyers References Evett and Weir, Interpreting DNA evidence. Balding, Weight-of-evidence for forensic DNA profiles.
Forensic Bioinformatic Services, Inc.
Attaching statistical weight to DNA test results 1.Single source samples 2.Relatives 3.Substructure 4.Error rates 5.Mixtures/allelic drop out 6.Database.
Database Searches Non-random samples of N individuals Typically individuals convicted of some crime Maryland, people arrested but not convicted.
Database Searches Evidence profiles are compared to a list of up to 3,528,903 profiles (FBI CODIS) References Balding, Weight-of- evidence for forensic.
Fig S1 Figure S1: 5T4 expression in B cell development. Adapted from microarray data published online by van Zelm et al
J.M. Butler (2009) Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing
Evaluating forensic DNA evidence
How strong is DNA evidence?
WSMO - revisited SWSL phone conference, Dieter Fensel Digital Enterprise Research Institute
DNA Fingerprinting.
3 Person Example #2 Suspect Boxer Shorts (The Ladies Man)
Advanced Topics in STR DNA Analysis
Hash Tables.
© Forensic Science Service Ltd All rights reserved. New DNA developments better, faster and cheaper Martin Bill, R&D Forensic Science Service Ltd.
MANAJEMEN PROYEK PERANGKAT LUNAK Program Pendidikan Vokasi Universitas Brawijaya Tahun 2011.
Introduction To 2 and 3 Person Mixtures How the RMP Can Help With Complex Mixtures.
Technology Transfer Workshop Laser Microdissection Advanced LMD Forensic Applications Patrick Wojtkiewicz, Ph.D. North Louisiana Crime Lab (318)
Evaluating Coprocessor Effectiveness for the Data Assimilation Research Testbed Ye Feng IMAGe DAReS SIParCS University of Wyoming.
2 Person Mixture #3 Questioned samples from bomb remains, no references.
CSE3201/4500 Information Retrieval Systems
Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing Slides prepared by John M. Butler June 2009 Chapter 11 Statistical Interpretation.
Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing Slides prepared by John M. Butler June 2009 Chapter 14 Forensic Challenges.
Application of Ensemble Models in Web Ranking
Ethics and the DNA Database Presented by: Mick Carling, Police Science and Technology Unit Date: April 2014.
Police 3.6 Politics and Government. DNA Data Collection.
The Basics of CODIS Combined DNA Index System
Genetic Statistic Application in Forensic Science Arthur J. Eisenberg, PhD Professor and Chairman Department of Forensic and Investigative Genetics Co-Director.
Forensic Statistics From the ground up…. Basics Interpretation Hardy-Weinberg equations Random Match Probability Likelihood Ratio Substructure.
DNA Criminalist and Court Appearance
Nederlands Forensisch Instituut Observed and expected numbers of (partially) randomly matching profiles in the Dutch DNA database,
Chapter : DQA1/PM Chapter 18: Autosomal STR Profiling.
Forensic Databases. What is a database? A collection of data that share common attributes, and can be used to match or compare to a submitted item Databases.
Thinking About DNA Database Searches William C. Thompson Dept. of Criminology, Law & Society University of California, Irvine.
DNA What is a DNA TEST.....Enjoy! ( Deoxyribonucleic Acid ) IF THAT DID NOT WORK ONE MORE TRY!
DNA, crime and law enforcement Personal Genetics Education Project (pgEd) Harvard Medical School
Implications of database searches for DNA profiling statistics Forensic Bioinformatics ( Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton,
Recommendation Algorithms for E-Commerce. Introduction Millions of products are sold over the web. Choosing among so many options is proving challenging.
Statistical weights of single source DNA profiles Forensic Bioinformatics ( Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic.
Forensic DNA Analysis Basic Review 46 chromosomes per cell, 23 pairs Humans have approximately 25,000 genes Each gene has multiple versions,
DNA, crime and law enforcement Personal Genetics Education Project (pgEd) Harvard Medical School
Statistics and Probability 9 What is the most... What is the least... How many... More people like... than.
Marjan Sjerps Kees van der Beek Ate Kloosterman
Statistical Weights of DNA Profiles
Validating TrueAllele® genotyping on ten contributor DNA mixtures
Error in the likelihood ratio: false match probability
Rules for DNA Comparison Analysis
Medicated Nation Tony John BMES 514.
JS 115 Validation Pre class activities Database issues- Continued
DNA Three billion base pairs in DNA 99.5% similarity among individuals
Investigative DNA Databases that Preserve Identification Information
Ch. 11: DNA Analysis.
Genotype Information Criteria for Forensic DNA Databases
DNA Analysis “The capacity to blunder slightly is the
Presentation transcript:

Cold Hit Statistics NRC I How does it work? Searches are done with a subset of available loci. A second set of different genetic markers are used to confirm the match. Statistics are only done with the second set of loci. The statistics are the standard product rule

Example: FBI African American Use six loci for search: D3S1358, vWA, FGA, D8S1179, D21S11, and D18S51 The average RMP is 1 in 62,000,000 The chance of a coincidental match in a 3 million person database is about 5% Confirm the match at D5S818, D13S317, D7S820, CSF1PO, TP0X, TH01, D16S539 The average match probability for these 7 loci is 1 in 15 million With the 2 Identifilier loci D2S1338 and D19S433 this average increases to 1 in 16 billion

Advantages and Disadvantages Standard statistics, avoid controversy Existence of databases doesnt have to be mentioned Easy to accommodate search to any subset of the CODIS 13 loci Lose information contained in database search match

Is there really a disadvantage? Prob{suspect matches perp profile|suspect profile,perp suspect} = Prob{}= RMP [1-Prob(false negative)] + (1-RMP) [Prob(false positive)] Usual assumption: Prob(false negative) = Prob(false positive) = 0, thus Prob{} = RMP However if RMP<<Prob(false positive), then Prob{} Prob(false positive) See Balding and Donnelly, 1995, PNAS 92:11741

References Nation Research Council, Committee on DNA Technoogy in Forensic Science DNA technology in forensic science. Morton, N.E The forensic DNA endgame. Jurimetrics 37: