MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
Advertisements

PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL June 11, 2014 OSPI’s Office of Student and School.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
How does Wisconsin Use Indistar to Establish Goals and Track Results? Aundrea Kerkenbush, MS Education Consultant; Title I WI Department of Public Instruction.
Priority School (SIG) TA Session Cohort IV
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
SIG Online Tool For Transformation Model
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Moving to Schoolwide from a Targeted Assistance Program Karen Seay, Title I-A Coordinator Shasta Oswald, School Improvement Coordinator August 28, 2014.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Title Grants Division Illinois State Board of Education 1 Navigating Rising Star for Title I District & Schoolwide Plans Dr. Lilibeth Gumia and Marie Nolen.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 4 January 7, 2014 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
Conducting a Comprehensive Needs Assessment Keeping the Process Effective and User-Friendly 1.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Indistar-NC Structures and Support George Hancock, School Improvement Grants Coordinator, NCDPI Diane Antolak, School Transformation Coach, NCDPI.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 1 October 21, 2013 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Using the Indistar® Web-based Planning Tool to Support School Improvement Session #2 Presenters: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Michael Hill Office of School.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Office of School Improvement Updates Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary December 3, 2012.
Russell Frank, Ph.D. Director II Assessment and Accountability Services Mike Barney Director II Instructional Services Getting LTELs Ready for College.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
ACADEMIC REVIEW: GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC SUPPORT THAT CAN BE PROVIDED TO HELP THE SCHOOL IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Confidential 1 Regional Achievement Center 3 Essex and Hudson Counties School Improvement Plan April 2013.
November 7, 2013 Dr. Kathleen Smith Office of School Improvement Virginia Department of Education Academic Review and School Improvement Plans.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Office of Service Quality
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Focus Schools 1. How are Focus Schools identified?  Title I schools with in-school gaps between the highest- achieving.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Office of Improvement and Innovation Jo Hannah Ward, Director Office of Improvement and Innovation.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Office of School Improvement Contractor Update Division Leadership Support Team Meeting The College of William and Mary March 31, 2014.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for
Division Liaison Update
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.

Session Overview Indistar® Access School-level Dashboard Cohorts & Year Identifications USED Forms and Reports Submitting Documents School Improvement Planning Transformation Toolkit

Indistar® Access OSI approved personnel will receive school consultant access to review reports and monitor implementation of improvement plans

School-level Dashboard

Cohorts & Year Identifications Cohort I – Year 6 (Identified 2010 – 2011) Cohort II – Year 5 (Identified 2011 – 2012) Cohort III – Year 4 (Identified 2012 – 2013) Cohort IV – Year 3 (Identified 2013 – 2014) Cohort V – Year 2 (Identified 2014 – 2015) Cohort VI – Year 1 (Identified 2015 – 2016) Continuing schools when completing USED forms & reports

USED Forms and Reports  Leading Indicators Annual Form  Lagging Indicators Annual Form  Interventions Annual Form  Adaptive Reading Assessment Form  Algebra Readiness Diagnostic Test (ARDT) / Other State-approved Mathematics Growth Assessment  Data Query System Form  Quarterly Data Analysis Reports

Leading Indicators Annual Form Cohorts I - III

Leading Indicators Annual Form

USED Forms and Reports  Leading Indicators Annual Form  Lagging Indicators Annual Form  Interventions Annual Form  Adaptive Reading Assessment Form  Algebra Readiness Diagnostic Test (ARDT) / Other State-approved Mathematics Growth Assessment  Data Query System Form  Quarterly Data Analysis Reports

Lagging Indicators Annual Form Cohorts I - III

Lagging Indicators Annual Form

USED Forms and Reports  Leading Indicators Annual Form  Lagging Indicators Annual Form  Interventions Annual Form  Adaptive Reading Assessment Form  Algebra Readiness Diagnostic Test (ARDT) / Other State-approved Mathematics Growth Assessment  Data Query System Form  Quarterly Data Analysis Reports

Interventions Annual Form  When the priority school intervention model implementation begins, schools will complete the descriptions of interventions and outcomes, for each Federal Requirement and any permissible activities within.  Each year, the school will update their progress of implementation for that year and send the form to be reviewed. NOTE: All cohorts must reference the appropriate school improvement strand (and indicators) in their responses. Responses from this form should be copied and pasted into the appropriate section of the school improvement plan.

Interventions Annual Form Response should include: Initial Plan (Cohort VI)  Review the appropriate Wise Ways for each requirement.  Based upon the Wise Ways, describe the planned interventions. Responses must include the current status of the intervention and descriptions of planned interventions and outcomes. Note: Interventions may be planned and implemented across a three year period. Returning & Continuing (Cohorts I – V)  Based the school’s Initial Plan, describe progress/changes/revisions. Include appropriate references to their School Improvement Plan (SIP) indicators.

Interventions Annual Form Response should include:  Both a) and b) in your Initial Plan  If changes have occurred since their last response, include them in the appropriate response area for that school. For example: Additional goal setting training, added peer review of goals, documentation logs, change in midyear review meetings, etc.

Interventions Annual Form Response should include:  How school leaders, teachers, and other staff who have increased student achievement and high school graduation rates are identified and rewarded  How staff who have not improved, after ample assistance, are identified and removed

Interventions Annual Form Response should include:  Who determines professional development needs  How data are used in determining needs  How professional development is implemented and monitored

Interventions Annual Form Response should include:  Strategies for recruiting, placing, and retaining staff  Note strategies named in the requirement Response should include:  How data are used to identify and implement an instructional program as described in the requirement. Note: This requirement is about using data for instructional program needs. Student data use is addressed in requirement 7.

Interventions Annual Form Response should include:  What data are used to meet individual student needs and how are they used? (Continuous use process is key.) Response should include:  Plans that align with response to the three year goal in #l on the Leading Indicator Form - Increased learning time requirements will be discussed during Priority school training in the fall. Response should include:  Current and future mechanisms for family and community engagement

Interventions Annual Form Response should include:  How the district supports differentiated operational flexibility  How flexibility is aligned to increase student achievement Response should include:  Technical assistance from the state and division. Response must include description/plans for support from Lead Turnaround Partner.  Cohort VI schools will describe state and district support and the plans/steps to identify the Lead Turnaround Partner.

Interventions Annual Form QUESTIONS??????

USED Forms and Reports  Leading Indicators Annual Form  Lagging Indicators Annual Form  Interventions Annual Form  Adaptive Reading Assessment Form  Algebra Readiness Diagnostic Test (ARDT) / Other State-approved Mathematics Growth Assessment  Data Query System Form  Quarterly Data Analysis Reports

USED Forms and Reports  Leading Indicators Annual Form  Lagging Indicators Annual Form  Interventions Annual Form  Adaptive Reading Assessment Form  Algebra Readiness Diagnostic Test (ARDT) / Other State-approved Mathematics Growth Assessment  Data Query System Form  Quarterly Data Analysis Reports

Quarterly Data Analysis Reports

USED Forms and Reports Report Submission Status

Submitting Documents

School Improvement Planning Each group of schools listed below that did not meet state and/or federal accountability requirements per the Regulations Establishing Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia and/or the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 flexibility waiver are required to develop, implement, and monitor an improvement plan using the state-determined improvement planning tool, Indistar®. All priority schools will develop, maintain, and monitor their plan via the Transformation Toolkit.  Provisionally Accredited – Graduation Rate  Focus Schools  Priority Schools  Title I Schools that did not meet an annual measurable objective (including Title I schools rated Accredited with Warning)

Transformation Toolkit

 Strand A: Establishing and Orienting the District Transformation Team  Strand B: Moving Toward School Autonomy  Strand C: Selecting a Principal and Recruiting Teachers  Strand D: Working with Stakeholders and Building Support for Transformation  Strand E: Contracting with External Providers  Strand F: Establishing and Orienting the School Transformation Team  Strand G: Leading Change (Especially for Principals)  Strand H: Evaluation, Rewarding, and Removing Staff  Strand I: Providing Rigorous Staff Development  Strand J: Increasing Learning Time  Strand K: Reforming Instruction  Intervention (TA01, TA02, TA03) ** See the Indicator Report – School Indicators handout for a list of required indicators for all Priority schools

Transformation Toolkit

Questions

Contact Information Kristi D’Souza ESEA Lead Coordinator (804) Natalie Halloran, Ed. D. ESEA Lead Coordinator (804) Beverly Rabil Director, Office of School Improvement (804)