INTER-RATER AGREEMENT IN KANSAS Summer Principals Academy July 22-24, 2014 Abilene, KS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Kansas Accreditation Model – Focusing on Relevance Curriculum Leaders Meeting January 10, :30-2:00 p.m. Scott Myers, Ed.D. Vicki Seeger,, NBCT, Ph.D.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Human Capital Management Office of Human Resources Office of Professional Development & Evaluation.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Metropolitan School District of Metropolitan School District of Pike Township Indianapolis, Indiana Pike Township Indianapolis, Indiana A K-12 Coaching.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session Technical Assistance.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Educator Evaluations 436 Caney Valley February 12, 2016 Bill Bagshaw, Assistant Director Teacher Licensure and Accreditation.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
KEEN Conference February 18, 2016 Bill Bagshaw, Assistant Director Teacher Licensure and Accreditation.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Kansas Educator Evaluation
KSDE Board Presentation Educator Evaluation Systems Update
KEEP2 Debriefing February 4, 2016
Implementing Race to the Top
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Colorado Department of Education
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

INTER-RATER AGREEMENT IN KANSAS Summer Principals Academy July 22-24, 2014 Abilene, KS

What is Inter-Rater Agreement? Consistent understanding Consistent agreement Consistent process Consistent credibility The degree 2 raters using the same scale give the same rating in identical situations. 2

Where is Inter-rater Agreement Useful?? Inter-Rater Agreement is useful in all areas of administrative practice including: Kansas Educator Evaluations Kansas Accreditation Personnel Decisions Family Engagement Programs Budget Management 3

What are the Goals of Inter-rater Agreement? The Inter-Rater Agreement Statistical Goal is 75% - agreement with no rating more than one level apart. The Goal is to have an administrative Common Frame of Reference for your district such as: Agreement with no rating more than one level apart. Consistent understanding Consistent agreement Consistent process Consistent credibility 4

How is Inter-rater Agreement Helpful?? What is a Common Understanding? How does Inter-rater Agreement help administrators?? Facilitates Quality Provide Consistent Messaging Impacts Increased Student Growth Enhances Trust Facilitates Quality Feedback Legally Defensible Assists Accurate Data Collection Allows for Increase Cooperation over Time Passes Public Scrutiny 5

District-wide Agreement about External Criteria Agreed Upon External Criteria for: Observations Artifacts Units of Study Processes Program Development Time Limits Walk-Throughs Protocols 6

Pragmatics/Considerations Potential Landmines Discuss with an Elbow Partner Possible Issues that may cause Rater Error Leniency: Benefit of the Doubt Central Tendency: Safety in the Middle Comparing One with Another: Stick to the Rubric Relying on Gut too Much: Stick to the Rubric Evaluating Absent Evidence: Stick to What is Observed 7

How to Train Administrators in using Inter-rater Agreement Inter-Rater Agreement Training – Things to Consider: Synchronous and Asynchronous Experience of the Participants How to Ensure Fidelity Use of Video Examples Use of Case Studies Bias Exists Single versus Multiple Observations Professional Judgment Degree of Familiarity 8

Getting Started in YOUR District Getting Your Bearings Developing a Guidebook Developing a Training Protocol 9

I. Getting Your Bearings Pilot with Administrative Team Pilot Approach: Start with Safe Example: Use a video from YouTube Assess Specific Area of Teaching Student Engagement Teacher Activity Classroom Environment 2. Review current issue/goal/vision/needs 3. Review current practices/instrumentation Rubrics Protocol Training

II. Developing a Guidebook Paper and Electronic: Synchronous and Asynchronous EXCELLENT Administrative Council Endeavor – Ultimately to be used during Professional Learning Times with the Staffs Pieces and Parts Terms/Definitions: Frame of Reference/Common Understanding “Demonstrates” “Frequently” “Usually” 11

II. Developing a Guidebook Pieces and Parts (continued) Examples and Rubrics Areas to Observe Establishes/maintains a culture of safety, respect and rapport Knows how to make content accessible to all learners Plans standards-based instruction and formative assessments Uses a variety of instructional strategies to meet needs Deepens understanding through critical thinking, problem-solving and student reflection Analyzes student performance and provides feedback Collaborates to support student learning 12

II. Developing a Guidebook Pieces and Parts (continued) Exemplars: Video and Artifacts Master-Coded Videos: Leads to high level of agreement Example Artifacts Classroom Rules Lesson Plans Parent Note Home Lesson Plan for Adults: Andragogy 13

III. Developing a Training Protocol Step-by-Step Procedure 1. Initial Training: Goals/Terms Practice Interpreting Rubrics Differentiate between Different Performance Levels with Examples 2. Calibration of the Players Video and Artifacts 3. Review of the System 4. Adjustments (If needed) 5. Implementation 6. Evaluate/Reflect/Adjust 7. Re-Calibrate… 14

Start Slowly Start with “Engagement” with a Small Group Get Agreement Gain Confidence Over Time Write and Refine in Teams 15 Take Aways – To Do List

16 Start with the End in Mind Develop Common Understandings Use Groups to Ensure Buy-In Build Measurable Steps to Reach Each Goal Final Thoughts

Contact Information Teacher Licensure and Accreditation Team Director Scott Myers