Review of Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Nie Junjian Airworthiness Inspector COSCAP-NA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Factors in Flight Operations A CAA Perspective
Advertisements

COMPANY MAINTENANCE MANUAL
RECORD KEEPING Cooperative Development of Operational
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Introduction to the Concept of Continuing Airworthiness
Module N° 7 – SSP training programme
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
© Integra A/S SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP Karachi - January 2006 PRESENTERS: PETER THORSEN STEFAN REIB.
Role , Responsibility and achievements of SARI 145 Working Group
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
EASA and the EU Regulatory Framework
European Aviation Safety Agency Slide show for rulemaking task M.017.
Managing the Health and Safety of Contractors
Table of contents 1 Manual of Operational Procedures (MOP) 2
MAJOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.
Part-M Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking Directorate EASA FBA introduction : insist on Standardisation.
Certificates of Airworthiness
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop From national to EU rules - Continuing Airworthiness Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager.
Issues regarding Acceptable Design Data Rodger Chalk & Richard Doig.
General Authority of Civil Aviation 1 Air Carriers & Operators In Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia has made a decision to liberalize the Civil Aviation Market.
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
1 30/31 January 2013EASA/Estonian CAA Rulemaking Workshop Future simplifications for General Aviation Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking.
International Civil Aviation Organization Regional Cooperation in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Cliff Elbl CTA/Project Coordinator.
ICAO Provisions for Safety Management
Functional Check Flights Presented by Wally Istchenko Chief Flight Test Transport Canada Functional Check Flight Symposium February 8-9, 2011 Vancouver,
ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDONESIA 1973 to 2004.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Future Defence Aviation Safety Regulation Module 3 EMAR Part M – Continuing Airworthiness Requirements May 2015.
European Aviation Safety Agency
Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards ICAO SMS Framework
Page 1 Introduction of new European Requirements on Continuing Airworthiness (Not yet published) The presentation is based on the final draft. Franz Graser,
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Staffing and Training.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
1 11 December 2012E&M Sub-SSCC EASA Rulemaking Update (Continuing Airworthiness) Juan Anton Continuing Airworthiness Manager Rulemaking Directorate EASA.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.
Federal Aviation Administration Maintenance "Personal Minimums" Federal Aviation Administration DOT/FAA.
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
16-17 November 2005 COSCAP – NA Project Steering Group Guangzhou, China 1 Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency.
Victor Kourenkov ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 LEGISLATION AND ORGANISATION CONSIDERATIONS.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
European Aviation Safety Agency Head of Aircraft Product Certification
Maintenance RAST Conclusions 15 June Maintenance Procedures SE-17, SE-18, SE-19, SE-20 Output 1 (SE-17)  FAA will issue guidance, to their field.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration AIRWORTHINESS Positive Safety Culture Failure to Follow Procedures 1 R1.
1 FAA Update The Civil Aviation Authority  The CAA is the UK's specialist aviation regulator. Its regulatory activities range from making sure.
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
Gdansk International Air & Space Law Conference November 2013 Authority and Organisation Requirements “effective management systems for authorities and.
Chapter 6 Requirements for a Maintenance Program.
Defence Aviation Safety Regulation
ICAO COSCAP - SA May AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE How can aerodrome certification be achieved? Establish an appropriate regulatory system within.
Slide 1 POA Seminar 02 March 2016 Personnel Competence Including Certifying Staff and Release to Service Andy Swift / Michael Greer.
2005 Europe/US International Aviation Safety Conference, Cologne 7-9 June The Europe-US International Aviation Safety Conference 2005 ‘ Aviation Safety.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECTS IN INDONESIA
Rulemaking update Neil Williams Policy Lead - Airworthiness
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
Juan Vázquez Sanz EUROCONTROL SRU
Co-operating with the European Aviation safety Agency
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
General.
AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.
COSCAP – SOUTH ASIA 19th MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
Presentation transcript:

Review of Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Nie Junjian Airworthiness Inspector COSCAP-NA

M AINTENANCE C ONTRACTING Draft AC 021 COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting  Annex 6 requires the air operator to ensure that aeroplanes are operated and maintained in an airworthy condition, and that an aircraft shall not be operated unless it is maintained and released by an approved maintenance organization (AMO) or an equivalent system.  Although an operator may include a maintenance facility within its organization, many operators now contract maintenance to a separate organization. COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022 3

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting  CAST SE-18 specifically directs that both the operators and regulators increase oversight of sub-contract activities between air carriers and maintenance providers.  SE-18 was discussed at the 2nd and 3rd ARAST and concluded that COSCAPs to prepare a draft Advisory Circular after consideration of EASA advisory material, for consideration by Member Administrations/States. COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022 4

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting  As a result, COSCAP-NA drafted the AC 021 –Maintenance Contracting with reference to the following materials: Part-M and Part-145 of the European Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003; and Acceptable Means of Compliance to Part-M and Part-145 included in the Decision No. 2003/19/RM of the Executive Director of EASA of 28 November COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022 5

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Contents of the AC:  Introduction  Responsibilities for Contracting of Continuing Airworthiness Management Tasks  Contracted Maintenance  AMO Sub ‑ contracting  Applicability COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022 6

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting INTRODUCTION  Introduces the relevant ICAO requirements (See slide 3)  Emphasizes that the operator is ultimately responsible for the airworthiness of its aircraft when maintenance is contracted out  Describes the purpose of the AC: to provide air operators with guidance on the contracting of continuing airworthiness management tasks and the contracting of maintenance tasks. The AC also provides AMOs with guidelines on the privileges regarding sub ‑ contracting of certain maintenance tasks. COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022 7

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Responsibilities for Contracting of Continuing Airworthiness Management Tasks  An operator may contract certain continuing airworthiness management tasks to competent persons or organizations, provided that the contracting is acceptable to the [State CAA].  This AC has not introduced the concept of Continuing Airworthiness Management Organization, but states that operator should contract only to organizations which are acceptable to the [State CAA]. COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022 8

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Responsibilities for Contracting of Continuing Airworthiness Management Tasks  When such tasks are contracted, the operator's continuing airworthiness management system is considered to be extended to the contracted organization. The contracted organization is considered to perform the continuing airworthiness management tasks as an integral part of the operator's continuing airworthiness management system. COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022 9

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Responsibilities for Contracting of Continuing Airworthiness Management Tasks  This section is supplemented by the Appendix I to the AC. Appendix I provides detailed guidance with regard to the key points that need to be considered when contract continuing airworthiness management tasks and the topics that may be applicable in a contract arrangement. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Contracted Maintenance  This section provides guidance with regard to an operator contracts maintenance tasks to an AMO or another operator and the operator’s control on contracted maintenance tasks. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Contracted Maintenance  This section is supplemented by the Appendix II to the AC. Appendix II provides a list of the main points that should be addressed in a maintenance contract between an operator and an AMO.  As only the technical parts of the maintenance contracts must be acceptable to the Authority, only technical matters are addressed in the AC and matters such as costs, delay, warranty, etc. are excluded from the discussion. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting AMO Sub ‑ contracting  In this section, sub-contracting refers to the case of one organization, not itself an AMO, carries out certain maintenance tasks or a specialized service under the quality system of an AMO as a sub ‑ contractor.  The work scope of such sub ‑ contracting shall not include a base maintenance check of an aircraft or a complete workshop maintenance check or overhaul of an engine or engine module. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting AMO Sub ‑ contracting  This section of the AC provides the fundamental reasons for allowing an AMO to sub ‑ contract certain maintenance tasks, and also the guidance on the principal procedures for the control of such sub ‑ contractors. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting APPLICABILITY  Air operators and AMOs are expected to consider the information contained in this AC, when applicable. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting  The draft AC 021 is included in the CD of the meeting.  Comments are requested by 30 May  Kindly send your comments to: Mr. Nie Junjian at COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Questions??? COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

T ASK AND S HIFT H ANDOVERS Draft AC 022 COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers  Accident and incident investigation data shows that shift and task handovers are one of the major contributing factors to error-caused events.  CAST SE-169 emphasizes that airlines, operators and regulators should ensure that work cards or other written instructions are used at the start of each task, and written and oral status reports are provided at every shift change. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers  SE-169 was discussed at the 2nd and 3rd ARAST and concluded that COSCAPs to develop a draft Advisory Circular through reference to UK CAP716 for consideration by Member Administrations/States.  As a result, COSCAP-NA drafted the AC 022 – Guidance for Task and Shift Handovers with reference to CAP 716 Aviation Maintenance Human Factors (EASA / JAR145 Approved Organisations) of 18 December 2003 of UK CAA. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Contents of the AC  Introduction  Shift Handover  Task Handover  Non-routine Task and Process Sheets  Applicability COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers INTRODUCTION  Explains that the primary objective of handovers is to ensure that all necessary information is communicated between the out-going and in-coming personnel.  Introduces the three basic elements on which the effective task and shift handover depends.  Recommends that organizations should have a recognized procedure for task and shift handovers. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Shift Handover  Explains the Aids and Barriers to Effective Communication at Shift Handovers.  Provides guidelines for the shift handover process: The shift handover process should include at least two meetings: the Shift Managers’/Supervisors’ handover meeting and the Supervisors/Certifying Staff walkthrough meeting. A list of typical topics that should be covered in each of the two handover meetings is also provided. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Task Handover  The handing over of tasks from one person to another does not always occur at the point of changing shifts. Tasks are frequently required to be handed over during a shift.  This Section deals with two common situations: handing over a task to someone who is present at the time, and stopping a job part way through when it is not certain who will pick this up at a later stage. Tasks to be handed over include both scheduled and non-scheduled tasks. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Non-routine Task and Process Sheets  Task Cards for scheduled maintenance are an everyday document for aircraft engineers. They not only identify the job to be performed, but also break down the task into stages to allow for individuals to sign or certify the various stages.  The primary purpose of a job card is to identify the task to be performed and then act as a job aid to help the engineer plan, complete the task fully, and in the correct sequence. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Non-routine Task and Process Sheets  Maintenance Programmes today are frequently based on the principles of Condition Monitoring.  Most components on the aircraft have no specific period defined as to when they will be removed for repair, overhaul, etc. The time to remove them is determined by a reliability programme or scheduled inspections which assess their serviceability. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Non-routine Task and Process Sheets  Unfortunately, aircraft manufacturers do not always provide task cards for those tasks which must be performed as a consequence of some other action. This had led to the situation whereby many jobs, often long and complex, have no pre-printed task cards or process sheets which break down the job into stages and so help the engineers.  This Section of the AC describes the types of tasks that need Non-Routine Task Cards or Process Sheets, and the goals from a human factors perspective. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers APPLICABILITY  Maintenance organizations are expected to consider the information contained in this AC for task and shift handovers. COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers  The draft AC 022 is included in the CD of the meeting.  Comments are requested by 30 May  Kindly send your comments to: Mr. Nie Junjian at COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Questions??? COSCAP Draft AC 021 &

Review of Draft AC 021, 022 Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Thank you ! COSCAP Draft AC 021 & 022