Summary of Fare Change Feedback and Proposal Hillary Foose Director, Communication & Marketing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Use of Online Methodology to Inform Public Policy Planning: A Case Study from San Francisco See Mobility, Access, and Pricing Study Final Report, Chapter.
Advertisements

Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Unmet Transit Needs Process Kern Council of Governments March 15, 2001.
Mobility Management Increasing Independence for Community Members.
City of Phoenix/Valley Metro Platinum Pass Program
Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension Transportation Project Advancement Agreement City Council Study Session December 4, 2014.
Eco Pass Program Evaluation Update SVLG Transportation Policy Committee October
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
Oceanside-Escondido Rail Line Final Project Presentation John R. VelascoMay 12 th, 2003.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 26: Transit Pricing.
Public Transit in Sacramento
ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION NATURAL GAS FORUM SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 CITY OF MESA UTILITIES DEPARTMENT FRANK McRAE RESOURCES DIVISION DIRECTOR.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
Innovative Fare Programs for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Scott Wisner Customer Service Manager.
Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan Thursday July 20, 2006 GF City Hall Rm A102.
Be Involved: Correcting Issues & Advocating for Improvements Michael J. Walk Director of Service Development Maryland Transit Administration 2015 Mobility.
Importance of Community Partnerships APTA Fare Collection Workshop March 20, 2013.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Moving the Most People for the Least Cost Preserving the American Dream Conference Friday, September 24, 2010.
1 Program of Projects Study The Impacts of Regional Transit Investment Forum March 21, 2013 Move LA - "LA's Got Lines"
Utah Transit Authority Proposed Changes to ADA Paratransit Services October 5, 2015 John M. Inglish, CEO/General Manager.
1 Governance Council Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR December 18, 2003.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
1 Comprehensive Strategic Operating and Capital Plan FY15 Update April 2, 2014 RELATED TO AGENDA ITEM 7.
FARE STUDY ECOPASS RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee September 8, 2015.
WYDOT Transit Program Reporting 101 June 16, 2011 Taylor J. Rossetti Joni Kithas Harlan.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Customer-Focused Public Involvement AzTA Annual Conference April 23, 2013.
Transit Agency Status FY Current Financial Position Current Operations Service Statistics/Trends Funding Statistics/Trends Other Information/Assumptions.
Transit Use at UNC Charlotte: The Potential Impact of the Northeast Corridor Light Rail Transit Line By: Philip Holleran December 6, 2006.
Capabilities Overview Regional Public Transportation Authority Coyote Crisis Collaborative Community Workshop April 26, 2012.
JOSHUA CRAIN CE 458: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS JUNE 4, 2009 Costs in Small Public Transit Systems in Oregon.
Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
Lessons From Washington State: Whatcom Transportation Authority (WTA) & Skagit Transit (SKAT) Tactics & Strategies for Organizing Successful Ballot Measure.
Pilot Programs, Fare Products & Transfers. Pass Development Goals/Criteria Increase ridership Increase revenue Convenient for Public Total number of pass.
Prepared by: May Metro Transit Train and Bus Rider Surveys COMPARATIVE RESULTS Bruce Howard Director of Marketing.
Welcome. How Did We Get Here… The process started in early 2012 In October 2014 Peterborough Transit introduced 3 service level increases for the Fleming.
Valley Metro Regional Paratransit Plan Public Meeting January 27, 2016.
Arizona Transit Association 2013 AzTA/ADOT Conference: Coming Together – Transit Connects Us PUBLIC TRANSIT DEPARTMENT City of Phoenix/Valley Metro Platinum.
How the MBTA effects us.. Student Fares Before Bus $0.60 Rapid Transit $0.85 Bus + Rapid Transit $0.85 After Bus $0.75 Rapid Transit $1.00 Bus + Rapid.
Increasing Success & Credibility of Your Service Through End-User Involvement.
Proposed Service Changes for March 20, 2016 The mission of the RTA is to provide safe and sustainable mobility services to the citizens of New Orleans.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
Paratransit Fare Increase Scott Wisner Valley Metro, customer service manager Phoenix, AZ.
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
FARE STUDY: STRUCTURE & LEVEL RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee February 10,
FARE STUDY RTD Board Study Session April 28,
ITS Coordination Tools: Perspectives from a Rural California Region Pam Couch, Executive Director Modoc Transportation - Alturas, CA
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee October 21,
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
FY Annual Transit Performance Report Maricopa Association of Governments Transportation Review Committee February 26, 2004.
T3 Webinar – April 26, 2012 Orange County Transportation Authority Fare Integration Project U.S. DOT Southern California Regional Rail Authority Orange.
AGENDA PROJECT OVERVIEW PAST AND PRESENT YOUR VALUES FOR TRANSIT NETWORK CONCEPTS.
SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY May 4, 2016 AGENDA ITEM:A-1 TOPIC: Executive Director’s Report Recommendation: Accept as Information PRESENTED.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Summary of Outreach Webpage with video & comment form Public meetings
Title VI Program Overview
Transit Standards and Performance Measures
Paratransit Fare Increase
Innovative Fare Programs for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
D Line Station Plan Overview
City of Phoenix/Valley Metro Platinum Pass Program
Annual Operating & Capital Budget
Paratransit Fare Increase
Annual Operating & Capital Budget
AC Transit Proposed Fare Structure Revision & Pricing Changes
Valley Metro Accessibility Advisory Group (VMAAG) Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Fare Change Feedback and Proposal Hillary Foose Director, Communication & Marketing

Background Fall 2011 – Conducted public outreach for $.25 increase to base fares Early 2012 – Initiated Title VI analysis; tabled fare increase discussion Summer 2012 – Revised fare proposal to increase Express/RAPID base fare by additional $.25 to mitigate study findings Sept – Board approved public outreach program for revised fare proposal Nov./Dec – TMC, BFS and Phoenix City Council have provided approval

Proposed Fare Changes for March 1, 2013

Current Fare Change Proposal $.25 increase on local bus/ LINK/light rail $.50 increase on Express/RAPID bus ADA Dial-a-Ride: $4.00 for 1-Ride –2x 1-Ride local bus fare Rural Route: $4.00 flat fare for 1-Ride –Changes from a distance-based fare

Current Fare Change Proposal ASU/employer-issued passes –Fare increase determined by organization Semester Pass –Would increase with summer semester Elimination of 3-day pass Addition of 15-day pass

Why a Fare Increase? Local, state and federal funding have experienced shortfalls in recent years Despite streamlining and cost-cutting, operating costs continue to rise The fare increase will help: –Preserve service –Keep pace with the cost of operations

Fare Change Public Involvement Online survey (1,047) (31) Intercept surveys (300) Information tables (4 – numerous visitors) Open houses (11 – 93 attendees) Public hearing (1 – 24 attendees) Webinar (1 – 22 attendees) Tweet Chat (1 – 8+ participants)

Fare Change Communication English/Spanish print advertising (5 ads) Door hangers on buses w/o 10/1 (30k) Take-ones on buses/trains w/o 10/22 (30k) A-frame signs (35 transit locations) Broadcast s (3,500+ viewers) Social media (80+ posts) News releases (35 news stories) Website (2,500 visitors to /farechange)

Public Input: Transit Usage Do you primarily ride…

Public Input: Cost vs. Service Which is more important to you?

Public Input: Budget Impact Using 1 to 10 scale, what impact would the fare change have on your budget? 68% 32%

Public Input: Continued Use Using 1 to 10 scale, how likely are you to continue using public transit if the fare change occurs? 59% 41%

Public Input: Fare Change Support Using 1 to 10 scale, what is your level of support for the fare change? 21% 79%

Public Input: Open Feedback Don’t raise prices, keep the same Make the increase gradual RAPID customers should pay more Fares should be similar to other regions Fares have gone up, but not service Run service later, more often Better quality drivers Call for greater service 14

Public Feedback Conclusions Cost and level of service are both important to riders A majority of respondents oppose the proposed fare increase However, majority will continue to use transit and have asked for increased service 15

Recommendation Approval of the proposed March 1, 2013 fare increase and associated changes 16

Fare Recovery Projection No Fare Increase

Fare Recovery Projection With Fare Increase

Fare Revenue Projection FY11 – FY15 19

Funding Public Transit Local and state tax revenues fund about 75% of transit costs. Passengers pay about 25% of the cost to ride. 25% 75%

Proposed Fare Changes for Dial-a-Ride Two times the 1-Ride fare Fares will increase in: –Avondale ‒ Mesa ‒ Tempe –Chandler ‒ Peoria* ‒ Tolleson –Gilbert ‒ Phoenix ‒ Youngtown –Goodyear ‒ Scottsdale Fares will not increase in: unincorporated Maricopa County, Sun City, Surprise *Only on trips under the ADA guideline where it travels ½-mile from a fixed route service

Proposed Fare Changes for Other Services/Programs Rural Route 685 –Current fare is distance-based; flat fare is proposed Employer/ASU-Issued Passes –Fare increase determined by employer/ASU

Fare Pricing in Other Cities 23 Service Provider City 1 Ride Cash Fare 1-Day Pass Local31-Day Pass Local Dallas$1.75$4.00$65.00 Valley Metro current$1.75 $3.50 $5.25*** $55.00 Valley Metro proposal$2.00 $4.00 $6.00*** $64.00 San Jose$2.00$6.00$70.00 Minneapolis *$2.25NA$85.00 Salt Lake City$2.35$5.75$78.50 Portland **$2.50$5.00$ San Diego$2.50$5.00$72.00 Sacramento$2.50$6.00$ Sources: Transit agency websites (10/12). * Minneapolis – peak time pricing. ** Portland – All zone pricing. *** Valley Metro - The price paid on fixed route buses (farebox)

Public Input Participation Online survey and comment system –1,907 visitors to “Fare Change Input” section on ValleyMetro.org –98 participated in the electronic survey Input via mail and –138 comments received Input via Public Hearings and printed surveys –71 participants Input via Customer Service Phone line –3 registered comments 24