Transition of UAV Technologies from MIT Aeronautics & Astronautics to Nascent Technology Corporation James D. Paduano Eric Feron Presented to the ACGSC,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human and Automation Integration Considerations for UAV Systems Prof. R. John Hansman Roland Weibel MIT International Center for Air Transportation Department.
Advertisements

Command and Control for Border Protection
Sensors and location technologies – the front end of ISR
Cooperative Control of UAVs A mixed-initiative approach Ltn. Elói Pereira Portuguese Air Force Academy
Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) Communications System
1 The NIAG - “Supporting Alliance Capability Development and Enhancing Interoperability” AFCEA Europe – June 2010 “Interoperability Revisited” “NATO Industrial.
Troop Leading Procedures
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Value of PATRIOT Embedded Data Recorded in Tactical Hardware (U) Presented by George Williams 23 July 03 Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Objectives The objective of this design process was to create a small, autonomous robot capable of completing a set of predefined objectives within an.
INNOCON Innovative solutions to the modern real time Arial surveillance challenges.
ASTM UMV Autonomy and Control Sub-Committee F41.01
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Laboratory Overview MIT Humans and Automation Lab February 2006.
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AND THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Army Digitization Research Initiative Dr. Richard A. Volz (Computer Science) Dr. Tom Ioerger.
Automatic Control & Systems Engineering Autonomous Systems Research Mini-UAV for Urban Environments Autonomous Control of Multi-UAV Platforms Future uninhabited.
Mary (Missy) Cummings Humans & Automation Lab
Remote Sensing in Modern Military Operations. Outline ► Background ► Former cruise missile technology ► Current cruise missile technology ► GIS on the.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Moody F061 ISE Conceptual System Design “Sets the Stage” State the problem Identify the need Conduct advanced system planning & feasibility analysis.
8/22/20061 Maintaining a Linked Network Chain Utilizing Decentralized Mobility Control AIAA GNC Conference & Exhibit Aug. 21, 2006 Cory Dixon and Eric.
Geodynamic Situational Awareness for Intelligence Operations
Aerospace Engineering By Patrick Ferrell. Aerospace Engineering is the main branch of engineering concerned with the research, design, development, construction,
UAV Helicopter Project 12-May-08 Presented by Mark Diel Whirled Air Incorporated Stanford University.
Aeronautics & Astronautics Autonomous Flight Systems Laboratory All slides and material copyright of University of Washington Autonomous Flight Systems.
Distributed simulation of realistic unmanned systems at FFI
Aurora Flight Sciences proprietary Aurora Overview James D. Paduano Presented to the ACGSC October Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation 9950 Wakeman.
Network-Centric Battlefield Operations
Goals Metrics Benefits MilestonesTechnology Challenges A.1 Mobile power – “always on” Identify, implement and test the best ways to use existing technology.
C4ISR via OA Mike Danjczek November, 2014 Copyright GTS 2014.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos, Cairo Lúcio Nascimento Júnior,
John Gruetzmacher, Lockheed Martin
Mobile Distributed 3D Sensing Sandia National Laboratories Intelligent Sensors and Robotics POC: Chris Lewis
FirstEnergy / Jersey Central Power & Light Integrated Distributed Energy Resources (IDER) Joseph Waligorski FirstEnergy Grid-InterOp 2009 Denver, CO November.
Multiple Autonomous Ground/Air Robot Coordination Exploration of AI techniques for implementing incremental learning. Development of a robot controller.
The Robert A. Reisman Precision Armaments Laboratory
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
PCA READAPT V&V DARPATech Exhibit Demo Flight Viewer & CSIM PCA Model Screenshots Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Laboratories Distributed Processing.
Space-Based Network Centric Operations Research. Secure Autonomous Integrated Controller for Distributed Sensor Webs Objective Develop architectures and.
Built in Collision Avoidance for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
BQM-167A Advanced UAV System Architecture
Page 1 of 35 Achieving Over-The-Horizon Requirements Using Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOS) Presented by Eric Saikin.
Advanced Range Technology Working Group July 2002 Contact information: Kevin Brown Vice President, Business Development Command and Control Technologies.
Working in the Virtual Environment Practical Experience
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
Polymorphous Computing Architectures Run-time Environment And Design Application for Polymorphous Technology Verification & Validation (READAPT V&V) Lockheed.
C4ISR and Information Warfare Naval Weapons Systems.
Projectile Kinetic Energy Reduction System (PKERS)
UK Aerial Robotics Team UK IDEA Laboratory Workforce Development: The UK Aerial Robotics Team and the PAX River Student UAV Competition Dale McClure (Matt.
10/19/2005 ACGSC Fall Meeting, Hilton Head SC Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © 2005 James D. Paduano 1 NTC ACTIVITIES 2005 Outline 1)Activities.
Network UAV C3 Stage 1 Final Briefing Timothy X Brown University of Colorado at Boulder Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program Electrical and Computer.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
SAFENET The OSU SAFENET Project The Ohio State University Center for Automotive Research & Center for Intelligent Transportation Research.
Requirements of an ITS/Simulation Interoperability Standard (I/SIS) Presented by:Dick Stottler Stottler Henke Associates, Inc.
Aeronautics & Astronautics Autonomous Flight Systems Laboratory All slides and material copyright of University of Washington Autonomous Flight Systems.
JLENS The Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System.
1 Earth Science Technology Office The Earth Science (ES) Vision: An intelligent Web of Sensors IGARSS 2002 Paper 02_06_08:20 Eduardo Torres-Martinez –
Boeing-MIT Collaborative Time- Sensitive Targeting Project July 28, 2006 Stacey Scott, M. L. Cummings (PI) Humans and Automation Laboratory
Meeting #96 Brian Van Vliet Chief, Control Sciences Division AFRL/VAC; Air Force Research Laboratory AEROSPACE.
1 Center for the Collaborative Control of Unmanned Vehicles (C3UV) UC Berkeley Karl Hedrick, Raja Sengupta.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
CRESST ONR/NETC Meetings, July July, 2003 ONR Advanced Distributed Learning Bill Kaiser UCLA/SEAS Wireless Networked Sensors for Assessment.
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
Enabling Team Supervisory Control for Teams of Unmanned Vehicles
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
Lockheed Martin Challenge
VIDEO SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING
Best Scout Competition
Presentation transcript:

Transition of UAV Technologies from MIT Aeronautics & Astronautics to Nascent Technology Corporation James D. Paduano Eric Feron Presented to the ACGSC, Salt Lake City March 2, 2005 Aeronautics & Astronautics NASCENT TECHNOLOGY

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © MOTIVATION – MIT UAV TECH OPPORTUNITIES MIT HAS CONTRIBUTED TO SEVERAL PROGRAMS ON UAV COORDINATION AND CONTROL –Software Enabled Control (DARPA) –Autonomous Integrated Network of Systems (AINS – ONR) –Mixed-Initiative Control of Autonomous Teams (MICA – DARPA) –Precision Autonomous Landing Adaptive Control Experiment (PALACE – US Army, NASA Ames) –Faculty participating: John Deyst (Draper collaborations) Eric Feron (LIDS) Jon How (formerly Stanford) Jim Paduano (through NTC) FLIGHT DEMONSTRATIONS USING MIT AUTONOMOUS MINIATURE HELICOPTER –Aggressive Maneuvering –MILP-Based Flight Control –Multi-Vehicle Coordination and Associated Optimization Methods MANY SBIR/STTR OPPORTUNITIES TO COMMERCIALIZE Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © NASCENT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION NTC began commercializing MIT Technologies in 2001 –Autonomous Highly Maneuverable Miniature Helicopter –Tools for Multi-vehicle Coordination –Flight Test Services Small, but Growing Base of SBIR, STTR and Aerospace Customers –SBIR: SOCOM, NSWC, MDA, DARPA –STTR: ONR (AINS Program) –Other: Lockheed Martin Systems Integration – Owego TechnoSciences, Incorporated Oregon Graduate Institute MIT (flight test support) Three full-time, Three part-time employees Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © AHMMH-1 MIT Designed, NTC Built Flight System Seven copies built to date (MIT, LMSI, AFRL) API created to enable interface with various ground stations (TCP/IP/CORBA, AMUST-D, MIT Multi-vehicle, NTC) Upgraded for long range, endurance, and higher lift –Collaborative requirements definition with ETGI, other potential customers Know-how to re-create aggressive helicopters has migrated from MIT students to NTC employees Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Route Monitor triggers automated route replanning when a UAV route is jeopardized by threats. Fuel Guardian monitors each UAV fuel usage and warns the operator of potentially dangerous low fuel situations. Flight Management Supports up to 16 UAVs – Sensor workload limited Control of UAVs Flight Mode (Route, Loiter, Direct-To-Home) Automated Onboard Route Planning Speed and Altitude Adjustments Sensor Management Controls for Sensor Pointing (Auto, Location, and Fixed Forward) Sensor Coverage History Video Display Window Lockheed Martin Systems Integration - Owego LMSI Proposed MMH/VTUAV/SonoUAV Team Demo

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Router/Switch Interoperable TCDL Mux/Demux ARC210 Radios FLIR Processor Embedded Computer Reduced Workload Command and Control Integrated Digital Map RFA ARC210 Radios smUAV Video smUAV Radio smUAV Comms Sensor Console VTUAV Surrogate – Nascent Technology AHMMH-1 TUAV Surrogate - Nascent Technology/ Cornell and ACR Demonstrates migration of MMH manned/unmanned airborne system architecture with VTUAV/TUAV Surrogates Dotted elements are currently under integration on base MMH program Huey Avionics Testbed MMH Surrogate Lockheed Martin Systems Integration - Owego LMSI 3-Vehicle Demonstration 17 August 2004 ACR ‘Silver Fox’ and NTC AHMMH-1 as TUAV/VTUAV Surrogates

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Other Activities Flight demonstration of visibility-minimization guidance algorithms (for MIT) –Vehicle performed an on-line computed path plan based on virtual urban map, reducing visibility to defined point ONR-STTR Two-vehicle demonstration of deceptive area search –Flight test complete 20 November 2004 Tactical Tomahawk Weapon Control System (TTWCS) operator interface –Imbedded algorithms to optimally place missiles –Help Navy to take advantage of TTWCS loiter capabilities Optically-Enabled Flight –Laser range-finder integrated into avionics –DARPA program initiated Jan ’05 for optic-flow integration –Acquiring an automotive radar for testing and possible integration Negotiating Marketing Agreement with ETGI –Enforcement Technology Group Inc. –Markets to Police, Special Ops, ‘Three-Letter Organizations’ Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Deceptive Area Search Scaled-down search area Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Deceptive Area Search Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Multi-vehicle Planning Interface Developed for Tactical Tomahawk… …applicable to multi-vehicle coordination under human supervisory control

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Multi-vehicle Planning Interface Developed for Tactical Tomahawk, applicable to multi-vehicle coordination under human supervisory control Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Multi-vehicle Planning Interface Developed for Tactical Tomahawk, applicable to multi-vehicle coordination under human supervisory control Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © What missions would benefit from MIT/NTC vehicles & algorithms? Aeronautics & Astronautics Aggressive Autonomous Helicopter: Any mission requiring… … persistent observation (as opposed to fly-by) at close range … flight at low altitude in obstacle-rich environments … urban canyon sensor emplacement missions … organic support of troops advancing through urban environments Algorithms: –Fast, cooperative navigation to a target point in threat-laden environment –Optimal coverage of multiple surveillance/target points (placement of assets) –Deceptive reconnaissance of a planned route where ambush is possible Low Cost Flight Test: For testing sensors, multi-vehicle algorithms, etc.

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Scenario: Nonlinear urban battlefield: Combat or Stability and Support Operation (SASO) Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB) completed to identify known or templated enemy locations Imagery available prior to operations to identify urban grid of major/minor roads GOAL: provide persistent recon of NAIs and key intersections to prevent enemy from ambushing ground element Assumptions: Multiple UAVs organic at battalion and brigade Analysts available in unit headquarters (TOC/TAC) to assess UAV imagery real-time Sufficient communications channels and bandwidth to enable UAVs to communicate between each other and relay data to headquarters (TOC/TAC) UAV sensors capable of identifying enemy ambushes Recon Mission Priorities 1.Timely, persistent recon of NAIs and potential ambush sites to answer Commander’s PIR 2.Provide situation awareness of enemy activities in key locations 2. Remain stealthy EXAMPLE: SENSOR EMPLACEMENT SCENARIO Ref: Army Field Manual 100-5, Staff Organizations and Operations

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Operations Officer (S3) develops ground route OBJ TAA ~8 miles Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB) Step 1: Define the Battlefield Environment Identify major road network Step 2: Describe the Battlefield’s Effects Weather analysis Identify friendly, neutral, and insurgent supported areas Step 3: Evaluate the Threat Develop threat model and doctrinal template Step 4: Determine Threat Courses of Action (COAs) † Develop Named Areas of Interest (NAIs) – zones necessary to observe to determine the enemy COA; observing NAIs is the key to determining whether the enemy can and will ambush a convoy Develop event template and event matrix – anticipated threat actions triggered by activity in NAIs

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Intelligence Officer (S2) develops NAIs † OBJ TAA Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (IPB) Step 1: Define the Battlefield Environment Identify major road network Step 2: Describe the Battlefield’s Effects Weather analysis Identify friendly, neutral, and insurgent supported areas Step 3: Evaluate the Threat Develop threat model and doctrinal template Step 4: Determine Threat Courses of Action (COAs) † Develop Named Areas of Interest (NAIs) – zones necessary to observe to determine the enemy COA; observing NAIs is the key to determining whether the enemy can and will ambush a convoy Develop event template and event matrix – anticipated threat actions triggered by activity in NAIs

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Operations Officer (S3) develops alternate routes OBJ TAA

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Operations Officer (S3) and Intelligence Officer (S2) develop and publish Recon and Surveillance (R/S) Order tasking two UAVs (White and Red) and 50 sensor emplacements to recon NAIs and convoy route Note: Ground convoy can depart at any time following the launch of the UAVs/sensors depending on the mission, threat and unit Tactics, Techniques and Procedures (TTPs) OBJ TAA

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Red and White UAVs begin ‘deceptive’ reconnaissance of planned and alternate routes Sensors are placed in NAIs, either launched from TAA or from UAVs OBJ TAA

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Red and White UAVs begin ‘deceptive’ reconnaissanceof planned and alternate routes Sensors are placed in NAIs, either launched from TAA or from UAVs OBJ TAA White UAV remains within comm range of sensors Red UAV forges ahead, relays comms from forward sensors through white UAV

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Aeronautics & Astronautics

9/9/2015 Copyright Nascent Technology Corporation © Spiral 2 Laboratory Configuration AUAV Aircraft Model Visualization Low Level Autopilot Ground Control Station Team Management Control Station Autopilot GPS IMU Comm Link TUAV1 VTUAV Surrogate Autopilot and Closed Loop SImulator TUAV2 Silver Fox Autopilot and Closed Loop Simulator Net-Centric Testbed Forward Platform Relay Platform Ship Platform Rugged Console Real TUAVs Simulated UAVs Joystick Takeoff/ Landing Minimal TUAV where needed Control Station UAV Laboratory supports integration with the MMH avionics system labs Lockheed Martin Systems Integration - Owego Lab Network