Shock wave formation heights using 2D density and Alfvén maps of the corona ABSTRACT Coronal shock waves can produce decametric radio emission known Type.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Advertisements

MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.
Plasmas in Space: From the Surface of the Sun to the Orbit of the Earth Steven R. Spangler, University of Iowa Division of Plasma Physics, American Physical.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
M. J. Reiner, 1 st STEREO Workshop, March, 2002, Paris.
Electron Acceleration at the Solar Flare Reconnection Outflow Shocks Gottfried Mann, Henry Aurass, and Alexander Warmuth Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam,
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: introduction.
The Hunt for a Link : Quantitative Connections Between Magnetic Fields and EIT Coronal Wave/CME Properties Prepared by James R. Robertson J.R. In conjunction.
Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
Identifying and Modeling Coronal Holes Observed by SDO/AIA, STEREO /A and B Using HMI Synchronic Frames X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema, Y. Liu, P. H. Scherrer.
Reconstructing Active Region Thermodynamics Loraine Lundquist Joint MURI Meeting Dec. 5, 2002.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: (Fig.
Absence of a Long Lasting Southward Displacement of the HCS Near the Minimum Preceding Solar Cycle 24 X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer Stanford.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
Magnetic Reconnection Rate and Energy Release Rate Jeongwoo Lee 2008 April 1 NJIT/CSTR Seminar Day.
MHD Modeling of the Large Scale Solar Corona & Progress Toward Coupling with the Heliospheric Model.
Solar Origin of energetic particle events Near-relativistic impulsive electron events observed at 1 AU M. Pick, D. Maia, S.J. Wang, A. Lecacheux, D. Haggery,
Measuring the Magnetic Field in the Sun and the Interstellar Medium Steven R. Spangler… University of Iowa.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
Pietro Zucca, Eoin Carley, Shaun Bloomfield, Peter Gallagher
High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Semi-Empirical MHD Modeling of the Solar Wind Igor V. Sokolov, Ofer Cohen, Tamas I. Gombosi CSEM, University of Michigan Ilia I Roussev, Institute for.
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
Radio obsevation of rapid acceleration in a slow filament eruption/fast coronal mass ejection event Kundu et al ApJ, 607, 530.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Using potential field extrapolations of active region magnetic fields, observed by SOHO/MDI, as a representation of a real active region, we apply hydrostatic.
Multi-level observations of magneto- acoustic cut-off frequency Ding Yuan Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
The Solar Wind.
CASS/UCSD - Jeju 2015 A Jets in the Heliosphere: A Solar Wind Component B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, and A. Buffington, Center for Astrophysics and.
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
3D Reconnection Simulations of Descending Coronal Voids Mark Linton in collaboration with Dana Longcope (MSU)
Type III radio bursts observed with LOFAR and Nançay radioheliograph Jasmina Magdalenić 1, C. Marqué 1, A. Kerdraon 2, G. Mann 3, F. Breitling 3, C. Vocks.
Quasi-periodic upflows in the solar active region Hui Tian High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research ASP research review 2010/10/27.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
-1- Coronal Faraday Rotation of Occulted Radio Signals M. K. Bird Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Universität Bonn International Colloquium on Scattering.
The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.
ESMP-14 Dublin Li Feng, Bernd Inhester, Yuming Wang, Fang Shen, Chenglong Shen, Weiqun Gan 1. Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Germany 2.
Fast Magnetosonic Waves and Global Coronal Seismology in the Extended Solar Corona Ryun Young Kwon, Jie Zhang, Maxim Kramar, Tongjiang Wang, Leon Ofman,
Radio Sounding of the Near-Sun Plasma Using Polarized Pulsar Pulses I.V.Chashei, T.V.Smirnova, V.I.Shishov Pushchino Radio Astronomy Obsertvatory, Astrospace.
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
What can we learn about coronal mass ejections through spectroscopic observations Hui Tian High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops
ISSI, Beijing, China. The famous example of the decaying kink oscillations of coronal loops observed with the TRACE ISSI, Beijing,
Solar observations with single LOFAR stations C. Vocks 1. Introduction: Solar Radio radiation 2. Observations with single LOFAR stations 3. Spectrometer.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
Data-constrained Simulation of CME Initiation and Propagation Antonia Savcheva ESPM 2014 September 11, 2014 Collaborators: R. Evans, B. van der Holst,
How massive is a CME? The greater accuracy offered by STEREO Eoin Carley R.T. James McAteer, Peter T. Gallagher Astrophysics Research Group, TCD.
The heliospheric magnetic flux density through several solar cycles Géza Erdős (1) and André Balogh (2) (1) MTA Wigner FK RMI, Budapest, Hungary (2) Imperial.
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
Xuepu Zhao Oct. 19, 2011 The Base of the Heliosphere: The Outer (Inner) Boundary Conditions of Coronal (Heliospheric) models.
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Exploring Large-scale Coronal Magnetic Field Over Extended Longitudes With EUVI EUVI B EIT EUVI A 23-Mar UT Nariaki Nitta, Marc DeRosa, Jean-Pierre.
Series of high-frequency slowly drifting structure mapping the magnetic field reconnection M. Karlicky, A&A, 2004, 417,325.
Introduction to Space Weather
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
High-cadence Radio Observations of an EIT Wave
On the nature of EIT waves, EUV dimmings and their link to CMEs
A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR DERIVING PROMINENCE MASS FROM SOHO/EIT Fe XII (19
V. Grechnev1, A. Uralov1, I. Kuzmenko2, A. Kochanov1, V
Evidence for magnetic reconnection in the high corona
Presentation transcript:

Shock wave formation heights using 2D density and Alfvén maps of the corona ABSTRACT Coronal shock waves can produce decametric radio emission known Type II bursts, which are effected by plasma density and Alfvén speed variations in the solar corona. To date, 1D radial models of densities and Alfvén speeds have been used, but these are not appropriate for non-radial shocks along the flanks of CMEs. Here, 2D density maps were derived using images from the Solar Dynamic Observatory/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (SDO/AIA) and the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (SOHO/LASCO). These were then combined with potential field source surface (PFSS) extrapolations to construct 2D Alfvén speed maps of a region of the corona where a CME and Type II radio burst was observed. We show that the a shock was formed along the leading flank of the CME at a height where the speed of the CME front becomes super-Alfvénic. ABSTRACT Coronal shock waves can produce decametric radio emission known Type II bursts, which are effected by plasma density and Alfvén speed variations in the solar corona. To date, 1D radial models of densities and Alfvén speeds have been used, but these are not appropriate for non-radial shocks along the flanks of CMEs. Here, 2D density maps were derived using images from the Solar Dynamic Observatory/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (SDO/AIA) and the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory/Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (SOHO/LASCO). These were then combined with potential field source surface (PFSS) extrapolations to construct 2D Alfvén speed maps of a region of the corona where a CME and Type II radio burst was observed. We show that the a shock was formed along the leading flank of the CME at a height where the speed of the CME front becomes super-Alfvénic. INTRODUCTION Type II radio bursts are signatures of coronal shocks. They appear as slow drifting features moving towards lower frequencies in dynamic spectrum, which results from the plasma emission generated by the super-Alfvénic shocks. To date, 1D radial density models such as Newkirk (1961) and Mann et al. (1999) have been used to calculate Type II kinematics. However, due to the solar corona variability, actual density observations are crucial to obtain the correct shock kinematics. In this work, a new independent observational method to observe the mean coronal density values and the Alfvén speed in the two dimensional plane-of-sky (POS) is presented. These 2D maps are then used to calculate the kinematics and the direction of propagation of a Type II radio burst observed on 2011 September 22 (Fig.1). INTRODUCTION Type II radio bursts are signatures of coronal shocks. They appear as slow drifting features moving towards lower frequencies in dynamic spectrum, which results from the plasma emission generated by the super-Alfvénic shocks. To date, 1D radial density models such as Newkirk (1961) and Mann et al. (1999) have been used to calculate Type II kinematics. However, due to the solar corona variability, actual density observations are crucial to obtain the correct shock kinematics. In this work, a new independent observational method to observe the mean coronal density values and the Alfvén speed in the two dimensional plane-of-sky (POS) is presented. These 2D maps are then used to calculate the kinematics and the direction of propagation of a Type II radio burst observed on 2011 September 22 (Fig.1). Pietro Zucca, Eoin P. Carley, D. Shaun Bloomfield, Peter T. Gallagher Figure 4 Height–time at different propagation angles of the EUV feature observed in SDO/AIA running difference images (red) and of Type II radio burst from different non- radial density profiles (blue). Insets show profiles separated by 10◦, with profile used marked with in red. (a) Height–time for a “low-flank” region (20◦from limb tangent). (b) An “upper-flank” region (60◦from limb tangent). (c) Radial profile (90◦from the tangent). Trinity College Dublin School of Physics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland Figure 3 (a) 2D electron density map measured on 2011 September 22. (b) Magnetic field strength from PFSS and on (c) Alfvén speed map obtained from the electron density and magnetic field strength values. DATA ANALYSIS Density maps were derived from SDO/AIA (1–1.3 R ⊙ ) and SOHO/LASCO (2.5–5 R ⊙ ). For 1.3–2.5 R ⊙ a combined plane-parallel and spherically-symmetric model was used (Fig. 2). An Alfvén speed map was obtained from PFSS magnetic fields within +/- 5 degrees of the POS and the 2D density map (Fig. 3). The Type II radio burst kinematics were calculated using non-radial density profiles from the 2D map. The CME kinematics were obtained from running difference height-time plots from SDO/AIA (131 Å). A comparison of the CME and Type II kinematics for 3 different propagation angles is shown in Fig. 4. DATA ANALYSIS Density maps were derived from SDO/AIA (1–1.3 R ⊙ ) and SOHO/LASCO (2.5–5 R ⊙ ). For 1.3–2.5 R ⊙ a combined plane-parallel and spherically-symmetric model was used (Fig. 2). An Alfvén speed map was obtained from PFSS magnetic fields within +/- 5 degrees of the POS and the 2D density map (Fig. 3). The Type II radio burst kinematics were calculated using non-radial density profiles from the 2D map. The CME kinematics were obtained from running difference height-time plots from SDO/AIA (131 Å). A comparison of the CME and Type II kinematics for 3 different propagation angles is shown in Fig. 4. Figure 2 Coronal density model constrained by SDO/AIA and SOHO/LASCO electron densities. The plane parallel solution (blue) models active region densities while the spherically symmetric solution (red) models the quiet Sun. The combined solution (orange) is used to model densities at R ⊙. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS A new method to derive 2D coronal density and Alfvén speeds is presented. These were used to find evidence for a shock formed along the “upper-flank” of a CME. In addition, temporal agreement with the start of the radio emission signature and the time where the propagating feature reaches a super-Alfvénic speed was found, suggesting that the Type II emission was triggered by the erupting CME. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS A new method to derive 2D coronal density and Alfvén speeds is presented. These were used to find evidence for a shock formed along the “upper-flank” of a CME. In addition, temporal agreement with the start of the radio emission signature and the time where the propagating feature reaches a super-Alfvénic speed was found, suggesting that the Type II emission was triggered by the erupting CME. REFERENCES Aschwanden M. J., Boerner P., Schrijver C. J., Malanushenko A., Solar Physics, Volume 283, Issue 1, pp.5-30, 2011 Benz A.O., Monstein C., Meyer H., Solar Physics, Volume 226, Issue 1, pp , 2005 Newkirk, G., Jr., Astrophysical Journal, Volume 133, p.983, 1961 Mann, G., Jansen, F., MacDowall, R. J., Kaiser, M. L., & Stone, R. G., Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 348, p , 1999 Zucca P., Carley E. P., McCauley J., Gallagher P. T., Monstein C., McAteer R. T. J., Solar Physics, Volume 280, Issue 2, pp REFERENCES Aschwanden M. J., Boerner P., Schrijver C. J., Malanushenko A., Solar Physics, Volume 283, Issue 1, pp.5-30, 2011 Benz A.O., Monstein C., Meyer H., Solar Physics, Volume 226, Issue 1, pp , 2005 Newkirk, G., Jr., Astrophysical Journal, Volume 133, p.983, 1961 Mann, G., Jansen, F., MacDowall, R. J., Kaiser, M. L., & Stone, R. G., Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 348, p , 1999 Zucca P., Carley E. P., McCauley J., Gallagher P. T., Monstein C., McAteer R. T. J., Solar Physics, Volume 280, Issue 2, pp Figure 1 Dynamic spectrum observed with e-Callsito (Benz et al. 2005) at the Rosse Solar Terrestrial Observatory (RSTO; Zucca et al. 2012) of the 2011 September 22 Type II radio burst. This burst shows fundamental (F) and harmonic (H) emission. Electron Density Magnetic Field Alfven Speed