DISPOSITIONS ASSESSMENT A Presentation by Ruby L. Thompson, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE WORKPLACE
Advertisements

An Introduction to Multicultural Education
Frameworks for Assessment of Student Learning: Questions of Concept, Practice, and Detail Christine Siegel, Ph.D. Associate Professor of School Psychology.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
A PRACTICAL GUIDE to accelerating student achievement across cultures
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
International Baccalaureate The Learner Profile
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Shelley Zion, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver
What should be the basis of
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Jennifer Robertson, SAGE Director Suzette Dohany, Professor of Communication.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Cultural Competence “Whenever people of different races come together in groups, leaders can assume that race is an issue, but not necessarily a problem.”
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
New Voices/Nuevas Voces Program: Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in Early Childhood Education and Intervention Betsy Ayankoya Dina Castro.
Education Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education Began the Master’s of Special Education program in January of 2011 Professional After graduation Sorensen.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
From Standards to Transfer. Parkway Mission All students are capable learners who transfer their prior learning to new demands, in and out of school.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
EDUC 657 Vicki Campos. Foundations- Social justice provides the ethical foundation in education for an increasingly diverse student population. All students.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Re-envisioning Teacher Preparation: Stage II September 16, 2011.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
A Mission of Restoration
Foundations and Best Practices in Early Childhood Education: History, Theories, and Approaches to Learning, 2 nd Edition © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Meeting the needs of diverse learners k-6. Carol Ann Tomilson  Its not a strategy but a total way of thinking about learners, teaching and learning.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
 When working with children, staff learns to communicate with a variety of people for different purposes:  Building relationships with colleagues 
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
USING DATA TO IMPROVE LEARNING FOR ALL STUDENTS Advancing Improvement in Education (AIE) Annual Conference October 18, 2012 Victoria L. Bernhardt Education.
An Introduction to Multicultural Education
NEASC SITE VISIT SEPTEMBER 30-OCTOBER 3, Standards of Accreditation 4 standards of Teaching and Learning 1- Mission and Expectations for Student.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme IB MYP.
Middle Years Programme The unique benefits of the MYP.
Teacher Responsibilities for teaching diverse learners Maintain good order and discipline in the classroom and school at all times. Provide and optimum.
SENIOR SEMINAR IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION What am I responsible for?
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
BY : GLORIA M.AMENY-DIXON MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY PREPARED BY : ROSIDAWATI BT AB AB RAHMAN ( P73938 )
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Diversity and ECE.
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Pat Conole (315) My Showcase Portfolio Pat Conole (315) t687.
Differentiation in Instruction
IDENTITY FORMATION.
NJCU College of Education
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

DISPOSITIONS ASSESSMENT A Presentation by Ruby L. Thompson, Ph.D.

Guiding Questions for Dispositions Assessment 1.What dispositions, broadly conceived, should our candidates possess to support an equitable school environment and effect high levels of academic achievement and positive development for diverse learners? 2.How do we recognize the attainment of these dispositions in our candidates (and ourselves)? 3.How do we develop candidates’ dispositions? 4.What strategies and tools might we use to assess candidates’ dispositions? 5.How can we use dispositions assessment outcomes?

Selecting Dispositions Sources: – Institution’s/Unit’s Mission and Unit Philosophy – Conceptual Framework Theme/Vision of Candidate – World of Practice – Educational Demographics/Socio-political Landscape – National/International Trends – SPA Standards

Recognizing Dispositions in Candidates We are able to recognize selected dispositions through behaviors identified in indicator statements that we derive from: – Academic Handbooks – Professional Journals – Professional Texts – Discipline Dictionaries – World of Practice Findings in all these sources enable us to know that we are, in fact, developing the dispositions that we say we are developing.

Dispositions Indicators D2. Cultural Sensitivity: Demonstrates respect for learners’ communities and cultural norms and sees the learning potential in all students. Indicators: 2.1 Takes responsibility for understanding values, cultural norms, taboos, concepts of self, and other elements of deep culture. 2.2 Appreciates and accepts students dialects as important dimensions of communication. 2.3 Models esteem for diverse learners and their families.

2.4 Articulates high expectations for all learners 2.5 Values students’ culture as a basis for learning 2.6 Critiques personal biases, prejudices, and intolerance in working with diverse learners Dispositions Indicators

Development of Candidate Dispositions Course Activities Extracurricular Activities (student organizations, symposia, conferences, volunteering) Mentoring/Advising Practice

Development in Courses Align indicator statements with course objectives CEDC 408 – Multicultural and Global Education Develop learning experiences for each indicator

Indicator: 2.1 Takes responsibility for understanding values, cultural norms, taboos, etc. Learning Activities 1.Deep Culture Element Study Candidates choose a cultural group from the local school community (field placement) and through a variety of strategies (interviews, observations, reports, informal interactions, conferences, community center visits, community newspapers and other media sources, church visits, etc.) collect data on at least 20 deep culture elements.

Critiques personal prejudices and stereotypes Learning Activities: 1.“My Cultural Eye” Candidates list several factors (heterosexuality, ethnicity, gender, socio-economic status, religion, race, etc.) that influence how he/she perceives members of other cultural groups 2.“Stereotyping Exercise” Candidates list stereotypes they hold for any of the cultural groups on a chart and then discuss with peers how these stereotypes were likely formed. Stereotypes are contrasted with factual information.

2.2 Appreciates and accommodates students’ linguistic diversity CECE 415– Methods of Teaching Reading and Writing K-5 Learning Activity: Candidates conduct a Language Experience Lesson and pay special attention to children’s language. Candidates accept this language and use it to help learners develop a wardrobe of language skills.

ASSESSING CANDIDATES’ DISPOSITIONS How do we assess candidates’ dispositions? We design instruments to assess indicator behaviors Candidate Self Assessment Faculty/Advisor Perceptions and Ratings Supervising/Clinical Teacher Perceptions and Ratings

Candidate Self Assessment Instruments Questionnaires Checklists

Faculty (all) Assessment of Candidates’ Dispositions – Informal Observations: checklists, running records – Performance Observations: rubric – Interviews: rubric – Artifact analysis: rubric – Constructed Responses: rubric

Use of Assessment Findings How do we use the findings from assessments of candidates’ dispositions? IMPROVEMENT OF INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES Change attitudes Develop new perspectives Affirm cultural strengths

IMPROVEMENT OF ADVISEMENT Support candidate development of dispositions as a part of advisement/mentoring process – Reflecting on choices (personal and academic) – Clarifying issues – Documenting growth – Raising consciousness of candidates regarding their dispositions challenges – Assisting in interventions when necessary

IMPROVEMENT OF INSTRUCTION Improve dispositions development activities and experiences Create greater coherence between all courses and experiences that treat dispositions Strengthen candidates’ perception of the importance of dispositions in teaching and learning

IMPROVEMENT OF FIELD EXPERIENCES Strengthen candidates’ dispositions in action Enhance ongoing monitoring of candidates’ dispositions attainment Work with departmental faculty and clinical faculty to intervene in and remediate situations in which candidates’ dispositions are unacceptable Provide specific dispositions information to departmental faculty for course and program improvement

DISPOSITIONS ASSESSMENT DECISION POINTS Decision Point1: Major declaration/Freshman Seminar Decision Point 2: Admission to Teacher Education Decision Point 3: Matriculation in Major Courses and Practica Decision Point 4: Admission to Student Teaching

FINAL WORDS Dispositions Assessment is… Daunting Debatable Developmental Dynamic, and… Doable!

D.3 AdvocacyNot at AllSomewhatTo a Great Extent 3.1 Affirms a personal commitment to advocate for diverse learners 3.2 Values advocacy efforts on behalf of political and social equity for diverse learners 3.3 Advocates for social justice in diverse schools and communities 3.4 Rejects apathy as an option in working on behalf of diverse learners 3.5 Takes professional risks to ensure educational equity