ELISA Data Processing Centre Volker Beckmann APC, Francois Arago Centre A. Petiteau, E. Porter, G. Auger, E. Plagnol, P. Binétruy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 1 An Overview of Computers and Programming Languages.
Advertisements

GENIUS kick-off - November 2013 GENIUS kick-off meeting The Gaia context: DPAC & CU9 X. Luri.
Resources for the ATLAS Offline Computing Basis for the Estimates ATLAS Distributed Computing Model Cost Estimates Present Status Sharing of Resources.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Motivation for Developing SPICE November 2014.
APPIC meeting APC, 9 May 2014 Pierre Binétruy, Data access challenges for the eLISA gravitational space mission.
23/04/2008VLVnT08, Toulon, FR, April 2008, M. Stavrianakou, NESTOR-NOA 1 First thoughts for KM3Net on-shore data storage and distribution Facilities VLV.
IS 214 Needs Assessment and Evaluation of Information Systems Managing Usability © Copyright 2001 Kevin McBride.
DCS Architecture Bob Krzaczek. Key Design Requirement Distilled from the DCS Mission statement and the results of the Conceptual Design Review (June 1999):
Advanced Technology Center 1 HMI Rasmus Larsen / Processing Modules Stanford University HMI Team Meeting – May 2003 Processing Module Development Rasmus.
09 May 2014page 1 ROCC to PPL ICD Initial Definition ExoMars Rover Operations Control Center ROCC.
Supplement 02CASE Tools1 Supplement 02 - Case Tools And Franchise Colleges By MANSHA NAWAZ.
DATA PRESERVATION IN ALICE FEDERICO CARMINATI. MOTIVATION ALICE is a 150 M CHF investment by a large scientific community The ALICE data is unique and.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
MIRI software; implementation plan Peter Roelfsema.
Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center 25 April 2012 Implementing Portals of the Universe, April
Andrea Santangelo, Kepler Center-Tü Toulouse, February 2, 2012 “The Organization of the EUSO- Balloon mission” Andrea Santangelo * Kepler Center for Astro.
CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.
FP OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems WP8: Use case 1: Quality Analysis for Satellite Missions.
Hunt for Molecules, Paris, 2005-Sep-20 Software Development for ALMA Robert LUCAS IRAM Grenoble France.
1 BTEC HNC Systems Support Castle College 2007/8 Systems Analysis Lecture 9 Introduction to Design.
Data processing group. General study of data processing architecture: - overall definition of the data processing functions - share of tasks between on-board.
Chapter 8 Architecture Analysis. 8 – Architecture Analysis 8.1 Analysis Techniques 8.2 Quantitative Analysis  Performance Views  Performance.
Medical Audit.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 8, 2002 K.Young 1 LAT Data Processing Facility Automatically process Level 0 data.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
Archiving 40+ years of Planetary Mission Data - Lessons Learned and Recommendations K. E. Simmons LASP, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
SGS: Activities and Requests Helen Middleton. Hermean Environment Working Group Meeting | SGS Team | Key Largo | 16/05/2013 | Slide 2 Contents 1.ESAC.
Cloud Computing Characteristics A service provided by large internet-based specialised data centres that offers storage, processing and computer resources.
High-Level Organization ALMA Board AUI NRAO North American ARC Manager North American ALMA Regional Centre AMACASAC Joint ALMA Observatory ALMA Director.
ALMA Software B.E. Glendenning (NRAO). 2 ALMA “High Frequency VLA” in Chile Presently a European/North American Project –Japan is almost certainly joining.
Data Management Challenges in Gaia
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
Planetary Science Archive PSA User Group Meeting #1 PSA UG #1  July 2 - 3, 2013  ESAC PSA Archiving Standards.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October ICC Status Tanya Lim 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – ICC Status Tanya Lim RAL.
Using the CMMI in small Organisations Stephen Fletcher PAS Ltd, UK.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
PDS Geosciences Node Page 1 Archiving Mars Mission Data Sets with the Planetary Data System Report to MEPAG Edward A. Guinness Dept. of Earth and Planetary.
Oct.10, 2007EAMA7 The next-generation Infrared astronomy mission SPICA Outline of SPICA Scientific Research Concept (SciReC) SPICA 研究コンセプト概要 17 th May.
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting GSSC USER SUPPORT David Band – GSSC.
1 TenStep Project Management Process ™ PM00.9 PM00.9 Project Management Preparation for Success * Manage Quality *
3/30/04 16:14 1 Lessons Learned CERES Data Management Presented to GIST 21 “If the 3 laws of climate are calibrate, calibrate, calibrate, then the 3 laws.
Response to ASAC Report of May 2004 Response to ASAC The Atacama Large Millimeter Array Tom Wilson and Al Wootten Science IPT.
SAGE meeting Socorro, May 22-23, 2007 EVLA Science Operations: the Array Science Center Claire Chandler NRAO/Socorro.
Science Data in the Science Mission Directorate (SMD) Jeffrey J.E. Hayes Program Executive for MO & DA, Heliophysics Division August 17, 2011.
Toulouse, September 2003 Page 1 JOURNEE ALTARICA Airbus ESACS  ISAAC.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
LISA News from ESA O. Jennrich LISA Project Scientist.
N. RadziwillEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting May 8-9, 2006 NRAO End to End (e2e) Operations Division Nicole M. Radziwill.
EC Review – 01/03/2002 – WP9 – Earth Observation Applications – n° 1 WP9 Earth Observation Applications 1st Annual Review Report to the EU ESA, KNMI, IPSL,
G Z 1 Real-time search for gravitational wave transients during S6/VSR2: Principles, thoughts and plans Erik Katsavounidis MIT for the LSC-Virgo.
Page 1 PACS GRITS 17 June 2011 Herschel Data Analysis Guerilla Style: Keeping flexibility in a system with long development cycles Bernhard Schulz NASA.
Frazer OwenNSF EVLA Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Transition to EVLA
March 2004 At A Glance ITPS is a flexible and complete trending and plotting solution which provides user access to an entire mission full-resolution spacecraft.
SOFTWARE ARCHIVE WORKING GROUP (SAWG) REPORT TODD KING PDS MANAGEMENT COUNCIL MEETING FEB. 4-5, 2016.
Summary of HEP SW workshop Ian Bird MB 15 th April 2014.
1 st EGI CTA VT meeting 18 January 2013 C. Vuerli (INAF, Italy), N. Neyroud (CNRS/IN2P3/LAPP, France)
V-Shaped Software Development Life Cycle Model. Introduction: Variation of water fall model. Same sequence structure as water fall model. Strong emphasis.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
A Computing Tier 2 Node Eric Fede – LAPP/IN2P3. 2 Eric Fede – 1st Chinese-French Workshop Plan What is a Tier 2 –Context and definition To be a Tier 2.
Chapter 3 Project Management Parts of this presentation is extracted from Ian Sommerville’s slides located at
International Data Centre October 2015Page 1 Progressive Commissioning Jerry Carter, Senior Scientist W. Randy Bell, Director Gerhard Graham, Coordinator.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
PDS4 Data From The Rover RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
ECT data sharing plan Which products do you intend to make available for use by other teams in their data analysis? When will these products be available?
VLA to EVLA Transition Plan
The Basics of Information Systems
French Access to Copernicus Space Data
GLAST Large Area Telescope Instrument Science Operations Center
The Basics of Information Systems
Presentation transcript:

eLISA Data Processing Centre Volker Beckmann APC, Francois Arago Centre A. Petiteau, E. Porter, G. Auger, E. Plagnol, P. Binétruy

Data Processing Centre  Thinking about eLISA data analysis  The data stream of eLISA  Ground segment structure of eLISA  Tasks of the Data Processing Centre (DPC)  Structure of the DPC V. Beckmann

Thinking about eLISA data analysis  eLISA is a large and important mission  Data have to be easy to access, understand, analyse, display  Community appreciates real-time information (risk?)  Colleagues want the possibility to verify  Make all data public (raw to high level)  Provide (open source) s/w which allows community to re-do our analysis -- and potentially include own algorithms  Speak their language: astronomers like fits format, catalogs in their formats, easy access through established data bases  Listen to wishes and ideas from the larger community in order to achieve maximum support for our ambitious mission Photo: Ted Carnaham

Data Stream  Omni-directional observations, no ‘pointed observations’, no observers  The accumulated data provide the best sensitivity and include all information  Level 0: raw telemetry  Level 1: fully calibrated and corrected Time Delay Interferometry (TDI) data  Level 2: source identification, parameter extraction, model parameters and probability density function of sources. Transient identification  Level 3: source catalogue, (astro)physical source parameters, strain time series  Use different algorithms in the production of Level 2/3 data  Regular (e.g. weekly) reprocessing of the accumulated data stream V. Beckmann

Data Stream  The data volume is small, the processing demand is large  5 Hz measurements  30 channels ‘mother’ spacecraft, 14 channels on each of the daughter spacecrafts  Housekeeping data (at various frequencies)  11 kbs  << Gbyte per day  Few Gbyte per day (incl. everything L0-L3)

Ground Segment Responsibility for data processing shared between MOC/SOC (ESA), IOTs (member states) and Data Processing Centre (member states)

Tasks of the DPC  Data Processing Centre (DPC) provides two analysis chains:  Quick look analysis (QA) and standard analysis (SA) pipeline.  QA: simplified version of SA. To run on a daily basis on the incoming data stream. Visualize data. Identify potential problems (beyond from what MOC/SOC) can spot.  SA: run full analysis on the accumulated data once a week  Integrate algorithms developed by the eLISA consortium members  Develop, test, maintain, document s/w chains  Distribute and provide user support for the SA pipeline  Report Level 2/Level3 results back to SOC for potential event announcements to the eLISA consortium/community.  Ensure mature level of s/w applied in the DPC  “Listen” to eLISA consortium, stay flexible

Structure of the DPC  Data Processing Centre (DPC) does not define the algorithms, does not (exclusively) provide scientific interpretation.  Changes in algorithms and in definition of products are to be approved by a Change Control Board (CCB) of the eLISA consortium.  Technical changes and quality control (version control, unit testing, etc.) handled locally at the DPC  Though tasks at DPC are not ‘scientific’ deep understanding of eLISA science necessary at DPC management level  Several member states can contribute to DPC (FTE or being in charge of certain tasks).

Structure of the DPC  Project scientist and project manager organise the work of the DPC and ensure contact with eLISA consortium, IOTs, and ESA (MOC/SOC)  Start early (but not too early!): 5 yrs before launch (1 year earlier for management)  Ramp up staff until launch  Important aspects: Quality control (testing!), maturity of s/w chain, be ready for changes after launch, maintain knowledge over the whole mission duration (including post mission activities)  DPC relies strongly on knowledge of the IOTs and the eLISA consortium  Hardware costs: mainly computing (~1,500 CPU during science operations)

FTEs at Data Processing Centre Launch

Data Processing Centre before launch

Data Processing Centre after launch

François Arago Centre  Project at APC, located across the street  Cluster, 640 CPU, 100 kW cooling, 100 TByte disk  10 Gbit/s connection  2 video conference rooms  Concurrent Design Facility (used e.g. for eLISA/NGO)  2 meeting rooms  Offices on demand  Hard- and software support  Projects: LISA-PF, Euclid, CTA, INTEGRAL, HESS…

The DPC as member state contribution  Providing the DPC by ESA member states, reduces the costs for ESA  I.e. the more tasks on data analysis/storage/distribution/support we as consortium can provide, the lower the costs to ESA  This has been done before: e.g. in INTEGRAL, the science data centre is considered as “5th instrument” of the mission (incl. specific consortium for the SDC, I.e. with SDC under control of the member states).  Competing with ESAC  CNES starts a phase-0 study (approved today!) concerning the eLISA data processing centre requirements, risks, options, etc.  Kick-off meeting in December 2012, phase 0 to start January 2013, lasting one year.

Summary  eLISA has to provide excellent service to the whole community, before, during, after the mission  Open to ideas, requests, wishes, concerns  DPC processes L1 to L3 data  Small data volume, large processing needs  Quick look and standard analysis (simulator not included)  Development, integration, testing, maintenance, documentation, user support  Algorithm development by eLISA consortium (not DPC), knowledge about instruments with IOTs  Start 2017 with 2 FTE management, 2018 first s/w integration activities  58 FTE*years until launch  French community is ready to provide the Data Processing Centre services to the eLISA consortium!  See also Beckmann et al. 2012, “The eLISA/NGO Data Processing Centre”, ASP Conf. Series 467 V. Beckmann