MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES JOHNS Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Inquiry Team Eydie Wilson, Ph.D. Math Coach November 3, 2009.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES State Personnel Development Grant April 23-24, 2014.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Maryland State Department of Education Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services Co-Teaching Initiative: Improving LRE and Student Achievement.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
New Era MMSR- Maryland Model for School Readiness ends. Maryland’s Early Learning Framework begins… begins transition:
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
OSEP Leadership Mega Conference August 4, 2010 Recruiting and Retaining Personnel from Cradle to Career.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education 2006 ACTION RESEARCH Eileen Ferrance Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratories Brown University.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
The Maryland Co-teaching Framework
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
Waverly Community Schools Standards Overview AdvancED District Accreditation External Review Team Visit April 21-24, 2013Welcome.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Timberlane Regional School District
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Montgomery County R-II Schools November 8, 2012 School Board Report Title I Instructional Coaches introducing Mrs. Jeania Burton, Literacy Coach Mrs. MaryAnn.
Cambrian School District Board of Education Presentation April 3, 2014 Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP)
O What’s the BUZzzz? Narrowing the Achievement Gap Maryland State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG)
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
- 0 - Collaborative Inquiry via Professional Learning Communities MSDF Impact Assessment.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
School Improvement Leadership: Developing the Action Plan CIA Team Denise Behrends Chad Dumas Beth McCracken February 23, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Collecting &Using Data to Guide RtI Implementation: Satisfaction Surveys & Implications Bill Trant, Executive Director of Special Education and Related.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
School Improvement Process
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
SIT Professional Development- Defining the Consultation Model Permission to reprint granted with appropriate acknowledgement ©2009 DPS.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Standards-Based Online Professional Development to Mentor and Retain Special Education Personnel Presented to Teacher Education Division of Council for.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Response to Intervention
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
Presentation transcript:

MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES JOHNS Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education Parents’ Place of Maryland State Personnel Development Grant April 2014 TAP-IT Overview

TAP-IT Featuring the JHU Digital Portfolio Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014 © © ©

TAP-IT A process for effective decision-making practices anchored in professional literature and research Developed by: The Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education A process for effective decision-making practices anchored in professional literature and research Developed by: The Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education ©

TAP-IT Purpose Promote high quality decision making to….. Advance achievement in mathematics among all students, including those with disabilities Purpose Promote high quality decision making to….. Advance achievement in mathematics among all students, including those with disabilities ©

Five Stages T eam A nalyze P lan I mplement T rack TAP-IT ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014 ©

Guide school implementation teams to use data ( student progress & fidelity implementation) Inform decision making Monitor student progress Promote improved performance Guide school implementation teams to use data ( student progress & fidelity implementation) Inform decision making Monitor student progress Promote improved performance TAP-IT ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014 ©

Establish Implementation Team UNITED protocol Implement high performance teaming Set team goals, roles, operating standards Establish Implementation Team UNITED protocol Implement high performance teaming Set team goals, roles, operating standards ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014

Conduct inquiry and examine data Utilize key questions to guide data analysis Identify individual students or groups needing support Identify PD to strengthen fidelity of implementation Synthesize key findings. Conduct inquiry and examine data Utilize key questions to guide data analysis Identify individual students or groups needing support Identify PD to strengthen fidelity of implementation Synthesize key findings. ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014

Identify focus area Seek solution(s) Select strategies Determine coaching needs & PD Identify focus area Seek solution(s) Select strategies Determine coaching needs & PD ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014

Action Plan Core Components 4 Goals 1 Yearly Goal 3 Cycle Goals (November, February, April) Performance Targets (Monthly) Actions Action Plan Core Components 4 Goals 1 Yearly Goal 3 Cycle Goals (November, February, April) Performance Targets (Monthly) Actions ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014

Action Plan Complete Actions within timelines Roles Responsibilities Action Plan Complete Actions within timelines Roles Responsibilities ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014

Action Plan Monitor monthly Compile and organize results Determine impact toward targets & goals Action Plan Monitor monthly Compile and organize results Determine impact toward targets & goals ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014

Key Features A Web-based environment with a user- friendly interface An electronic file cabinet A showcase of work ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014 * Key Features A Web-based environment with a user- friendly interface An electronic file cabinet A showcase of work ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014 *

Digital Portfolio: Two Important Areas 1st area: TAP-IT To collect meaningful artifacts at a district and school level associated with using relevant data to analyze student math performance, and To present the selected interventions that produce positive mathematical outcomes for all students in each of our three districts. ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, st area: TAP-IT To collect meaningful artifacts at a district and school level associated with using relevant data to analyze student math performance, and To present the selected interventions that produce positive mathematical outcomes for all students in each of our three districts. ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014

Digital Portfolio: Two Important Areas 2 nd Area: Math Coaches Assist coaches in communicating and giving feedback to teachers Provide repository for artifacts and data: Multi-media vignettes Fidelity check results Student progress outcomes Formative assessments. 2 nd Area: Math Coaches Assist coaches in communicating and giving feedback to teachers Provide repository for artifacts and data: Multi-media vignettes Fidelity check results Student progress outcomes Formative assessments. ©Johns Hopkins University School of Education Center for Technology in Education, 2014