Company LOGO Grants and Funding Helping schools pursue federal and state entitlement and competitive grants.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
INTENT OF FUNDS. INTENT OF TITLE I A Title I Director salary and benefits Title I Administrative Assistant/Secretary salary and benefits Teachers Educational.
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Update and 2009 Grant Process. What is ITQ? Part of Federal No Child Left Behind $$ focused on increasing the number of “highly qualified” teachers in.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Consolidated Application Budget Detail and Fiscal Issues.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
STaR Chart Summary for Bryan ISD By Jenna Springfield.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Presented by: Sandy O’Neil Title II, Part A Coordinator
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Title II-A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality ESEA Application Workshop April 21-22, 2015.
TIM MEYER CLINTON TOPEL JENNA BRENDEMUHL Poor Staff Development Districts Not Using Funds Properly.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Company LOGO Grants and Funding Finding federal and state entitlement and competitive grants for your school.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Title II A: Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting The primary goal of the program is to provide professional development to increase student achievement.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Historical and Legal Perspectives of Assistive Technology BJ Gallagher, Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting. 2 Let’s learn about Title I Title I is the largest federal assistance program for our nation’s schools.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting W.H. Rhodes Elementary School School Year.
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Perkins 101 Review Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 Purpose and Expectations Act aims to increase the quality of.
Linden Elementary Title I Parent Night
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
No Child Left Behind.
What Parents Need to Know
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
What Parents Need to Know
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Schoolwide Programs.
What Parents Need to Know
Presentation transcript:

Company LOGO Grants and Funding Helping schools pursue federal and state entitlement and competitive grants

2  John Richards,Ph.D., President  Renee Chandonnet, Director of Sales  Amy Sosman, Director of Federal Programs  Joe Walters,Ed.D., Vice President, Research

3  On-line course  Here today  On-going technical support Technical Assistance

4 Purposes for Today  Review information from on-line course  Extend that learning  Get to know CS4Ed staff  Discuss school and district-level sales  Give you tools to use in your efforts  Address your questions and concerns

5 Topics No Child Left Behind Recap Formula Grants Competitive Grants Sample Presentation re: Title II-D Private Partnerships Major Pillars What Can the Data Tell You?

6 What Kinds of Grant Funds are Out There? Federal Entitlement Federal Competitive State Entitlement State Competitive National Foundations Local Foundations

7 10% -- Who CARES????  Why do we care so much about 10% if that’s “all” federal government supplies?  Represents $65 billion dollars  Money used for “supplemental” programs  New programs  Pilot programs  Very concerned with teacher quality issues  Professional development  Money for technology programs  25% for professional development

8 No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Recap  Amy K. Sosman 

9 Federal Funding Review: NCLB Four “Pillars” of NCLB 1.Accountability (AYP) 2.Proven education methods:  Using scientifically-based research (SBR)  Providing high-quality staff in every classroom  Promoting high-quality professional development 3.Flexibility (spending) 4.Choices for parents (school choice, supplemental services)

10 Adequate Yearly Progress: (AYP)  NCLB Report Cards  States report progress  Schools in Need of Improvement (INOP)  Have additional professional development requirements and funds  Highly-qualified staff in core areas  Find percentage that meet requirements – may have extra $$ for professional development

11 Highly Qualified Staff  State certified/licensed  At least Bachelor’s degree  Demonstrate subject-matter competency  Advanced degree in appropriate major  Pass subject-matter competency test  Core academic subjects  Each State’s definition of HOUSSEHOUSSE

12 High Quality Professional Development Components of High Quality Professional Development Programs (NCLB definition) PBS TeacherLine Improve teachers' knowledge of academic subjects. More than 80 research-based courses for teachers at every grade level in reading, mathematics, science, technology integration, teaching strategies, and curriculum mapping. Developed in association with nationally recognized curriculum organizations Are integral to broad school- wide educational improvement plans. With an array of courses, teachers can select which course(s) best address their school’s needs for improvement

13 HQPD - Continued Give teachers and principals the knowledge and skills to help all students meet challenging state academic standards. Standards-based, content-rich courses provide authentic tasks with real-class applications. Courses are “mapped” to identified needs Improve classroom management skills Proven, scientifically-based teaching strategies and methods to help raise student achievement. 24-hour access to resources and training. Interactive simulations, streaming video, animations and interactives Modeling of research-based practices by master practitioners in real classrooms. Practice and application of skills. Coaching, feedback and reflection. Free tutorials, tech tips, classroom management techniques, lesson plans

14 HQPD - Continued Are sustained, intensive, classroom-focused, and are not one-day or short-term workshops. Most classes run for at least 6 weeks, providing ample opportunity for discussion, integration, and extended learning. Real class videos and examples embedded in each course. Advance teacher understanding of effective instructional strategies that are supported by scientifically based research. More than 80 research-based courses for teachers at every grade level in reading, mathematics, science, technology integration, teaching strategies, and curriculum mapping. Are developed with extensive participation of teachers, principals, parents, and administrators. Teachers select which course(s) to enroll in, based on their individual needs and school improvement plans. Schools and districts can customize courses to meet their goals.

15 Provide guidance to enhance parental involvement PBS TeacherLine offers a course entitled Connecting Family, Community and Schools Provide training on how to use data and assessments to improve classroom practice and student learning. PBS TeacherLine reading, math, Capstone and some technology courses address this by asking teachers to work with students to try to identify skill levels and plan future instruction. HQPD - Continued

16 Every State is Special  States receive money in competitive or block grants to the state DOE  Distribute money to LEAs using formula or competitive grant programs  Have established their own methods for complying with NCLB mandates  Reporting  Assessment/Accountability  Teacher Licensure

17 Title I - Entitlement  School wide/Targeted Assistance  Mostly elementary schools  Reading, Math  5% Professional Development set aside (10% if INOP)  Supplement vs. Supplant  Often considered “entrée” point for change

18 Title I - Competitive  Reading First  Provide scientifically based instructional methods to improve reading in K-3  Professional development  Comprehensive School Reform  School reform as an improvement strategy  Research based  Effective practices  Professional development

19 Title II - Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High-Quality Teachers  Improving Teacher Quality State Grants (Part A)  Given to districts using a formula  Math and Science Partnerships (Part B)  District partner with colleges and universities to strengthen content expertise  Enhancing Education Through Technology (Part D)  Technology grants  50% formula  50% competitive

20 Title II - Competitive  Math and Science Partnerships – Part B  Increase achievement in math and science  Improve content knowledge  Improve pedagogical skills  Enhancing Education Through Technology – Part D  Integrate standards-aligned technology into the curriculum  Increase access to technology  Support distance learning

21 EETT – Enhancing Education Through Technology (II-D)  25% must be used for professional development  Half of the funding is used for competitive and half for formula grants  Districts must be “high need”

22 Title IV Part A- Competitive  21 st Century Community Learning Centers  Academic support in after school settings  Professional development

23 Title IV Part B  Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP)  Formula-driven: Small and Rural Schools Achievement Program  Direct from US DOE to districts w/600 or fewer students  Competitive to states: Rural and Low Income Schools Program  Funds used for variety of purposes, including professional development

24 Title V - Entitlement  “Special” projects  Flexible program that can be used for a myriad of projects, including professional development.  Allotments listed at state Web sites

25 Perkins Vocational  Vocational-technical education programs  Formula and competitive grants used for:  vocational curriculum materials  materials for learning labs, curriculum development or modification  staff development  efforts for academic-vocational integration

26 So they want to move forward…

27  # teachers  # courses  Teacher stipends  Facilitator  On-site face-to-face component  Administrative costs  Equipment/internet access  Evaluation Budget Considerations  # teachers  # courses  Teacher stipends  Facilitator  On-site face-to-face component  Administrative costs  Equipment/Internet access  Evaluation

28 Sample Enrollment Budget # teachers# PBS TL courses $$$ ($150/course) 72$2, (2/yr, 2 years)$4, $4,500 The average elementary school has app. 500 students and maybe 20 teachers

29 Sample Budget (based on 7 teachers, 2 courses each) Budget Line Item$ Enrollment$2,100 Stipends e.g. $20/hr x 30 hours per course $8,400 (7x60x$20) On-Site meetings (2 2-hr per course) Teacher stipends $1,120 On-site Facilitator (PBS or locally provided) $2,000 ($500/mtg.) Evaluation10% of total = app. $1300 Administration10% of total = app. $1450 TOTAL$16,370