Strawman R&D Tasks and R&D Costs Neil Morley and Alice Ying INL, August 10-12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Summary Slides on FNST Top-level Technical Issues and on FNSF objectives, requirements and R&D Presented at FNST Meeting, UCLA August 18-20, 2009 Mohamed.
Advertisements

First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Quick Look Report on EU Fact Finding Trip S.J. Zinkle 1, R.J. Kurtz 2, and A.F. Rowcliffe.
What is Dual Coolant Blanket? Siegfried Malang 2 nd EU-US DCLL Workshop2 nd EU-US DCLL Workshop University of California,University of California, Los.
Structural and Failure Analysis Cost & Risk Assessment Shahram Sharafat TBM Cost Estimate Meeting UCLA Dec , 2005.
September 15-16, 2005/ARR 1 Status of ARIES-CS Power Core and Divertor Design and Structural Analysis A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
DCLL TBM: Comments on Design Strategy, and Experimental plans, schedule and required diagnostics Compiled by Neil Morley for the TBM Meeting May 10, 2006.
Summary of Current Test Plan for US DCLL TBM in ITER Neil Morley and the US TBM Participants INL, August
1 O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Comments on Corrosion R&D Needs for DCLL B.A. Pint and P.F. Tortorelli Presented by S.J.
February 24-25, 2005/ARR 1 ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering: Status and Next Steps A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting GA.
THERMOFLUID MHD for ITER TBM. CURRENT STATUS By UCLA Thermofluid MHD GROUP Presented by Sergey Smolentsev US ITER TBM Meeting UCLA May 10-11, 2006.
Multiple effects for HT DCLL Presented by Neil Morley University of California, Los Angeles US-EU DCLL Workshop November 14-15, 2014 Slides from my colleagues.
A design for the DCLL inboard blanket S. Smolentsev, M. Abdou, M. Dagher - UCLA S. Malang – Consultant, Germany 2d EU-US DCLL Workshop University of California,
Thermofluid MHD issues for liquid breeder blankets and first walls Neil B. Morley and Sergey Smolentsev MAE Dept., UCLA APEX/TBM Meeting November 3, 2003.
The effect of the orientations of pebble bed in Indian HCSB Module Paritosh Chaudhuri Institute for Plasma Research Gandhinagar, INDIA CBBI-16, Sept.
2 nd EU-US DCLL Workshop University of California, Los Angeles, Nov th, 2014.
Issues and Prospects of Silicon Carbide Composites for ITER-TBM
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
ITER Test Blanket Module and the Need for Coordination Outline What ITER means for the World Technology / Chamber / Blanket Community ITER Plans for TBM.
1 Recent Progress in Helium-Cooled Ceramic Breeder (HCCB) Blanket Module R&D and Design Analysis Ying, Alice With contributions from M. Narula, H. Zhang,
DCLL R&D Task Area Reports Compiled by Neil Morley for the TBM Conference Call Oct 6, 2005.
WBS activity and Cost Summary (Focus on Design) Clement Wong TBM Conference Call Oct. 27, 2005.
Fusion: Bringing star power to earth Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego NES Grand Challenges.
MHD Modeling and Experiments at UCLA for the ITER Test Blanket Program N. Morley, M. Abdou, A. Ying, S. Smolentsev, M-J. Ni, T. Sketchley, J. Burris, M.
Dec 12-14, 2005TBM Planning and Costing Meeting DCLL R&D Evaluations Summary Compiled by Neil Morley for the TBM Planning and Costing Meeting Dec 12-14,
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
1 U.S. Presentation in TBWG-16 Beijing, China November 15 – 17, Overview of R&D, Time Schedule, and Cost Estimation M. Abdou (25 min.) 2.Possible.
1 VLT Research Highlights ITER Test Blanket Module (TBM) M. Abdou and the ITER-TBM Team Outline 1.Introduction and TBWG activities 2.Technical planning.
ITER test plan for the solid breeder TBM Presented by P. Calderoni March 3, 2004 UCLA.
Solid Breeder Blanket R&D and Deliverable TBM Costing Kickoff Meeting INL, August 10-12, 2005 Presented by Alice Ying.
Conference Call, June 23, 2005 Remarks on US Costing Activities for the US ITER-TBM Mohamed Abdou.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy TBM Structure, Materials and Fabrication Collaboration Issues R.J. Kurtz 1, and A.F. Rowcliffe.
DCLL TBM R&D Summary Compiled by Neil Morley for the TBM Conference Call Oct 27, 2005.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy Initial Cost Estimates for Development of DCLL TBM Ferritic Steel Structural Components.
US ITER TBM Overview of DCLL R&D and Predictive Capability Activities Compiled by Neil Morley of UCLA 2006 US-Japan Workshop on Fusion High Power Density.
US Test Blanket Module Partially Integrated Testing Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for.
Background information of Party(EU)’s R&D on TBM and breeding blankets Compiled and Presented by Alice Ying TBM Costing Kickoff Meeting INL August 10-12,
An ITER-TBM Experimental Thrust for ReNeW Themes III and IV Neil B. Morley, Mohamed Abdou, Alice Ying (UCLA); Mohamed Sawan, Jake Blanchard (UW); Clement.
Development of tritium breeder monitoring for Lead-Lithium cooled ceramic breeder (LLCB) module of ITER presented V.K. Kapyshev CBBI-16 Portland, Oregon,
Materials Integration by Fission Reactor Irradiation and Essential Basic Studies for Overall Evaluation Presented by N.Yoshida and K.Abe At the J-US Meeting,
Multiple Effect / Multiple Interaction Discussion Topics  How do we really simulate volumetric heating in LMs without distorting the experiment? Simulate.
DCLL ½ port Test Blanket Module thermal-hydraulic analysis Presented by P. Calderoni March 3, 2004 UCLA.
Various Strategies for DCLL in the US Technology Program Poor ITER utilization (Lowest Cost Scenario) - Support EU HCLL effort, no independent DCLL TBM.
US ITER TBM DCLL ITER-TBM Plan and Cost Summary PbLi Flow Channels He-cooled First Wall PbLi He SiC FCI 2 mm gap US DCLL TBM – Cutaway Views 484 mm US.
Review of Thermofluid / MHD activities for DCLL Sergey Smolentsev & US TBM Thermofluid/MHD Group 2006 US-Japan Workshop on FUSION HIGH POWER DENSITY COMPONENTS.
Top-Level Technical Issues for FNST #3 MHD Thermofluid Phenomena and Impact on Transport Processes in Electrically Conducting Liquid Coolants/Breeders.
UCLA - March 8, 2006 US TBM Cost Estimate Status March 8, 2006 Tom Mann.
DCLL Thermofluid/MHD R&D Sergey Smolentsev, Neil Morley and the ITER- TBM thermofluid group US ITER-TBM Meeting August 10-12, 2005 INEL.
1 Discussion with Drs. Kwon and Cho UCLA-NFRC Collaboration Mohamed Abdou March 27, 2006.
Overview of the US ITER Test Blanket Module (TBM) Technical Plan
Highlights of US ITER TBM Technical Plan and Cost Estimates (and Impact of International Collaboration) Mohamed Abdou and the U.S. Team TBWG-17 Presented.
HARNESSING FUSION POWER POWER EXTRACTION Power Extraction Panel Preliminary Research Thrust Ideas Robust operation of blanket/firstwall and divertor systems.
US Participation in the
Some General Guidelines for the US TBM Costing
DCLL TBM Reference Design
Produktentwicklung und Maschinenelemente
Integrated Modeling Approach and Plans
U.S. Presentation in TBWG-16 Beijing, China November 15 – 17, 2005
Overview and Meeting Objectives
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Mohamed A. Abdou Summary, Approach and Strategy (M. Abdou)
An ITER-TBM Experimental Thrust for ReNeW Themes III and IV
US TBM Cost Activity Tom Mann December 12 – 14, 2005.
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
ITER-TBM Planning and Costing Meeting
ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering: Status and Next Steps
Compiled by Neil Morley for the TBM Conference Call Nov. 17, 2005
TITAN - Flow Control and Thermofluid Modeling Tasks
DCLL Nuclear Analysis WBS Costing Mohamed Sawan University of Wisconsin-Madison Mahmoud Youssef University of California-Los Angeles ITER TBM Meeting.
Presentation transcript:

Strawman R&D Tasks and R&D Costs Neil Morley and Alice Ying INL, August 10-12

US strategy for ITER testing of the DCLL Blanket and First Wall Concept  Develop and deploy a series (~4) of vertical half-port DCLL-TBMs during the period of the first 10 years of ITER operation with –Ferritic steel structure test articles from day one of ITER operation with specific testing goals and diagnostic systems –Associated ancillary equipment systems of various materials in a transporter behind the bioshield and in space in the TCWS and tritium buildings using PbLi flow control (bypass/flowrates) to keep temperature of ancillary equipment below material limits (e.g. 475C for PbLi/FS)  Develop international collaboration on PbLi systems to the maximal extent

Electromagnetic/Structural (EM/S) TBM Testing Objectives 1.Explore/validate general TBM structure and design for later DT operation –Measure forces and the mechanical response of the TBM structure to transient EM loads –Determine ferromagnetic and MHD flow perturbation of ITER fields –Measure thermal and particle load effects on plasma facing surface (Be) and FW structure/heat sink 2.Establish performance baseline and operational experience of the TBM and basic (He and PbLi flow) ancillary systems –Integration of control systems and diagnostics with ITER systems –Demonstration of required port integration and remote handling procedures –Measurement of thermal time constants and heat loss –Testing heating/filling/draining/remelting and accident response procedures 3.Perform initial studies of flow effects and Flow Channel Insert performance in steady and transient ITER magnetic field environment –MHD flow distribution and pressure drop in toroidal field and toroidal + poloidal field –FCI performance changes as a function LM exposure time and loading from EM events –Map ITER field in TBM area Information in the early HH phase can be used:  to modify designs of subsequent TBMs to be deployed in the later DT phase  for ITER DT Licensing.

Key areas and responsible persons for TBM R&D 1.SiC FCI Development [Katoh] 2.SiC/PbLi/FS system compatibility [Pint] 3.Thermofluid MHD [Smolentsev] 4.Safety R&D [Merrill] 5.Tritium removal/control systems R&D [Sze/Willms] 6.TBM Plasma Interface [Ulrickson] 7.Pebble bed thermomechanics [Ying/Calderoni ] 8.Structural material and fabrication [Kurtz] 9.Structural analysis and failure rates [Ghoniem/Sharafat] 10.Mechanical design [???] 11.Diagnostics/Instrumentation/Control [???] 12.Thermofluid Helium systems [Wong ] 13.Virtual TBM [???] 14.Mockup facilities [???] 15.mockup tests [???]

R&D Definition and Costing Schedule Phase Responsible Persons Duration (working days) Draft R&D planMorley/Ying15 days Iteration on R&D tasks and scheduleR&D Area Leaders20 days Detailed estimate of resourcesR&D Area Leaders15 days Supporting quotes/expert estimates for required materials/fabs R&D Area Leaders20 days R&D and Costs Draft Report Morley/Ying 15 days Iterate on Final Draft R&D costs report R&D Area Leaders 15 days Costing Report DueAbdou

The following information is requested from each responsible person:  Recommended list R&D tasks in your area needed to –Establish basic TBM feasibility –Understand/predict TBM performance –Design and fabricate first TBM – EM/S  Recommended scheduling of listed R&D tasks  Description of each task including: –Main purpose and method (numerical, experimental, …) –Identification of facility/code or description of new/upgraded facility/code required –Description of test section and diagnostics to be fabricated –Anticipated duration and person-years of effort –Any perceived overlap with another US R&D area and similar international R&D

 Schedule  cost profile  costing methodologies  Risks  acquisition strategy  Scaling of existing experience (this was what was done for ITER Project Pre-CD0)  Scaling international partner cost estimates on TBM program  Complete bottoms up based on WBS

SiC/PbLi/FS system compatibility [Pint] –Need to establish reference design (materials, operating conditions) asap –Near-term compatibility R&D activities would focus on analysis of existing compatibility for ferritic/martensitic steel with flowing Pb-Li and develop tool for blanket conditions. Also continue limited number of static capsule tests on candidate piping materials (possibility to avoid coatings or ceramic inserts) SiC samples to EU for 500C flowing tests –Medium-term activities would be centered on flowing loop experiments Thermal convection loop Other loops? –Scoping experiments on stress-corrosion cracking should also be initiated in the near- to medium-term

SiC FCI Development [Katoh]  Initial analysis and strategy development –Confirm if expected cross-sectional distortion is within design allowance. –Develop material design strategy for low flexural modulus and compatibility with other requirements (eg. porous mid-plane) –Develop FCI design strategy that allows longitudinal bending deformation of each face. –Develop method to determine stiffness matrix of relevant materials. –Develop research plan to be able to predict irradiation creep compliance of FCI material.  For electrical (and thermal) insulation: –Establish a reliable technique to measure trans-thickness electrical conductivity of SiC/SiC plates at elevated temperatures. –Identify appropriate method(s) for engineering porous mid-plane components, compensated high resistivity SiC matrix, and insulating SiC-based matrices. Trial-fabricate flat plates of these composites and evaluate baseline properties. –Perform small scale irradiation experiment (rabbit type) on insulating SiC matrix composites.  For mechanical integrity: –Perform detailed evaluation of cross-sectional and longitudinal stress / strain due to thermal gradient. Interact with design people –Design materials / components for low flexural / trans-thickness shear moduli and compatibility with other requirements (eg. porous midplane) –Determine stiffness matrix and other design properties for FCI material. Develop appropriate test methods. –Determine irradiation creep compliance of FCI material. –Perform mock-up (-like) testing to ensure mechanical integrity and sealing are maintained up to design maximum thermal gradient.

Structural material and fabrication [Kurtz] Structural analysis and failure rates [Ghoniem/Sharafat]  Themomechanical heat treatments after fab, hip, weldSpecial emphasis will be needed for specific manufacturing processes and joining techniques such as HIPped and difusion bonded materials (presently not nuclear qualified).  Pre-service Nondestructive inspection  High temperature design rules  Selection of an appropriate ferritic steel (F82H, Eurofer, other?). This is not trivial since the U.S. will need to take advantage of databases developed in Japan and the EU.  Development of joining technology of Be to ferritic steel. (overlap)  Effects of radiation to ~3 dpa at °C on the deformation and fracture properties of structural materials.  The planned U.S./Japan 15J/16J HFIR irradiation experiment provides a good approximation of the TBM irradiation conditions (300/400°C, dpa)  Creep-fatigue interaction due to the high number of short operational pulses in ITER  Iteration with Structural Analysis Tasks/Design/Materials and Fabrication

Thermofluid MHD [Smolentsev]  Effectiveness of the FCI as electric/thermal insulator  Flow effects on corrosion rate and thermal stresses in the FCI*(coupled)  Pressure equalization on both sides of the FCI  EM forces in and around the FCI during the disruptions*  3-D flow effects on the FCI and the whole TBM functions  3-D MHD pressure drop of flow elements an flow balancing – normal and faulted conditions  Multi-channel flow effect  Design and optimization of the inlet Pb-17Li manifold  Coaxial pipe vs. two separate pipes  Thermal behavior of the TBM during the ITER cycle?* (coupled)  Effect of natural convection, turbulence, etc. on the thermal behavior of the TBM

Safety R&D [Merrill]  Tritium permeation through cooling system pipes  Inventory analysis based on tritium extraction technique  Hydrogen generation – PbLi spray experiment contact mode characterization

Tritium removal/control systems R&D [Sze/Willms]  Fundamental R&D on Tritium extraction technologies for high temperature (coupled) –Permeators Nb, Ta, Pd –Direct contact  Tritium permeation ??? what to be done (coupled to saftey)

TBM Plasma Interface [Ulrickson]  Joining Be and FS (coupled)

Pebble bed thermomechanics [Ying/Calderoni ]

Diagnostics/Instrumentation/Control [???]

Thermofluid Helium systems [Wong ]  Headers and non-isothermal flow distribution  Heat transfer coefficients

Virtual TBM [???]  Morley, Merrill, Sharafat, Smolentsev

Mockup facilities [???]

Mechanical Design [???]