Title I Coordinators’ Meeting: Guiding Students to Proficiency December 07, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discovery Education ThinkLink Assessment. Founded by Vanderbilt University Acquired in March 2006 by Discovery Education Specializes in Predictive Assessment.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Using Data to Meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Middle School Principal’s Breakout Session November 16, 2005.
Created By: Peter S. Lindquist School Psychologist Yolo County Office of Education CAN MY STUDENT TAKE THE CMA? START Exit This presentation is designed.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
District Accountability Update May February 2007.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
California Standards Test and CAHSEE Correlation Use of Student Data for Targeted Preemptive Intervention November 1, 2006 Dr. Janis Fries-Martinez, Principal.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
The DATA WISE Process and Data- Driven Dialogue Presented by: Lori DeForest (315)
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Smarter Balanced Accommodations – Knowing and Using Allowed Resources Presenters: Donna Gearns Alicia Skelly 8/20/2014.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Understandin g the API & the AYP APLUS+ Annual Conference October 2010 Del Mar, California Diane Grotjohn
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Pittsfield Public Schools September 23, 2009.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) for Middle Schools EXTENDED LEARNING PROGRAM (ELP) for Middle Schools 1.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Meeting AYP and Generating API: Preventing “Leakage”
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Reclassification of English Learners and Monitoring of RFEP Students Elementary Title III Master Plan Institute Language Acquisition Branch.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services November 21, 2014.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Response to Intervention Does it work for ELL & Poverty Children Highland Pacific Elementary School San Bernardino City Unified School District CASP March.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
K-6 Benchmark Assessment Inservices
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions
Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Name _________________________ Date _______________
Presentation transcript:

Title I Coordinators’ Meeting: Guiding Students to Proficiency December 07, 2005

Contents:  Computer Distribution Review: Three Priorities for the School Year Time Task Calendar I.Using Data to Meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) 1.How Many Do We Need? To determining the number of students schoolwide and in each subgroup that must be targeted to allow the school to meet AYP. 2.Who Are They? Identify the students who may be targeted to move to Proficiency. 3.How Can We Take Them to Proficiency? Key step is to accurately assess CST test results so a school may customize interventions and changes in classroom practice.

Using Data to Meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Title I Coordinators December 7, 2005

Purpose of the Session: 1.How Many Do We Need? To determining the number of students schoolwide and in each subgroup that must be targeted to allow the school to meet AYP. 2.Who Are They? Identify the students who may be targeted to move to Proficiency. 3.How Can We Take Them to Proficiency? Key step is to accurately assess CST test results so a school may customize interventions and changes in classroom practice.

Key to Meeting Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP): Positive Annual Gains

Goal: Move One Testing Level Per Year regardless of assessed level.

Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

#1 How Many Do We Need? Determine the number of students schoolwide and in each subgroup that must be targeted to allow the school to meet AYP.

Analysis of 2005 AYP Accountability Progress Report Individual School Reports

Work Period: Elementary/Middle Calculating #of Proficient or above to meet AMO ELA: Multiply.244 times the number of valid scores in a significant subgroup to determine how many students must be at Proficient or better to meet the AMO. Math: Multiply.265 times the number of valid scores in a significant subgroup to determine how many students must be at Proficient or better to meet the AMO

Work Period: High Schools Calculating #of Proficient or above to meet AMO ELA: Multiply.223 times the number of valid scores in a significant subgroup to determine how many students must be at Proficient or better to meet the AMO. Math: Multiply.209 times the number of valid scores in a significant subgroup to determine how many students must be at Proficient or better to meet the AMO

Work Period 5 to 10 minutes

Blank Slide

#2 Who Are They? Identify the students who may be targeted to move to Proficiency.

Figure #5- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

Who Are They? Training to Run CST data utilizing Decision Support System (DSS) All coordinators will be offered training at Fort Mc Arthur, January and February 2006 Dates for sign ups will be ed to you this month. Sub day will be provided for all in class coordinators.

Who Are They? Technical Assistance for CST Information from SIS Screen 7 Elementary SIS Secondary SIS

#3 How Do We Get Them To Proficiency? Use of Assessment Tool to customize interventions and changes in classroom practices to meet the needs indicated by the CST results

Procedure: 1. Use STAR Master List to assess individual CST Reporting Clusters by each separate grade and quintile level 2. Use the Introduction/CST Test Release Questions as a tool for assessing the summarized weaknesses to: 1. Determining the need for any tactical changes in classroom practice. 2. Better customized targeted interventions.

CST Assessment Protocol: Use STAR Master List to assess individual CST Reporting Cluster by each separate grade and quintile level: Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

CST Assessment Protocol: In each Reporting Cluster, simplify the percentage correct by rounding to the nearest single digit number. 76% is 8; 35% is 3.5; 64% is 6

CST Assessment Protocol: Record the rounded single digit representation on the CST Analysis Form under the proper Reporting Cluster for the first 10 students in the same grade and quintile level. Add all simplified scores. Divide by the total number of students recorded (10 students). Calculate score for each Recording Cluster

Work Period 5 to 10 minutes

CST Assessment Protocol: Read Test Release Questions Introduction (20 minutes) Ask the following questions in job alike groups: Which Reporting Cluster has the greatest number of questions asked on the test? The least number of questions? In reading the Introduction to the Test Release Questions, is there a Reporting Cluster which has significant influence on a student’s ability to master the other Reporting Clusters? In reading the standards within each Reporting Cluster, are there key standards which have significant influence on a student’s ability to master the other standards within that Reporting Cluster?

CST Assessment Protocol: Chart responses to the 3 questions Label top of chart with grade level

CST Assessment Protocol: Use Test Release Questions answer key and Testing Blue Prints to match questions with standards. Determine which standards are areas of need.

CST Assessment Protocol: By consensus prioritize top three needs. Chart

CST Assessment Protocol: Begin brainstorming to determine the need for any tactical changes in classroom practice. Begin with analysis of your core program implementation. Develop specific targeted interventions. Exhaust all core program resources and materials first.

Purpose of the Session: 1.How Many Do We Need? To determining the number of students schoolwide and in each subgroup that must be targeted to allow the school to meet AYP. 2.Who Are They? Identify the students who may be targeted to move to Proficiency. 3.How Can We Take Them to Proficiency? Key step is to accurately assess CST test results so a school may customize interventions and changes in classroom practice.

Wade Hayashida Title I Coordinator, Local District