Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -

Advertisements

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives

When Students Can’t Read…

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.

The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.

Personalized Learning Update. Essential Questions  What is Personalized Learning and how is it aligned to our business plan?  Where are we now?

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

Carol Franks, KDE Literacy Consultant

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.

Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

District Teacher Leaders and School Teacher Leaders Workshop April 29, 2004 Tallassee High School.

Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions

Orientation to the Physical Education K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.

Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.

What should be the basis of

performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.

ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.

Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners

Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.

1 District PLC/Curriculum Team  To provide a liaison between the PLC teams and the Admin SIPPLC team  Revise and align K-12 curriculum to.

Session Materials  Wiki

Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.

40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.

Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 7 Portfolio Assessments.

Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”

Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.

ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.

Curriculum Updates and Draft Instructional Framework I.Welcoming and Thank you… II.Implementation timeline and where we are… III.Review of the Curriculum,

FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.

CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.

Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.

CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.

Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.

Fall, 2011 Get ready, Get set………..It’s Here. PROGRAM REVIEW Wide Lens View Senate Bill 1-March 2009 Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living Career.

Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.

Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.

Program Review A systematic method of analyzing components of an instructional program, including instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum,

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.

Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.

Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.

Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.

Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.

About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School

Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.

Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.

Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.

The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.

Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.

KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.

Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.

Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.

Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.

Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.

Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.

External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.

SOL Innovation Committee

Presentation transcript:

Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up

Program Review A systematic method of analyzing components of an instructional program, including instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum, student work samples, formative and summative assessments, professional development and support services, and administrative supports and monitoring KRS (1)(i)

Goals of Program Reviews To improve teaching and learning for all students in all programs To allow equal access to all students the skills that will assist them in being productive citizens To allow students to demonstrate their understanding beyond a paper-and-pencil test

ActionTimeline Share Arts & Humanities Program Review with districts April 2009 Develop Guiding Framework for all Program Reviews Spring 2009 Disseminate Guiding Frameworks for all Program Reviews Summer 2009 Develop Program Review DraftsSummer/Fall 2009

ActionTimeline Pilot Program Reviews in a small number of districts to gather evidence and further inform the design Spring 2010 All schools have access to Program Reviews in draft form Spring 2010 Revise Program Reviews based on pilot resultsSpring 2010 Program reviews finalized; Professional Development provided to schools and districts Spring/Summer 2010 All schools/districts implement Program Reviews for new state assessment system School Year

Parameters

Other Considerations Doable Allows for diversity between schools Encourages Innovation Measureable

Standards Curriculum & Instruction Formative & Summative Assessments Professional Development & Support Services Administrative/Leadership Support & Monitoring

Guidelines Number of Demonstrators Learning Climate/Environment Administrative Support Identify Weaknesses Characteristics

The Process Establish Teams School Visits by content teams Writing Days Virtual Writing and Revisions

Arrangement Standard Demonstrator Characteristics

Highlights for Writing Promotes a whole school vision for developing students’ writing and communication skills to compete in the 21 st century world Moves expectations beyond simply writing on paper to communicating for a variety of purposes and audiences using a variety of technological modes

Highlights for Writing Emphasizes an assessment process which informs instruction and allows students to take ownership of their learning Sets the stage for whole school and on-going support through empowering teachers and administrators as instructional leaders, coaches, and collaborators

Highlights for Arts & Humanities A rigorous arts curriculum provides access to a common academic core for all students as defined by state and national standards in the arts Teachers examine and discuss student work and use this information to inform their practices

Highlights for Arts & Humanities Students’ arts assessment is based on clearly-defined standards that identify the skills and knowledge expected of students in each art form and for each arts course Creating, performing and responding attainment levels are clearly communicated to the student, evidenced in classrooms, and observable in student work

Highlights for PL/CS Opportunity to showcase innovative programming utilizing technology, project-based instruction and promoting student leadership and achievements. Emphasis on collaboration with community/business partners, parents and other academic teachers is a key component Emphasis on school leadership to support high quality instructional PL/CS programs

Highlights for PL/CS Importance of program related professional development is a key component of the professional development plan Provides an opportunity to integrate non-traditional types of assessments (e.g. technology driven projects, electronic portfolios and performance/skill based test)

Evidence Suggested, partial list

How were schools chosen? 48 schools, 34 districts Districts volunteered –Some suggested schools and programs Remaining schools randomly selected Equal distribution of: –Geography –Grade level –Locale –Achievement –(Demographics & Size)

Web Page Located under “Instructional Resources” Find drafts of the Program Review documents Dedicated address for general inquiries Will continue to be updated throughout the next few months Check back for feedback survey

Questions?????