MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #1 7-Sep-15 swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Mid Term Review The swarm E2E Consortium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© NERC All rights reserved Update on MMA, QL and AUX_OBS products Susan Macmillan, Brian Hamilton, Alan Thomson Various observations on 1st year of MMA,
Advertisements

European Repeat Station Workshop Bucharest May 2007 UK repeat station programme Tom Shanahan and Susan Macmillan.
No. 1 Characteristics of field-aligned currents derived from the Swarm constellation Hermann Lühr, Jaeheung Park, Jan Rauberg, Ingo Michaelis, Guram Kervalishvili.
Repeat station crustal biases and accuracy determined from regional field models M. Korte, E. Thébault* and M. Mandea, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (*now.
New software for the World Magnetic Model (WMM) Adam Woods (1, 2), Manoj Nair (1,2), Stefan Maus (1,2), Susan McLean (1) 1. NOAA’s National Geophysical.
Coestimating models of the large-scale internal, external, and corresponding induced Hermean magnetic fields Michael Purucker and Terence Sabaka Raytheon.
Separating internal geomagnetic secular variation and long-term magnetospheric field variations Monika Korte Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ.
The European geomagnetic secular variation and acceleration over the last four decades Mioara MANDEA Giuliana Verbanac, Monika Korte Helmholtz-Zentrum.
The Geomagnetic Field Problem The mechanism for generating the geomagnetic field remains one of the central unsolved problems in geoscience. National (U.S.)
Spatio-temporal structures of equatorial F-region plasma irregularities & Geomagnetic Regular Daily Variations (Sq, Solar quiet) as seen in space and at.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
Joint GSTM and DFG SPP Symposium, GFZ-Potsdam October 2007 ESA’s supporting Activities Related to Mass Transport in the Earth System Roger Haagmans.
J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &
V. M. Sorokin, V.M. Chmyrev, A. K. Yaschenko and M. Hayakawa Strong DC electric field formation in the ionosphere over typhoon and earthquake regions V.
Swarm Data Processing and First Scientific Results
| 9:30 am | IUGG | page 1/25Manoj et al, Evidence for short.... Evidence for short correlation lengths of the noon- time equatorial electrojet.
Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm PM1, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.
4 th Swarm QWG Meeting 2 – 5 December 2014GFZ Potsdam/D Data Selection Model Parameterization Results: Statistics, Lithospheric Field, Core Field Perspective.
Kick off meeting, swarm E2E study, nio #1 8-Sep-15 Development Approach Task 1: Industrial Module –to be used by industry for their system simulation –Output:
Icebase: A proposed suborbital survey to map geothermal heat flux under an ice sheet Michael Purucker SGT at Planetary Geodynamics Lab, Goddard Space Flight.
Secular variation in Germany from repeat station data and a recent global field model Monika Korte and Vincent Lesur Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, German Research.
Water storage variations from time-variable gravity data Andreas Güntner Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Section.
Final Presentation, Swarm E2E study, June 18, 2004, ESTEC, nio #1 1-Nov-15 Swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Final Presentation The Swarm E2E.
Introducing POMME Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth Star camera calibration Ring current field Static and annually varying external fields Internal field.
GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Mar 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Mon 31 Mar: Burger (§7.4–7.6) Last Time: Earth’s Main Magnetic Field Earth’s.
Swarm ASM-VFM meeting 9-10 Apr 2015ESTEC (NL) Ideas for improving the disturbance model or Welcome to the Null-Space! Nils Olsen, Lars Tøffner-Clausen,
1 Earth’s Magnetic Field Introduction –Earth’s structure Observations –Magnetic observatories –Satellites –Dedicated field campaigns The external field.
Gravimetry Geodesy Rotation
Recognizing and interpreting the longest wavelength lithospheric magnetic signals obscured by overlap with the core field 2004 Fall AGU: GP31A-0821 Michael.
Oceanic Magnetic Fields Robert Tyler -Planetary Geodynamics Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -Astronomy Department, University of Maryland College.
Boundary Layers & Magnetic Fields: Observations
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.
ENTRY QUIZ 1 1. What elements do we know? 2. What are they, name them? 3. Which are metals, gases, nonmetals? 4. What is next?
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Study of an Improved Comprehensive Magnetic Field Inversion Analysis for Swarm MTR, E2Eplus Study Work performed by Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Luis.
Future China Geomagnetism Satellite Mission (CGS) Aimin Du Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS 2012/11/18 Taibei.
Characterizing the magnetic fields of Mars: What do the tell us about the history of Mars? Michael Purucker, Raytheon Planetary Geodyn. Laboratory,
Earth’s Dynamic Magnetic Field: The State of the Art Comprehensive Model Terence J. Sabaka Geodynamics Branch NASA/GSFC with special thanks to Nils Olsen.
STSE Swarm + Innovation Science Study: MTR Meeting Magnetic Tidal Signals and Their Use in Mapping the Electrical Conductivity of the Lithosphere and Upper.
Sensitivity Analysis and Building Laterally-Variable Ocean Conductivity Grid 1 N. R. Schnepf (UoC/CIRES) C. Manoj (UoC/CIRES) A. V. Kuvshinov (ETHZ)
OSTST Meeting, Hobart, Australia, March 12-15, 2007 On the use of temporal gravity field models derived from GRACE for altimeter satellite orbit determination.
STSE Tides to Sense Earth, MTR 25 January 2016DTU, Lyngby/DK REPORT ON WP2X00: TIDAL SIGNAL RECOVERY USING THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) RESULTS FROM.
5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F About ESL Level 2 Processing and Data Products Some Selected Science Results Plasma depletion.
5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F PRELIMINARY NEW VERSION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE INVERSION (CI) LEVEL-2 PRODUCTS Terence.
CAS e-pop 26/27 April 2016 Montreal Swarm Level 1 and Level 2 Data Products and Processing Some Selected Science Results Models of the Earth’s magnetic.
IUGG 2015 Prague 25 June 2015IUGG-4186 SCARF: Level 2 Data Products and Processing Some Selected Science Results Plasma depletion seen in different parameters.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 30 Mar 2016
Magnetic Measurement Expert Group10-11 March 2016Warsaw / PL MAGNETOMETER – STAR-IMAGER ALIGNMENT: APPARENT EULER ANGLE VARIATION DUE TO MAGNETOSPHERIC.
The 3rd Swarm Science Meeting, June 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark
Summary of Swarm L2 and swarm science The Swarm Team
Rapid core field variations just before Swarm
Danish National Space Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
Summary of part of L2 session
The Europa Initiative for ESA’s M5 mission JEM SCIENCE PLAN
Search for Cosmic Ray Anisotropy with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station G. LA VACCA University of Milano-Bicocca.
The Swarm D NanoMagSat project Latest News
Estimating susceptibility and magnetization within the Earth’s terrestrial crust Michael Purucker (SGT at GSFC/NASA, USA) and Suzanne McEnroe (NTNU, Norway)
Nils Holzrichter, Jörg Ebbing
swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Working meeting on Task 2
OceanMag II EM-Raying the Ocean
Global crustal models for magnetic applications
SPP Colloquium, 16-Jun-2017, Bremen
New "quite time" concept: application to Champ lithospheric field modelling Nils Olsen, Jesper Gjerløv & Co.
P Kotzé (1), M Korte (2), M Mandea (2,3)
Future Opportunities in Geomagnetism and Electromagnetism:
Session 5: Higher level products (Internal)
Presentation transcript:

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #1 7-Sep-15 swarm End-To-End Mission Performance Study Mid Term Review The swarm E2E Consortium DSRI: Eigil Friis Christensen Flemming Hansen Nils Olsen Per Lundahl Thomsen Susanne Vennerstrøm IPGP: Gauthier Hulot Mioara Mandea BGS: Vincent Lesur Susan Macmillan Alan Thomson GFZ: Monika Korte Hermann Lühr Stefan Maus Christoph Reigber Patricia Ritter Martin Rother GSFC: Michael Purucker Terence Sabaka IUEM: Pascal Tarits

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #2 7-Sep-15 swarm Mid Term Review Draft Agenda Achieved Milestones Presentation of the results achieved in Task 2 –Example 1: Lithospheric Field Recovery (HL) –Example 2: Comprehensive Inversion (TJS) How to proceed in Task 3 General discussion

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #3 7-Sep-15 Achieved Milestones Task 1: Development, implementation, test and delivery of documented software modules to industry –calculation of the magnetic field and its variations for a given position and time Design of a reference model (swarm_02a_03) up to Spherical Harmonic Degree n=120 Task 2: Design, implementation and test of modules to produce synthetic data –orbit generator –magnetic field generator –electric field generator –auxiliary data

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #4 7-Sep-15 Achieved Milestones (cont.) Task 2: Development of Testplan –test quantities and procedure Successful closed-loop simulation recovery of field using data that only contain contributions from those fields –Example 1: lithospheric field (cf. presentation by Hermann Lühr) –Example 2: comprehensive inversion (cf. presentation by Terence J. Sabaka) Successful ”full inversion” noise-free data, but containing all source contributions (and thus unmodeled external signals) –Recovery of lithospheric field at least up to n=85 (cf. HL+TJS) –Recovery of high-degree secular variation at least up to n=19 (cf. TJS)

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #5 7-Sep-15 Outline of Task 2 (red boxes are part of Task 3)

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #6 7-Sep-15 Orbit Design Initial Constellation # 1 Two pairs of satellites 450 and 550 km initial altitude 86.0° and 85.4° inclination lower satellites are close together separation a few hundred km upper satellites are at antipodal position 180° separation Different inclinations yields different drift rates 0.44 min/day differential drift rate corresponding to 90° separation after 27 months

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #7 7-Sep-15 Magnetic Field Generation From the Comprehensive Model CM4 (Sabaka et al) High-degree crustal field (n up to 120) and secular variation (n up to 20) from synthetic model

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #8 7-Sep-15 Data Products: Overview

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #9 7-Sep-15 Test Plan Closed-loop-simulation: Test of the forward and inversion approaches using noise-free data –using data that only contain source fields for which we invert for Focus on field contributions that are main swarm objectives –Core field and secular variation –Lithospheric field Test quantities: Difference between recovered and original model –Power spectrum of the model SH coefficients –Degree correlation  n of coefficients –Sensitivity matrix –Global Maps (e.g., of B r ) of the model difference Results: –successful recovery of the original model using clean and noise-free data Definition: noise-free datadata without additional S/C and payload noise clean datadata that only contain source contributions that is inverted for

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #10 7-Sep-15 Various Approaches for Field Recovery Comprehensive Inversion Core Surface Field and Secular Variation - Method 1 Earth Surface Main Field and Secular Variation Lithospheric Field Recovery - Method 1 Lithospheric Field Recovery - Method 2

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #11 7-Sep-15 Example of Study Result Recovery of lithospheric field and of high-degree secular variation using data from 4 swarm satellites and 88 observatories degree correlation  n > 0.9 Achieved by Comprehensive Inversion; details will be given by T.J. Sabaka original model recovered model difference

MTR, swarm E2E study, Nov 11, 2003, DSRI Copenhagen, nio #12 7-Sep-15 How to proceed in Task 3 Adjustment of Forward Scheme –perform experiments with small-scale contributions from ionospheric and toroidal fields –perform experiments with large-scale magnetospheric field (e.g. non-periodic variations of coefficients with n>1) –induced field due to 3D conductivity (oceans, sediments and mantle) Inclusion of S/C and Payload Noise Other Constellation/Combination of Satellites –additional ”constellation #1” satellites »inversion using data from up to 4 out of, e.g., 6 satellites –new constellation: #2