‘Positively defined learning outcomes’ Harriet Barnes Standards, Quality and Enhancement 19 June 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning Outcomes in quality enhancement
Advertisements

University of Hull Centre for Lifelong Learning
How do I know that my work is PhD level? Professor Chris Park Director, The Graduate School.
1 ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT IT MEANS. 2 ORIGINS Dearing report 1997 Dearing report 1997 Proposals: Proposals: framework for qualifications and awards.
Key Capabilities in Child Care and Protection. Agenda for today Your role in embedding Key Capabilities Sharing approaches Your questions and comments.
Language Learning and Academia: Can we match their levels? Ulrike Bavendiek SCHML workshop 25 January 2008.
Delivering Planning Education Now and in the Future Ruth Richards London South Bank University.
The AEC Learning Outcomes for the 1 st, 2 nd and 3 rd cycles in music Martin Prchal European Association of Conservatoires (AEC) Trieste, 14 December 2007.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
Employer Engagement; Curriculum Refinements Carol Costley Institute for Work Based Learning.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
THE MERIT OF SANDWICH DEGREES IN COMPARISON WITH POST GRADUATE CONVERSION COURSES Michael Jayne Property Management Division Nottingham Trent University.
The European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (EQF)
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
Professor Stanley Marshall Makuza Dean, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology.
European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong learning (EQF)
Masters Level Assessment of Teaching and Learning C r e a t i v i t y without  What should we do?
Research Examiner Training Programme Examining the Thesis.
AQF cover Australian Qualifications Framework. ANZAM Institutional Members Meeting Canberra, 15 June 2012 Presented by: Di Booker Director (Policy) AQF.
Advances research methods and proposal writing Ronan Fitzpatrick School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology. September 2008.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
1 Writing Undergraduate Programme Outcomes Dr Ciara O’Farrell.
Aims, teams and working methods Presentation of the session Anna Maria Tammaro Florence, March 2005.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 Requirements for awarding a doctorate. Dublin descriptors.
Multidisciplinary Research Methods Training Professor Linda A Lawton Graduate School Leader & Director of PgCert Research Methods.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
UK Higher Education Qualifications Dr Stephen Jackson Quality Assurance Agency.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Pathways and Laddering: The Irish Model Dr Brendan J. Murphy Toronto 28 November 2011.
EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY REGIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION QUALIFCATIONS FRAMEWORK.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
PRO-EAST Workshop Rome, 9 – 11 May 2007 Promotion and Implementation of EUR-ACE Standards Two Cycles of European Engineering Education: Dublin Descriptors,
Professional Doctorates in the Built Environment: How Higher Education is Responding to the Changing Needs of Industry & the Professions Paul Chynoweth.
1 The proposed UK computing masters benchmark 5th TEMPUS JEP Meeting Belgrade April 26/27.
Supervision and post-graduate study Trade Mini-Colloquium February 5, 2015 Sonja Grater & Ernst Idsardi.
BUSINESS INFORMATICS descriptors presentation Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST) Linkoping.
Learning outcomes for BUSINESS INFORMATCIS Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST)
Learning Learning Outcomes, Qualification Frameworks, Goals, Cycles, Levels, Credit, Workload, Profiles Andy Gibbs Bishkek 2011.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Chartered Scientist Michelle Jackson BSc (hons) PhD FIScT Registrar.
INTRODUCTION TO GRADUATE STUDIES AND WRITING. Mailing List Subscription Post
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
MYP: Humanities The Criteria.
Masters Level Modules Ros Ollin School of Education and Professional Development University of Huddersfield.
Learner-Centred and Competence-Based Curricula T. N. Mitchell Čatež, December 15th 2006.
Professional Doctorates at The University of Northampton.
FYITS – Students Mktg Briefing Nov 2010 BSc (Hons) Engineering Management Nature of Course The course seeks to equip students with management knowledge.
Quality Assurance Netherlands Universities Dublin descriptors.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
MSc ADVANCED PRACTICE (HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE) A Collaboration between: Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority (as part of its Delivering the Workforce.
Slide 1 Accounting Education Requirements and Implementation of the EU Directive on Statutory Audit Wim Moleveld Education Subgroup of the Liberalization/Qualification.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Type of descri ptor Description Knowledge and understanding - Express knowledge and understanding in the field of general agriculture that builds upon.
Seminar 2: Research training and Postgraduate Supervision: Issues and current trends Dr Joseph S. Agbenyega.
Phase C.
High quality Doctoral programmes
Presenter: Sue Hackett
Masters and Doctorate – what are these?
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
Albanian Qualification Framework Warsaw – September 2016
Making use of Qualification Frameworks
Wm. Paul Meahan Melissa Barnard Andrew Wilson
Welcome to Keele University
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Learning outcomes in higher education
Validation Programme Developers
Presentation transcript:

‘Positively defined learning outcomes’ Harriet Barnes Standards, Quality and Enhancement 19 June 2015

Quality Code context

Expectation A1 In order to secure threshold academic standards, degree- awarding bodies: a)ensure that the requirements of the FHEQ/FQHEIS are met by: positioning their qualifications at the appropriate level of the relevant framework for higher education qualifications ensuring that programme learning outcomes align with the relevant qualification descriptor in the relevant framework for higher education qualifications naming qualifications in accordance with the titling conventions specified in the frameworks for higher education qualifications awarding qualifications to mark the achievement of positively defined programme learning outcomes

Review recommendations review its regulations to ensure both that exit ('concessionary') awards and ordinary/pass degrees have learning outcomes in a relevant programme specification (Institutional review, August 2012) specify learning outcomes for all interim awards where these awards are available as exit routes (HER, November 2014) ensure that level 7 exit qualifications have positively defined programme learning outcomes (HER, February 2015) ensure that intended learning outcomes for intermediate qualifications are positively defined in course specifications (HER, February 2015)

Bedfordshire’s challenge

Named exit awards have learning outcomes defined in the course documentation But no learning outcomes defined for unnamed awards such as:  CertHE and DipHE  Non-honours degree  PGCert/PGDip The theory…

Could generic learning outcomes be meaningful? ‘Lesser’ awards at the same level as the target award (eg non-honours degree, PGCert/PGDip) Awards at a lower level than the target award (eg CertHE and DipHE) Defining learning outcomes

Learning outcomes for a DipHE, using the FHEQ level 5 descriptor (Foundation Degree), FQHEIS level 8 descriptor and the SEEC level 5 descriptor Learning outcomes for non-honours degree, using the FHEQ level 6 descriptor OR PGCert and PGDip using the FHEQ level 7 descriptor Try it for yourselves…

Bedfordshire’s solution

Diplomas of Higher Education are awarded to students at the University of Bedfordshire who are able to: Demonstrate detailed knowledge and understanding of the scope of their subject area and its established theories, concepts and principles, including awareness of competing perspectives and the limitations of, and current challenges to, knowledge in the subject Apply those theories, concepts and principles to new contexts, recognising how the limitations in their knowledge influence their approach Critically analyse information and examine data for patterns, evaluating the significance and limitations of their findings Use the main methods of enquiry in the subject to collect information, comparing alternative techniques to select the appropriate method, and communicating the findings in a variety of forms appropriate to the audience and the subject area

Synthesise their knowledge to define problems, generate ideas, formulate arguments and identify and critically evaluate solutions in unfamiliar contexts Analyse their own performance and capabilities to determine their individual learning needs and how to develop their skills, using feedback from others and taking the wider needs of the context into account Take responsibility and initiative in applying knowledge and a range of skills to working with limited supervision within defined guidelines in contexts of varying complexity and predictability, interacting with others as necessary

Bachelor's degrees without honours (unclassified) are awarded to students (having achieved 120 credits at level 4 and 120 credits at level 5) who have passed at least 60 credits but less than 120 credits of the final stage of the bachelor’s degree with honours. Bachelor's degrees without honours are awarded to students at the University of Bedfordshire who have demonstrated aspects of:  a systematic understanding … etc

The PGCert is awarded to students who have successfully completed at least 60 but less than 120 credits at level 7. They are awarded to students who have demonstrated aspects of the descriptor for a master’s degree but who have not successfully completed the dissertation stage or demonstrated the increased intensity, complexity and density of study associated with remaining 120 credits of the full master's degree. The PGCert is awarded to students at the University of Bedfordshire who have demonstrated aspects of: The PGDip is awarded to students who have successfully completed the taught stage of a master’s degree, achieving 120 credits at level 7. They are awarded to students who have demonstrated aspects of the descriptor for a master’s degree but who have not completed the dissertation stage of the full master's degree and the associated intensity, complexity and density of study The PGDip is awarded to students at the University of Bedfordshire who have demonstrated:.

PGCertPGDipMaster’s Degree  a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice  understanding of techniques applicable to advanced scholarship  an understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline  conceptual understanding that enables the student:  to evaluate critically current research and advanced scholarship in the discipline  to evaluate methodologies and develop critiques of them.  a systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice  a comprehensive understanding of techniques applicable to advanced scholarship  an understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline  conceptual understanding that enables the student:  to evaluate critically current research and advanced scholarship in the discipline  to evaluate methodologies and develop critiques of them.  a systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice  a comprehensive understanding of techniques applicable to their own research or advanced scholarship  originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline  conceptual understanding that enables the student:  to evaluate critically current research and advanced scholarship in the discipline  to evaluate methodologies and develop critiques of them and, where appropriate, to propose new hypotheses.

PGCertPGDipMaster’s Degree Typically, holders of the qualification will be able to:  deal with complex issues, make sound judgements in the absence of complete data, and communicate their conclusions clearly to specialist or non-specialist audiences  demonstrate self-direction in tackling and solving problems, and act autonomously in planning and implementing tasks at a professional or equivalent level  continue to advance their knowledge and understanding, and to develop new skills to a high level. Typically, holders of the qualification will be able to:  systematically deal with complex issues, make sound judgements in the absence of complete data, and communicate their conclusions clearly to specialist and non-specialist audiences  demonstrate self-direction in tackling and solving problems, and act autonomously in planning and implementing tasks at a professional or equivalent level  continue to advance their knowledge and understanding, and to develop new skills to a high level. Typically, holders of the qualification will be able to:  deal with complex issues both systematically and creatively, make sound judgements in the absence of complete data, and communicate their conclusions clearly to specialist and non-specialist audiences  demonstrate self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems, and act autonomously in planning and implementing tasks at a professional or equivalent level  continue to advance their knowledge and understanding, and to develop new skills to a high level.

Are there other ‘exit’ awards? Where is the check made that learning outcomes have been met, as opposed to the accumulation of the requisite credit? Implementing ‘named’ awards across all courses In practice…

qaa.ac.uk +44 (0) © The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2015 Registered charity numbers and SC037786