Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Other models. A Practical Framework External Influences political context evidence links Campaigning, Lobbying Politics and Policymaking Media, Advocacy,
Advertisements

Action Research for Maximum Impact
Linking research to policy in Vietnam: how can complexity concepts help?
An introduction to ODI, RAPID and Evidence Based Policy.
Context, Evidence, & Links
Day 2. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Outline of the Workshop Day 1 General Introductions Theory - Research Policy.
Develop enthusiasm to address topic Learn in partnership Develop awareness and enthusiasm Challenge existing beliefs High General level of alignment Low.
Networks and Policy Influence in International Development Julius Court and Enrique Mendizabal RAPID Programme, ODI
Research and Policy in Development Aim for the bulls eye How to maximise the impact of development research John Young Overseas Development Institute,
Promoting Evidence-Based Development Policy DSA Conference 2004 Workshop 1.5 Speakers: John Young, Dominic Furlong, Dylan Winder & Naved Chowdhury Chair:
The Analytical Framework
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Workshop, 4 rd January 2004 Some Specific Tools Political context (Engaging Policymakers)
Implications for Think Tanks Need to be able to: –Understand the political context –Do credible research –Communicate effectively –Work with others Need.
A Practical Framework. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, An Analytical Framework The political context – political.
Tools for Policy Influence. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Practical Tools.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Advancing knowledge, shaping policy, inspiring practice
Maximising the impact of research: experience from ODI’s RAPID Programme John Young Overseas Development Institute
Sidney B. Westley East-West Center Let’s Talk about Reaching Wider Audiences with our Research Results.
PSD SECRETARIAT RESOURCE PERSON: NIYI LAWAL Medium Term Sectoral Strategies Presentation at the 2009 Stakeholders Budget Harmonization Session.
Measuring policy influence: like measuring thin air? John Young:
Monitoring and Evaluation of Influence John Young.
Pathways to Impact: Influencing practice and policy RIMC Research Capacity Enhancement Workshops Series : “Achieving Research Impact”
Mapping the Policy Process Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations Bosnia and Herzegovina Office This project is funded by the European Union.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
“Look, Listen & Learn” Promoting the use of CSOs evidence in policies for food security By Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Health Communication, Advocacy and Integrated Strategic Communication. The case of HIV/AIDS Jan Servaes Professor and Chair, Department of Communication.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Making the case: using research-based evidence for policy advocacy John Young, ODI, London BOND Advocacy and Capacity Building Group.
Making Knowledge Count Maximising the value of Research for Development John Young: ODI, London
INASP- ODI Research – Policy Symposium A practitioner´s understanding of the key factors in play to promote evidence based policy processes Av. Callao.
Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Case study 1: Dairy marketing policy in Kenya.
THE MYSTERY OF GETTING RESEARCH INTO USE… THE ONGOING MYSTERY OF GETTING RESEARCH INTO USE.
3ie Grantees Communication for Policy Influence Clinic Negombo 16 th – 18 th July 2012.
Strategies for capacity building for health systems research in LMIC: some lessons and ideas from ICDDRB HPF Hub Technical Review meeting Krishna Hort.
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Can ILRI hope to influence pro-poor policy change through research? John Young, ODI, UK Dannie.
Advocacy The practice of the European and the Hungarian Anti-Poverty Networks Kunbábony, 21 June 2011.
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 The Analytical Framework The political context – political.
Inclusive Business in Agrifood Markets: Evidence and Action FANRPAN Model – A Regional Multi-stakeholder Platform for Research, Knowledge Sharing and Policy.
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme EU Stakeholder consultation 27 March 2013 ESPON renewal, refocus and upgrade: Mission, Priority Axes, Specific Objectives,
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Simon Hearn, ODI 16 April 2010 Bern, Switzerland.
Tony Karbo, Ph.D. AHSI/UPEACE Africa Program.  Action or inaction taken by interested entities such as NGOs, Think Tanks, government departments, ministries,
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 2: Situation Analysis Lesson 3 - Political Context Analysis.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Bridging the gap between research and policy making? Ajoy Datta Foundation for the Future, Dead Sea, Jordan Civil Society Partnerships Programme
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
M&E of policy influence some guidance thoughts…. Elements of a monitoring frame.. Policy objective and theory of change Indicators Data collection tools.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
October 8 & 9 th, 2008 Conference on the Economy (COTE) University of the West Indies Programme Management Office Ministry of Planning, Housing and the.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Learning lessons from the Kampala urban agriculture policy process Process and Partnerships for.
(1) Bridging research, policy and politics the RAPID+ framework This presentation is based on: Court, J., and Young, J Bridging research and policy.
Hosted by: Funded by: Research into Reality Overcoming the challenges of knowledge exchange Foundation for the Future Research Conference 26 th – 28 th.
Linking Research, Policy and Practice Dr Niamh Gaynor IAP Director.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Influencing Policy through Research: Introduction to Principles and Tools Arnaldo Pellini:
Managing the National Communications Process UNFCCC Workshop on Exchange of Experiences and Good Practices among NAI Countries in Preparing NCs September.
Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations Regional Office This project is funded by the European Union. Advocacy and Policy Influencing KOEN.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Enrique Mendizabal.
Florita Montgomery West Virginia University Extension Allison Nichols West Virginia University Extension Teresa McCoy University of Maryland Extension.
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
Enriching Policy With Research
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach
Presentation transcript:

Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young

RAPID Power, Politics and evidence use Evidence production and communication Knowledge intermediaries and interactions

Identify the problem Commission research Analyse the results Choose the best option Establish the policy Evaluation Implement the policy Policy processes are not... 3

Monitoring and Evaluation Agenda Setting Decision Making Policy Implementation Policy Formulation Policy processes are more like... Civil Society Donors Cabinet Parliament Ministries Private Sector 4

Research plays a minor role Kate Bird et al, Fracture Points in Social Policies for Chronic Poverty Reduction, ODI WP242, 2004 ( 5

Health Care in Tanzania “The results of household disease surveys informed processes of health service reform which contributed to a 43 and 46 per cent reduction in infant mortality between 2000 and 2003 in two districts in rural Tanzania.” TEHIP Project, Tanzania:

An analytical framework The political context – political and economic structures and processes, culture, institutional pressures, incremental vs radical change etc. The evidence – credibility, the degree it challenges received wisdom, research approaches and methodology, simplicity of the message, how it is packaged etc External Influences Socio-economic and cultural influences, donor policies etc The links between policy and research communities – networks, relationships, power, trust, knowledge etc. 7

A practical framework External Influences political context evidence links Politics and Policymaking Media, Advocacy, Networking Research, learning & thinking Scientific information exchange & validation Policy analysis, & research Campaigning, Lobbying 8

Policy and social entrepreneurs Researcher StorytellerNetworker Fixer Engineer 9

To maximise impact you need to: 10 focus on the policy question ensure results are robust and credible establish the right incentives in the team establish an inclusive approach Emphasise engagement and communications produce appropriate products be ready to seize unexpected policy opportunities and move very fast

6 Steps: ROMA Start by defining your policy objectives – constantly review them during the process 11

Policy objectives 12

An iterative approach Academic research communications Develop a network or partnership Online communications Media strategy More research Policy advocacy coalition

Tools For example:  Progress Markers  Opportunities and Threats timeline  Policy Objectives  AIIM  Force Field Analysis For example:  Force Field Analysis  Theory of Change For example:  Policy entrepreneur questionnaire  SWOT  Internal performance frameworks For example:  Log Frame (flexible)  Outcome Mapping  Journals or impact logs  Internal monitoring tools Start by defining your policy objectives – constantly review them during the process For example: AIIM Stakeholder analysis Influence Mapping Social Network Analysis Force Field Analysis For example:  Publications, public relations  Media and events  Negotiation and advice  Develop a network or coalition  Research For example:  RAPID Framework  Drivers of Change  Power Analysis  SWOT  Influence Mapping  Force Field Analysis 14

Develop enthusiasm to address topic Learn in partnership Develop awareness and enthusiasm Challenge existing beliefs High General level of alignment Low High Interest in specific topic Identifying the key stakeholders AIIM Matrix 1.Identify all stakeholders 2.Map them onto the alignment / interest matrix 3.Identify who has power 4.Identify who you can influence 15

Theories of change 16 Goal (Beneficiaries) Management, inputs Project Management (Budget, HR, Organisational Practices) Purpose (Policy Influencing Objectives) Output 2 Target or audience Output 3 Target or audience Approaches or Activities 1Activities 2 Output N Actions of actors not targeted by DFID Activities A-Z from other actors Output 1 DFID Activities A-Z from other actors Strategy Objectives

Communication Tools Key Messages The Elevator Pitch Communication Strategies Policy Briefs Working with the media 17

M&E of policy change Strategy and Direction - Are you doing the right thing? – Theories of Change; Log Frames etc Management - Are you doing what you planned? – Mgt records; AFTER Action Reviews etc Outputs - Are the outputs appropriate? – Peer review etc Uptake - Is anyone taking note of them? – Logs; Citation analysis; SNA etc Impact - Is anything changing? – OM; SNA; Stories; MSC; Micro-narratives; Case Studies; Episode Studies; ROA etc 18

19

Any questions?