Stuff September 29, 2011. Attendance 0 absence = +3 EOS 1 absence = +1 EOS 2-3 absences = 0 EOS (3 people) 4-5 absences = -5 EOS 6 or more absences =

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS AN INTRODUCTION. FORCES DRIVING INDUSTRY COMPETITION.
Advertisements

Copyright ©2003 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. Slide 2-1 The Competitive Environment: Assessing Industry Attractiveness.
Industry Analysis - Porter's Five Forces
A Framework for Industry Analysis
1 The Five Forces model and competitive strategies Geoff Leese September 2005 revised September 2006, July 2007, August 2008, August 2009.
Presented By:- Dharm Jeeta Singh
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY - Dolly Dhamodiwala.
Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model.
Chapter 2 The External Environment:
Porter’s Five Forces Michael Porter
Lecture 2 External Environment Analysis & Globalisation.
Tutorial 5 Five forces and PEST analysis
Portor’s Five-Forces Analysis
Planning, Strategy and Competitive Advantage
© 2006 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.3-1 The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition and Competitor Analysis.
Robert E. Hoskisson Michael A. Hitt R. Duane Ireland
Cola Wars Key Take-aways.
from Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining
Components of the General Environment
External Analysis BUSI 7130/7136 Dr. Shook. What’s an Environment? What’s an Environment? Analyzing the Industry Analyzing the Industry v Five Forces.
©2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Conducting an Industry Analysis. Seven Questions for Industry Analysis 1. What are the industry dominant economic traits? 2. What competitive forces are.
By: Kavita, Chris, and Jake PORTER’S GENERIC STRATEGIES AND FIVE FORCES.
Chapter 2: The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition and Competitor Analysis Overview: The firm’s external environment.
Netflix and Core Competency September 20, Change in due date First team paper due 10/6, NOT 10/4 as stated in syllabus.
TM -1 The Next Economy Jason C. H. Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS Gonzaga University Spokane, WA 99258, USA
Module 7 – Strategic Planning Chapter 4. Learning Objectives LO1 LO1 Summarize the basic steps in any planning process LO2 LO2 Describe how strategic.
Define the environment in the context of business Learn the difference between the general environment and the industry Explain how PESTEL analysis is.
IT Strategic Planning.
Competitive Forces Model and Knowledge Management Jason C. H. Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS School of Business Administration Gonzaga University Spokane,
External and Internal Analyses General Environment GeneralEnvironmentGeneral Environment Sociocultural Global Technological Political/Legal Demographic.
SUNY - UB – International Collaborations Presented by Group 3.
The Strategy Environment Session 2 Business Strategy.
Ch2-1 Chapter 4: Competitor Analysis “What are they going to do?”
Business Strategy and Policy
Corporate Strategy -Kishore Kumar August Characteristics of Strategic Decisions Concerned with the scope of an organization’s activities Concerned.
ANALYSING THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT Failing to plan is planning to fail! The only constant in the modern world is change!
Recap Chapter 1 & 2. CHAPTER 1 The 3 Basic Functions of Business Organizations Operations Finance Marketing Organization.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Evaluating a Company’s External Environment.
Lecture 23 Electronic Business (MGT-485). Recap – Lecture 22 E-Business Strategy: Formulation – Internal Assessment Value Chain Analysis Linkages within.
P ORTERS F IVE F ORCES. I NTRODUCTION Devised by Harvard Professor Michael Porter The five forces analysis is a framework used by strategist’s and consultants.
Ch2-1 Chapter 2 The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis The External Environment: Opportunities,
THE EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT Chapter 2. The Organization Owners & Directors Managers Employees The Task Environment Gov’t agencies Competitors Unions Suppliers.
SWOT Analysis, Strategic Planning and Resource Gap Analysis By Abhijeet Agashe.
A Summary of Porter’s Main Points in His Article Created by Samantha Wong, Northeastern University 2009.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE UNIT – II. EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT Any organization before they begin the work of strategy formulations, it must scan the external.
INDUSTRY PROFILE of TOP INDUSTRY SECTORS IN CAMARINES SUR.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT II Porter’s five forces module.
The Porter Framework McIntire Investment Institute Presented by Michael Rosete.
Advanced Strategy Nathan Washburn Associate Professor Huntsman School of Business.
INTERNAL INDUSTRY RIVALRY
F Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section B: Key environmental influences & constraints on business & accounting B1. Political.
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
BUSINESS LEVEL STRATEGY ANALYSIS
Porter’s Five Forces Model
PORTER’S FIVE FORCES MODEL
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
Porter’s Competitive Forces dan Value chain
The External Environment: Opportunities, Threats, Industry Competition, and Competitor Analysis 1.
Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model.
The external environment
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS (Competitive analysis)
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS (Competitive analysis)
Chapter 2 The External Environment:
Strategic Management B O S.
The external environment
STRATEGIC ANALYIS OF BUSINESS
Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model.
POWER OF SUPPLIERS IS HIGH WHEN:
What affects our business from the outside?
Presentation transcript:

Stuff September 29, 2011

Attendance 0 absence = +3 EOS 1 absence = +1 EOS 2-3 absences = 0 EOS (3 people) 4-5 absences = -5 EOS 6 or more absences = -10 EOS

Participation 10 or more = = 85 7 = = = 70 (3 mistakes!) 1 = 65 0 = 55

Essays A = 95 A- = 90 B+ = 88 B = 85 B- = 80 C+ = 78 C = 75 C- = 70 D+ = 68 D = 65 D- = 60 F = 55

Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNot SureAgree Strongly Agree Our team would have better without this member This team member “carried his/her share of the load” on the project The quality of this team member’s work was always good This team member made our team stronger This team member was easy to get along with This person just didn’t put out the kind of effort our team needed

Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNot SureAgree Strongly Agree Our team would have better without this member This team member “carried his/her share of the load” on the project The quality of this team member’s work was always good This team member made our team stronger This team member was easy to get along with This person just didn’t put out the kind of effort our team needed 43210

Name of person being evaluated_____________________________ Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNot SureAgree Strongly Agree Our team would have better without this member This team member “carried his/her share of the load” on the project The quality of this team member’s work was always good This team member made our team stronger This team member was easy to get along with This person just didn’t put out the kind of effort our team needed ( ) / 6 = 2.8 ( ) / 6 = 3.0 ( ) / 5 = 1.8 ( )/3 = 2.5

Peer Appraisals Avg. AppraisalQuality Point EquivalentNumerical score 4.0A A – 3.6B – 3.2B – 2.9B – 2.6C – 2.2C – 1.7C – 1.6D D – 0.9D and belowF55

Questions?

Jane Swift….. Is she…or isn’t she??? Summary of situation Show of hands

Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) Salary basis test –Hourly pay –Salary –Salary √

Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) Salary level test –Standard test $455 per week ($23,660) –Highly compensated Total annual compensation of at least $100,000 Perform office or non-manual work Customarily and regularly perform any one or more of the exempt duties identified in the standard tests for the executive, administrative or professional exemptions

Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) Duties test –Controversial –Types of exempt employees

Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) Executive –Managing the enterprise, dept., subdivision –=> 2 full-time employees –“particular weight”

Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) Administrative –Office/non-manual work –Discretion and independent judgment when it counts

Core Competencies Article on course website Identify Netflix strategy (2 nd paper) Have to i.d. them for final project Tie them tightly directly one-to-one like- ugly-on-a-duck to specific criterion

Core Competency Particular strengths you have that others don’t Criteria It provides consumer benefits It is not easy for competitors to imitate It can be leveraged widely to many products and markets Technical/subject matter/relationships/ culture

Identify Core Competencies Identify strategic intent –Corresponds to the option your team was assigned 4 key questions to i.d. core competencies that support this strategy (which in this case, was your team’s option)

Questions How long could we dominate our business if we didn’t control this competency? What future opportunities would we lose without it? Does it provide access to multiple markets? Do customer benefits revolve it?

Core Competency Particular strengths you have that others don’t Criteria It provides consumer benefits It is not easy for competitors to imitate It can be leveraged widely to many products and markets Technical/subject matter/relationships/ culture

Industry Analysis Mean = 76 A = 6 –Shad Benn –Haley Cox –Rhonda Daughdrill –Emily Lindner –Max Moseley –Troy Reahard

Industry Analysis A/B = 49% C = 32% D = 10% F = 10%

Industry Analysis No impact on grade (this time) –Introduction Purpose Overview of what follows –Conclusion Brief –Number pages –Order of discussion My error

Industry competitors Rivalry among existing firms BuyersSuppliers Substitute products Potential entrants Threat of new entrants Bargaining power of suppliers Bargaining power of buyers Threat of substitutes PORTER’s 5 FORCES MODEL

Intensity of competitor rivalry Very high strategic stakes* Large number of firms Diversity of rivals* Slow market growth High fixed cost Short shelf-life* Low switching costs*

Intensity of competitor rivalry Types of questions –How many competitors are there? –How much market share does each competitor hold and how strong are competitor brands –How easy is it to win new customers?

Supplier power Supplier concentration* Differentiation of inputs (*?) Cost relative to total purchases Switching costs*

Supplier power Types of questions –How many suppliers are there and what mkt share do the largest suppliers hold? –How distinctive are each supplier’s products? –How easy is it for the customer to switch to another supplier?

Barriers to entry Access to inputs* Economies of scale Government policy Brand identity Switching costs* Access to distribution Expected retaliation Proprietary products

Barriers to entry What are the barriers to entry? –Knowledge, technology, distribution network, brand? How much would it cost a new entrant to enter the mkt and how quickly would this investment pay back?

Buyer power Buyer volume Buyer information Brand identity Product differentiation* Buyer concentration vs. industry Price sensitivity

Buyer power Types of questions: –How many customers are there and how many customers does a typical player have? –How much mkt share do the largest customers account for? –What alternatives do customers have?

Threat of substitutes Switching costs* Buyer inclination to substitute Price-performance trade-off of substitutes

Threat of substitutes What are substitute products and how effective are they? How easy is it for customers to switch products? NOTE – EMPHASIS IS ON PRODUCTS/SERVICES NOT COMPETITORS