Detection of 3He with SQUIDs. Experimental parameters For B=300 Gauss The expected signal is 220 fT (specific geometry is taken into account), while the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Advertisements

Lecture Notes Part 4 ET 483b Sequential Control and Data Acquisition
Magnetic shielding calculations and also Petr Volegov Andrei Matlashov Michelle Espy LANL, P-21, SQUID team Igor Savukov.
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall
SQUID NMR Measurements in nEDM experiment -- how to get a big signal & how to operate SQUIDs in High Voltage Environments Chen-Yu Liu.
Introduction The use of qNMR for purity measurement has been steadily growing in recent years. The assessment of the purity of calibration materials and.
What are we measuring with EEG and MEG James Kilner.
Lab #2: Magnetic Fields due to Currents Learn how to measure magnetic fields Verify biot-savart law/Ampere’s Law by comparing prediction and measurement.
Eric Sorte University of Utah Department of Physics Generic Long-Time Relaxation Behavior of A Nuclear Spin Lattice.
Faraday’s Law  produces an induced current Lenz’s Law: Induced current is in a direction so as to produce a B opposing the change in magnetic flux, 
Magnetism The density of a magnetic field (number of magnetic lines passing through a given surface) is the magnetic flux: Units of flux are Webers. Tesla/m.
Noise near peak field is increased Peak width narrow Peak is symmetric Purpose: Resonate nuclei to prevent polarization. Matching the resonant frequencies.
SPIN 2004 Oct. 14, 2004 W. Kim, S.S. Stepanyan, S. Woo, M. Rasulbaev, S. Jin (Kyungpook National University) S. Korea Polarization Measurements of the.
F. Cheung, A. Samarian, W. Tsang, B. James School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
1 On A Laboratory, “Magnetic Resonance” Experimental Set up This is an Animated feature Viewable ONLY with the MS PowerPoint XP Version. Other versions.
NMR Background Curve Fitting Caitlyn Meditz, on behalf of the Nuclear and Particle Physics Group. Advisor K. Slifer, E. Long Overview Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.
Fast imaging of global eigenmodes in the H-1 heliac ABSTRACT We report a study of coherent plasma instabilities in the H-1 plasma using a synchronous gated.
F.M.H. Cheung School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
A VOICE ACTIVITY DETECTOR USING THE CHI-SQUARE TEST
Magneto-Electric Test Procedure A Charge-Based Magneto- Electric Test Procedure Scott P. Chapman & Joseph T. Evans, Jr. Radiant Technologies, Inc. Aug.
The result shows that as the frequency increases, the output voltage decreases, effectively allowing only low frequencies to pass. Guitar Electronics:
INTRODUCTION In studying the relation between the electric and the magnetic field produced by the current sources of different forms there is a challenging.
Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.
A Portable Ultrasensitive SERF Atomic Magnetometer for Biomagnetic Measurements R Wyllie, 1 Z Li, 2 R Wakai, 3 N Proite, 1 P Cook, 1 T Walker 1 1 – Department.
Image, one quantity of interest is the variance: (4) which is defined as the RMS difference between the recovered susceptibilities and their actual values.
Michelle Espy SQUID NMR Signal Outline Overview of SQUIDs in EDM: present thinking - experimental design ideas - expected signal,
Comparison of Surface Coil and Automatically-tuned, Flexible Interventional Coil Imaging in a Porcine Knee R. Venook 1, B. Hargreaves 1, S. Conolly 1,
Graphic from poster by Sarah Lamb, UConn Honors Program event Frontiers in Undergraduate Research, April 2009 Collimator subtends
3 He Polarization Tests at UIUC Danielle Chandler David Howell UIUC.
SQUID Performance in a HV Environment
Low-frequency nuclear spin maser and search for atomic EDM of 129 Xe A. Yoshimi RIKEN SPIN /10/11-16 Trieste, ITALY Collaborator : K. Asahi (Professor,
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Duke nEDM Collaboration Meeting The status of 3 He Relaxation Time Measurement at ~400mK Q. Ye, D. Dutta, H. Gao, W. Zheng, X. Zhu Duke University R. Golub,
Jeff J. Orchard, M. Stella Atkins School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University Freire et al. (1) pointed out that least squares based registration.
2007/11/02nEDM BOSTON1 Dressing Field Study Pinghan Chu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign nEDM Collaboration Boston Dressed.
DOE 2/11/05 #1 EDM R&D Progress Steve Lamoreaux, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to The Department of Energy Cost & Schedule.
Brit and the Rad Lab at MIT Radiation Laboratory Series: Documented developments from the Rad Lab Volume 19 (copyright 1949): Waveforms- edited by B. Chance.
Frequency Map Analysis Workshop 4/2/2004 Peter Kuske Refinements of the non-linear lattice model for the BESSY storage ring P. Kuske Linear Lattice My.
Gravitational Experiment Below 1 Millimeter and Search for Compact Extra Dimensions Josh Long, Allison Churnside, John C. Price Department of Physics,
Ultra-low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Measurements with SQUIDs
Study of T 1 relaxation time A proposal to test T 1 using a dilution fridge and SQUID NMA at Royal Hollow University,London.
R Wyllie, R Wakai, T G Walker University of Wisconsin, Madison Spin-Exchange Relaxation Free Heart signal frequency spectrum from DC-100Hz Adult heart.
3 He R&D Plan at Los Alamos Takeyasu Ito Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Collaboration Meeting May 26, 2006 Oak Ridge, TN.
A Portable Ultrasensitive SERF Atomic Magnetometer for Biomagnetic Measurements R Wyllie, 1 Z Li, 2 R Wakai, 3 N Proite, 1 P Cook, 1 T Walker 1 1 – Department.
Run Time, Mott-Schwinger, Systematics, Run plan David Bowman NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting 10/15/2010.
Chapter 1 Science Skills. Natural Science Physical Science _______________________ ______________ Geology, Astronomy Meteorology & Oceanography __________.
Electron beams in order to sense nm-size mechanical vibrations? CERN: Marek Gasior: BBQ electronics (Andrea Boccardi: VME electronics) Juergen Pfingstner:
Derek F. Jackson Kimball. Collaboration Dmitry Budker, Arne Wickenbrock, John Blanchard, Samer Afach, Nathan Leefer, Lykourgas Bougas, Dionysis Antypas.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
Date of download: 6/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Trans-cis conformational change of the azo-dyes under light irradiation. (a) Equivalent.
Design of a High-Precision β Telescope
Ali Cafer Gurbuz, Waymond R. Scott Jr. and James H. McClellan
K. Sedlak, A. Stoykov, R. Scheuermann
Flaw recognition in presence of interferences from fasteners
Lecture 10 Biot-Savart’s Law.
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
CORRELATION BETWEEN LEAKAGE CURRENT AND NOISE
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
10.5 Fourier Transform NMR Instrumentation
The Number of Postsynaptic Currents Necessary to Produce Locomotor-Related Cyclic Information in Neurons in the Neonatal Rat Spinal Cord  Morten Raastad,
MEG fundamentals.
Knut Debus, Manfred Lindau  Biophysical Journal 
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
by I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Urbach, N. P. de Leon, S. Choi, K
by I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, E. Urbach, N. P. de Leon, S. Choi, K
Dynamics of the Transition between Open and Closed Conformations in a Calmodulin C-Terminal Domain Mutant  Johan Evenäs, Anders Malmendal, Mikael Akke 
Target Analysis for Transversity
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
R.P. Schuhmeier, B. Dietze, D. Ursu, F. Lehmann-Horn, W. Melzer 
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Presentation transcript:

Detection of 3He with SQUIDs

Experimental parameters For B=300 Gauss The expected signal is 220 fT (specific geometry is taken into account), while the sensitivity is 3 fT/Hz 1/2 SQUID pick-up 3He cell 25 mm 70 mm Bp coils He Dewar Cell is shifted, pick-up loop is 7 cm from the center, so Bp field at the pick-up loop is only 200 G, instead of 500 G in the center of Bp coil, and there is also a large gradient Which causes fast (20 s) T1 relaxation 120 mm

Taking into account the specific geometry of the cell and the experimental configuration one would expect a total input magnetic flux of 2.0e-16 Wb or ~0.1  0 that corresponds to 220 fT at the lowest two turns of the gradiometer. For this particular configuration M = 7.4e-9 H, L pickup = 1.52e-6 H, and L input = 0.42e-6 H. This corresponds to a magnetic flux at the SQUID of 7.6e-19 Wb or ~380 m  0 at the SQUID.

Input coil Pickup coil SQUID Figure Schematic diagram of experimental apparatus showing SQUID-gradiometer coupling, orientation of magnetic fields, and electronics. The actual sample was a 3He cell as described in the text and not a frog. From Matlachov et al., JMR 170 (2004)

Observation of 3He NMR 5v/nT FID ampl mV Translates into 190 fT or 1.7e-16 Wb for 48s prepolarization 2 fT floor The signal will be 10% larger for infinite prepolarization time, 209 fT extrapolating from our data. Theory predicts 220 fT at 300 G

Due to magnetic field gradients the T2* of the sample was 0.25sec. A detailed calibration of the set-up was performed with a water phantom and agreement between the measured signal and theoretically expected value was better than 5%, which gives us high confidence in our estimations. The total number of atoms in the cell was 4.5e20, or 2e19/cc. The number of polarized atoms in the cell was 0.7e14/cc. Based on these results we have sensitivity to ~0.7e14 atoms/cc with signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) of 14 in.25 sec. The proposed measurement time for the nEDM is 500 seconds, which would improve the SNR by a factor of ~45. Giving us sensitivity to ~1.5e12 polarized atoms per cc, with the same SNR. From the EDM report, there will be ~ 0.8e12 atoms/cc of polarized 3He in the cell. Based on these crude measurements, even with this simple configuration we are already within a factor of ~2 of required EDM sensitivity. Calibration tests

50.4 mm 30 mm 75 mm 175 mm 30 mm 120 mm 20 mm 39 mm 30 mm Water phantom measurement configuration Bp coil geometry

Speculation toward a more realistic nEDM design Experimental data from a 98.5 cm 2 axial gradiometer (112 mm diameter) Predicted input flux 2e-17 Wb (see nEDM proposal, page 113) Peak-to-peak amplitude of the flux at the SQUID to be 5e-20 Wb, or 25 m  0 RMS value of 8.8 m  0 Expected RMS noise at 0.5 K is 0.5 m  0 /sqrt(Hz) (see page 118 of nEDM proposal) SNR in unity band (1 s measuring time) will be ~18. Array of 8 gradiometers of 30 cm 2 Lost factor of 3 in signal due to reduced area (signal scales linearly with diameter or side size) will be compensated for by the array.

Formula V.H.4 from the nEDM proposal (page 143) states n = 0.5 m  0 /sqrt(Hz) and A = 8.8 m  0 and T m = 500 s  f 3 ~ 3 mHz. From page 143 of the proposal the required frequency sensitivity is 26 mHz. The final accurate SNR will, of course, depend on actual geometry and size of pick- up coils. One should also note that, as with the assumptions in the nEDM proposal page 143, this calculation assumes the 3He polarization does not decay significantly over the measurement period.

Measurement of T 1

Dependence of T 1 on B p coils locations When one coil is moved away, T1 shortened 2 times due to larger rel. gradients

Magnetic field non-uniformity 2-coil geometry One-coil geometry

High field 3He NMR 30 minutes 45 minutes 60 minutes Signal is not calibrated

Relaxation due to gradients Two-coil caseOne-coil case D=0.1 cm2/s for 4.2 K These are estimates, and more accurate calculations are under way

Detection fraction 1.5x10 14 atoms/cm 3 are detected with SNR 14 per 0.25 sec Or 5x10 12 with SNR 1 per 1 sec, and this constitute Relative fraction in liquid (2x10 22 cc) X=2.5x In nEDM experiment the fraction X= To detect this amount using the same detectors and geometry We need 6.25 sec In nEDM experiment geometry differs and detector can be also optimized In current 3He experiment we have 2 fT/Hz 1/2 sensitivity, However, by using larger pick up loops sensitivity can be improved To the level 0.5 fT/Hz 1/2 and better. Time of measurement is also much longer, so the fraction X= should be readily detectable

Geometry of nEDM Pick-up coil is 6 by 5 cm Pick-upFlux Wb e e e e e e e e-018 In the middle, 1 fT signal Magnetic dipoles in the 3He cell, blue color, are oriented upward Sensors, pink, are gradiometers of first order Volume magnetization is 5e-9 A/m, which corresponds to X=1E-10

SQUID sensitivity for different loops By applying simple scaling that the SQUID sensitivity improves with Square root of pick-up area, we obtain 0.84 fT/Hz^1/2 We can make a big loop instead of a number of small loops, So 6 cm dimension is replaced by 30 cm to give 0.4 fT/Hz^1/2