RESULTS Training Core Module 3 Obligation Reporting Submitting by ESF Sept 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EziLink RESULTS Training Session 1 – Show and Tell For the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations.
Advertisements

Forest Practices Code Transition Planning and Silviculture John McClarnon Regeneration Specialist MOF.
Page 1 of 12 To the ETS - Correspondence Online Training Course Welcome The Correspondence functionality is an online service that enables clients to receive.
Page 1 of 11 Lessees can submit individual Unit Values for their Production Entities if they do not want to utilize the default unit value. If no Unit.
RESULTS Amendments and Updates March 2012 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
RESULTS Training Core Module 4 Obligation Reporting Standards Unit Modifications Overview Sept 2013.
RESULTS Training Core Module 5 Obligation Reporting Standards Unit Modifications-ESF Sept 2013.
RESULTS Training Core Module 6 Obligation Reporting Standards Unit Modifications Online Sept 2013.
RESULTS Spacing Reporting December Background Spacing activity is conducted on young stands soon after free growing on pre-existing silviculture.
RESULTS Training Core Module 1 Obligation Reporting Policy and Business Context Sept 2013.
Forest Practices Code Transition Planning Ian Miller Legislation and Policy Forester, MOF.
Page 1 of 66 PNG Continuation: Validation is the process for your company to fill in and submit an Online Validation Application via ETS. You will start.
RESULTS Training Woodlot Reporting to RESULTS ESF Submission March 2013 Mei-Ching Tsoi
Page 1 of 21 This module will describe the procedure for a Metis Bid Request and how to upload the Metis supporting documentation. Welcome To the ETS –
1 Forest and Range Practices Act: Forest Stewardship Plans.
RESULTS Training Woodlot Reporting to RESULTS Online Data Entry March 2013 Mei-Ching Tsoi
RESULTS Training Woodlot Reporting to RESULTS Online Data Entry Demo March 2013 Mei-Ching Tsoi
Understanding Key Applications 1 Ministry of Forests Understanding Key Applications: An overview of application inter-connections Corporate IT Training.
Survey and Update of Backlog/NSR in the Mackenzie & Dawson Creek TSA’s Anna Monetta, RPF Silviculture Specialist - Omineca Region Ministry of Forests Lands.
RESULTS Training Forest for Tomorrow Jan Learning Objectives Documentation Guidance Opening Codes and Funding source Codes Use of New vs. Existing.
Welcome to the Manage Quality Assurance module of the “MIP Release 3 Study Workflow Training” course! This module guides you through the process of managing.
Overview of the importance of info systems Ralph Winter October 8, 2004.
Using the Forest Stewardship Plan Tracking System (FSPTS) October 2013.
Page 1 of 14 E-Bidding is mandatory for the submission of bids for Petroleum and Natural Gas (P&NG) leases and licences and for Oil Sands (OS) permits.
Spring 2006 Version 3.0 Overview Module. FTA/ESF Overview Module Introduction to the Session Welcome to the FTA/ESF Overview Training Session 1.1.
1 Ministry of Forests and Range Understanding Key Applications: The “Big Picture” of application inter-connections Sponsored by the Information Management.
SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.
RESULTS Forest Cover – Treed Retention January 2010 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
RESULTS Spacing Reporting December Background Spacing activity is conducted on young stands soon after free growing on pre-existing silviculture.
RESULTS FRPA s.108 Application November 2010 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
RESULTS Corporate Reporting System March 2012 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
Library Services CDRS Requirements Report February 9, 2001.
RESULTS – Fertilization Overview Interior 2012 Fertilization Meeting February 8 th, 2012 Prince George, BC Paul Rehsler, RPF Resource Practices Branch.
Introduction to eziLink Training For the Ministry of Forests and Sustainable Resource Management.
A1 Agenda RESULTS Training RESULTS & Mapview RESULTS & Mapview MOF Information Management Group 2005 Module 8 – RESULTS & Mapview.
RESULTS Business & CRS Overview March 2010 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
1 FRPA Quiz Show Harvesting & Roads Module FRPA Training Program February 2004.
Access Online Cardholder Transaction Approval Training 1 Client Logo.
RESULTS Training Woodlot Reporting to RESULTS Legislative Context and Submission Documentation March 2013 Mei-Ching Tsoi
Page 1 of 68 PNG Continuation – Validation: This the process to complete and submit an Online Validation Application via ETS. The process begins with the.
A1 Agenda RESULTS Training Planning Planning MOF Information Management Group 2005 Module 7 – RESULTS Generating Reports.
Streamlining Project Final Version August 2005 Cutblock Integration Team Proposals Creating a streamlined forest information management model…
Banner Fee Approval Training Shelley Johnson Trainer – Student Business Services.
1 FRPA Quiz Show Overview Module -- Break 4 FRPA Training Program February 2004.
What’s New? RESULTS Training RESULTS 3.0 What’s New? RESULTS 3.0 What’s New? MoFR Information Management Group March 2007 Module 12 – RESULTS 3.0 What’s.
RESULTS Training Carbon Offset Reporting to RESULTS Sept 2013.
Quesnel Forest District Sharing of experiences and learning's Gord Wall, Tenure Supervisor ESF Implementation Team Member.
1 FRPA Quiz Show Silviculture Module FRPA Training Program February 2004.
RESULTS Spatial Views & Business Overview November 2009 Presented by Mei-Ching Tsoi
SWIS Digital Inspections Project Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board August 22, 2008.
RESULTS Training Core Module 2 Obligation Reporting Online Entry and Mandatory ESF Conditions Sept 2013.
3 Copyright © 2010, Oracle. All rights reserved. Product Data Hub: PIM Functional Training Program Setup Workbench Fundamentals.
UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Only 1 Contract Load Notification “Fly-in” Action ( Continue to Page Down/Click on each page…) Electronic Document Access.
RESULTS: A New Integrated Tool for Forest Stewardship John Gallimore, RPF Information Management Group Ministry of Forests ESF User Meeting December 9th,
Forest Practices Code Transition Compliance & Enforcement Dan Graham Director, Compliance & Enforcement Branch MOF.
To the ETS – Metis Bid Request Online Training Course
Online Training Course
To the ETS - Correspondence Online Training Course
To the ETS – Agreement Management Online Training Course
Online Training Course
5.8 Presentation.
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
RESULTS 2.0 What’s New? Amalgamations and Forest Cover
To the ETS – Metis Bid Request Online Training Course
ETS – Air Data submission Training
To the ETS - Correspondence Online Training Course
RESULTS 3.0 What’s New? 1 MoFR Information Management Group March 2007
To the ETS – Agreement Management Online Training Course
Guide to Developing FDP Stocking Standards
Appendix 1 Existing Silviculture Prescription in effect Yes
Presentation transcript:

RESULTS Training Core Module 3 Obligation Reporting Submitting by ESF Sept 2013

Learning Objectives  Business Guidelines Business Guidelines  Guidance on Mandatory ESF Guidance on Mandatory ESF  Online or ESF Matrix Online or ESF Matrix  Technical documentation references Technical documentation references  Submission Components Submission Components  ESF Meta-dataESF Meta-data  Opening definition Opening definition  Disturbance submission Disturbance submission  Silviculture submission Silviculture submission  Forest Cover submission Forest Cover submission  Milestone submission Milestone submission  Technical Documentation-Forest Cover Submission Rules Technical Documentation-Forest Cover Submission Rules  Mandatory vs. Edit rules Mandatory vs. Edit rules  Submission Process Submission Process  Help resources Help resources

Business Guidance

Mandatory ESF

Online or ESF Matrix * Any spatial requirements must be submitted by ESF Submission ComponentESFOnline \Opening Definition Tenure & Site Plan Information YesNo Opening and Standards Unit Spatial required SU Modifications*YesConditional ESF where there is changes to Standards Unit (additions, deletions) or changes in spatial. DisturbanceYes Silviculture ActivityYes Mandatory ESF for government funded activities (FE, JS) Forest Cover *YesNo Forest Cover Spatial required MilestoneYes s.108 ApplicationNoYes

Technical Documentation References

Technical Documentation ESF Schema References Tech Specs has ESF Reference with business rules and field specific edits. Reference is by schema item.

Technical Documentation Codelists

Technical Documentation SU Modifications Cheatsheet Helps explain setup for ESF portion “A” and “V” actions with inclusion or omission of SU implies addition or removal of SUs!

ESF Submission can be set up by individual opening or can be batched for multiple openings. If new to RESULTS ESF – suggest do it individually to become familiar with process and requirements Submission Components - ESF Submission

ESF Submission Metadata  Identifies the submitter RESULTS Submission Metadata  Identifies the Licensee  Indicates Validate or not Note this info is automatically provided via BCeID for online entrie s Submission Components - ESF Submission Metadata

Submission Components - Opening Definition  Opening Key  Identifies the opening to which the submission belongs  Can be any of  Opening Number  TimberMark/Blk*  Licence/CP/Blk*  Opening ID *These keys link to FTA and bring tenure data forward to RESULTS. Must use one of these keys for the first submission.

Opening Definition –Used to: Create new openings Update existing openings Propose amendments to existing openings Propose cutblocks to amalgamate into a single opening –Identifies: Site Plan information including –Previous stand information –Standard regime (standard id) –Governing tenure –Spatial location opening/SUs Key Links: FTA for Tenure Data Data shipped to GeoBC Submission Components - Opening Definition

 Opening Definition – 3 components  Opening data  Tenure data  SU data Submission Components - Opening Definition Action Codes I – Insert (New openings) U – Update A – Amendments M – Minor Amendments V – Approved Variations O – Opening Amalgamation

SU Requirement & Role of Site Plan Exempt Ind All New Openings via ESF must have at least ONE Standards Unit in the Opening Definition Rst: sitePlanExempt is an indicator used by RESULTS to determine if Standards Unit is: a silviculture prescription “Y” – full stocking standards provided ; OR a site plan “N” – an approved standards regime ID authorized by submitter is provided.

 Opening Definition – 3 components  Opening data  Tenure data  SU data Submission Components - Opening Definition RESULTS allow multi-cutblock openings. Prime Licence Indicator is set to true if only one cutblock is assigned to one opening. If there is a requirement to have more than one cutblock associated with an opening, one must be true, all other cutblocks must be False (non-prime).

Submission Components - Opening Definition  Opening Definition – 3 components  Opening data  Tenure data  SU data Spatial data for Standard Units is required Standards Regime must be approved for use for submitting client and org unit unless Ministry default. Key Links: FTA validation GeoBC Derives FSP ID if Standard Regime ID exists in FSPTS

Submission Components - Opening Definition Spatial data for Standard Units is required  Opening Definition – 3 components  Opening data  Tenure data  SU data  Spatial Data

Submission Components - Opening Definition Example spatial information for an Opening Definition Opening Boundary SU Boundary

Submission Components - Opening Definition Example spatial information for an Opening Definition Opening Boundary SU Boundary

Submission Components - Disturbance Submission  Used to:  Create new Disturbances (“I”- Insert)  Update existing Disturbances (“U”- Update)  Identifies:  Disturbance code  Silviculture System  Harvest Start and Complete Dates  Area disturbed  Disturbance Activity Map is optional  Key Links  Updates FTA for Harvest Area, Dates, and cutblock status,  GeoBC  Used as trigger for VRIMS to indicate depletion

Submission Components - Disturbance Submission Multiple Disturbance Submissions per opening are required where there is more than one tenure governing an opening, and/or there are different silviculture systems within the same opening

Submission Components - Disturbance Submission Gross area – NPNAT - Undisturbed Reserves = Disturbance Area Newly created roads are included in the disturbance area

Submission Components - Disturbance Submission Gross area – NPNAT - Undisturbed Reserves = Disturbance Area Newly created roads are included in the disturbance area

Submission Components - Silviculture Activity Submission  Used to:  Create new Activities (“I”-Insert)  Update existing Activities (“U”-Update)  Identifies:  Silviculture Treatments  Treatment Date  Area treated  Spatial Location*  * Silviculture Activity Map is optional (unless specified in RISS)  Key Links  GeoBC  SPAR (species and seedlot validation)

Submission Components - Silviculture Activity Submission  Silviculture Activities  Site prep  Planting  Brushing  Juvenile spacing  Fertilization  Pruning actDateIndicator True – completed activity False – planned activity

Submission Components - Silviculture Activity Submission  Planting Activity  Requires additional information associated with the planted trees  Seedlot Number is validated against SPAR to confirm Seedlot number exists and species matches seedlot number

Submission Components - Forest Cover Submission  Forest Cover – 4 main data components  Polygon Data  Layer Data  Tree Species  Damage Agent  NonMappable Component  Spatial Forest Cover Submission can occur only when a Disturbance Report exists in the ESF submission or if it exists for the opening. *Spatial data for forest cover polygons is required If submitting for reserve, important to understand Treed Retention Reporting requirements:

Submission Components - Forest Cover Submission  Forest Cover – 4 main data components  Polygon Data  Layer Data  Tree Species  Damage Agent  NonMappable Component  Spatial Forest Cover is a complete replacement. Forest Cover Submission must be submitted for the entire opening even if only a partial of the opening has underwent forest cover change. Partial forest cover is not allowed and will create spatial data gaps!

Submission Components - Forest Cover Submission  Forest Cover – 4 main data components  Polygon Data  Layer Data  Tree Species  Damage Agent  NonMappable Component  Spatial Forest Cover is a complete replacement. Forest Cover Submission must be submitted for the entire opening even if only a partial of the opening has underwent forest cover change. Partial forest cover is not allowed and will create spatial data gaps!

Polygon Descripti on Standards Unit Area (ha) ACutover110.0 BMature35.0 CNP UNN5.0 Submission Components - Forest Cover Submission

PolygonDescription Standards Unit Area (ha) AClearcut130.0 BSeedtree220.0 CReserves10.0 DNP UNN3.0 PolygonDescription Standards Unit Area (ha) AVariable Retention BNP UNN5.0 C Submission Components - Forest Cover Submission

Submission Components - Forest Cover Submission  Forest Cover contains many validation rules and inter-data dependencies to ensure data completeness where expected.  Mandatory requirements are explained in the RISS-ls and also in the ESF technical specifications.

Submission Components - Milestone  Milestone Declaration  StandardsUnit ID  Milestone Type  Declaration Date  Comment (optional) but useful for reference of RFP performing declaration, s.97.1, s.108 relief of obligation, or any useful notes pertaining to declaration  Note that free growing forest cover must be submitted prior to free growing declaration (not system’s enforced but required by legislation)

Mandatory legal requirement vs. Edit Checks RESULTS Information Submission Specification document provides information on mandatory data requirements. RESULTS will provide some rudimentary system’s checks for data quality and data dependencies but cannot check for all legal requirements due to complexity and requirement for interpretation. It is responsibility of the submitter to ensure that the data submitted is consistent with legal requirements. Any system’s edit checks are described in the RESULTS Technical Specifications webpage.

Submission Process Must specify Submission Type: Opening Submission Vendor product s often have integrated ESF submission to RESULTS ESF. This step may not be required

Submission Process

Must specify Submission Type: Opening Submission Confirmation of Pending, Acceptance, or Rejection Ability to reference XML submitted and any submission errors if rejected.

Help Resources E-Stand Enhancement