Mod 334 - for Discussion on 7 th January 2011 Draft Outline of Potential Refinements to the User Pays Modification Process Action RG0334 007 Based on discussions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Nexus Next Steps Xoserve/Large GT View – 6 December 2011.
Advertisements

Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.
Senior Stakeholder Forum 04/02/2014. Agenda UK-Link Programme Update –Including Data Cleansing Update Nexus Modification Update Faster Switching EU Reform.
UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services Progress Report for Ofgem 5 th December 2006.
UNC Modification Proposal Daily Metered Elective Action 005: User Pays Proposal Simon Trivella – 4 th November 2008 Development Work Group 0224.
Lessons Learned Process – A Strawman.  Lessons Learned  “To pass on any lessons that can be usefully applied to other projects”  “The data in the report.
UNC Modification 0213 – User Pays Governance Arrangements Simon Trivella – 19 th June 2008 Governance Workstream.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
STEP 4 Manage Delivery. Role of Project Manager At this stage, you as a project manager should clearly understand why you are doing this project. Also.
ROM and DCA. Scene setting Our house Our aspiration for our house Our project manager Us.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
Project Nexus : Funding Arrangements Joel Martin - 30 April 2009.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2014/15 15 th May 2013.
User Pays User Group 8th December Agenda  Customer voting arrangements  UPUC & UPCEG ToRs  Funding change  Contract refinements register  Future.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Development Modification Proposal: Introduction of an Inter-day Linepack Product Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Update to Members Analysis Team Update on current activities for comment List of proposed new project ideas Opportunity for Members to suggest new projects.
DSC Change Committee UK Link Future Releases Proposed Approach
Supply Point Enquiry Service
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement - Update
DSC ChMC CSS update 13th June 2018
UNC Trader User – Licence obligations
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Assignment Workshop 2 16th September 09, Solihull.
DSC ChMC CSS update 7th November 2018
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
XRN 4695 Supporting Document High Level Plan
UK Link Programme and ‘Nexus’ UNC Modifications
CSS Update for CoMC 19th September 2018
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
DSC ChMC CSS update 6th July 2018
UK Link Programme Engagement Forum
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 16th January 2014
Chris Warner UNC Modification Panel 21 December 2017
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Change Proposals Capture to Delivery
Topic raised at July 2009 Distribution Workstream
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Lessons Learned Process – A Strawman
Release 3 Scope Selection and Plans
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
UIG Task Force Progress Report
DSC ChMC CSS update 12th September 2018
Assignment of NTS Entry Capacity – Work currently being Undertaken
Assignment of NTS Entry Capacity – Previous Work Undertaken
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Data Office POAP July/August 2019
Capacity Access Review
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Presentation transcript:

Mod for Discussion on 7 th January 2011 Draft Outline of Potential Refinements to the User Pays Modification Process Action RG Based on discussions at 334 work stream on 15 th December 2010

2 Key Points Raised at 334 on 15 th Dec 2010  Proposer engages with xoserve ahead of any Mod being raised to share proposal and discuss options – establish what problem we are trying to resolve  Early view on scale of costs and potential delivery timescale  Aim is to give an early high level assessment to customers so they can assess whether to carry on with the proposal or not  Standard set of questions to be addressed early on  Give an early indication of what, if any, the potential constraints on the proposal may be  Consider alternative and make all customers aware  xoserve to flag up if alternative approaches exist  Discussions between proposer and/or any customers outside of meetings regarding alternatives to be shared with all customers  Customers to have a view of overall industry change programme for centralised systems so Mods can be prioritised  At the ROM stage an overview of the system/process impacts of the proposed change would be useful – schematic view preferred

3 Potential Improvements to the User Pays Modification Process 1.Proposer to talk to xoserve ahead of the Mod being raised. Standard set of questions worked through with proposer 2.Mod raised with consideration of centralised systems 3.Mod review by Panel and assigned 4.xoserve provides High Level Cost and Timescale Assessment Matrix*. Matrix reviewed at appropriate forum. Forum (work stream or UNCC) considers Mod’s priority against all Mod activity on central systems 5.Customers (Shippers and GTs) work up proposal and business rules with xoserve. Understanding of customer demand for service established *Could be done at stage 1

4 Dovetailing into the Current Process 6.A ROM can be requested and/or DCA commissioned following stage 5. An industry steer will be sort on how best to progress after customers have had the opportunity to review/discuss ROM/DCA. 7.If Mod proceeds it goes to Panel for final approval 8.Mod and ACS then go to Ofgem 9.Once approved by Ofgem system project work can commence

5 High Level Cost and Timescale Assessment Matrix  The matrix represents a very high level assessment  It will come out before the service is fully defined  No analysis or investigation work will have been undertaken – it is a ‘finger in the air’ assessment based on xoserve’s experience  It is designed to give the proposer and other customers a view from which they can decide early on in the Mod process whether to proceed (or not) based on potential costs and timescale vs. their internal business case 12 mths plus Six to 12 mths Less than 6 mths Less than £100k £101k to £500k £501k to £1m£1m plus Potential Timescale Once project starts Cost estimate Estimate Matrix