Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Presentation to Utility Districts April 8-9, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Center for Houstons Future? Energy Corridor District.
Advertisements

Consultant: In association with: ETC Institute Leisure Vision Nationally Recognized….Uniquely Local A Presentation for the Citizens Capital Budget Advisory.
February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:
January 25, 2011 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Sustainable Housing and Communities Lessons Learned from the Inaugural Regional.
REGIONAL PLAN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT September 18, 2012 A Sustainable Rhode Island.
East Central Florida HUD Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Project “Transit as an Economic Catalyst” $2.4 Million Awarded to the East Central.
Equitable Transit Oriented Development the Denver perspective.
Vision North Texas Presentation by Karen Walz FAICP.
1 Resilient Investment in San Francisco San Francisco - Investing in Resilience May 21, 2013 Presentation to UNISDR Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction.
Greater Southeast Management District 19,400 acres (30.3 SM) OST Almeda TIRZ 1,215 acres (1.89 SM) Museum Park Super Neighborhood 359 acres (0.56 SM) How.
Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program Pre-Nomination Study for the Town of Erwin Village of Painted Post and Village of Riverside.
Washtenaw County Office of Community Development Urban County Needs Assessment Public Hearing December 18th, 2007 Library Learning Resource Center.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Orange County Board of Commissioners Request for Funding Wednesday, July 23, 2008 Shelley Lauten Director, myregion.org.
East Central Florida Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Grant Affordable Housing Group Bill O’Dell Shimberg Center for Housing Studies 7 April 2014.
A Unique Bi-State Partnership to Improve Jobs, Housing and Transportation NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES Mt Vernon City Hall February 15,
July 15, 2011 NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESSES Citizens Capital Budget Advisory Committee Presentation November 1,
Office of Strategic Planning ANNUAL ACTION PLAN: ONE YEAR USE OF FUNDS PROGRAM YEAR November 19, 2007 Northwest Community Center 155 Lawn Ave.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Education and Engagement Template Round One. A Greater Baltimore Region Involving community residents in the Opportunity Collaborative.
Eccles Housing Market Report Community Committee Meeting 25 th January 2005 Shahla Zandi Strategy and Planning (Partnerships and Planning)
Where the Home Is Matters Planning for Healthy and Equitable Communities Julie West, MPH Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Public Health – Seattle & King County May.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Implementation of the HUD/DOT/EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities in EPA Region 5 Stephanie Cwik US EPA Region 5 Community and Land Revitalization.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
ECIA A Regional Response to Local Needs CHANDRA RAVADA Director of Transportation Introducing Long Range Transportation Plan.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Parklands Development Agreement. SUBJECT SITE Approved Specific Plan, Annexation, General Plan Amendments & EIR Approved Affordable Housing as part of.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Roger Jacobs Field Office Director Sioux Falls Field Office 4301 West 57 th St., Suite 101 Sioux Falls,
WEDNESDAY MARCH 17, 2010 NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD Sustainable Communities Planning Grant Opportunity for Metropolitan Washington.
Infrastructure planning Sustainable Development Partnership 21 April 2009 Sustainable Development Partnership work programme discussion Designing the social,
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
VALUES WORKSHOP Anne Arundel County | April 26, 2010.
Project Overview for Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission Transportation Advisory Committee January 16, 2013 Aaron Brown HUD ECV Transportation.
© 2007 PMP. All rights reserved. Wednesday 18 th July South Northamptonshire Council Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study and Green Space Strategy.
Planning for the Waller Creek District Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce Delegation April 4, 2013.
Pine Hills Business Redevelopment Task Force Interim Report Board of County Commissioners August 31, 2010.
SR 436 / SR 50 Area Redevelopment Plan Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners February 24, 2009.
Subregional Planning Initiative (SPI) Project Fact Sheet – East Port Area Plan – February 2010 What is the purpose of the SPI Initiative? The SPI Program.
Steps to Creating a Comprehensive Plan  PHASE 1: Where are we? Research & Analysis of Existing Conditions  PHASE 2: Where do we want to be? Creating.
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
AGING & DISABILITY SERVICES DRAFT AREA PLAN ON AGING Presentation to Seattle Planning Commission September 10, 2015 Maureen Linehan, Director.
Subregional Planning Initiative (SPI) Project Fact Sheet – East Port Area Plan What is the purpose of the SPI initiative? The SPI Program will provide.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
DOWNTOWN MOVES TRANSFORMING OTTAWA’S STREETS
Presentation title | Date. Who We Are Building a Healthier Heartland (BHH)  Super-coalition of local and national partners that promotes policy, systems.
COG Activity Center Update Climate, Energy, & Environment Policy Committee May 23 rd, 2012.
COG 2020 Central Ohio Greenways COG Board.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
DRAFT INNER MELBOURNE ACTION PLAN Presented by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer January 2016.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
Orchard Park State College neighborhood plan SWOT analysis meetings pm State College Planning Commission South Hills Business School.
Planning Commission Meeting July 30, Presentation Outline  Project Purpose, Background and Schedule  Overview of Community Input  Overview of.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
New Hanover County Comprehensive Plan Progress Report New Hanover County Board of Commissioners Planning & Inspections DepartmentJune 12, 2014 Chris O’Keefe.
What the Bayou Greenway Initiative Does…
Vallamont Nittany Hills East Penfield
Options for TDR in Puyallup
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Housing Policy Meeting
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Presentation to Utility Districts April 8-9, 2013

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Part of Houston-Galveston Area Council’s Regional Plan for Sustainable Development One of six case studies Case Study local sponsor: Houston Parks Board Consultant team: – CDS Market Research – Marsh Darcy Partners Case Study: What and Why?

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Bayou Greenways Initiative – City of Houston greenways – federal grant and City resources – Spring Creek – adopted by Harris and Montgomery counties – Cypress Creek: no designated public entity or funding source Case Study: What and Why?

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study HUD Six Livability Principles 1. Provide more transportation choices. 2. Promote equitable, affordable housing. 3. Enhance economic competitiveness. 4. Support existing communities. 5. Coordinate policies and leverage investment. 6. Value communities and neighborhoods.

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Bayou Greenway Initiative

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Cypress Creek Corridor

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Case Study: What and Why? Case Study purpose: develop basis for continuing further discussion to move Cypress Creek Greenway forward Dialogue with: – Residents – Commercial property / business owners – Government entities such as utility districts – Other community groups Produce demonstrations of commitment

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Fractured Governance Three County Commissioner Precincts

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Fractured Governance 68+ Utility Districts

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Governance Harris County – Three commissioner precincts – Flood Control District 68+ utility districts – Some have lost assessed value since 2002 – At least 38 with Special Partnership Agreements (SPAs) – Some have issued park bonds

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Work to Date Demographic and economic research Greenway Benefits Model Public outreach

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Demographic and Economic Characteristics Area Population Growth 2000 Census2010 CensusDifference RegionCount Change% Change East Region70,24095,62125, % Central Region70,87583,04212, % West Region25,57059,43433, % Total Area166,685238,09771, %

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Population Trends Continued population growth Fast-growing population of seniors Rapid diversification of ethnicities Wide range of income levels

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Property Valuation Trends – All Property Types Count (by Parcel) Assessed Value Change Whole AreaEastCentralWest Less than -50%1, % to -25%10,2018, % to -10%25,43011,5209,7484, % to 10%41,3269,56815,80115,957 10% to 25%1, % to 50% Greater than 50%4,4211, ,191 Share Assessed Value Change Whole AreaEastCentralWest Less than -50%1.8%2.8%0.9%1.6% -50% to -25%11.9%26.0%3.4%3.0% -25% to -10%29.7%35.3%34.3%17.0% -10% to 10%48.3%29.3%55.5%65.2% 10% to 25%2.0%1.4%2.1%2.6% 25% to 50%1.1%0.8%1.0%1.7% Greater than 50%5.2%4.4%2.8%8.9% Source: HCAD

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Valuing of Parks and Linear Greenspace

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Linear Parks and Trails are Cool But Do They have an ROI? So if a community invests in the design and construction of new trails and acres of parkland what will they get in return? Or said another way… “What is the ROI of that cool Green Infrastructure?” Buffalo Bayou Partnership Buffalo and Beyond Master Plan, 2002, prepared by Thompson Design Group

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Cypress Creek User Map

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Estimated Benefits Recreation Benefits$7,978,137 Health Benefits$2,053,961 Vehicle Operating Cost Savings / Congestion Relief$561,061 Crash Reduction$38,254 Air Quality: VOC, NOx, CO 2 $19,198 Carbon Sequestration$114 EcoSystem Services$2,717,223 Property Value$2,966,092 Estimated Annual Total (Moderate)$16,334,041 Total Number of Individuals Living Within 1.5 Mile Buffers: 208,913 The following projections are preliminary and will be refined in response to comments from Stakeholders and project participants.

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study The Greenways’ Bottom Line

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Public Outreach Stakeholder Advisory Group Small-group meetings Facebook page Online survey Public open houses

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Active Users – March 5 Health / Medical – March 8 Education – March 19 Real Estate – March 20 Business – March 21 & 22 Small Group Stakeholder Meetings

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Small Group Stakeholder Meetings Broad and enthusiastic support the Cypress Creek Greenway concept Varying priorities (health, strengthening community, economic competitiveness, revitalization) but widely viewed as a key asset Comments that benefits analysis too conservative Encourage pursuit of diverse array of funding sources County viewed as key player; existing entities working in partnership

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study March 19 – West Saint Aidan's Episcopal Church; 7 attendees March 21 – Central Cypress Creek Christian Church; 31 attendees March 26 – East Mercer Arboretum & Botanic Gardens; 42 attendees Open House Meetings

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Questions for the Community Do you support the Cypress Creek Greenway concept? Why or why not? What key features and amenities need to be part of the Greenway? What are the high-priority and high-opportunity locations along Cypress Creek to focus efforts in the near term? What are acceptable ways to fund the Greenway project? Who should eventually manage the project?

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Interim Survey Results 4/4/13 Over 400 completed surveys Average benefits ratings (-2 to +2): – Health1.64 – Economic1.21 – Recreation1.71 – Transportation1.12 – Flooding / erosion1.41 – Environment / open space1.57

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Interim Survey Results 4/4/13 Concern ratings (-2 to +2): – Maintenance0.23 – Security0.39 – Funding0.67 – Organization / oversight0.64 Activities: – Biking, walking – Other: running, off-road biking, disc golf, kayaking

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Interim Survey Results 4/4/13 Strongly agree: – The Greenway would benefit residents and businesses in Northwest Harris County. – 76.6% – Implementing the Greenway should be a high priority. – 68.2% – I would want the Greenway to connect to my neighborhood. – 70.0%

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Interim Survey Results 4/4/13 Most desired features: – Trash cans59.3% – Restrooms56.3% – Directional signs / maps47.9% – Connections to neighborhoods44.4% – User parking40.9% 74.1% very supportive of continuing discussions 61.6% willing to get involved

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Utility District Outreach Group meetings April 8 and 9, 7:00 – 8:15 p.m. Over 56 districts contacted Seeking approval from boards of directors – Sample resolution drafted – Ideal result: secure commitment to move Greenway segments and connections forward

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Questions and Discussion Willingness to support concept Willingness to work with adjacent districts / property owners Willingness to contribute funding Board action?

Cypress Creek Greenway Case Study Presentation to Utility Districts April 8-9, 2013