NATA Foundation Position Statement Process a.Ideas are solicited year-round i.Ideas are accepted through the NATA Foundation website

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Advertisements

Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.
1. 2 Anyone can suggest an idea for a law. Only Members of Congress can introduce a proposed law to the House or Senate. 3.
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” EVALUATION.
Cleveland State University ESC 720 Research Communications Dissertation Proposals Dan Simon 1.
1/28 Proposals Dr. Thomas L. Warren, Professor Technical Writing Program Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078
1 Proposal Defining The Purpose Preparation Components of Proposals.
Technical Writing II Acknowledgement: –This lecture notes are based on many on-line documents. –I would like to thank these authors who make the documents.
Student Research Conference 2011 Submitting a Research Conference Proposal.
In the name of ALLAH the most beneficent and the most merciful
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
NATA Foundation Deloss Brubaker, EdD, ATC Undergraduate Student Writing Contest (USWC) Process The NATA/NATA Foundation Undergraduate Student Writing Contest.
A research proposal is a document written by a researcher that provides a detailed description of the proposed program. It is like an outline of the entire.
The Dissertation Process
OSIAM4HE Proposed org structure Authored by the strategy and organization team.
 needs to be met  existing resources  content outline  contributor team  contract details  timeline.
CHE 165 Plant Design Introduction. Greensheet Review  Target is Study –Reported Verbally and in Text –Consists of Various Components  Most are submitted.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines: Consensus Conference (CC) SOP Edited by EDC-SC September 2013.
3rd WG meeting, Brussels Proposed Plan for Governance of the Washington Group Prepared by: Jennifer Madans, Barbara Altman, Beth Rasch (USA); Renée Langlois.
Author Instructions How to upload Abstracts and Sessions to the Paper Management System.
Author Instructions How to upload Single Abstract to the paper management system.
The Story of your ORS Abstract Before submitting, check that you have : Correct Title, Authors, Institution(s), Keywords Introduction, Methods, Results,
IEEE-SA myBallot TM myBallot ™ IEEE Standards Association New Electronic Balloting System Sponsor Tools.
Networking the World TM IEEE: Networking the World.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
FEALAC Website (ECO/2007/12). FEALACMeetings FEALAC Meetings This is a chart of FEALAC Meetings at all levels. If you click each icon, you will see a.
MA Thesis/Papers-In-Lieu Overview and Process. Thesis: What is it?  A thesis is a scholarly manuscript that reports on a significant in-depth investigation.
1 Business Communication Process and Product Brief Canadian Edition, Mary Ellen Guffey Kathleen Rhodes Patricia Rogin (c) 2003 Nelson, a division of Thomson.
1. 2 Who can propose a law? Anyone can suggest an idea for a law. However, only a Member of Congress can take a proposed law to the House of Representatives.
1. 2 Who can propose a law? Anyone can suggest an idea for a law. However, –Only Members of Congress can take a proposed law to the House of Representatives.
FOR 500 The Publication Process Karl Williard & John Groninger.
Phoenix Campus Faculty Refresher Training. This workshop will provide faculty with updated knowledge and tools necessary to be effective in the classroom.
©2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
ECE791 Senior Design Experience Project Requirements and Timeline.
Page © ASME 2015 Module B – Process B4.Initiating and Terminating Standards Projects Standards and Certification Training.
Science & Engineering Research Support soCiety Guest Editor Guidelines for Special Issue 1. Quality  Papers must be double -blind.
RESEARCH PROJECT Everything you need to know, but are afraid to ask!
User Guide Enhanced Knowledge Hub. 2 Note Accessing Knowledge Hub 1 2 Access K-Hub by selecting: 1.Knowledge Hub tab, OR 2.Knowledge Hub under My Communities.
Middle School Grading Policy GoTo Meeting JUNE 4, :15-4:45 P.M.
1. 2 Who can propose a law? Anyone can suggest an idea for a law. However, only a Member of Congress can take a proposed law to the House of Representatives.
1. 2 Who can propose a law? Anyone can suggest an idea for a law. However, only a Member of Congress can take a proposed law to the House of Representatives.
Doc.: /0036r0 SubmissionSlide 1 11/03/2016 Slide 1 IEEE White Space Radio Opening Report Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
HOW TO WRITE A PAPER FOR PUBLICATION IN A SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL.
Prepared by /Dr.Amira Yahia.. Introduction  Research proposals are an integral part of most studies, and are typically prepared after a researcher has.
Get best technical writing from experts. About Us We are technicalwritingservices.biz providing you all sort of help required in writing technical things.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Rotary Club Grants Module ClubRunner Rotary District 5520 Dominic J. Bernardi Jr. Grants Committee Chair Rotary Club Grants Module.
PSYCH 500 Week 3 Individual Outline for week 6 Paper Prepare a two-page outline of your topic of choice for the paper due in Week Six. Your outline should.
February 28 Assignments HW #8, 9, and 10 assigned Implementation plan
WHAT IS SYNOPSIS? Is a short summary/ abstract
September Session Chair’s Supplementary Material
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
* 07/16/96 *.
Space 2017 Abstract Writing Course
Journal of Tissue Viability & Journal of Clinical Biomechanics Award 2019 Call for papers! The EPUAP Scientific Committee is pleased to invite applications.
NATA Foundation Building Blocks Process
Blockchain hackathon Registration & team formation guide.
Blockchain hackathon Registration & team formation guide.
September Session Chair’s Supplementary Material
Book Of Choice Final Report
* 07/16/96 How a Bill Becomes a Law *.
* 07/16/96 *.
Student Research Conference 2019
July Session Chair’s Supplementary Material
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Accreditation: Working towards the self-study
After this meeting… Voting period begins
* 07/16/96 How a Bill Becomes a Law *.
Presentation transcript:

NATA Foundation Position Statement Process a.Ideas are solicited year-round i.Ideas are accepted through the NATA Foundation website pronouncements-committee pronouncements-committee ii.Ideas may be submitted directly to the PC through or other forms of communication a.Ideas are solicited year-round i.Ideas are accepted through the NATA Foundation website pronouncements-committee pronouncements-committee ii.Ideas may be submitted directly to the PC through or other forms of communication Solicit Idea (Year 1) b.Those submitting ideas for PSs are asked to include a 1-page proposal outlining ideas for recommendations & content. Included should be the key references which will support major recommendations. c.PC will ideas during June meeting, choosing 1-3 ideas for development. The review process includes the following questions: i.Will the idea result in a good PS for ATs? ii.Is there sufficient literature to support the PS? iii.Is there an AT who is an expert in the area & who can lead the writing group? c.PC will ideas during June meeting, choosing 1-3 ideas for development. The review process includes the following questions: i.Will the idea result in a good PS for ATs? ii.Is there sufficient literature to support the PS? iii.Is there an AT who is an expert in the area & who can lead the writing group? Author & Writing Group Selection (Year 1) 1

NATA Foundation Position Statement Process Author & Writing Group Selection (Year 1) a.Lead author (AT) invited by the PC b.Author packet sent to lead author c.PC liaison & subcommittee (2 additional members) assigned to PS by PC chair d.Lead author submits writing group members to PC for approval i.All COI and other forms (Authorship contribution form, Author contract, Conflict of Interest form) are submitted ii.Writing group should include 5-8 members iii.Writing group should include the following: 1.International experts in the area of topic 2.Practicing ATs in the area of topic 3.Practicing MDs/DOs in the area of the topic 4.Other healthcare professionals relevant to the topic d.Lead author submits writing group members to PC for approval i.All COI and other forms (Authorship contribution form, Author contract, Conflict of Interest form) are submitted ii.Writing group should include 5-8 members iii.Writing group should include the following: 1.International experts in the area of topic 2.Practicing ATs in the area of topic 3.Practicing MDs/DOs in the area of the topic 4.Other healthcare professionals relevant to the topic f.Writing group has 1 year to submit reviewable draft to PC Writing (Year 2) e.PC approves writing team no later than June meeting 2

NATA Foundation Position Statement Process Writing (Year 2) a.The lead author may choose how to lead the writing group b.The PC liaison will follow-up on a regular basis with the lead author c.A finished, reviewable draft will be submitted to the PC subcommittee i.The authors guide provides detailed information about the format & structure of the PC ii.The SORT should be applied to all recommendations in this draft c.A finished, reviewable draft will be submitted to the PC subcommittee i.The authors guide provides detailed information about the format & structure of the PC ii.The SORT should be applied to all recommendations in this draft Review Process (Year 3) a.PC Subcommittee Review (multiple reviews if necessary) i.Structure & organization review a.PC Subcommittee Review (multiple reviews if necessary) i.Structure & organization review b.External Review i.Content review ii.Approximately 5 international experts (not on the writing team) b.External Review i.Content review ii.Approximately 5 international experts (not on the writing team) c.PC Review (whole committee) i.Overall format, structure, and content review c.PC Review (whole committee) i.Overall format, structure, and content review Final Approvals 3

NATA Foundation Position Statement Process Final Approvals a.PS submitted to NATA & NATA Foundation for approval Thanks for your interest in the NATA Foundation Position Statement Program! Go to Go to b.Proofs sent to lead author, PC liaison, and PC chair for final review c.Executive summary (Introduction & Recommendations) published in print & the entire document published on the JAT website 4