March 11, 2014 2:15 – 3:00 1. Agenda Introduction and Approach2:15 – 2:25 Research Admin. Assessment2:25 – 2:55 Questions2:55 – 3:00 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

The Challenge and Importance of Evaluating Residents and Fellows Debra Weinstein, M.D. PHS GME Coordinators Retreat March 25, 2011.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Research Administration Capacity Building in an Established Institution Presenter: M.M.Aboud, MD Director of Research and Publications, MUHAS.
Support Services Review Support Services Review (SSR) is a representative, responsive form of assessment and self-evaluation to ensure continuous quality.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes In the Context of SACS Re-accreditation Standards Presentation to the Dean’s Council September 2, 2004.
Presentation Author, 2006 GRANTS BATO Facts and Snacks December 16, 2010.
Award Close-out Procedures-an overview Review award documents Complete Reconciliation Sheet Budget Reconciliation Expense Reconciliation Oracle Balances.
March 11, :30 – 2:10 1. Agenda Introduction and Approach1:30 – 1:35 Current Research Administration Landscape1:35 – 1:45 Award Lifecycle - Idea.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Supervised by: Dr- Fatmah Baddar. 2 Health Care Service Accreditation Accreditation Accreditation is the process of assessing health institutions against.
Assessment of the Sponsored Projects Services Office at the University of California, Merced Jennifer Teixeira Sr. Research Administrator Sponsored Projects.
Performance Appraisal System Update
Grant Financial Management Post Award Sponsored Projects Training Program1.
March 31, Overview University of Pennsylvania.
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Retention Interview Process Training July 2008 Retention Interview Process Training 1.
Departmental and Central Departmental Administration: Same Goals, Different Paths Kay Gilstrap Georgia Institute of Technology School of Chemistry and.
Performance Management Upul Abeyrathne, Dept. of Economics, University of Ruhuna, Matara.
Integrating Evaluation and Curriculum, GLTS. Welcome Presenters: Lauren Jones - Lead Teacher - Carpentry/ Architectural Drafting, ILT member Paul Mears.
Effort Reporting: A Departmental Approach to Meeting Audit Requirements Dianne Valdez, MBA, CIA, CISA, CCSA Enrique Valdez Jr., MBA.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Working with DRDA NSF Career Development Workshop Division of Research Development and Administration Dave Plawchan Managing Project Representative, DRDA.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Quality Assurance at the University St. Kliment Ohridski Elizabeta Bahtovska National Bologna promoter TEMPUS SCM C-032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters.
Departmental Assessment Process.  The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides.
POST AWARD INTRODUCTION Linda Brown, Associate Director, Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis and Research (MIPAR) Gina Fischer, Business Manager, Engineering.
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Effort Reporting System Departmental Coordinator Training Updated 01/11/2012.
Daisy Asiñas & Mahshid Parsi School of Medicine
1 1 Reid Bluebaugh, IT Systems Programmer And Robert Smith, Ed.D., AVP for Planning, Assessment, and Institutional Research.
Audits & Assessments: What are the Differences and How Do We Learn from the Results? Brown Bag March 12, 2009 Sal Rubano – Director, Office of the Vice.
ISMMMO, Antalya April Internal Audit, Best Practices Özlem Aykaç, CIA,CCSA CAE Coca-Cola İçecek.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Using Metrics to Drive Research Administration Performance
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
10/16/2015 Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/ Program Directors/ Project Directors.
ORSP Proposal Process STEP 3 Upload all administrative components of the application and the draft technical section to Cayuse. Route to Chair, Dean, Director.
1 © 2000 Technology Commercialization Group LLC. All rights reserved TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION GROUP, LLC P AUL G. W AUGAMAN L OUIS G. T ORNATZKY Higher.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Page 1 Fundamental elements of internal control. 2 Reputation promise/mission The Auditor-General has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme Audit.
Strategies for Knowledge Management Success SCP Best Practices Showcase March 18, 2004.
Strategic Planning System Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System ….a comprehensive system designed to form a reliable, understood system for.
Office of Sponsored Projects The Funding Life Cycle.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Phoenix Campus Faculty Refresher Training. This workshop will provide faculty with updated knowledge and tools necessary to be effective in the classroom.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Internal Auditing Effectiveness
Indian Health Service Grants Management Grants 101- Fundamentals.
Inception Report: 21st March, 2012
Making It Better Planning Employee & Patient Satisfaction November 2010.
Key Leader Orientation 3- Key Leader Orientation 3-1.
Slide 1 September 21, 2010 deM 132 McLean Hospital DRAW Meeting.
Brown Bag Series July 20, 2011 Gathering Information to Support Institutional Training Applications: It takes a team.
Building A Bridge from Central Administration to Departments, Centers and Institutes Mary E. Schmiedel, JD, CPCM Georgetown University Mary Glasscock Georgetown.
Page 1 Fundamental elements of internal control Sharonne Adams, Senior Manager 13 April 2010.
Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 “HIPAA” Public Law
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Reinventing the Award Review and Set-Up Process NCURA Annual Meeting November 2012 Marcia Smith, Associate Vice Chancellor, Research Administration, UCLA.
TOP Practices in Post Award Administration
Award Closeout Checklist Discussion
Introduction to Sponsored Programs
The Lycurgus Group: Instructional Effectiveness Survey System
Building Partnerships:  How the Office of Assessment and Accreditation Can Help You and Your Program Be Successful.
Performance Review for County Educators
Performance Review for County Educators
Presentation transcript:

March 11, :15 – 3:00 1

Agenda Introduction and Approach2:15 – 2:25 Research Admin. Assessment2:25 – 2:55 Questions2:55 – 3:00 2

Objectives Obtain the fundamentals to assess the current performance and efficiency of the research administration enterprise to enable future improvements Review and evaluate five key areas. Evaluate the current state against goals to determine opportunities for improvement Goal Approach 3

Research Administration Assessment 4

Optimal Research Operation 5

Key Elements 6

Organizational Structure 7

8 Determine if the current organizational structure provides the necessary level of service to the research community Determine if the current organizational structure meets the evolving research needs and goals of the institution Weigh current model against other models. Modify structure to enable the office to provide greater support and achieve stretch goals People are the link to ensure the organizational structure, business processes, technology and metrics are in synch

9 Individual Basis Operating Unit/Office Evaluation of Personnel

10 Business Process

11 Technology Identify current systems/tools, purpose and risks Short and long term needs Technology roadmap

12 Source: Harvard University

13 Performance Measurement

14 Pre Award Average number of days to review and approve a proposal Average number of days to prepare and set-up subcontracts Number of hours/days to respond to a departmental or PI inquiry Number of people that met their professional development plan Customer service satisfaction survey and results Feedback vs. performance objectives Post Award Average number of days to set-up awards Monthly unbilled balance ($) Number of active awards past award end date (+90 days) Number of late financial reports Average accounts receivable balance ($) Average days outstanding for accounts receivable Number of hours/days to respond to departmental or PI inquiry Number of people that met their professional development plan Customer service satisfaction survey and results Feedback vs. performance objectives Academic Schools, Departments, or Centers Percentage of proposals submitted to Pre Award by deadline Number of accounts in overdraft Number of active awards past award end-date (+90 days) Number of departmental cost transfers % of effort forms completed in designated time frame Number of effort forms re-certified after initial certification Number of late financial reports Number of hours/days to respond to Central office inquires % of faculty and staff that met their training obligations Percentage of effort reports completed by PIs in designated time frame Performance Measurement

15

Identification of strengths, weaknesses and gaps preventing efficiency Detailed review of weaknesses and gaps lead to realized results Develop and implement plan to reach results, which may: Improve service to faculty and other customers Strengthen performance on key financial metrics Increase process efficiency Reduce cost, and Mitigate compliance risk 16 Research Administration Assessment Outcomes

Thank you! Nate Haines Alison Sanders 17