Development of a Biosphere Dose Model (BDOSE) for Waste Incidental-to- Reprocessing and Non-High-Level Waste Determination Consultations J.W. Mancillas,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is “Appalachian Compact”?
Advertisements

Near Surface Disposal Facilities
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division formerly the National Radiological Protection Board EMRAS II – Working.
 Regulated under the Atomic Energy Act ◦ Low concentrations of source, byproduct and special nuclear material ◦ Accelerator produced material ◦ Generally.
RESRAD Program Manager Environmental Science Division
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.
Constructing Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Diagrams using the Simulation Editor EXAMPLE Constructing Conceptual Site Model (CSM) Diagrams using the Simulation.
The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009.
1 WASTE CHARACTERIZATION METHODS S. Vanderperre Belgatom Vanderperre, Belgatom, chapter 7.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
EPAs Proposed Ground Water Protection Standards 40 CFR 192 an Industry Perspective Peter Luthiger Mesteña Uranium LLC.
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
Ra226 Rn222 Po218 Pb214 Bi214 Terrestrial radionuclides An example from the U238 family α α α β β γ γ γ.
Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
EGU General Assembly 2007 Neptune and Company, Inc. Los Alamos, NM, USA A Systems Modeling Approach for Performance Assessment of the Mochovce National.
College of Engineering Oregon State University DOE’s Graded Approach for Evaluating Radiation Doses to Biota: Derivation of Screening and Analysis Methodologies.
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to human health.
Radiation in Your Environment. Radiation Around You Nature –Cosmic (direct and cosmic-produced radioactivity –Terrestrial (including radon) Medical Consumer.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
Ronald Warren Ecological & Environmental Monitoring National Security Technologies, LLC Community Environmental Monitoring Program Workshop July 26, 2011.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Development dynamic compartment models
IAEA Technical Meeting on Future Human Actions at Disposal Sites IAEA, Vienna, Austria September 24-28, 2012 Overview of NRC Approach to Human Intrusion.
Case Study 1 Application of different tools: RBCA Tool Kit and APIDSS.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 GENII Version 2.0 Overview and.
CRITICAL PATHWAY ANALYSIS FOR RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT CONTROL AND ASSESSMENT Riaz Akber
The Radionuclides Rule Analytical Issues and Considerations John Griggs U.S. EPA Office of Radiation and Indoor Air National Air and Radiation Environmental.
Nuclear Power Regulatory Overview The Keys To Our Success By Bob Wills RRPT GEL Laboratories, LLC.
Impact of License Extension on Radionuclide Buildup Assumptions Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at the 18 th Annual RETS-REMP.
September 2014 Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61 Tom Corbett, Governor E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary.
Status of Commercial Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 Simulation Modeling: A Reviewer’s Perspective David W. Esh 1 and Cynthia S. Barr 2 Division of Waste Management.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
Atomic Energy Organization of Iran Iran Nuclear Regulatory Authority (INRA) Ramsar the Radioactive Nature Presented by: Naser Rastkhah Head of INRA.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Management System Part I: Quality System. Management system Objectives To understand the importance of a management system to ensure effectiveness of.
Dale Holden Duke Energy.  Programs established in 1970’s and 1980’s  Required for licensee  Preoperational and Operational  “check” on effluent releases.
David G Bennett December 2014
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
WP4. Assessment of environmental impacts and resulting externalities from multi-media (air/water/soil) impact pathways A. Rabl, T. Bachmann, R. Torfs -
Isotopic and Nuclear Analytical Techniques for Health and Environment
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Management Systems Part I.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Authorized Limits Request for Release of Neutron Scattering Experiment Samples From SNS and HFIR Donald.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Status of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) Compacts and Update on Commercial LLRW Disposal Facilities.
Safety-related Issues for the Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) Dr. Jürgen Wollrath Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) Department Safety.
Status Update on the NRC Proposed Rule to Amend 10 CFR Part 61.
1 External Costs: A Tool for Internalizing Imported Pollution Ari Rabl Ecole des Mines de Paris Damage cost of pollution = external cost Imported pollution.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
1 Introduction to safety case and safety assessment: purpose and content of safety case Ian Crossland Crossland Consulting
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Fall Low Level Waste Forum Meeting
Transfer analysis of 210Po and 210Pb in the terrestrial environment
Earl Fordham, Deputy Director, Office of Radiation Protection
Overview of NRC Low-Level Waste Activities and Initiatives
Human Intrusion in Deep Geologic Repositories in the U.S.
NRC Update of LLW Emerging Issues
Modeling Water Treatment Using the Contaminant Transport Module
Presentation transcript:

Development of a Biosphere Dose Model (BDOSE) for Waste Incidental-to- Reprocessing and Non-High-Level Waste Determination Consultations J.W. Mancillas, A.A. Simpkins, L.D. Howard, P.A. LaPlante, O. Pensado (Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, Texas); A. Turner Gray (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC) ABSTRACT: A radiological dose model has been developed in the GoldSim (registered trademark of GoldSim Technology Group, LLC ) modeling environment to be used as a tool for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses (CNWRA) staffs to review U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) non-high-level waste determinations for compliance with the appropriate performance objectives. The model uses a groundwater source to probabilistically evaluate radionuclide partitioning into intake pathways and evaluates dose histories for multiple receptor groups. Exposure pathways include direct exposure, inhalation, and ingestion. This model was constructed using basic GoldSim elements and elements of the Contaminant Transport (CT) module. Model development was funded by the NRC to support the requirement of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2005 that the NRC consult on non-high-level waste determinations prepared by the DOE for sites in South Carolina and Idaho. Leaching constant Erosion constant PR = Precipitation rate [m/m 2 -yr ] IR = Irrigation Rate [m/m 2 -yr ] ER = Evapotranspiration rate [ m/m 2 -yr ] Θ = Volumetric water content of soil [Unitless] ρ = Soil density [Kg/m 3 ] d = Soil depth [m] Kd i = Soil-liquid partition coefficient of RN i [m 3 /Kg] ELR= Erosion rate [Kg/m 2 -yr] C gw,I = Concentration of RN i in groundwater [g/m 3 ] Pathways Resident Farmer Resident GardenerRecreationist Acute Intruder Chronic Intruder Ingestion Ingestion of Drinking WaterXX X Ingestion of VegetablesXX X Ingestion of MilkX X Ingestion of BeefX X Ingestion of GameX X Ingestion of FishXXX X Ingestion of SoilXXXXX InhalationXXXXX External SurfaceXXXXX Submersion in AirXXXXX Submersion in Water X Introduction: The Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2005 provides for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to consult on non-high-level waste determinations prepared by the US Department of Energy (DOE) for cleanup of facilities in Idaho and South Carolina The purpose of these consultations is to ensure performance objectives established in 10 CFR Part 61, Subpart C (dose-based performance objectives) are met. To understand key uncertainties and to evaluate whether these performance objectives are met, NRC staff may choose to perform limited confirmatory calculations using probabilistic performance assessment analyses developed in the GoldSim modeling environment. Because it is expected that the NRC will be involved in the evaluation of multiple site locations, such as those with unique source terms, ground water transport characteristics, and exposure environment and populations, the NRC is seeking ways to improve staff efficiency in the model development and review process. To aid the NRC in meeting the requirements of NDAA, CNWRA staff have developed a compact biosphere module which can be readily inserted into a performance assessment model to probabilistically evaluate dose consequences to resident receptors based on groundwater radionuclide (RN) concentrations and potential intruder scenarios. The development and use of a reusable robust biosphere module provides multiple benefits: (1) Reduces the time required for model development by allowing model developers to focus attention on site specific data rather than repeatedly develop biosphere models for individual performance assessment models; (2) Use of generic model components developed under approved quality assurance procedures, including documented validation testing, increases the confidence in the total performance assessment analysis; (3) The use of a single, well-documented biosphere module increases model transparency, thereby increasing consistency of reviews and reducing review time for model developers, site regulators, and affected stakeholders. BDOSE: BDOSE is a compact biosphere model developed for use as either a standalone module or use in performance models to stochastically evaluate dose consequences from radionuclides introduced into a biosphere via groundwater transport. BDOSE currently evaluates dose consequences for 49 radionuclides for multiple receptor groups. Receptors: BDOSE evaluates dose consequences for several site specific receptors. Three receptors types are defined within BDOSE: residents, either farmer or gardener, recreationists, and intruders, chronic and acute. Doses to respective receptors are evaluated for inhalation, ingestion and direct exposure pathways with considerations of receptor consumption rates, inhalation rates and exposure times. Within BDOSE individual receptor pathways are established by selecting to include or exclude possible pathways in a defined Pathway vector that defines a receptor. This selection is a simple operation of either selecting 1 or 0 within the vector. Potential pathway doses are stochastically evaluated for each receptor type and pathway based on user defined ingestion, inhalation rates and exposure time distributions. Each of these calculations generates a result that is stored in the DOSE_PATHWAYS matrix, which is defined as a [Species, Pathways] matrix. The dose to a receptor is evaluated by a simple matrix vector operation, where a receptor dose is the vector sum of the DOSE_PATHWAYS matrix multiplied by the receptor vector and an individual radionuclide dose from a specific pathway is evaluated by the multiplication of the DOSE_PATHWAYS matrix by the pathway vector and a defined RN vector. This type of data management and use of vector definitions for the receptors provides a robust and flexible means to evaluate dose consequences for receptors whose pathway definitions may change from site to site. The use of alternative dose coefficients (ICRP72 or FG11) for internal radionuclide dose calculations. The time for loss of institutional controls. Controls for manually defined sources (decay/no decay within source). The model use to evaluate soil concentrations. The exposure to various sources of contaminated water (ponds, streams, and groundwater). The receptor pathway definitions. Results: Using result elements, BDOSE generates graphical results for each receptor type. These results include time history statistical evaluations of multiple realizations and the mean dose for each radionuclide. In addition to these basic results, total receptor doses by pathway and receptor radionuclide doses by pathway are provided. In addition to dose histories, BDOSE provides time history results for sources, groundwater concentration, soil concentration, and air concentrations. Biosphere -- Soil: BDOSE is supplied with seven soil models that can be used to evaluate radionuclide buildup in the soil from irrigation with contaminated groundwater. These multiple models provide various considerations for deposition processes (irrigation and ingrowth) and removal processes (decay, soil erosion, and leaching into deep soil). Simple soil: (soil concentration = IR* C gw i ) no buildup, decay, ingrowth, erosion or leaching. Annual soil: Model includes partitioning of RN from groundwater to soil, soil erosion, deep leaching and RN decay. But only applied for the given year, with no ingrowth. Annual soil equilibrium: Model includes partitioning of RN from groundwater to soil, soil erosion, deep leaching, and RN decay. Annual soil buildup: Model includes partitioning of RN from groundwater to soil, soil erosion, deep leaching and RN decay. In this model, the soil evaluates RN buildup based on the continued irrigation of the soil with the contaminated groundwater to the equilibrium value. Physical soil: Model uses the physical descriptions of the soil environment (soil KD, soil density, water content of soil, plow depth, erosion rate, irrigation rate, precipitation rate, and evaporation rate) to evaluate the buildup of radionuclides in the soil (grams per square meter) using a GoldSim cell element. Analytic soil: Similar to the physical soil model, except that each RN is partitioned into a single GoldSim cell for decay, ingrowth, leaching, and erosion evaluation. User defined: Soil concentration can be set to a fixed concentration. Biosphere -- Animal Products: BDOSE evaluates radionuclide concentrations for several animal products including: Beef, Milk, Poultry, Eggs, Fish and Game. These concentrations are based on animal-specific-grain contamination and consumption rates, water contamination and consumption rates, soil concentration and consumptions rates and RN transfer coefficients. RN concentrations in animal products are evaluated for both the resident scenario, in which the biosphere contamination is from contaminated groundwater, and the intruder scenario in which soil and crops have been contaminated by direct deposition of radioactive waste from materials excavated by a site intruder. Biosphere -- Vegetation: BDOSE evaluates RN concentrations for multiple vegetation types, including those used for human consumption (Vegetables, Leafy Green Vegetables, Fruits and Grains), and those used for animal feed( animal specific grains and fodders). These concentrations are based on soil contamination levels and irrigation water contamination levels and vegetation specific irrigation rates, growth rates and durations, vegetation yields (kg/m 2 ), root uptake coefficients, fractions of uptake from air deposition, translocation factors, and transfer factors. Radionuclide concentrations in vegetation are evaluated for both the resident scenario, in which the biosphere contamination is from contaminated groundwater, and the intruder scenario in which soil and crops have been contaminated by direct deposition of radioactive waste from materials excavated by a site intruder. Grain Module Statistical Analysis of Dose Results Dose Results by Radionuclide Receptor Pathway Definitions H3 C14 Co60 Ni59 Ni63 Se79 Sr90 Y90 Nb94 Tc99 I129 Cs137 Ba137m Eu152 Eu154 Eu155 Pb210 Ra226 Ra228 Ac227 Th228 Th229 Th230 Th232 Pa231 U232 U233 U234 U235 U236 U238 Np237 Pu238 Pu239 Pu240 Pu241 Pu242 Pu244 Am241 Am242m Am243 Cm242 Cm243 Cm244 Cm245 Cm246 Cm247 Cm248 Cf249 Radionuclide List Biosphere Radionuclide transport diagram Biosphere Module This poster was prepared to document work performed by the CNWRA for NRC under Contract No. NRC–02–02–012. The activities reported here were performed on behalf of the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. This poster is an independent product of CNWRA and does not necessarily reflect the views of NRC. Groundwater Source Module Decay constant Pathway Module Pathway Vector This centralization of controls facilitates easier model manipulation, while minimizing inadvertent alteration of other model components Controls: Key biosphere model settings within BODSE are controlled by switch elements that are centrally located in a single Controls module. Switches and data elements were included to allow the user to control: Crops Module Livestock Module