Darley and Latane - The Bystander Effect

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNIT 5 WHY DO PEOPLE HELP EACH OTHER?
Advertisements

Chapter 13: Altruism Social Psychology by Tom Gilovich, Dacher Keltner, and Richard Nisbett.
Introduction to Psychology Studying the mind of the individual.
Saint Louis University: How to be an Active Bystander.
The Holocaust. Terms and People Holocaust − name now used to describe the systematic murder by the Nazis of Jews and others anti-Semitism − prejudice.
Kohlberg’s Moral Development Stages
The Holocaust.
 To passively agree to something to which there are no apparent consequences  Example: Gender Conformity 
Social Approach Background to study Core Study 3: Piliavin (1969)
Factors Influencing Reluctance to Help.
A look at bystander intervention and diffusion of responsibility. Project by Bryce Monser.
A Question A woman is being brutally attacked in the street where she lives. She screams for help. 38 of her neighbours witness the attack,
“I can tell you who I am, what I think, feel, believe, want to do, and have done, without getting anxious or worrying about what you may think about.
Prosocial Behavior What is Prosocial Behavior? Why do We Help? When do We Help? Who is Most Likely to Help? Whom do We Help?
__________ Middle School is a… “The End of Bullying Begins with Me”
? A Look into America and the Holocaust. An innocent bystander is someone who during a certain event is unknowledgeable as to what is going on and thus.
To Help Or Not To Help Darley, J.M., & Latene, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
Prosocial behavior Chapter 11.
HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS.
Ch. 1 – What is Law?. Rules created and enforced by a government to regulate the conduct of people Rules created and enforced by a government to regulate.
Social Psychology.
MORALITY What are morals? What are your morals?
Chapter 9 - Prosocial Behavior
Social psychological phenomenon in which individuals do not offer help in an emergency situation when others are present.
Cyberbullying Be Upstanding.
PRO-SOCIAL AND ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR UNIT 2 – AOS 1.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 13 Social Psychology.
Helping Behavior. Prosocial Behavior Prosocial behavior - any behavior that helps another person, whether the underlying motive is self-serving or selfless.
Chapter 10 Social Psychology Title: To Help or Not to Help Authors: J.M. Darley and B. Latane (1968) Presented by Kelley Reinhardt May 5, 2004.
Social Psychology Chapter 20 & 21 Review. Group Behavior When the desire to be part of a group prevents a person from seeing other alternatives.
 Fundamental Attribution Error  Bystander effect  Social Loafing  Group Processes  There are many valuable aspects of social psychology to be kept.
Conformity and Obedience. CONFORMITY “ The tendency to change our perceptions, opinions, or behaviour in ways that are consistent with group norms” (Brehm,
Altruism & Bystanders Prosocial behaviour Altruistic behaviour Bystander behaviour
Helping Behavior. Prosocial Behavior Prosocial behavior - any behavior that helps another person, whether the underlying motive is self-serving or selfless.
Objective 1.4: Examine factors that influence bystanderism
Look at these examples: wLcIuw&feature=related wLcIuw&feature=related
1.3 Psychology. What is Psychology? Study of how and why humans act as they do Instead of studying how humans function in cultures or societies, psychology.
C BYSTANDER EFFECT Maddy Pasche. What is it? social psychological phenomenon that refers to cases in which individuals do not offer any means of help.
1 Bystander effect Learning lite. 2 Why would we think about the Bystander Effect? Understanding the Bystander effect, what it is and why it happens enables.
KANTIAN ETHICS IDEAS ABOUT DUTY. ► Kant asserts that we give the most praise to people who perform an action simply because they are required to. ► They.
 You are driving along a deserted country road and you notice that a car has slid across the shoulder and into a ditch. An elderly man is standing next.
NEVER BELIEVE THAT A FEW CARING PEOPLE CAN’T CHANGE THE WORLD. FOR, INDEED, THAT’S ALL WHO EVER HAD. Margaret Mead.
Introduction to Psychology Social Psychology. The study of how we behave, think, and feel in social situations How the situation shapes our behavior.
Look at the image below…what do you think is happening in the photo? The photo shows a female Sudanese toddler, alone and severely emaciated, attempting.
Chapter 20, Section 4.  The Holocaust (mass murder of Jews) was a result of ideology that believed that Aryans (especially those of Germanic, Nordic.
Attraction & Altruism Katie Kucharyszyn and Fran Simonian Period 5.
SEXUAL ABUSE SEXUAL ABUSE IS AN EPIDEMIC IN THE USA. NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO SEXUALLY ABUSE ANOTHER PERSON.
Chapter 9 Prosocial Behavior: Doing What’s Best for Others © 2014 Wadsworth Cengage Learning Oskar Schindler’s grave. The Hebrew inscription reads: “A.
RESOLVING CONFLICTS. Passive accepting or allowing what happens or what others do, without active response or resistance. Examples?
Holocaust The And The Lessons It Teaches Cal Mirowitz.
Moral Dilemmas What would you do when faced with a difficult moral choice?
The Human Behavior Experiments: The Bystander Effect
Social Psychology: How individuals are influenced by others.
Why Do We Help? Pro Social Behavior. When We Don’t Help…. The Bystander Effect Consider the power of the situation.
FRIENDS. What is a Friend?  A friend is someone you like and who likes you.  A friend is someone you can talk to.  A friend is a person who shares.
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR Social psychologists are interested in 2 extremes of human behavior: altruism and aggression.
Current Issues Sex slave trade Imprisonment/death penalty Racism Ageism Sexism Gender inequality at work LBGT rights Religious persecution Abortion Mental.
Chapter 6: Social Influence and Group Behavior
Types of Social Interaction
Unit 11 Essential Question: How do we relate to one another?
Do Now Now: Grab your novels 15 minutes of silent reading
Group Processes.
Diffusion of Responsibility
Bystander Effect occurs when the presence of others discourages an individual from intervening in an emergency situation Social psychologists Bibb Latané.
Social Influence So what is confomity?’
Bullying.
The Bystander Effect.
Social Psychology Chapter 11.
Piliavin et al. (1969) Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?
Interfere? OneWay™ moment The Bystander Effect:
Presentation transcript:

Darley and Latane - The Bystander Effect http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-WvaRJdAA0 Smoke Filled Room Study Kitty Genovese What Would You Do? - scenarios Factors of Bystander Effect Memory of the Camps, Holocaust Bystanders - Case

Bystander Effect Researchers Bibb Latane and John Darley found that the amount of time it takes the participant to take action and seek help varies depending on how many other observers are around.   In a typical experiment, the participant is either alone or among a group of other participants or confederates. An emergency situation is staged and researchers measure how long it takes the participants to intervene, if they intervene. These experiments have found that the presence of others inhibits helping. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybpg_B9S_q0#t=179

Bystander Effect: Bystander – person who is not an active participant in a situation – they are standing by and witnessing The most frequently cited examples of the Bystander Effect are: 1. The Smoke Filled Room Study 2. The brutal murder of a young woman named Catherine "Kitty" Genovese.

Smoke Filled Room Study People respond slower (or not at all) to emergency situations in the presence of others who are passive. Imagine that you are in a room all alone filling out a questionnaire, and smoke starts coming from under the door.  What do you do?  If you are like most sane people, you get out... or at least tell someone in charge, and you do this without hesitation.  Now imagine the same situation, except that you are not alone, you are with several other people who don't seem to care about the smoke.  What do you do now? http://www.sociallypsyched.org/item/the-smoke-filled- room

The Case of Kitty Genovese On Friday, March 13, 1964, 28-year-old Genovese was returning home from work. As she approached her apartment entrance in New York City, she was attacked and stabbed by a man later identified as Winston Moseley. Despite Genovese’s repeated calls for help, none of the dozen or so people in the nearby apartment building who heard her cries called police to report the incident. The attack first began at 3:20 AM, but it was not until 3:50 AM that someone first contacted police. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdpdUbW8vbw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JozmWS6xYEw

What Would You Do? Look at these examples… Child Abducted in Public: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIvGIwLcIuw&feature=related Waitresses Harassed in Restaurant http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euXzkLZQPRY Deaf Girl Discriminated Applying for Job http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqI1d4rLWSM Helping the Homeless https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaKF3_FwJ3w What are the factors that people say motivated them to help or not help when they are bystanders in a situation?

Factors of Bystander Effect DID ACT (ACTORS): DID NOT ACT (BYSTANDER):

Factors that Cause People to Become Actors Morals – parents taught you the right thing to do – i.e. damaging someone’s property Damage done in their community Fear – don’t want to get in trouble for not helping Personal – if you were in that situation, you would want help Stereotypes – racial profiling, gender, age Pressure from others - conformity

Factors that Cause People to Remain Bystanders Fear – personal safety, mistake (hurting someone…, judgment) “not my business” – i.e. conflict in a family Lack information on the situation Don’t know people involved Assume someone else will do it – diffusion of responsibility Inconvenient – busy, don’t want to get involved, don’t have time…

Factors of the Bystander Effect Theory by Bibb Latane and John Darley 4 years after Genovese was murdered, two psychologists, John Darley and Bibb Latane, wanted to identify the factors that influence bystanders’ decisions to get involved in public situations

Factors of the Bystander Effect Diffusion of Responsibility = the more people in the group, the less likely individuals are to act b/c they think that the responsibility rests with all other bystanders as opposed to when they are the only ones witnessing the situation (If there are 100 people in a group, each person bear 1% of the responsibility, if there are 2 people, they each bear 50%) Pluralistic Ignorance = is a situation in which a majority of group members privately reject a norm, but incorrectly assume that most others accept it, and therefore go along with it. (When a teacher asks a class 'Any questions?' there will often be a deafening silence, even if nobody understands).

Factors of the Bystander Effect Ambiguous (uncertain/unsure) Situations – Having more than one possible meaning not expressed or understood clearly When alone, a person is responsible for deciding how to respond appropriately to a situation. But when there are others present, we look to them for how to behave (i.e. help or not) Case of Matthew Carrington: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kt_ZtfhQ094 Understanding Environment = has to do with their familiarity of the environment where the emergency occurs. If the bystander is familiar with the environment, they are more likely to know where to get help, where the exits are, etc. Bystanders who are in an environment in which they are not familiar with the surroundings are less likely to give help in an emergency situation.

Factors of the Bystander Effect Similarities = Research based on altruism (selflessness) found that a bystander was more inclined to help the person in distress, if there was something in common between them (such as being the same gender or being football fans, and the victim is wearing a football jersey) Cost-Benefit Analysis = Evaluating the consequences of helping - consider costs of helping (e.g. effort, potential harm) and benefits of helping (e.g. social approval, self-esteem).

Real Life Application - Case Study Holocaust

Extreme Case of Bystander Effect – THE HOLOCAUST On a list of the top 10 most notorious cases of bystander effect, the Holocaust rates #1. Read the following:

The most repugnant, globally violent disgrace of the reputation of humanity gave rise to the equally infamous use of the phrase “diffusion of responsibility,” as the Nazi officers tried at Nuremberg all claimed the same defense, “We were just following orders.” They argued that if the Holocaust really was as bad as journalists were saying, then someone else must surely have known of it, and thus it was not necessarily their responsibility to report it to the authorities.

They also argued that the only authorities in Continental Europe at the time were German, and thus, they would only have killed themselves by attempting to inform the outside world, and would have accomplished nothing. This is not true. Most of the German population knew nothing of it, but had they, they could easily have banded together and demanded that the Holocaust be stopped. The Nazis would have been reluctant to exterminate their own “master race,” and by that point, the Allies would have heard news of it. So the Nazis wisely concealed the concentration and death camps from all but the small villages nearest to them

The Holocaust achieves #1, however, because the populations of the villages near these camps, Dachau, Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Sachsenhausen, Mauthausen, and Ravensbruck, to name a few, knew perfectly well of the atrocities and horror inside the camps. The camps were established near fairly large towns and cities, the inhabitants of which could not have ignored the stench coming from them. Allied soldiers all reported smelling camps before finding them, from as far as 20 miles if the wind blew right.

The Allies accused the German citizens of these towns of knowing full well what was happening to Jews and other “undesirables” and yet making no effort to save one life. These German populations were thus forced to clean up the emaciated corpses and bury them in mass graves, as punishment for their passivity.

QUESTION: What reasons did the Nazi’s give for “standing by”?

Memory of the Camps – Bergen Concentration Camp Holocaust Survivor Speak Against Bullying Bystanders http://www.didsburyreview.ca/article/20121106/DID 0801/311069963/0/did Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp http://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2011/01/22/50000 -deaths-at-bergen-belsen-but-only-6851-death- certificates-issued/  

Extreme Example of Bystander Effect The Holocaust – Memory of the Camps Identifies atrocities of the camps Places blame on bystanders by camp liberators http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq0px38Cwo4 Watch (13:30-21:00) This is a VERY graphic film.