Coastal Wind Energy Study In summer 2008, the North Carolina General Assembly directed the UNC Board of Governors to study wind energy feasibility University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The three most important considerations for development of wind farms are: LAND with good to excellent wind resource CONTRACT to sell electricity produced.
Advertisements

Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan SeaWeb/National Press Club MA Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian A. Bowles, Secretary Deerin.
Overview of the Environmental Assessment for Lease Issuance and Site Assessment Activities off Rhode Island and Massachusetts July 16-17, 2012July 16-17,
Geology Matters 2013 Presenter: Robert Federico, Principal November 14, 2013 Donkin Coal Mine Environmental Assessment Case Study.
Coastal Wind Energy Study Study Components Wind resource evaluation Ecological impacts, synergies, use conflicts Foundation concepts Geologic framework.
Cetaceans (dolphins, whales & porpoises) Pinnipeds (seals) Sea Turtles Manatees Protected Marine Species of Concern in Virginia.
Integrated Assessment of Off-shore Wind A Research Partnership between: Grand Valley State University Michigan Alternative and Renewable Energy Center.
Toward Comprehensive, Statewide Ocean Planning in Massachusetts: Implementing the Ocean Management Task Force Recommendations Susan Snow-Cotter, Director.
A new study out of UNC Chapel Hill discusses how North Carolina could have 100% of its power coming from off-shore wind turbines. These off-shore turbines.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Environmental Assessment of Marine Renewable Energy Presentation to Pre-BIC meeting 24 th June 2010 Andrew Casebow Chris Green.
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
Wind Energy in the Nantucket Sound A righteous, pro-environmental alternative energy proposal? Or A profit seeking, ocean sacrificing capitalist scheme?
Windfarm Siting in North Carolina Bob Leker State Energy Program NC DENR 100 kW Northwind in Boone, NC.
Engineering Technology Division
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Offshore Wind Energy Overview Patrick Gilman Environmental & Siting Specialist Wind and Water Power Program.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
The Potential for Increased Cooperation on Offshore Wind among the Northeast States Warren Leon, Executive Director.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Offshore Wind Opportunities and Challenges Greg Watson Massachusetts Technology Collaborative Capitol Hill Ocean Week Coastal States.
Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study
Georgia’s Off-shore Wind Opportunities Presented by Bill Bulpitt and Rita Kilpatrick for Tybee Island City Council March 27, 2008.
Factors Affecting Wind Power Development in North Carolina Dr. Dennis Grady Director, Appalachian State University Energy.
1 Revised Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor Lisa Webb Sharpe, Director Wind Strategy.
THE OFFSHORE SITUATION IN GREECE Municipality of Corfu.
PERSPECTIVES OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN MARINE AREAS OF LITHUANIA, POLAND AND RUSSIA, , PALANGA PERSPECTIVES OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY.
Slayton Solar Project RDF Grant Award EP3-10 Presentation of the Project Results to the RDF Advisory Board January 8, Project funding provided by.
Oregon Renewable Energy Action Plan April 2005 with Geothermal Energy highlights by Carel DeWinkel Senior Policy Analyst.
MACOORA Annual Meeting State Partnerships Panel Laura McKay
The Multipurpose Marine Cadastre A Tool for Planning & Decision Making in the Marine Environment Christine Taylor Minerals Management Service (MMS) David.
Eagle Crest Energy Company February Page 2 New Hydro: Making it Happen Background on the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Need for Eagle.
BMT Designers & Planners 1 Wind Farm Technology: Is it the Answer? National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) 30 th Environmental and Energy Symposium.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
PERSPECTIVES OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN MARINE AREAS OF LITHUANIA, POLAND AND RUSSIA, , PALANGA PERSPECTIVES OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY.
Transmission interconnect into the existing ‘Durbin-Monterey’ 69kV line 
W IND E NERGY C HALLENGES. W IND ENERGY HAS MANY BENEFITS Oil independence Locally produced (jobs) No air pollution (or CO2) Uses no water Renewable Lower.
Wind Power Jennifer Malaga Mister Diaz Leidy Colon.
Marine Spatial Planning for Wave Energy Development in Oregon Kate Sherman, M.S. Candidate Marine Resource Management College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric.
Alternative Energy on the Outer Continental Shelf Robert P. LaBelle Deputy Associate Director Offshore Energy and Minerals Management Minerals Management.
MMS Alternative Energy Program November 28, 2007.
17 October 2015www.CapeWind.org1 Project UPDATE March 25, 2009.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
DOE Peer Review May 10, 2006 Golden, CO Walt Musial Leader-Offshore Projects National Renewable Energy Laboratory Offshore Wind.
Offshore Wind Energy Deployment in the European Union Concerted Action for Offshore Wind Energy Deployment (COD) Environmental Issues Ruud de Bruijne (SenterNovem)
1 Overview of Minerals Management Service’s Alternative Energy Program Ocean Law Conference May 22, 2008 Seattle, WA Walter D. Cruickshank Deputy Director.
Perspectives of the offshore wind energy development in Russian EEZ, Kaliningrad Oblast V. Sivkov, D. Dorokhov, M. Chestnova, B. Zatoplyaev, O. Pichuzhkina,
Tony MacDonald Director Urban Coast Institute Monmouth University November 30, 2009.
2 nd Annual “Ocean Energy for New England” Conference September 17, 2009 Chris Powicki Principal, Water Energy & Ecology Information Services President,
Western Renewable Energy Zone (WREZ) Concept (as of 11/27/07)
Bob Anderson West Wind Wires Siting and Policy Wind Power Plants* 119th Annual Convention Anaheim, CA November 16, 2007 NARUC *transmission, too.
Long Island’s Offshore Wind Farm David Tobias Project Evaluation.
Water quality challenges in the Bay Delta Estuary.
Every state in the nation benefits from wind energy.
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Dale Arnold Director, Energy Services Ohio Farm Bureau Federation.
Dutch program offshore wind energy Cumulative effects and Mitigation measures ORELG 4 february 2016.
North Coast Wind Farm Tolano Environmental Consulting.
Regional Transmission Expansion Project Staff Council Briefing Tom Kaiserski (MT) Program Manager February 15, 2011 Governor’s Office of Economic Development.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
How Much Power Does A Wind Turbine Produce. How Much Energy Will Wind Turbines Produce?
COSA Committee Meeting
Offshore Wind Farms and Bald Head Island
Baseline Ecological Study of Wind Turbines at Block Island Wind Farm
Barriers and Challenges to Developing Renewable Energy Projects
Offshore Wind Energy Development – Technical Challenges
COSA Committee Meeting
NC Sustainable Energy Conference
Update of Guidance document on Wind ENErgy and natura 2000
Expert meeting on Wind Energy Potential in Europe
Presentation transcript:

Coastal Wind Energy Study In summer 2008, the North Carolina General Assembly directed the UNC Board of Governors to study wind energy feasibility University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill designated to conduct the study (led by C. Elfland, AVC for Campus Services; project manager D. McCarthy, UNC Energy Services) Study area Pamlico and Albemarle Sounds Off shore over waters less than 30 meters in depth Study scope Potential for energy production Benefits from reducing dependence on fossil fuel for electricity generation Siting Ecological impacts Statutory or regulatory barriers Feasibility and synergistic benefits of co-siting wind turbines and artificial oyster reefs Report due date - July 1, 2009

Coastal Wind Energy Study Study Components Wind resource evaluation, including energy potential Siting, including geology Turbine alternatives, including foundation systems Potential synergies of co-location with artificial oyster/fish reef sanctuaries including foundation compatibility Coastal environmental issues Coastal area statutory and regulatory issues and barriers Utility transmission infrastructure including collection, sound-to-shore, and interconnections Utility statutory and regulatory issues and barriers, including federal, regional, and state Economic feasibility

Coastal Wind Energy Study Phase 1 Tasks Evaluate existing wind resource models Migratory bird pathways, waterbird foraging areas, endangered species habitat Coastal statutory and regulatory issues Utility statutory and regulatory issues Utility transmission and interconnection capacity Sound bottom geology structural adequacy evaluation Preliminary assessment of compatibility of turbine foundation systems and artificial marine habit. Carbon reduction potential Preliminary economic evaluation

Wind Resource Evaluation Led by H. Seim (Marine Sciences, UNC-CH) and G. Lackmann (RENCI/NCSU) Will evaluate existing wind power estimates from AWS Truewinds by analyzing available 10 meter wind observations from eastern NC Requires extrapolation of 10 m winds to turbine height – will examine several possible methods, and collect new observations Will initiate archive and evaluation of regional wind models being run by NC Climatology Office and RENCI

[m/s]

At measurement height (most at 10 m, some offshore at 5 m, one at 44m) No adjustment to turbine height >400=excellent >300=superior >250=v. good >200=good >150=fair <100=poor W/m 2 * * - collection height=44 m Preliminary, from IE/UNC-CH Capstone course final report, fall 2008

Wind Power Evaluation (cont.) Vertical extrapolation – tricky – must account for varying roughness of lower boundary (straightforward) and horizontal variations (internal boundary layers - more difficult) For NC, changes in water temperature between the sounds and ocean can lead to important changes in wind speed that may not be accounted for in existing wind power estimates Examining existing vertical wind profile observations to assess extrapolation techniques

Migratory Birds, Waterbird Foraging Areas and Endangered Species Habitats Led by P Peterson (Institute of Marine Sciences, UNC-CH) Assembling existing information, including interviews with local experts Will be used to define possible exclusion areas Avoiding/reducing conflict with others Airspace (military, training, FAA), navigation corridors, heavily fished areas, recreational areas, visual impact areas Environmental impacts, in the Sounds and offshore Will consider species of concern, marine mammals, butterflies, birds, bats and soft-sediment benthos Mitigation methods Noise, lighting, perches, AEC disturbances

Coastal statutory and regulatory issues Led by J. Kalo (Law School, UNC-CH) and L. Schiavinato (NC Sea Grant, NCSU) Working with law fellows to outline federal framework, including recent proposals by MMS Reviewing existing state laws and regulations and considering need for new or revised laws and regulations Reviewing the roles of the Coastal Resources, Environmental Management and Utilities Commissions in permitting and the need for a consolidated permitting process

Utility Statutory and Regulatory Issues Led by K. Higgins (Energy Strategies, Inc.) Will identify utility statutory and regulatory barriers to construction of wind farms and the sale of wind energy Examine ways to address the barriers

Utility Transmission and Interconnection Capacity Led by K. Higgins (Energy Strategies, Inc.) Assess capacity of existing transmission facilities adjacent to the Albemarle and Pamlico Sounds and offshore to carry additional load Status: Some challenges in getting access to transmission maps (security issues), being worked through

Sound Bottom Geology Structural adequacy Led by Jerry Schuett (AEI Engineering) Identify turbine foundation system alternatives to a depth of 30 meters Will assume monopole foundation for artificial reef compatibility studies

Assess compatibility of turbine foundation systems and artificial marine habitat Led by P. Peterson (Inst. For Marine Sciences, UNC-CH) Assess the compatibility of turbine foundations with artificial oyster/fish reefs and identify conflicts to co- location

Carbon Reduction Potential Led by D. Arneman (Energy Services, UNC-CH) Estimate carbon reduction from utilization of wind power versus fossil fuel power Will require some assumptions about wind farm size, location, lifetime, etc

Preliminary Economic Analysis Led by Nick Travis (Energy Strategies, Inc) Preliminary economic feasibility analysis sufficient to make go/no-go decision for next phase