AMENDED LAWS FOR UTILITY COORDINATION 2009 AASHTO R/W & Utilities Subcommittee Conference April 22 nd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Advertisements

W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.
City of Eugene Certification Project Case Study. Why Did Eugene Get Certified? Can’t do fund exchange ODOT's Local Agency Program More project control.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 5C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Federal Budget Process Steve Kidd and Allison Boehm Budget and Program Analysis Staff April 2009.
Board Transitions: Control and Information Presenters Cathi Sleight and Ryan Harris.
With the Genesee County Road Commission By Fred Peivandi, P.E. And Ken Johnson, P.E. Local Road Funding.
EVALUATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS. Strengths of Mediation  Strengths 1) Mediation is often less expensive. Mediation avoids the costs of a trial,
Resolve Business Disputes and Select and Prepare a Construction Contract Lesson Three Cert IV - M. S. Martin January 2012.
Rail Freight Assistance Program (RFAP) S ETTING THE S TAGE FOR THE F UTURE Rail Transportation Assistance Program (Rail TAP) RFAC Meeting April 28, 2010.
ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF GAZA FACULTY OF ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 20. Claim, Disputes and Arbitration [Construction Contract Administration]
Overview of the Federal Aid Process for Transportation Projects.
Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT
SAFETY * MOBILITY * DELIVERY * STEWARDSHIP * SERVICE Timely Use of Federal and State Funds Stella Liao, P.E. District Local Assistance Engineer 1.
By Aidan, Lochie, Curtis. WORKPLACE DISPUTES  Negotiation: Is a method of compromising disputes within a workplace. This easygoing approach usually.
Policy 7003 Review BCPS Facilities Task Force – Policy Subcommittee Report July 16, 2015.
CH1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE CONTRACTS
Risk Management Overview with Meg Tully, CAE Meg Tully, CAE Association Development Director.
COMPLIANCE WITH GRANT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES TxDot Grant Fund Project.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT August 21, 2014.
MOASBO Spring Conference Bill Sloan – Rockwood School District Director of Purchasing and Transportation.
Dr. Ralph Ellis Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Dispute Review Board Value Contributions Ralph Ellis, P.E., Ph.D.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction Burlington, Vermont Tuesday, August 17 th, 2010 Tom Ravn.
Unit 8 –Government Lessons 2, 3, and 4: Three Branches of Government Study Presentation Georgia Studies.
NOTICE OF CLAIM – HOW TO AVOID THE TRAP© LAW OFFICES OF MICKEY BEISMAN
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Pre-action Procedure for Financial Cases. Pre-action Procedure- Financial Cases  Rule 1.05(1)- each prospective party to the case must comply with the.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
RIGHT OF WAY BEST PRACTICES FOR LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCIES.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT November 19, 2013.
1 Asset Management Steering Committee Briefing on Senate Bill 408 (Access Management) August 2013 Harold Lasley, P.E. Access Management Program.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Utility and Railroad Engineer, INDOT June 10, 2015.
Contractor / Engineer Conference 2010 Dispute Resolution Process Dispute Resolution Process.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Pages
Stanton Energy Center Solar Facility Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners February 22,
DGS Recommendations to the Governor’s Task Force on Contracting & Procurement Review Report Overview August 12, 2002.
1 Resolving Special Education Disputes Understanding When and How to Use the New Procedural Safeguard System Education Law Center November 28,
Construction Review LaVon M Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
NCMA Boston Chapter March Workshop March 13,
Change Orders. CO Proposals Initiated by owner or GC –Owner requests estimate for work proposed –GC CO results from changed site condition or response.
1 Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data Hong Kong SAR Tony LAM Deputy Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data Briefing to Asian Data Privacy.
Trials and Resolving Disputes
Solving a civil dispute Methods of dispute resolution Chapter 9.1.
Employment Act 2008 IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
What Is Employment? Compare employee with agent and independent contractor Differences: Control test - Degree of control exercised over an employee is.
Regulatory Streamlining Task Force Update Discussion Item December 6, 2011 Board of County Commissioners.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
Project Cost Estimating Improvement Actions, Results and Trends CTC Briefing March 16, 2006.
OTC Pres Project Del P5 12/08 Page 1 Project Delivery Performance Improvement Report to the Oregon Transportation Commission Jeff Gower, State Construction.
Understanding Business and Personal Law The Court System Chapter 4 The Court System What You’ll Learn How disputes can be settled without the courts.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Policy Development Governing Board Online Training Module.
DISTRICTS OF INNOVATION OVERVIEW PRESENTATION TO DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT & PLANNING COMMITTEE MAY 11, 2016 Dr. Maroba Zoeller, Chief Governmental Relations.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT June 21, 2016.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Resolving Health Care Disputes
Mason County School District
Construction Oversight
Gordon L. Jaynes A DAM GOOD THING Gordon L. Jaynes Copyright 2008.
Working and Partnering with Others
Designers’ Manual Overview and Chapter Contents
Resolving Health Care Disputes
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
For more information call the EEO Office at
How we got to where we are today.
Presentation transcript:

AMENDED LAWS FOR UTILITY COORDINATION 2009 AASHTO R/W & Utilities Subcommittee Conference April 22 nd

“You either pay now or pay later - Pick your poison” PAY NOW… Avoid unnecessary relocations Resolve all foreseeable conflicts OR PAY LATER… Delays Damages Claims Increased costs

DID YOU KNOW? What the State Utilities Engineer looked like in 2000?

DID YOU KNOW?

CWP vs. Utility Delays

FY 2008 Construction Time Extensions

RECENT EXAMPLES OF PROJECTS DELAYED  US-441 Dublin:206 days - $1.18 million  SR-92 Douglas Co:334 days - $1.92 million  SR-166 Douglas Co:309 days - $ 113 thousand  Mercer Univ. Bibb Co:577 days - $3.78 million  Fury’s Ferry Road:457 days  (Augusta)

Utility Time Extensions – Detail FY 2005 Study

Utility Mitigation Efforts  GDOT Board & Commissioner: Initiated Utility Task Force  August 2005  Internal/GDOT Policies & Procedures 43% Lack of Project/Utility Coordination

Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  Electronic Data Guidelines (EDG) / Automated Drafting Design System (ADDS)  Plan Presentation Guide (PPG)  Plan Development Process (PDP)  Consultant Management Process Improvement (CMPI)  Consultant Cost Proposal Standardization  Geographical Information System (GIS)  Performance Based Contracting  Field Plan Review Checklists

Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  Utility Design/Build Specification  Field Plan Review Inspections  Office of Utilities Web Page  Electronic Plans Transfer Guidelines  Environmental Issues  Created Utility Task Force 4 Subcommittee Teams (R/W Team – monthly reports)  Training and Education  Notice of Award & Authorization letters

Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  Electronic Receipt and Submittal of Utility Invoices  Electronic Submittal of Utility Agreements  Utility Plans  Re-Engineering Organizational Structure  Utility Redline Software  Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)  SUE Program Enhancement  Utility Accommodation Policy & Standards Manual

Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  Utility Coordination Scope of Services  Move to New GDOT Headquarters (Apr. ‘08)  Georgia Utility Permitting System (GUPS)  TRAQS  TPRO  CMIS  PeopleSoft Privileges  Utility Phase Funding Early Authorizations & Master Agreements for PE

Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  GA PSC – Large Projects  Locator Certification  AASHTO Best Practices  SHRP – R-15 Utility Coordination Study  Awards and Recognitions  Senate Bill 19 – Legislative Session 2007

Utility Mitigation Efforts  Senate Bill 19  Accountability  (PIF) Contract Items $$ - GDOT fund  PDP Deadlines  Mediation Rule/Jan. ‘08 Project lettings May ‘08 19% Low Priority 28% Lack of Resources

PROPOSED MEDIATION RULE Legislative Intent Applicability Time Period Escalation Process Mediation Board & Procedures Costs Decisions / Mediation Period

OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  LEGISLATIVE INTENT Mediation less expensive than Litigation

OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  APPLICABILITY Three (3) Types of Disputes WORK PLAN REVISED WORK PLAN ANY OTHER MATTER  TIME PERIOD FOR APPLICABILITY  May 2008 Letting

OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  ESCALATION PROCESS Notice of Potential Dispute to Utility Structured Negotiation Process (Formalizing Communication) Prerequisite to the Mediation Board

GDOT Project Development Utility Relocation Funding & Mediation Process

OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  MEDIATION BOARD & PROCEDURES 3 Member Board Qualified by State Office of Dispute Resolution Written Petition for Mediation Board established w/in 30 days Hearing held w/in 60 days No Direct Relationship (contractually or employed) w/in previous 6 months

OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  COSTS Utility & GDOT – Pay for Member Selected Utility & GDOT – Equally pay for 3 rd Member Party Acts in Bad Faith May be responsible for All costs

OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  DECISIONS / MEDIATION PERIOD Majority Vote – No Ties Public Document Subject to Judicial Review (Superior Court) An Agreement is reached or 60 days Can extend if mutually agreed by the parties

GDOT Resources – Office of Utilities – Office of Construction – Office of Construction Claims – Legal Services – District Offices

Time Extensions Related to Utility Delays

References SENATE BILL 19 ( Click on “ Current Version ” and you should be able to view) GDOT RULE – CHAPTER GOVERNING UTILITIES MEDIATION PROCESS ( Georgia Secretary of State website – ) ESCALATION POLICY (GDOT website – Chapters 2 & 4 of the UAM:

Questions? State Utilities Office web site:

THAT’S ALL FOLKS