L2C: Civilian code on L2 carrier broadcast by 7 Block IIR-M SV’s since 2005, and 1 Block IIF since 2010.  Unencrypted code – tracked by civilian receivers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nick Talbot Research Fellow, Trimble Navigation Australia
Advertisements

GPS Signal Structure Sources: –GPS Satellite Surveying, Leick –Kristine Larson Lecture Notes 4519/asen4519.html.
RECALL THE THEORETICAL JARGON:
SVN-49 Signal Anomaly Presented by Tom Stansell GPSW POC: Lt. Col. James Lake, Ph.D.
2013 Western Australia Surveying Conference
Modulation Error Ratio and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Demystified Presented by Sunrise Telecom Broadband …a step ahead.
Receiver Test Selection Criteria Tom Stansell The National Transportation Systems Center Advancing transportation innovation for the public good U.S. Department.
June 12-14, 2013, Ottawa, Canada From dual- to triple-frequency PPP: method, problems and application in California Jianghui Geng, Yehuda Bock Scripps.
Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland IGS Analysis Center Workshop June 2-6, 2008, Miami FL AIUB Astronomical Institute University of.
Geodetic Research Laboratory, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Workshop, October 27 – 28, 2006, Quebec city, Quebec Sükeová, Liliána 1 L2C.
GPS - Global Positioning System Presented By Brindha Narayanan.
A SINGLE FREQUENCY GPS SOFTWARE RECEIVER
GPS and other GNSS signals GPS signals and receiver technology MM10 Darius Plausinaitis
Distance-decreasing attack in GPS Final Presentation Horacio Arze Prof. Jean-Pierre Hubaux Assistant: Marcin Poturalski January 2009 Security and Cooperation.
03/18/05OSU GAMIT/GLOBK1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
EE 570: Location and Navigation: Theory & Practice The Global Positioning System (GPS) Thursday 11 April 2013 NMT EE 570: Location and Navigation: Theory.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 07 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
Surveying with a GPS How to configure a GPS unit to ensure the highest accuracy.
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services
Angelyn Moore IGS Central Bureau Jet Propulsion Laboratory USA The IGS Network.
NGS Real Time Network Status & Future Prospects Neil Weston NGS Convocation, 2005 Silver Spring, MD.
Pg 1 of 12 AGI GPS Signal Simulation & Visualization Oct 11, 2005 Curtis Hay Spirent Federal Systems.
ENC-GNSS 2006 – Manchester, UK Civil GPS Interface Committee International Sub-Committee May 7, 2006 John E. Augustine Acting Director, Office of Navigation.
Development of Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) Receiver
for Maritime Services)
Earth Science Applications of Space Based Geodesy DES-7355 Tu-Th 9:40-11:05 Seminar Room in 3892 Central Ave. (Long building) Bob Smalley Office: 3892.
Introduction QZSS (Quasi-Zenith Satellite System) program:
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
GPS Adjacent Band Compatibility Assessment Topic Introductions Karen Van Dyke, Steve Mackey, Hadi Wassaf, George Dimos, and Tom Stansell The National Transportation.
CZEPOS – a Multipurpose Positioning System for the Czech Republic Oldřich Pašek – Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre Jan Řezníček – Land.
Mr.Samniang Suttara B.Eng. (Civil), M.Eng. (Survey) Topcon Instruments (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Tel Satellite Surveying.
Class 19 – NAVSTAR GPS, GLONASS and Galileo
Tripp Corbin, CFM, GISP CEO eGIS Associates, Inc. Relationships Matter.
Compatibility of Receiver Types for GLONASS Widelane Ambiguity Resolution Simon Banville, Paul Collins and François Lahaye Geodetic Survey Division, Natural.
Spazio ZeroUno Cell Broadcast Forum Plenary, Milan, May 28-29th 2002 Andrea Ghirardini Business Development Spazio ZeroUno An efficient and effective method.
Trimble NetR8 GNSS Reference Receiver
1 Todd E. Humphreys, Cornell University Larry Young, JPL Thomas Pany, University FAF Munich 2008 IGS Workshop, Miami Beach FL IGS Receiver Considerations.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 01/06/27 S.Bisnath A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR GPS-BASED.
Advances in GNSS Equipment Todd Humphreys With Input From: Thomas Pany, Bernhard Riedl IFEN, Carsten Stroeber UFAF Larry Young, JPL David Munton, UT/ARL.
Modulation Error Ratio and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Demystified Presented by Sunrise Telecom Broadband …a step ahead.
GSI Japan - 21st of June 1999 GPS-Positioning using Virtual Reference Stations - Theory, Analysis and Applications Herbert Landau Spectra Precision Terrasat.
Making good from bad: Can we use GPS multipath to measure soil moisture? Kristine M. Larson Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences University of.
Data centre support for the IGS-RT PP W. Söhne, H. Habrich, G. Weber Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
SVY207: Lecture 17 Third party products and GPS processing procedures
What Makes a GNSS Signal the IGS Analysis Center Workshop 2-6 June 2008, Miami Beach Larry Young (not an expert, just a user) Jet Propulsion Lab.
The Global Positioning System. Early Satellite Systems Satellite Surveying started more than 30 years ago. Now, High accuracy could be achieved in real.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 1 UNB3 data management script assessment Thatchineswaran.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Using Real-time Networks in the Northeast
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 08 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Relative positioning with Galileo E5 AltBOC code measurements DEPREZ Cécile Dissertation submitted to the University of Liège in partial requirements for.
Facility New GNSS Signals and Receivers Freddy Blume – UNAVCO D&T Manager USGS Geodesy Workshop, 12 March, 2010 Development and Testing.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module R King overview from longer T Herring.
Fundamentals of Communications. Communication System Transmitter: originates the signal Receiver: receives transmitted signal after it travels over the.
SE40 Meeting on Pseudolites JRC test results
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 07
GPS - Global Positioning System
Modulation Error Ratio and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Demystified Presented by Sunrise Telecom Broadband …a step ahead.
Real-Time Working Group
GNSS data from receiver to processing input
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
GNSS data from receiver to processing input
Presentation transcript:

L2C: Civilian code on L2 carrier broadcast by 7 Block IIR-M SV’s since 2005, and 1 Block IIF since  Unencrypted code – tracked by civilian receivers without correlation.  Provides 6-12 dB-Hz SNR improvement over P2, stronger than L1 C/A.  Broadcast in quadrature (90° out of phase) with P2: L2C Basics P2 Carrier (In Phase)

L2C: Civilian code on L2 carrier broadcast by 7 Block IIR-M SV’s since 2005, and 1 Block IIF since  Unencrypted code – tracked by civilian receivers without correlation.  Provides 6-12 dB-Hz SNR improvement over P2, stronger than L1 C/A.  Broadcast in quadrature (90° out of phase) with P2: L2C Basics C2 Carrier (Quadrature)

Quadrature Phase-Shift Key Modulation Do Phase Shifts Affect Carrier Phase Positioning?  Depends on who made your receiver  Depends on how you have configured your receiver  Depends on how you translate and pre-process your data  Depends on how you process the positions

GPS Receiver Tracking Configuration Most receivers simultaneously track L2C and L2P(Y)  Can also be configured to track ONLY L2C if present (this is often the default)  Some can only do one or the other (e.g. Ashtech ProFlex CORS, Trimble NetRS with older firmware (1.1-5) < Leica GR10 Trimble NetR9 > < Topcon Net-G3A Trimble NetRS >

GPS Receiver Logging Configuration Some Data Formats Don’t Allow for both L2C and L2P  Trimble Record Type 17 (RT17)  Default Topcon TPS Messages  BINEX Record 7f-03 (Leica and some Trimble Receivers) Just because you’re TRACKING both L2 phases doesn’t mean you’re LOGGING both! Trimble NetRS

Your RAW data contains BOTH L2C and L2P(Y) But RINEX 2.XX currently allows for a single L2 Phase and SNR (it does allow multiple pseudoranges)  RINEX 2.30 under development (UNAVCO/National Geodetic Survey) would allow both L2 phases and SNR’s in the same file. For now, UNAVCO’s teqc pre-processing software selects L2C phase and SNR when C2 observation is included in the RINEX file (+C2 flag in command line) since Sept RINEX Translation Software 2.11 OBSERVATION DATA G (GPS) RINEX VERSION / TYPE teqc 2011Feb :55:52UTCPGM / RUN BY / DATE 8 L1 L2 C1 P1 C2 P2 S1 S2 # / TYPES OF OBSERV G24G16G18G21G10G22G29G01G05G

RINEX Translation Software Javad SIGMA et al. Leica GR10 If you do not control the receiver or pre-processing, how do you know which L2 information you have?  Some translators prefer P2 phase when C2 is present. May find SV’s with NO L2 observations in some cases  L2C 6-12 dB-Hz SNR improvement over P2.  SNR for L2C is higher than L1-C/A

L2C Phase is ¼-wavelength out of phase with L2P(Y) Some manufacturers correct for this in the raw logged data by subtracting 0.25 from observed phase.  Ashtech, Septentrio, Trimble Others don’t correct: Javad, Leica, Topcon Receiver Quadrature Phase Correction

Receivers use separate correlators for each L2 carrier phase.  Instrument noise is independent, reveals Rx digitizing resolution How do Receivers Track L2C and L2P? Trimble NetRS: Banding at 1/256 cycle ≈ 1 mm (8-bit A-D) Phase L2C – Phase L2P(Y) Same raw data file containing Both L2C and L2P(Y) Different teqc translation method

Receivers use separate correlators for each L2 carrier phase.  Instrument noise is independent, reveals Rx digitizing resolution How do Receivers Track L2C and L2P? Phase L2C – Phase L2P(Y) Same raw data file containing Both L2C and L2P(Y) Different teqc translation method Leica GR10, Topcon Net-G3A: Banding at 1/512 cycle ≈ 0.5 mm (9-bit A-D)

Receivers use separate correlators for each L2 carrier phase.  Instrument noise is independent, reveals Rx digitizing resolution How do Receivers Track L2C and L2P? Phase L2C – Phase L2P(Y) Same raw data file containing Both L2C and L2P(Y) Different teqc translation method Trimble NetR9, Javad SIGMA: Banding at 1/1024 cycle ≈ 0.25 mm (10-bit A-D)

Zero-Baseline (same receiver, different L2 phase used) How Does This Affect Position? 24-hour TRACK Solution: No net bias, noise depends on L2C visibility

TRACK phase residuals for L2C Satellite How Does This Affect Position? Lower figure shows difference between L2C (red) and L2P (blue)

TRACK phase residuals for non-L2C Satellite How Does This Affect Position? This case demonstrates that L2C noise does not affect other satellites

GAMIT Solution Using L2-P(Y) Phase (GREEN) vs. L2C Phase (BLUE) Direct Comparison of L2C-L2P Position Same Receiver (Trimble NetRS) – L2C enabled on day 100

Sub-millimeter differences in L2C and L2-P(Y) GAMIT Solutions Same Receiver (Trimble NetRS) – L2C enabled on day 100 Direct Comparison of L2C-L2P Position

Elevation Dependent Phase Residuals between L2C and L2P GAMIT Solutions L2C Noisier at Low Elevations – Increased Multipath due to SNR (remember this!) Direct Comparison of L2C-L2P Position

Carrier Phase Position Comparison for L2-P(Y) and L2C Trimble NetRS to Trimble NetR9 TRACK Processing: Both correct Quadrature in L2C 10 km Baseline – Mixed Receivers L2P – BLUE L2C - RED

Carrier Phase Position Comparison for L2-P(Y) and L2C Trimble NetRS to Leica GR10 (no quadrature correction) TRACK Processing 10 km Baseline – Mixed Receivers L2P – BLUE L2C - RED

L2C Is Not Yet Suitable For Use in Carrier-Phase Positioning  Only Partial Constellation Available  Confusion over receiver configuration and pre-processing Improper receiver configuration and/or translation can result in loss of L2-P Phase information and missing observations  Fundamental Incompatibility of receiver brands IGS and RTCM should encourage universal quadrature correction as has been done with L1P and L1-C/A  Problems in kinematic processing with mixed receivers Real-time issues (not discussed here) are worse! Recommendations :  L2C phase not be used in “production” RINEX files used for position time-series.  Log both L2-P(Y) and L2C iff raw data format allows, and use separate pre-processing flows for positioning and special uses. Conclusions

If adopting something as “simple” as a new carrier on an existing frequency is so difficult, what about:  New GPS frequency: L5?  Existing GNSS Constellation: GLONASS?  Future constellations: Galileo, Compass? Issues to address:  Upgrade timeline of existing infrastructure Receivers & Antennas (disrupt time-series)?  Data Formats and metadata RINEX 2.30 (draft) vs. RINEX 3 (not (yet) supported by teqc)  Data Analysis software Carrier phase and multi-code analysis Questions:

January 13, 2012: Results Conveyed to NTIA Wildcard: New Hardware Development to Allow High-Powered Terrestrial Broadband Internet in the MSS-Band (a.k.a. LightSquared)  Letter from NPT EXCOM Chairmen to NTIA regarding near-band interference: “It is the unanimous conclusion of the test findings by the National Space-Based PNT EXCOM Agencies that both LightSquared's original and modified plans for its proposed mobile network would cause harmful interference to many GPS receivers. We propose to draft new GPS Spectrum interference standards that will help inform future proposals for non-space, commercial uses in the bands adjacent to the GPS signals and ensure that any such proposals are implemented without affecting existing and evolving uses of space-based PNT services vital to economic, public safety, scientific, and national security needs.” Questions: