Overview of the United States Partitioning and Transmutation Research Program OECD/NEA 8 th Information Exchange Meeting On Partitioning and Transmutation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(1) Office of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Energy – Advanced Fuel Cycles and the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Buzz Savage Office of Nuclear Energy U.S.
Advertisements

Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Fuel Cycles and Repositories Dr. Phillip.
Nuclear Energy University Programs (NEUP) Fuel Cycle Technologies Program Overview Dr. Monica Regalbuto Office of Nuclear Energy Deputy Assistant Secretary,
Nuclear Energy University Programs Fuel Cycle Technologies, Separations and Waste Forms Program August 10, 2011 Terry Todd, National Technical Director.
Fuel Cycle Subcommittee: Overview and Status Fusion-Fission Hybrid Workshop Gaithersburg, MD September 30, 2009 Robert N. Hill Department Head – Nuclear.
Augustus Merwin Presented to the National Security Forum
Text optional: Institutsname Prof. Dr. Hans Mustermann Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft Partitioning & Transmutation Combined with Molten Salt.
Safety and Security Aspects of the Management of High Level Waste and Spent Fuel Ramzi Jammal Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations.
Generation IV Systems: Key Technological Challenges for Fission Reactors and What It Means for Fusion David Petti R&D Technical Director Next Generation.
Nuclear Energy University Programs MS-RC1 - Reactor Concepts RD&D August 10, 2011 Christopher Grandy Argonne National Laboratory.
1 GAO Study on Radioactive Waste Management Scenarios Ric Cheston US Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Oregon State University Academic Center of Excellence Workshop Thermal Fluids and Heat Transfer at the INL Dr. James R. Wolf, Manager Thermal Fluids &
Indian strategy for management of spent fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors S.Basu, India.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Timothy Pairitz. Nuclear Power 101 Uranium-235 is enriched from 0.7% to 3-5%. Enriched fuel is converted to a uranium oxide powder.
50th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society 11 July Spokane, Washington, USA Kevan D. Weaver, Ph.D. U.S. System Integration Manager, Gas-Cooled.
 Benefits of Nuclear Energy  How Fission Works  Nuclear Power Plant Basics  Overview of Uranium Fuel Cycle  Energy Lifecycle of Nuclear Power  Generation.
Nuclear Energy in the 21 st Century BEIJING 2009 International Ministerial Conference April 2009.
BNFL/Westinghouse’s Perspective on the Nuclear Hydrogen Economy Dr PJA Howarth Head of Group Science Strategy.
The Way Forward in the US: Nuclear Waste Management Allison Macfarlane AAAS San Diego February 19, 2010.
GNEP: A Proliferation Risk or a Solution to the Nuclear Waste Problem? Allison Macfarlane George Mason University Senate briefing June 23, 2008 Allison.
Recycling Nuclear Waste: Potentials and Global Perspectives Mikael Nilsson Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science University of California,
EURATOM RESEARCH AND TRAINING ON NUCLEAR ENERGY 1.
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
Yacine Kadi Thorium Energy Conference 2013 Globe of Innovation, CERN, Switzerland October 31, 2013.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO) Presented by Jon R. Phillips.
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
The European nuclear industry and research approach for innovation in nuclear energy Dominique Hittner Framatome-ANP EPS, Paris, 3/10/2003.
The Nuclear Energy Future John F. Kotek, Deputy Manager Idaho Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy November, 2003 The Government Role in Creating.
Fusion-Fission Hybrid Systems
Future perspectives of nuclear energy
Environment Institute Where ideas grow atomexpo 2013 forum: “Nuclear energy and public acceptance”, Saint Petersburg, 28 June 2013 Plentiful Energy – key.
CANDU Fuel Options: Practical Adaptability Jerry Hopwood Vice President, Marketing & Product Development World Nuclear Association, Annual Symposium September.
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Dr. Okan Zabunoğlu Hacettepe University Department of Nuclear Engineering.
1 TCADS, Technology & Components of Accelerator Driven Systems, March 15-17, 2010, Karlsruhe (DE) Copyright © 2009 SCKCEN MYRRHA: ADS Programme in Belgium.
Nuclear Energy Options and Project-X Shekhar Mishra Fermilab Yousry Gohar ANL June 7 th 2010.
Reprocessing of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Sustainability Of U.S. Nuclear Energy: Waste Management And The Question Of Reprocessing Nathan R. Lee American Nuclear Society 2010 WISE Internship August.
Can Thermal Reactor Recycle Eliminate the Need for Multiple Repositories? C. W. Forsberg, E. D. Collins, C. W. Alexander, and J. Renier Actinide and Fission.
The Nuclear Reactors from a « Natural History » Perspective Bertrand BARRÉ, AREVA President European Nuclear Society Director ANS Vice-president INSC.
PBNC- 1 Overview of US Nuclear Energy Initiatives /06- 1 Harold McFarlane President American Nuclear Society.
Steven Biegalski, Ph.D., P.E. Director, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Dusting off the Atom: Nuclear.
Thorium for Use in Plutonium Disposition, Proliferation Resistant Fuels, and Future Reactors Brian Johnson WISE 2006
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Activities in the Area of Partitioning and Transmutation Alexander Stanculescu Nuclear Energy Department Nuclear.
Sustainable Cycle Solutions World Nuclear Association London, Sep 12 th, 2013 Caroline Drevon SVP Strategy, Sales & Innovation Back-End Business Group.
11 The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Phillip J. Finck Idaho National Laboratory April 2, 2007.
The Proposed Materials Test Station at LANSCE Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at the Workshop on High-Power Targetry for Future.
Integrated Used Nuclear Fuel Management Regulatory Information Conference U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 11, 2009 Steven P. Kraft Senior Director.
IAEA Sources of Radiation Fuel Cycle - Reprocessing Day 4 – Lecture 8 (2) 1.
1 Massimo SALVATORESiemtp 8 – November th Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation University.
1 Nuclear Energy Division MIT Report on the Future of Nuclear Power in the United-States : review and discussion Eric Proust Director, Industrial Affairs.
PIME 2004 / Barcelona, Feb. 10, 2004Nuclear Energy Division 1 PIME 2004 plenary session February 10, 2004 – Barcelona Preparing the future : New challenges.
D J Coates, G T Parks Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK Actinide Evolution and Equilibrium in Fast Thorium Reactors UNTF 2010 University.
ENERGY FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY the Potential for Nuclear Power Luis Echávarri Director-General, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency IAEA Scientific Forum at the General.
Critical and Source Driven Subcritical Systems for: - Waste Transmutation - Fuel Breeding Phillip Finck Associate Laboratory Director for Nuclear Science.
Regional Strategies Concerning Nuclear Fuel Cycle and HLRW in Central and Eastern European Countries Z. Hózer (AEKI, Hungary), S. Borovitskiy (FCNRS, Russia),
Future Nuclear Reactors Third and Third-Plus+ Generation Reactors Next Generation is Simpler
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.9i – slide 1 of 20 Session I.4.9i Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 9iFuel Cycle - Reprocessing IAEA.
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.9h – slide 1 of 24 Session I.4.9h Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 9hFuel Cycle – Spent Fuel IAEA Post.
Status of Nuclear Power in US Brief history of nuclear power Brief history of nuclear power Nuclear reactor roadmap Nuclear reactor roadmap 2010 Program.
Department of Nuclear Energy International Atomic Energy Agency Overall Roadmap Organization NERAC GEN IV Roadmap NERAC Subcommittee (GRNS) Technical Community.
 closure E M Environmental Management  cleanup  performance safety STRATEGY MEETING NATIONAL SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL PROGRAM Bringing Innovation to Spent.
Potential role of FF hybrids Massimo Salvatores CEA-Cadarache- France Fusion-Fission Hybrids have a potential role (in principle and independently from.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Nuclear Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory.
International Atomic Energy Agency Reprocessing, Waste Treatment and Disposal Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel Seminar on Nuclear Science and Technology.
Why Thorium? # Thorium can address issues that have remained unresolved with Uranium based nuclear energy. * Thorium leads to some natural advantages in.
Adonai Herrera-Martínez, Yacine Kadi, Geoff Parks, Vasilis Vlachoudis High-Level Waste Transmutation: Thorium Cycle vs Multi-Tier Strategy.
Natural Resources Defense Council
IAEA International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power – The next Fifty Years Moscow - Obninsk, Russian Federation - June 28, 2004 Nuclear.
Global Nuclear Energy Partnership [GNEP]
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the United States Partitioning and Transmutation Research Program OECD/NEA 8 th Information Exchange Meeting On Partitioning and Transmutation Las Vegas, NV November 9, 2004 Buzz Savage AFCI Program Director U.S. DOE

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology “The NEPD Group recommends that the President support the expansion of nuclear energy in the United States as a major component of our national energy policy.” Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group, May 2001 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant The National Energy Policy and Nuclear Power Recommendations: ♦Support expansion of nuclear energy in the United States ♦Develop advanced nuclear fuel cycles and next generation technologies ♦Develop advanced reprocessing and fuel treatment technologies

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology U.S. DOE currently has a number of initiatives to promote the growth of nuclear energy Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative - Recovery of energy value from SNF - Reduce the inventory of civilian Pu - Reduce the toxicity & heat of waste - More effective use of the repository Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative Develop technologies for economic, commercial-scale generation of hydrogen. Nuclear Power Explore new sites - Develop business case - Develop Generation III+ technologies - Demonstrate new licensing process Generation IV Better, safer, more economic nuclear power plants with improvements in - safety & reliability - proliferation resistance & physical protection - economic competitiveness - sustainability

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Open Yucca Mtn Generation IV and Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative A Long-Term U.S. Strategy for Nuclear Energy NP 2010 Deploy First U.S. ALWR Commercial Fast Reactor Option Available Once-Through Fuel Cycle Nuclear Energy Production NGNP Demo Plant Fast TRU burners Self-sustaining closed fuel cycle Advanced Thermal Reactor Fuel Cycle High-Level Waste Proliferation-resistant recycling of Pu (+Np/Am?) in thermal reactors Actinide Recycle Rec. on 2 nd repository Ultra-high- burnup fuel First Commercial NGNP AFCI

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Gen IV Second Priority GFR LFR SFR Lower Priority SCWR MSR U.S. Generation IV Implementation Gen IV Top Priority VHTR + H 2 NGNP Next-Generation Nuclear Plant Collaborative with international community Collaborative with industry, especially utilities Demonstrate H 2 and direct-cycle electricity production Result in a commercially viable plant design U.S. Fast Reactor Closely coordinated with Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative ♦Mission Develop proliferation-resistant spent nuclear fuel treatment, fuel and transmutation technologies to enable the transition from the once-through fuel cycle to a stable, long-term, environmentally, economically, and politically acceptable advanced closed fuel cycle. ♦Goals Develop advanced fuel and fuel cycle technologies for application to current operating commercial reactors and next- generation reactors Develop technologies to reduce the cost of geologic disposal of high level waste from spent fuel, enhancing repository performance

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology AFCI Benefits ♦Achieving AFCI program goals could: Reduce civil plutonium inventories, reducing proliferation risk Extract valuable energy from spent fuel components Retain nuclear energy as a major component of the U.S. energy mix, ensuring energy security in the 21 st century Significantly reduce volume, heat load and radiotoxicity of high-level waste from spent fuel, delaying any near- term need for a second geologic repository in the U.S.

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology History of DOE’s Advanced Fuel Cycle Research ♦ Accelerator Transmutation of Waste (ATW): Roadmap issued by RW, outlined use of high-powered proton accelerators for destruction of all actinides from spent fuel ♦ ATW: research program initiated to explore transmutation technology ($9M) ♦ Advanced Accelerator Applications (AAA) Program launched: combined ATW with Accelerator Production of Tritium (APT) Program to optimize use of resources ($34M-NE, $34M-DP) ♦ AAA refocused to AFCI: emphasis on reactor based systems, accelerator transmutation focused on “fuel burn” role to minimize toxicity and support Generation IV (Gen IV) fuel development ($50M) ♦ AFCI establishes new management structure: National Technical Directors, Technical Integrator, and integrates with Gen IV for fuel cycle development ($58.2M) ♦ AFCI Budget: $68M ♦2005 – AFCI Budget Request: $46.3M

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology AFCI Recent Accomplishments ♦Successfully demonstrated UREX aqueous process at SRNL, separating uranium from actual spent nuclear fuel with over percent purity ♦Demonstrated lab-scale high-purity separation of cesium/strontium, plutonium/neptunium and americium/curium from spent fuel (INEEL, ANL, ORNL) ♦Fabricated and irradiated non-fertile and low-fertile metallic, nitride and oxide fuel samples containing plutonium, neptunium and americium (LANL, ANL-W, INEEL). PIE started at ANL-W ♦Built a lead-bismuth test loop at LANL and completed 1000 hour corrosion test

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology AFCI Challenges: ♦Define, plan and execute the optimal research to inform the Secretarial recommendation on second repository and meet AFCI/Gen IV program goals ♦Scale of demonstrations to provide sufficient confidence in Secretarial recommendation ♦Integration of analysis and modeling with experiments ♦U.S. nonproliferation policy ♦R&D facilities, including pilot-scale demos and fast spectrum irradiation facility ♦Reliable long-term funding

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Spent Fuel From Commercial Plants Direct Disposal Conventional Reprocessing PUREX Spent Fuel PuUranium MO X LWRs/ALWRs U and Pu Actinides Fission Products Repository Interim Storage Less U and Pu (More Actinides Fission Products) Advanced, Proliferation-Resistant Recycling + ADS Transmuter? Trace U and Pu Trace Actinides Less Fission Products Repository Gen IV Fast Reactors Once Through Fuel Cycle Current European/Japanese Fuel Cycle Advanced Proliferation Resistant Fuel Cycle Gen IV Fuel Fabrication LWR/ALWR/HTGR AFCI Approach to Spent Fuel Management Advanced Separations Technologies

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology AFCI Long-Range Strategy Phase 1 Separations for Waste Management Phase 2 Thermal Recycle of Pu/Np Phase 3 TRUs to Dedicated Burners Phase 4 Entry into Gen IV Economy  Uranium disposal as LLW  Cs/Sr extracted for decay storage  All TRUs and remaining FPs to HLW or Interim Storage  Uranium disposal as LLW  Cs/Sr extracted for decay storage  Pu/Np and possibly additional MAs recovered for thermal recycle  Remaining MAs and FPs to HLW  Uranium recovery for re-use  Cs/Sr extracted for decay storage  TRUs directed to dedicated burners  Remaining FPs to HLW  Uranium recovery for re-use  Cs/Sr extracted for decay storage  Actinide recycle to Gen IV reactors

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Separations – Current Approach ♦Aqueous separations process development (UREX+1, UREX+2) with laboratory-scale experiments ♦Process technology development (equipment, process integration, process control and instrumentation, safeguards instrumentation, etc.) ♦Development of waste forms and storage forms (including performance testing) ♦Evaluation of advanced processing methods and validatation of promising candidates at laboratory- scale

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Separations Technology Development in 2005 ♦Large centrifugal contactor tests Scaleup issues, remote operation/reliability/maintainability Process sampling and analysis, process control ♦Dissolution studies Optimize for most complete dissolution of TRU and compatibility with subsequent separations steps ♦Feed clarification experiments Efficiency of different methods ♦Alternative head-end process development Voloxidation process Off-gas recovery and treatment ♦Uranium crystallization process development Maximizing purity of separated uranium Carbonate dissolution process

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Advanced Fuels Research ♦NGNP particle fuel UCO, SiC coating High temperature requirement (1000°C) ♦LWR Recycle Fuel Mixed Oxide Pu + Np + Am? + Cm? Inert Matrix Intrinsic proliferation resistance ♦Fast reactor Fuels Metal, Nitride, Oxide, Dispersion Optimize transmutation

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology Materials Research ♦Coolants/targets for Generation IV fast reactors and Accelerator Driven Systems Lead, lead-bismuth for LFR, ADS Helium, supercritical CO2 for GFR ♦Structural materials for high-temperature, high fast neutron flux performance ♦Fuel matrix materials for very high-burnup fast reactor and transmutation fuels

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology AFCI International Collaborations ♦International Cooperation has provided U.S. with much needed research and experimental data France - CEA: separations, fuels (FUTURIX), physics, systems studies MEGAPIE facility at Paul Sherrer Institute (Switzerland); spallation target technology, physics & engineering support Russia - LBE Test target; UNLV cooperation OECD/Nuclear Energy Agency European Commission Japan South Korea IAEA

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology DOE Approach for International Collaborations ♦International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative (INERI) changes in FY 2004 INERI budget funds completion of ongoing projects only; no new starts New starts of bilateral international collaborations funded by the research programs (AFCI, Gen IV, Hydrogen) INERI bilateral agreements will be main mechanism (France-CEA, S. Korea, OECD/NEA, Euratom, Brazil, Canada); several new agreements close to signing (Japan, South Africa, UK) ♦Existing AFCI cooperative agreements and “implementing arrangements” will also be used ♦Collaborations with European community on FUTURIX, MEGAPIE, TRADE expected to continue ♦Trilateral with France and Japan under discussion for use of Monju for transmutation fuel assembly tests

Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology International Collaborations 2000 France CEA Gen IV/AFCI/NHI OECD/NEA NSC, NDC 2003 Euratom Gen IV/AFCI 2001 Switzerland PSI MEGAPIE IAEA Fuel Cycle 2004 Italy ENEA TRADE 2002 Russia ISTC Pb-Bi Target 2002 Korea MOST Gen IV/AFCI 2004 Japan JNC/JAERI 2004 Brazil CNEN 2004 South Africa DME 2005 UK Gen IV/AFCI 2004 Canada AECL