TEACHER KEYS EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM (TKES). WHY TKES? HOUSE BILL 244 Passed during 2013 legislative session Mandates use of single, state-wide evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Advertisements

Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness Podcast 4.
Grading and Reporting Grades K-3. Purpose of Grading and Reporting Our primary purposes of grading and reporting include: Report student progress toward.
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making.
“RACE TO THE TOP” UPDATE – TKES/LKES & THE G.O.L.D. ACADEMY SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 BOE STUDY SESSION Dan Ray, Ed.S. Director – “Race to the Top” Henry County.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Preparing for Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards.
Teacher Evaluation Model
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Overview and Principal Effectiveness Rubric.
State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness April 2011 CCSSO Ohio Principal Evaluation System.
Arkansas Teacher Excellence and Support System: Guide to Evidence & Artifacts.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Road To Success Florida School Leader Assessment (FSLA)
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Improving Our Profession Through Deliberate Practice.
The levels of performance considered at the element level are not intended to be used to label teachers as Not Evident, Emerging, Proficient, and Exemplary.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 9: Annual Evaluation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Field Test of Counselor System July 2000 Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program.
District Meeting #3 Year One East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Educator Evaluation On-line Systems Training. History of the Evaluation System In , the new Evaluation System was piloted in 25 schools. In 2012,
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Designing Professional Development Session 1 – Introduction to Instructional Rounds Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
USING THE LAPTOP/IPAD Organizing the technology in the Classroom How I Organize My Technology.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
Rubrics Principal Evaluation Model Examples. Note… In the state examples given the Principal/Asst. Principal is evaluated by the “Superintendent” or “Designee”
Strategic Plan Goals City Schools of Decatur seeks to challenge every student to succeed by providing a rigorous, engaging, and authentic learning experience.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Teacher Orientation Training for teachers FY15 July 28,
Pre-Evaluation Conference Conducted August 18, 2015 STING Schedule.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Educator Effectiveness
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Georgia Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

TEACHER KEYS EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM (TKES)

WHY TKES? HOUSE BILL 244 Passed during 2013 legislative session Mandates use of single, state-wide evaluation system for teachers Optimize teacher quality Optimize student learning

PRIMARY PURPOSES Optimize student learning and growth Improve the quality of classroom instruction Support the continuous growth of teachers

TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS METHOD (TEMS) 3 Components: Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards Students growth and Academic Achievement Surveys of Instructional Practice

TEACHER ASSESSMENT ON PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TAPS) FIVE DOMAINS: Planning, Instructional Delivery, Assessment of and for Learning, Learning Environment, Professionalism and Communication

TEN STANDARDS Professional Knowledge Instructional Planning Instructional Strategies Differentiated Instruction Assessment Strategies Assessment Uses Positive Learning Environment Academically Challenging Environment Professionalism Communication

RATING PERFORMANCE EXEMPLARY PROFICIENT NEEDS DEVELOPMENT INEFFECTIVE

TAPS PROCESS Orientation Familiarization Self-Assessment Pre-Evaluation Conference Observation and Collection Formative Assessment and Mid-Year Evaluation Conference Summative Assessment and Summative Evaluation

TAPS MANAGEMENT Electronic Platform: houses all records and resources for TKES Supports dialogue between principals and teachers Produces reports on usage and completion of process steps

GROWTH AND ACHIEVEMENT Based on GROWTH, NOT academic scores Students growth is based on the IMPACT of your teaching

THE BOTTOM LINE “For every one of us that succeeds, it is because there is somebody there to show you the way out. For me, it was teachers and school.” Ophrah Winfrey