Ontario Psychological Association (OPA) Student Assessment Project “Designing a Project for Success” Date: February 6, 2009 Presented by: Marg Peppler,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
Advertisements

School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Evaluation Capacity Building Identifying and Addressing the Fields Needs.
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
STIMULUS AND STATE FISCAL STABILIZATION BOROUGH ASSEMBLY MEETING AUGUST 20, 2009 NANCY WAGNER, FNSBSD SUPERINTENDENT TRACI GATEWOOD, GRANTS AND SPECIAL.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 2: Historical Perspective of Policy 2320 Dr. Donna Davis Deputy Director, OEPA.
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) What is an IEP?  a summary of the student’s strengths, interests, and needs, and of the expectations for a student’s.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
A District Perspective Thomas Purwin, Jersey City Public Schools
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
SPECIAL EDUCATION POLICY AND PROGRAMS OVERVIEW October, 2006 Ministry of Education.
© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.
MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES JOHNS Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
BOLD’S WORLD’S BEST WORK FORCE, MISSION TO SUCCESS.
Build Readiness Collect & Analyze Data Set Goals Based On Data Investigate Research Based Practices Make Action Plan Implement & Monitor Evaluate Effectiveness.
Today’s Outcomes understand the importance of evidence-based decision making in improving student learning learn more about EQAO as a source of information.
Whistler 2020 Monitoring Program CSIN February16, 2006.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
October 25, Rock, Paper,Scissors Ms. Constance Lade.
Dr. Timothy Mitchell Rapid City Area Schools
 Share draft PD Plan for SY Development Process District Priorities Draft District Learning Plans for 4 core content areas  Allow time for small.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
South West and Mid Wales Consortium Eifion Evans.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
The Accountability Framework BCSTA New Board Academy December 10, 2005 Emery Dosdall, Deputy Minister The Accountability Framework BCSTA New Board Academy.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
School Improvement Leadership: Developing the Action Plan CIA Team Denise Behrends Chad Dumas Beth McCracken February 23, 2012.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Long-Term Planning Process Draft for Discussion Purposes.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP)
Using data for instructional decision-making
Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Ontario Psychological Association (OPA) Student Assessment Project “Designing a Project for Success” Date: February 6, 2009 Presented by: Marg Peppler, Project Manager Dr. Beverley Terrell-Deutsch, Team Lead For:Ministry of Education 2009 Ontario Education Research Symposium

Feb 6, Outline Background Project Governance Project Objectives Evaluation Strategy Results – Highlights in Closing the Gap Conclusions

Feb 6, Background Early in 2006: issue of wait times for professional assessments tabled by the Minister’s Advisory Committee on Special Education April 2006: OPA were approached by the Ministry of Education to develop and lead a project to provide a $20M grant to school boards Purpose: support the school boards and school authorities to reduce wait times for students requiring professional assessments and to enhance teacher capacity Target Students: Junior Kindergarten to Grade 4

Feb 6, Project Governance Project Manager & Team Advisory Group Core Committee OPA Board of Directors Decision Makers on Behalf of the OPA Board of Directors Accountable for the Project Responsible to Core Committee for Planning, Execution, Control, Closure Inform the Decisions of the Project Manager and Team

Feb 6, Project Objectives reduce wait times for students in junior kindergarten to grade IV requiring professional assessments enhance teacher capacity to provide effective programming for students provided with professional assessments improve literacy / numeracy for students provided with professional assessments sustain assessment process improvements for the long term

Feb 6, Evaluation Strategy Clear project objectives & measures defined, approved, & communicated to school boards up front School boards develop Assessment Capacity Building Plans 100% Success Model Monitor school board progress and coaching to facilitate success Test evaluation questions/data requirements with school boards: Right data / questions to measure project success? Clear / understandable instructions? Reasonable effort to acquire / provide data? Web-based software for data input with reporting / analysis capability at back end Involve decision makers in data reporting Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6

Feb 6, Results – Highlights in Closing the Gap Building capacity of teachers to provide effective programming for students provided with a professional assessment Impact on student achievement Status of activities to sustain assessment process improvements for the long term

Feb 6, Priorities for Building Capacity of Teachers

Feb 6, Priorities for Building Capacity of Professional Services Staff

Feb 6,

Feb 6, Priorities to Sustain Assessment Process Improvements

Feb 6, Sustain Assessment Process Improvements Results report “Summary of Key Results Areas – Critical Findings”: –is available in English/French on the Ontario Psychological Association website at: Resource Guide “Sharing Promising Practices”: –produced in English/French –contains brief descriptions of each school board project with 12 of them in more detail –More than 6000 copies distributed to Ontario school boards and other project stakeholders –For copies contact OPA at – Carla Mardonet

Feb 6, Conclusions 100% success model Established a governance structure Set clear direction with objectives and evaluation measures at the beginning Developed plans to meet project objectives and monitored progress along the way Tested evaluation questions / data requirements and made changes based on stakeholder feedback Involved decision makers Developed web-based software to efficiently collect, verify, summarize and analyze the data Planned for knowledge mobilization

Feb 6, Designing a Project for Success Ministry of Education Advisory Group OPA Core Committee School Boards Community Practitioners OPA Project Team EDU Special Education Leads ACPOSB OPA “Understanding, responding to, and managing the expectations of project stakeholders is one of the most crucial ingredients in designing a project for success. In the final analysis, a project is only successful when the stakeholders declare it so”.