A Statistical Analysis of The University of Oregon’s Retention Rates for Minority Groups Zoe Grover & Joe Croson June, 2006 Economics 419.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Top Ten Myths About Scholarships
Advertisements

Mobility, Time to Degree, and Institutional Practices: Towards a New Conceptual Model of Undergraduate Retention for Underrepresented Students Lucy Arellano,
Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship Program Annual Report Tennessee Higher Education Commission Winter Quarterly Meeting 25 January 2007.
 Increasing degree attainment rates is a national priority  Living communities, first year seminars, and supplemental instruction are among institutional.
Academic Achievement among STEM Aspirants: Why do Black and Latino Students Earn Lower Grades than their White and Asian Counterparts? Jessica Sharkness,
Copyright 2013 aha! Process, Inc.  1 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2013 Annual Social and Economic Supplement.
Penn State Worthington Scranton Challenges and Opportunities Penny Carlson Executive Director Academic Services and Assessment.
Institutional and Student Characteristics that Predict Graduation and Retention Rates Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Tennessee Education Lottery Scholarship Program Annual Report Tennessee Higher Education Commission January 29, 2009.
Arizona State University University Student Initiatives, 2007 Profile of the New American University October 2007.
Access to Resources: Pre-college Characteristics and Experiences of Underrepresented Minority Students in the Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences Sylvia.
T ENNESSEE S TUDENT A SSISTANCE C ORPORATION Financial Aid 101 Funding a College Education.
Indianapolis-Carmel MSA
+ Association for Institutional Research May 2013 Long Beach, California Making It!... Or Not: Institutional Contexts & Biomedical Degree Attainment Tanya.
Tulane University Financial Aid Information
Mikaila Mariel Lemonik Arthur Data on Race and Education.
Demographics 14,583 people. 6,137 housing units The racial makeup 97.31% White, 0.23% African American, 2.03% Native American, 0.76% Asian,
Cluster Analysis on Perceived Effects of Scholarships on STEM Majors’ Commitment to Becoming Teachers versus Teaching in High Needs Schools Pey-Yan Liou.
Lois Douglass Financial Aid Counselor, UNC-Chapel Hill Julie Rice Mallette Assoc. Vice Provost & Dir. OSFA NC State Emily Bliss, Director OSFA UNCW.
The Gender Gap in Educational Attainment: Variation by Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Nativity in the United States Sarah R. Crissey, U.S. Census Bureau Nicole.
Changing Demographics and Enrollment Trends Ken Esbenshade Associate Dean and Director of Academic Programs College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North.
By: Claire Dahlman. Roughly 30% of entering freshmen in the US are first generation college students, and 24% (4.5 million) are both first generation.
Assessing College Wide SLOs using a Student Perception Survey: A Tale of Two SLOs Jeanne Edman and Brad Brazil Cosumnes River College.
T ENNESSEE S TUDENT A SSISTANCE C ORPORATION Financial Aid 101 Funding a College Education.
Cultural Difference: Investment Attitudes and Behaviors of High Income Americans Tahira K. Hira – Iowa State University
KBauer IFST 689 Students in American Higher Education Karen Bauer IFST 689.
Student Demographics Current Native American1.47%1.11%0.96%0.75%0.60% Asian2.53%1.17%1.02%0.99%1.05% Pacific Islander0.41%0.13%0.20%0.26%0.30%
Deferred Costs, Delayed Credentials: High Debt among Community College Transfer Students Student Financial Aid Research Network Conference June 20, 2013.
Norfolk State University TATIANA TYLER. I AM NSU SPRING OF 2016 I WILL HOPEFULLY OFFICALLY BE ATTENDING NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY.
Testing Programs to Help Community College Students Succeed: The Opening Doors Demonstration Tom Brock October 18, 2005.
 Scholarship- A financial award which need not be repaid.  Academic Scholarships- Financial awards given to students for high academic achievement.
Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm.
Undergraduate Student Persistence and Completion: Do Pell Grants Matter? Charles Hatcher, California Competes CAIR Conference, Tongshan Chang, University.
Wake Forest University By: Emma Mclellan. Location Wake Forest University is a private school founded in 1834 located in the foothills of Winston-Salem,
Maja Mihaljević Kosor University of Split, Faculty of Economics, CROATIA Examining the Determinants of Student Non-completion in.
Issue: Affirmative Action Group Names TITLE SLIDE.
What Matters in STEM: Institutional Contexts That Influence STEM Bachelor’s Degree Completion Rates Kevin Eagan Sylvia Hurtado Mitchell Chang Higher Education.
Student Debt Susan Choy MPR Associates Berkeley, California SHEEO Professional Development Conference Seattle, August 2005.
Self Confidence and Diversity at MIT Lizz Albany, Olivia Gierlich, Peter Lee, and Michael Plasmeier.
Using Entering Student Data to Estimate Campus Retention Rates LINDA J. SAX Associate Professor & Associate Director of HERI University of California,
Voluntary Disclosure Not Covered in Textbook. You’re on a job interview and the interviewer knows what the distribution of GPAs are for MBA students at.
The Transition to High School: Initial HS Experiences and 9 th Grade Failure Jerald R. Herting October 19 th UW-BHS Project Workshop.
Valencia College District Board of Trustees September 17, 2013.
Examining the Enrollment and Persistence of Students with Discrepant High School Grades and Standardized Test Scores Anne Edmunds, Ed.D. Higher Education.
 I want to attend Lsu because they offer a great music program and they offer music scholarships.  I want to study music because I HAVE always wanted.
Understanding Graduation Rates. A Look Across Institutions.
23 rd Annual Report on Physician Assistant Educational Programs Marie S. Link.
The Profile of the New American University October 2006.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND MCPS Demographics October 12, 2010 MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND.
Defining Non-Traditional Students
Affirmative Action Bans and the “Chilling Effect”
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2015 The data for Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near.
UMCP Student Loan Default Study & Financial Literacy Initiatives
Buckeye Central Local Schools
KCTCS Strategic Plan Retention PM Update Board of Regents June 2017.
The Impact, Costs, and Benefits of NC’s Early College Model
Allison Ambrose, PhD Illinois State University
African American College Students’ Perceptions of Valuable College Experiences Relative to Academic Performance Jeanette Davis, M.Ed., PC and Cassandra.
Results of the Civil Rights Movement Data & Trends
African American.
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Scholarships! Class of 2019.
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Defining Non-Traditional Students for Retention Studies
Duke University By: Karen Sandoval.
Linda DeAngelo CIRP Assistant Director for Research
How do we embrace the “Uncommon” on our Campuses?
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
School Profile Andy Dekaney High School
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and
Presentation transcript:

A Statistical Analysis of The University of Oregon’s Retention Rates for Minority Groups Zoe Grover & Joe Croson June, 2006 Economics 419

Retention for Minority Groups Motivation Diversity is important to universities, including the UO –Open access to all at public universities is important –Diversity of experiences can enhance learning One focus for diversity initiatives has been under- represented racial groups Two critical areas where representation by these groups are affected include admissions and retention Differences in factors affecting minority-group retention has rarely been studied

Retention for Minority Groups Previous Literature Descriptive Statistics Hypotheses Methodology Results Conclusion

Previous Literature Loo and Rolison (1986) Hurtado et al. (1998) Nora (1990) Singell (2002, 2006) –Differences in effects of merit based aid and need based aid.

Our Paper We will be extending Singell’s study to examine the differences in how various factors affect retention across minority groups at the UO. We will separate Singell’s model by race to see how retention varies. We will also consider other factors affecting retention not studied by Singell

Hypotheses Factors –Financial –Academic –Social/Adaptation

Hypotheses Factors –Financial Family Income Work Study Hours Financial Aid Eligibility Scholarships –Academic –Social/Adaptation

Hypotheses Factors –Financial –Academic High School GPA UO GPA SAT Scores –Social/Adaptation

Hypotheses Factors –Financial –Academic –Social/Adaptation Demographics of student’s community of origin –Percent of Community with Bachelors Degree –School Type –School Size

Descriptive Statistics A Comparison University of Oregon Demographics State of Oregon Demographics

Descriptive Statistics Hometown Percent of Hometown With Bachelor’s Degree Asian27.70% African American24.40% Hispanic25.90% Native American23.40% White29.70%

Descriptive Statistics Hometown Income Levels Race/EthnicityMedian Household IncomeAverage Family Income Asian$35,461$57,794 African American$31,410$50,583 Hispanic$32,152$56,252 Native American$31,473$53,777 White$34,509$59,172

Average Yearly Financial Aid Over a Four Year Period

Descriptive Statistics Grade Point Average Race/EthnicityYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4 Asian African American Hispanic Native American White, Caucasian

Methodology We will be using a statistical model that estimates the contribution of a specific factor or characteristic in retaining a student at the UO, holding all other factors constant. –For example, if an African-American student were given $1000 more in scholarship monies, how much more likely would they be retained at UO? –How does this differ from giving a Hispanic (or White) student an extra $1000?

Methodology Data Source –UO Admissions Data with generous help from Prof. Singell Statistical Model Retention= C +B 1 Gender + B 2 Resident+B 3 Contact Age +B 4 HSType+ B 5 CityType +B 6 Net High School GPA+ B 7 Net Cumulative SAT+ B 8 First Year GPA+ B 9 Average Family Income +B 10 FAFSA Completion +B 11 Aid Eligibility +B 12 Financial Aid + B 13 Scholarships + Random Error Term

Results Retention To Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects

Results Retention To Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites UO GPA (change from 3.0 to 4.0) 11.89%**5.02%**9.44%**11.44%**9.69%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Median Household Income (change from $40,000 to $80,000) 0.40%- 2.00%18.40%**- 8.00%4.80%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Average Family Income (change from $40,000 to $80,000) 1.20%44.00%**8.00%11.60%4.80%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Gender- If Female 4.54%**-1.74%-8.36%**-4.76%-3.37%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Percent of Hometown w/ Bachelor’s Degree (change of 1 percentage point) 0.29%**0.48%0.77%**0.39%0.17%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Percent of Hometown That is White (change of 1 percentage point) 0.09%-0.06%0.37%**-0.06%-0.17%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Positive Financial Aid Eligibility (change of $1000) 0.96%**2.29%**0.57%-3.24%**-0.06%

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Unsubsidized Loan (change of $1000) -1.75%**-2.08%**-1.21%*-0.23%-1.06%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Subsidized Loans (change of $1000) 2.74%*0.87%0.21%5.76%1.43%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Diversity Scholarships (change of $1000) 2.98%**4.96%**2.23%3.04%---

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Deans Scholarships (change of $1000) -0.74%6.52%4.18%16.31%*0.29%

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Other Scholarships (change of $1000) 6.12%**4.00%0.15%9.12%2.64%**

Results Retention to Sophomore Year Academic Effects Family Background Effects Gender Hometown Community Characteristics Financial Aid, Scholarship, Grant Effects Race Asians African Americans Hispanics Native Americans Whites Grants (change of $1000) -5.84%**-4.68%*-0.64%0.67%0.97%**

Conclusion General Results –Asian students respond to both financial aid and scholarship dollars –Hispanic students respond more heavily to hometown community attributes –African American students respond to financial factors, specifically diversity scholarship dollars, GPA seems less important –White students respond to a full spectrum of factors, but in most cases to a lesser degree Missing Variables/ Future Research

Conclusion General Results Missing Variables/Future Research –Athletes –Clubs, Organizations –On Campus Living –Faculty and Leadership Demographics