1. Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

2. What kinds of Student data do we measure? Enrollments Retention Graduation Grades Majors High impact practices (study abroad, service learning project, senior capstone course, etc.) Comparisons with peer universities

3. What categories of students do we track? Gender Race and ethnicity First generation Low income Student level (graduate, undergraduate, first year, etc.) Transfer student International Age Program (PEOPLE, Posse, First-year Interest Group, etc.)

4. How many minority students attend UW-Madison? How has the number changed over time?

5. From 2003 to 2012  4.4 percentage point increase in Minority Enrollment  3.4 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of Minority Undergraduate Students Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections. http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012 data is preliminary.

6. Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories. http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm From 2003 to 2012:  Increases in undergraduate enrollment in all race/ethnic categories  3.4 percentage point increase in undergraduate targeted minority enrollment  International Students: 6.8% of Undergraduate Enrollment 2012 data is preliminary.

7. Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories. From 2003 to 2012:  Increases in graduate student enrollment in all race/ethnic categories  3.2 percentage point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment  International Students make up 25.6% of graduate enrollment http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012 data is preliminary.

8. From 2003 to 2012:  Constant percent of professional targeted minority enrollment  International Students make up 3.9% of professional student enrollment Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories. http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012 data is preliminary. Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT

9. How do we compare to other universities?

10. Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2010 Average Percent Minority for AAU Public Institutions: 29% 6 AAU Public Institutions have a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison. 10 AAU Public Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW- Madison. Peer Enrollments by Minority Status http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2010 80%

11. What about some other measures of student diversity? – How many low income students and first generation students are enrolled at UW?

12. Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients (Undergraduates) http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012 data is preliminary. 14.3% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients. 13.7% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients. All Undergraduates New Undergraduates

13. Data on first- generation status is collected at the time of application. Question first asked in 2005. 18.9% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are first-generation students. Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of First- Generation Students (Undergraduates) http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012 data is preliminary. All Undergraduates New Undergraduates Accumulating Data

14. What does the pipeline to UW- Madison look like? – How many low income students are enrolled in high school in Wisconsin? – How many students of color?

15. Pipeline: Low Income “Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch. Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2010-12 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student Group UW-Madison Data based on Fall 2012-13 34% of Public K-12 students in Wisconsin are Economically Disadvantaged (2011-12) 23%of Public High School Graduates are Economically Disadvantaged (2010) We have no reliable information on income of applicant students, all data based on financial aid applications 17% of Resident New Freshmen are Pell Grant Recipients http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

16. Pipeline: Minority 21% of Public High School students in Wisconsin are minority students(2011-12) 18%of Public High School Graduates are minority students (2009-10) 14% of Resident New Freshmen are minority students (2012) http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm “Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT score). The ACT is only one of many academic factors considered in the admissions process.

17. How many students return for a second year? How many graduate within six years?

18. Retention and Graduation http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm Graduation Rates: (percent graduated within 6 years) Retention Rates: (percent retained to the second year) 14 percentage point Graduation Rate gap 2 percentage point First-Year Retention Rate gap All Students: 94% All Students: 83% Targeted Minority Students: 69% Targeted Minority Students: 92%

19. Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group Equity in Educational Outcomes http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 1-Year Retention Rate% Difference 6-Year Graduation Rate % Difference All New Freshmen93.9 -82.8- Women93.7 -.283.40.6 Men94.1 0.281.9-0.9 Targeted Minority91.7 -2.268.8-14.0 Non-Targeted94.2 0.384.11.3 African American92.9 61.9-20.9 Native American89.5 -4.468.6-14.2 Hispanic/Latino/a92.3 -1.674.9-7.9 South East Asian89.9 -4.068.4-14.4 Non-Targeted Asian95.9 2.081.7-1.1 International88.7 -5.270.5-12.3 Wisconsin Residents95.0 1.183.40.6 Non-Residents92.4 -1.580.7-2.1 First-Generation College Students93.1 -0.875.8 -7.0 Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid93.2 -0.776.4-6.4 Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants91.7 -2.269.7-13.1 FIGs95.0 1.179.1-3.7 Targeted Minority in FIGs93.8 -0.164.7-18.1 Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2010 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2005 Cohort

20. Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2003-2005 Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates. Average graduation gap among AAU institutions is 1.2% (was 9.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts) Gap at UW-Madison is 10.5 percent, Compared to 17.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts. http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

21. What do we know about our employees? Employee counts over time Recruitment Retention and turnover Promotions Comparisons with peer universities

22. What groups of employees can we examine? Gender Race and ethnicity Age International Type of position (classified staff, academic staff, faculty, teaching assistant, etc.) Tenure status Work unit

23. Women as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff 2012 data available in December 2012 http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison. A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)

24. All Employee Groups -Around 13% of all employees are minorities -A larger proportion of faculty are minorities. http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010

25. Indicator 12: Minority Faculty Representation In 2010: 2,177 total faculty members 17.6% (384) of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities. 8% increase in minority faculty since 1996 2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010 http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

26. Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment Increases in the percent of faculty hires that are racial/ethnic minorities. 2010-11 Data is preliminary. http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

27. Instructional Academic Staff In 2010, 2,225 Instructional Academic Staff members 11.8% (263) of Instructional Academic Staff are racial/ethnic minorities 2.7% increase in minority instructional academic staff since 1996 http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010

28. Non-Instructional Academic Staff In 2010: 5,092 non-instructional Academic Staff 12.3% of non- instructional Academic Staff are minorities 3.7% increase in minority non- instructional academic staff since 1996 http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010

29. Classified Staff In 2010: 5,410 Classified Staff members 12.9% (697) of classified staff are minorities 8.7% increase in minority classified staff since 1996 http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm 2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010

30. Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender At 9 years, 67% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure. Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06 http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

31. Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status At 9 Years, 66% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure. http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06

32. Promotion to Tenure A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies. The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is within the Physical Sciences division. Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05 http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

33. What kind of survey data do we have? – National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) includes many climate-related questions. Fielded in 2001, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011 – Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI) survey of faculty worklife in 2003, 2006, 2010, 2012 – UW System Climate survey of staff and students in CALS in 2011

34. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Selected NSSE 2011 Results ** significantly different Percent of Seniors who often or very much: http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm