Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 29 Writing Proposals to Generate Evidence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 12 Assessing.
Decoding RFAs, RFPs, and PAs Charlotte Flipp Division of Epidemiology Anne Everett Division of Epidemiology Kevin McKoskey Sponsored Projects Administration.
California State University, Fresno – Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Basics of NIH – National Institutes of Health Nancy Myers Sims, Grants.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 2: Asking Compelling, Clinical Questions.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 36 Implementing and Evaluating Care.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 9 Recording and Reporting.
Decoding RFAs and PAs Charlotte FlippDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH) Anne EverettDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health (EpiCH)
November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.
Lippincott's Illustrated Reviews: Biochemistry
Chapter 13 Spirituality.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
Nancy L Desmond, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science Key Things to Know about Research Project Grants (R01)
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 2 Nursing Process.
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 18 Mixed Methods and Other Special Types of Research.
NIH Review Procedures Betsy Myers Hospital for Special Surgery.
INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH SUPPORT Kassie M. Obelleiro Funding Opportunities Program Coordinator Rainbow Vogt Editorial Coordinator Pivot: Identifying.
Chapter 24 Trustworthiness and Integrity in Qualitative Research
Electronic Submissions of Grant Applications Muhsin Aboud Principal Investigator, IEARDA Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences.
Applying for AAFCS Awards, Grants, Fellowships, and Scholarships 1 American Association of Family & Consumer Sciences 106 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPO June.
Chapter 5 Literature Reviews: Finding and Critiquing Evidence
6/10/2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 5 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES In-House Research Resources.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 9 Continuity of Care.
Scientific Merit Review René St-Arnaud, Ph.D. Shriners Hospital and McGill University CCAC National Workshop May 13, 2010, Ottawa (Ontario)
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 21 Sampling in Qualitative Research.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 8 Healthcare Delivery Systems.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 5 Finding and Critiquing Evidence: Research Literature Reviews.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Writing a Grant.
Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 12 Planning and Developing Community Programs and Services.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 15 Developing and Testing Self-Report Scales.
Copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 13 Policy Making and Community Health Advocacy.
Proposal Preparation NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 21 Evidence in Learning and Teaching.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 2 Evidence-Based Practice.
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 06The Nursing Process in Mental Health Nursing.
Future Approaches to NIAMS Clinical Trials * As presented to the NIAMS Advisory Council on June 2, 2009.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 10 Ethnography in Practice, Education, and Administration.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Research: An Overview.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 11 Specific Types of Quantitative Research.
Writing a Grant. What is a grant? A sum of money given to an agency or individual to address a problem or need in the community A grant proposal is a.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 28: Disseminating Evidence: Reporting Research Findings.
MODULE 4 FHIP NOFA – FACTOR 3. What will be covered in Module 3: Factor 3 - Maximum Points and Distribution for each sub-factor Factor 3 – Sub-factor:
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Grantsmanship: The Art and Science of Getting Funded Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Molecular Endocrinology National Institute of Diabetes and.
BSHS 452 Entire Course (2 Sets) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT BSHS 452 Week 1 DQ 1 BSHS 452 Week 1 DQ 2 BSHS 452 Week 2 Individual Assignment.
Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 32 Oral Medications.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 The Health Care System.
Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.
Graduate Studies Workshop Part 2
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Grant Writing Information Session
HCA 311Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 29 Writing Proposals to Generate Evidence

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Question Tell whether the following statement is true or false: A research proposal is a written document specifying what a researcher intends to study.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Answer True A research proposal is a written document specifying what a researcher intends to study; proposals are written by students seeking approval for dissertations and theses, and by researchers seeking financial or institutional support.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Functions of Proposals Written document What is to be studied Written by students for dissertation and theses Written by researchers seeking financial or institutional support

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Dissertation Proposals: The Committee Choose advisor carefully Assemble a committee with balanced skills and members who will work well together Become familiar with committee members’ work Take detailed notes on members’ suggestions

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Content of Dissertation Proposals Typically 20 to 40 pages in length Learn what type of proposal is expected Literature review section especially important

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Question Tell whether the following statement is true or false: The NIH is the largest source of research funds for health researchers in the United States.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Answer False The federal government is the largest source of research funds for health researchers in the United States. In addition to regular grants programs through Parent Announcements, federal agencies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announce special opportunities.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Federal Funding for Research Proposals in the United States Grants—Funding mechanisms: –Announcements of broad agency objectives –Periodic program announcements of new program interests –Request for Applications (RFAs) on specific topics

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Federal Funding for Research Proposals in the United States (cont’d) Contracts for explicitly described studies: –Request for Proposals (RFPs)

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Nurses Variety of NIH Grants Research Project Grants AREA Grants Small Grants Exploratory/Developmental Grants

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Types of Grants Through NIH (Including NINR) Research Project Grant (R01)—the basic grant program Area Research Enhancement Awards (AREA)(R15)—grants for researchers from colleges/institutions that have tended to emphasize teaching

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Broad Review Criteria for R01 Grants 1.Significance of the problem 2.Proposed methodologic approach 3.Originality/innovativeness 4.Investigator qualifications 5.Quality of the research environment

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Question Tell whether the following statement is true or false: NIH grant applications also require budgets, which can be an abbreviated modular budget if requested funds for R01 grants do not exceed $300,000 in direct costs per year.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Answer False NIH grant applications also require budgets, which can be an abbreviated modular budget if requested funds for R01 grants do not exceed $250,000 in direct costs per year.

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Content of Grant Applications for NIH Submitted online Require uploaded PDF attachments Research plan component  Specific Aims  Research Strategy

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins NIH Budget Modular budget Do not exceed 250,000 dollars

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins NIH Review Process Three cycles of grant reviews annually Two levels of review: –Scientific review groups (study sections): 15 to 20 peer reviewers –Advisory council: scientific and lay representatives

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins NIH Review Process (cont’d) Study section reviewers: –Perform triage (scored versus unscored applications) –Assign priority scores (score of 10 is the most meritorious ranking and 90 is the lowest possible score) –Prepare pink sheets with priority score and comments (sent to applicants)

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Tips on Proposal Development—Prior to Writing Start early Select an important problem Know your audience Review a successful proposal Create a strong research team

Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Tips on Proposal Development Build a persuasive case Justify methodologic decisions Begin and end with a flourish Adhere to instructions Pay attention to presentation Have the proposal critiqued