Planning Coordinator Function Task Force Survey Results Doug Tucker Associate Staff Engineer W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL

Background In November 2013 the System Review Work Group (SRWG) conducted a “Planning Coordinator” survey to identify potential modeling gaps in preparation for MOD-032 In September 2014 the Planning Coordinator Function Task Force sent out a similar survey – Sent to Primary Compliance and TSS contacts – Identify issues that have been addressed since SRWG survey was distributed 2 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL

Responses 20 Planning Coordinators had changes to their initial SRWG survey response 9 Planning Coordinators had no changes to their initial SRWG survey response 656 bus changes to the initial SRWG survey responses were identified through the PCFTF survey 3 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL

Changes to the Initial SRWG Survey Responses 4 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL

Significate Changes to the Initial SRWG Survey Responses WAPA RMR claimed 200 of the 390 Tri-State Buses in the “WAPA RMR” base case area LADWP removed buses belonging to the following owners – City of Burbank (17 buses) – City of Glendale (19 buses) WAPA UGP added 10 buses 5 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL

Significate Changes from the PCFTF Survey BPA included – Jefferson County PUD (12 buses) – Lower Valley Power & Light (22 buses) – Various Generator Owned (72 buses) BPA removed – Douglas County PUD (24 buses) PSColorado has removed 30 buses 6 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL

PC Area Differences from SRWG Survey 7 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL

Potential Gaps within certain Areas 8 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL

Potential Gaps within certain Areas 9 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL