Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI) Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 2001 at UWO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COSHH ASSESSMENT TRAINING Essential Elements of a COSHH Form.
Advertisements

Emergency Preparedness and Response
Hazard Survey Dow Fire and Explosion Index is the most popular form of hazard survey. A formal systematized approach using a ranking form (similar to an.
Risk Analysis For: ES-317Y and ES Plant Design Project at UWO By: R.A. Hawrelak, P.Eng. - Lecturer Dept of Chem & Biochem Eng’g Dow Chemical –
Ethanol Tank Fire Manildra, Inc. Port Kembla, NSW, Australia 3 Mar 04
Where We Go Wrong In Distillation Towers Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO.
Where We Go Wrong In Line Sizing Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO.
Cairo University Faculty of Engineering Petrochemicals Engineering Plant Layout May 2010.
1 2.3b Potchefstroom, SA, Ammonia Tank Failure, 13 July 73 Presented to ES-317y at UWO in 1999 Dick Hawrelak.
Hazard Communication Chemical Specific. Determine hazardous chemicals in work areas Consult the list of hazardous chemicals Chemical manufacturers supply.
Welding, Cutting, and Brazing
Nicholas Licht Design Engineer Dust Explosion Fundamentals.
1 Hot Work Permits Corporate Environment Safety & Health.
Suzanne Reister, Program Manager Paula Vanderpool, Program Assistant North Central Washington Workers’ Comp Trust Chemical Hygiene – Hazardous Chemicals.
Fires and Explosions.
23 killed, 130 Injured, $1,300MM damage
Hazardous Materials Response
Introduction to Hydraulics ClassAct SRS enabled. In this presentation you will: identify the fundamental parts of a hydraulic system and safety issues.
Unit 1 Introduction to Fire Safety
HMT 1C 24-1 u Chapter 24 –Fixed Facility Incident Consideration Haz Mat Incident Considerations.
CHAPTER 25 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION Copyright© Delmar is a division of Thomson Learning.
1 Chemical Process Safety. 2 Outline of Lecture on Chemical Process Safety Inherent Safety Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Fire Protection.
Material Safety Data Sheets
LNG Hazards.
Pressure Safety Valve Design Presented to ES-317 at UWO in 1999 Dick Hawrelak.
Where We Go Wrong In Heat Exchangers
CNG STATION & GARAGE MODIFICATION CODES & STANDARDS Graham Barker Business Development Manager.
MSDS = Material Safety Data Sheet
Where We Go Wrong In Vessel Design Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES-317Y in 1999 at UWO.
Process Hazard Analysis DOW Fire & Explosion Index ChE 258 Chemical Process Safety University of Missouri - Rolla.
Where We Go Wrong In Pump Design Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 1999 at UWO.
TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE EUROPEAN NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY Development of a Eurogas-Marcogaz Methodology for Estimation of Methane Emissions Angelo Riva.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Prepared by: Miss Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
12. Health, Safety and Environment (Tasks 10 & 11)
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Safety Procedures in the Chemical Industry Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December 2013.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS INTRODUCTION TO RELIEF
The Tragedy Of San Juanico, PEMEX, Mexico City, 19 Nov 84 A BLEVE Case Study Presented to ES-317y at UWO in 1999 Dick Hawrelak.
1 Module 5 Damage Control. 2 Terminal Objectives Upon the successful completion of this module, participants will be able to describe methods used to.
Safety Training Presentation
Part 3.3 Production Safety. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand safety.
Florida Operations Level Hazardous Materials Training Unit 2.2 Physical and Chemical Properties.
Handling and Storage of Hazardous Chemicals direct.com/assets/ite ms/c126.jpg.
Introduction to Hazardous Evaluation Techniques Guidelines for Hazardous Evaluation Procedures (1992 by AIChE). Second Edition with Worked Examples. Center.
Hazardous Materials Subpart H. Subpart H Standards Compressed Gases Acetylene Hydrogen Oxygen Nitrous Oxide Flammable.
Explosion An explosion is a rapid expansion of gases resulting in a rapid moving pressure or shock wave. The expansion can be mechanical or it can be.
“The Right To Know” POLYTECH HIGH SCHOOL What is “The Right To Know” ? The right to know is a law that states every person has a right to information.
1 Selecting an ERS Design Basis SACHE Workshop Gary Van Sciver September 20, 2005.
Module 3: Planning and Response. 2 Objective Upon the successful completion of this module, participants will be able to develop strategies for preplanning.
HAZWOPER: Awareness Level 29 CFR (q). Headline Stories Ammonia Evacuates Industrial Site Acid Spill Sends Workers to Hospital Fuel Spill Contaminate.
Introduction to Chemistry
What is a safe work permit? A safe work permit is a written record that authorizes specific work, at a specific work location, for a specific.
© 2012 Delmar, Cengage Learning Chapter 11 Engineering Controls.
Hazardous Chemicals In The Laboratory A Guide for Their Safe Use and Disposal.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
3D LEISURE - Health & Safety Refresher Training Manual.
BY FRANS WILBRINK WILBRINK & ASSOCIATES. OUTLINE Classify the different types of hazardous areas Identify the risks associated with each of these areas.
Timing (minutes) Learning ObjectiveMain tasks / ProcessResources / tools 5TitleStandard Operating Procedures for Power Press Machine Slide 1 5Index 
Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk
These materials have been developed based on applicable federal laws and regulations in place at the time the materials were created. The program is being.
Hazardous Waste.
Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI)
2. Hazards Survey Suitable for identifying hazards for equipment design, layout, storage etc. Can be as simple as survey of inventory/stock of hazardous.
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System
Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System
INDUSTRIAL FIRE SAFETY. INTRODUCTION Industrial Fire Safety is the set of practices intended to reduce the destruction caused by fire. The measures of.
HAZARD COMMUNICATION (HAZCOM)
NFPA chemical hazard label and MSDS sheet
Fire Prevention Safety Department
HAZOP Guidewords Base Set
Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI)
Presentation transcript:

Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI) Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 2001 at UWO

Introduction V1.0 was first Issued in 1964 By Bill Braise (RIP). V7.0 was last issued in 1994 and is now marketed by the AIChE ($50/copy). n FEI is widely used outside of Dow. n FEI is the leading hazard index methodology recognized by the chemical industry. n V7.0 is available on my CD in Folder (9) as Dow FEI V1.3.

What is the Dow FEI? n The Dow FEI is a ranking system that gives a relative index to the risk of individual process units due to potential fires and explosions.

What is the Primary Purpose of the Dow FEI? n It serves as a guide for the selection of fire and explosion protection methods. n It assists in determining the spacing between adjacent process units within the ISBL. n It is a guide for insurance agencies to set insurance rates. n It ranks individual process units where special safety attention can be focused.

When should one perform an FEI? n Late in Phase III Engineering after: u P&IDs have been completed, u Equipment has been sized, u A trial equipment layout has been done, u A DFC estimate has been completed.

Who Usually Performs the FEI? n Generally a senior process engineer, who is acquainted with the details of the project, is assigned the task. n Occasionally, different groups tackle the assignment and results are compared for consensus building.

What Does the FEI Consider? n Six general process hazards. n Twelve special process hazards. n Nine process control credit factors. n Four material isolation credit factors. n Nine fire protection credit factors.

General Process Hazards n Exothermic reactions. n Endothermic processes. n Material handling and transfer n Enclosed or indoor process units. n Access. n Drainage and spill control.

Special Process Hazards n Toxic materials. n Sub-atmospheric pressure (<500 mmHg). n Operating in or near flammable range. u Tank farm storage flammable liquids. u Process upset or purge failure. u Always in flammable range. n Dust explosion. n Pressure.

Special Hazards Cont’d n Low temperature. n Quantity of flammable/unstable material. u Liquids or gases in process. u Liquids or gases in storage. u Combustible solids in storage. n Corrosion and erosion.

Special Hazards Cont’d n Leakage – joints and packing. n Use of fired equipment. n Hot oil heat exchanger system. n Rotating equipment.

Process Control Credit Factors n Emergency power. n Cooling. n Explosion control. n Emergency shutdown. n Computer control.

Process Control Factors Cont’d n Inert gas. n Operating instruction procedures. n Reactive chemical review. n Process hazard analysis.

Material isolation Credit Factors n Remote control valves. n Dump or blow down control. n Drainage. n Interlocks.

Fire Protection Credit Factors n Leak detection. n Structural steel. n Fire water supply. n Special systems. n Sprinkler systems. n Water curtains. n Foam. n Hand extinguishers. n Cable protection.

FEI Example

General Process Hazards

Special Process Hazards

Fig 8: Damage Factor

Process Control Credit Factors

Material Isolation Factors

Fire Protection Credit Factors

Credit Factor Summary n Process Control, C1 =0.75 n Material isolation, C2 = 0.88 n Fire Protection, C3 = 0.79 n C1xC2xC3 = (0.75)(0.88)(0.79) = 0.52

Process Unit Risk Analysis Summary

Plot Plan Summary

Features Not Used In V7.0

Limitations of Dow FEI n No scientific basis for many of the features can be found in Dow records. Fig 8 is an example. (RAH study – 1993). n Does not correlate well with known plant disasters (Flixborough, Phillips, Norco). n While explosion damage is fairly advanced (Flixborough – 1974), fire damage alone is more difficult to predict. n Not scenario driven as in recent QRA work in Holland and the U.K.

Recent Trends n Insurance companies are looking at Maximum Foreseeable Loss, (MFL), based on Baker‘s blast technology for Detonations and Deflagrations as applied to plant equipment layout. n There is a trend toward higher insurance premiums as insurance companies adjust their actuarial data. n Many chemical companies may follow Exxon’s trend to insure themselves.

End Of Show n Your Department should have a copy of the 7 th Edition available for further examination and application to your projects.