1 RPS 20.17 Critical Planning Preparation & Delivery of Critical Parts Goodrich Aerostructures Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AS9102 First Article Inspection Report
Advertisements

Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
CIP Cyber Security – Security Management Controls
Final/Shipout Inspection Approved for Public Release.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
First Article Inspection Report
EPSON STAMPING ISO REV 1 2/10/2000.
SUBSAFE Approved for Public Release
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF BANGLADESH ICAB CPE on Insurance Accounts under IFRS 4 Presented by: Md Shahadat Hossain, FCA October 28, 2008.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST Large Area Telescope: Manufacturing Preparation Design Engineering Meeting Jerry Clinton 1 April 2003 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford,
Slide 1 FAA’s Special Technical Audit of Boeing and the Audit Resolution Plan.
Course Introduction (Lecture #1) ENGR 107 – Intro to Engineering The slides included herein were taken from the materials accompanying Engineering Fundamentals.
Quality control of raw materials In-process control
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
First Article Inspection
1 Electrical Industry Drug-Free “Alliance” ScreenSafe Inc. Program Administrators.
1 Plumbing Industry Drug-Free Alliance ScreenSafe, Inc. Program Administrators.
Overview of NPG Social Responsibility Audit Process
The Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable Ralph Covington David Wang.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT August 21, 2014.
By: Carol Martineau, Acting Assistant Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-301 Date: June 7, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration ASA Conference.
Good Hygiene Practices Module 2, Module 11 Recall and Traceability.
Mandatory Annual ACE Training Fiscal Year 2010 – 2011.
From Research Prototype to Production
MATTHEW MATKOVICH MINE EQUIPMENT COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST QUALITY ASSURANCE & MATERIALS TESTING DIVISION MSHA – APPROVAL & CERTIFICATION CENTER 30CFR, PART.
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT November 19, 2013.
Important informations
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Configuration Management QMS Training.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
1 Electrical Industry Drug-Free Alliance ScreenSafe, Inc. Program Administrators.
CABLING SYSTEM WARRANTY REGISTRATION. PURPOSE OF CABLING REGISTRATION.
19-Feb-16 “"Dana Confidential Information - Those having access to this work may not copy it, use it or disclose the information contained within this.
Quality Assurance and Risk Management Services, Inc. 
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
LAT-PR GLAST LAT ProjectManufacturing Readiness Review, Oct. 12, 2005 LAT Test Stand Manufacturing Readiness Review 1.Introduction Bill Olson.
HighImpactSoft 2010 Organizing a Better Future. Agenda Specify Goals ScopeDefinitions Process Model Preliminary Requirements Issues and solutions TraceabilityPrototype.
Update of API Standards for Supply Chain Management API Standard 20J – Qualification of Distributors.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Inspection & Test Plan (ITP) / Manufacturing Process Quality Plan (MPQP) - training of suppliers to FMC Technologies, Norway QRL FMC Standard.
SQA01 Supplier Guidance Material: Certificate of Conformance Requirements GKN Aerospace Services – CowesDate:13/5/16.
Quality Management: Mutually beneficial supplier relationships.
External Provider Control
SQA01 Supplier Guidance Material: Certificate of Conformance Requirements GKN Aerospace Services – Cowes Date: 13/5/16.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Digital Images / Write Copy CUFIMA01A Produce And Manipulate Digital Images CUFWRT05A Write Content And/Or Copy.
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Project Control
ISUAL Product Assurance
First Article Inspection
Training Appendix Revised January 2018.
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
First Article Inspection (Per AS9102)
ISO 9001 Awareness Training.
Management of Change Report Errors to Management.
Residential Placement Application 2011
SQA01 Guidance Material: FAI Review
First Article Inspection
AS 9100 Awareness Training.
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
Region I PLANNING MEETING APRIL 11, 2014
First Article Inspection (Per AS9102)
Fiber Reinforced Polymer Systems
Presentation transcript:

1 RPS Critical Planning Preparation & Delivery of Critical Parts Goodrich Aerostructures Group

2 Outline Definition of Critical Parts How do you distinguish a critical part from other parts? How are Critical Parts handled differently from other parts? Controlled manufacturing plans Recent revision to RPS Where and How to submit changes Other key changes made in Rev. N

3 Definition of Critical Parts “A critical part is a component (either a part or an assembly) that because of design or manufacturing process considerations, must be controlled to assure that it is produced to strict engineering requirements on a highly uniform and consistent basis”. At a minimum, engine mounts designed by Goodrich/Rohr are critical parts.

4 Definition of Critical Parts Critical parts are key structural elements whose integrity is crucial to the safety of the aircraft For this reason, critical hardware undergoes extensive testing to insure its reliability Any change to the design or manufacturing processes are carefully evaluated

5 How do you distinguish a critical part from other parts? A critical part is any part designated as such per RPS 20.17, RPS Critical Assembly, or RPS Critical Extrusion. The following note (or one very similar) will be specified on the drawing and specified for each affected part number “CRITICAL PART PER RPS 20.17”.

6 How are Critical Parts handled? A Critical Part requires special control of planning. The specific requirements of this planning are specified in RPS This planning is referred to as “frozen” or controlled planning.

7 Controlled Manufacturing Plans RPS requires that manufacturing plans for critical parts be submitted to GR/AG Quality and M&P Engineering for approval. This plan is then considered “frozen” and all changes must be processed per the requirements of RPS prior to being incorporated.

8 Controlled Manufacturing Plans Parts manufactured or processed to a plan other than the approved plan on file at GR/AG are done so at the supplier’s risk! Hardware manufactured at risk can not be delivered to GR/AG until the plan has been approved by GR/AG and the supplier has received written confirmation of that approval.

9 Controlled Manufacturing Plans Recent revisions to RPS have significantly affected the approval process required for critical parts. Each part number shall have Serial Number Traceability per Para Sub-Para. a thru e.

10 What is a “Critical Operation”? Critical Operation (CR) - any operation that, if removed, revised, or changed in sequence, may affect the quality or integrity of the final product.

11 What are some examples of Critical Operations? Forging operations Heat treatment Starting stock material specification Non-destructive testing of finished part Traceability requirements Ref. par in Revision N for a complete list of critical operations

12 How are Critical Operations identified on the planning? When a plan is submitted, the letters (CR) should precede each operation that is a “critical operation”. If no operations are identified with a (CR), all operations will be considered “critical” and all changes will require GR/AG approval prior to implementation.

13 Changes to Critical Operations Any change to the content or sequencing of Critical Operations shall require approval from GR/AG M&P Engineering and Materiel Quality Engineer (MQE) or Program Quality Engineer (PQE) prior to their implementation.

14 Changes to Critical Operations When production planning is submitted to GR/AG for approval, a “Critical Planning Revision Sheet” will accompany the plan. All relevant blocks should be completed. An incomplete form will be returned to the supplier and result in a delay of the planning approval.

15 What if “Critical Operations” are not changed? Changes to planning that do not affect “Critical Operations” must be submitted to GR/AG M&P Engr and GR/AG MQE or PQE within 10 working days. As before, any change to the plan will require a change to the approved planning date and (where applicable), a change to the planning revision letter.

16 What if “Critical Operations” are not changed? Changes to operations that are not “Critical Operations” do NOT require GR/AG approval. Hence, these changes can be made and immediately implemented by the supplier. As stated before, a copy of this revised plan must be submitted to GR/AG within 10 days.

17 Control of Planning Revisions During the annual RPS audit, the ‘working’ shop travelers (job instructions) will be audited for conformance to the approved planning on file at GR/AG. The planning dates/ revision letters must match as well as the content and sequencing of all “critical operations”.

18 Control of Planning Revisions Failure of the supplier to comply with these requirements will result in the supplier being put on probation and/or may lead GR/AG to require that ALL planning changes have prior GR/AG approval.

19 Where and How changes are to be submitted If at all possible, changes are to be ed to M&P Engineer and a MQE / PQE - Patricia Adams, M&PE, address - Dave Hollings, MQE, address, - Ed Bernad, PQE, CFM56 & PW4000 Engine Mount Program, address

20 Where and How changes are to be submitted If is not possible, all plans should be faxed to Patricia Adams at (619) (this is both her phone and fax number) Do NOT fax a copy to the buyer / subcontract administrator UNLESS you have first sent a copy to the cognizant engineers

21 Other Key Changes Engineering takes precedence over the approved plan. – “Where a conflict exists between the engineering requirements and the approved planning, the engineering requirements shall take precedence.”

22 Other Key Changes Failure to strictly comply to the requirements of Rev. N could lead to probation and the loss of privileges – “At the discretion of RM&PE or RQA, Rohr may require that all revisions to the planning (whether critical operations or non- critical operations) may be submitted to RM&PE and RQA for approval prior to the delivery of the affected hardware.”

23 Other Key Changes Raw material must be traceable to the point of manufacture and ALL raw material sources (mills) are controlled by the GR/AG QSD – “Raw material shall be traceable to approved raw material manufacturers specified in the Qualified Suppliers Document.”

24 RPS Training Record Date of Training________________ Attendee’s of Training____________________________________ Instructor: David Hollings