PLWG Report to ROS July 9, 2014. PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
Advertisements

Regional Planning Group Charter Revisions May 2008.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
Houston Region Import Capacity Project August 27, 2013 Regional Planning Group Meeting.
ROS Meeting November 8 th, 2012 SSWG 13DSB Case Preparation Extraordinary Dispatch.
ERCOT Load Forecast and Reserve Margin Update June 2, ERCOT Load Forecast and Reserve Margin Update June 2, 2005.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
RTWG Report to TAC August 5, 2010 Howard Daniels.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
April 16, 2010 RPG Meeting ERCOT Five-Year Transmission Plan Update Jeff Billo.
Jenell Katheiser Doug Murray Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update January 22, 2013.
1 ERCOT 2007 Strategic Financial Plan & Budget Proposal _____________________ Board of Directors November 14, 2006.
Texas Wind Energy American Meteorological Society Summer Community Meeting – Norman Oklahoma Henry Durrwachter, P.E. August 12, 2009.
ERCOT Long-Term Demand and Energy Forecasting February 20, 2007 Bill Bojorquez.
ERCOT PUBLIC 5/20/ RTP Inputs and Assumptions-Updated April 22, 2014.
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
NPRR514, Seasonal Generation Resource Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2013 Amanda Frazier.
Wind ELCC Calculation Comparisons and ERCOT’s NERC LTRA Capacity Forecasts GATF Meeting, June 24, 2014.
ERCOT PUBLIC 5/20/ RTP Inputs and Assumptions May 20, 2014.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/22/ RTP Inputs and Assumptions April 22, 2014.
Proposed Generation Expansion Process For Review and Discussion March 1, 2011.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
09/17/2006 Ken Donohoo ERCOT Peak Day August Initial Settlement Data by Fuel Type.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
South Texas Electric Cooperative Load Forecasting Methodology ROS Meeting, 6/10/10.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
PLWG Report to ROS January 7, Draft NPRR More closely aligns a generation line item in the CDR with the generation included in the Planning Models.
ERCOT ROS Planning Working Group (PLWG) Scope Approved at ROS Meeting.
ROS July 10, 2008 Meeting WOTF Update on ROS Action Plan Summary: EECP Step #2 (Feb.26 th, 2008) Mark Garrott WOTF Chair.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April 2007 (which is in March)
MISUG TAC Update Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT 3/7/ TAC3/7/ /22/2011 Meeting Focus on the high priority items from MISUG: Review task list prioritization.
ERCOT PUBLIC November RPG Meeting RTP – Study Scope November 20, 2015.
Panhandle Renewable Energy Zone (PREZ) Study
PLWG Report to ROS September 4, PGRR039 PGRR requires Interconnecting Entities (IEs) to provide information for ERCOT’s resource adequacy reports,
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
ROS Report Bill Hatfield 2014 ROS Chair Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting ERCOT Public June 26, 2014 TAC Meeting.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez May 4, 2007.
2006 Report on the Capacity, Demand, & Resources for the ERCOT Region Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006 Kenneth A. Donohoo. P.E. Manager, Transmission.
Joint PLWG/CMWG Assignment Update to ROS September 15, 2011.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007.
ERCOT Transmission Planning Process Overview and Recommendations November 6, 2002.
2006 CDR Status Report Technical Advisory Committee May 4, 2006 Bill Bojorquez.
ERCOT PUBLIC 3/25/ RTP Inputs and Assumptions March 25, 2014.
June 26 and July 31, 2014 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott August 5, 2014 TAC Update to RMS 1.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Response to TAC Questions on PGRR031 TAC– January 28, 2014 Jeff Billo, ERCOT 1.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Meeting April 10, 2014.
03/06/2008 TAC CREZ Transmission Optimization (CTO) Study Update Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
PLWG Report to RPG January 21, 2014 Presented by John Moore, PLWG Chair.
2016 LTSA Update Doug Murray 6/21/2016. Agenda Introduction Scenario Retirement Process Scenario Summary Results Appendix.
Impact of not including proposed generators lacking RARF data in the planning models Planning Guide Section 6.9 Issues February 17, 2016.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
GATF Loss of Load Process (or How to Make Sausage) October, 2012.
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors April 18, 2007.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Southern Cross Directives Planning Items
Load Scaling PGRR042.
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS
Presentation transcript:

PLWG Report to ROS July 9, 2014

PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the Full Interconnect Study (FIS) and makes it a requirement for initial synchronization – Aligns FIS procedures with IEs business practices and lowers the probability of SSR restudies – PLWG has agreed on current language as in the 6/22/2015 PLWG report – IA is no impact – Recommended action is to approve PGRR043

PGRRs needing vote PGRR044 – MIS Classification of GINR Study Information – PGRR044 changes the MIS classification of certain studies in the GINR process. Requires ERCOT to post the security screening study and the steady state, system protection and facility studies out of the TSP FIS studies – FIS Dynamic Studies will be posted to the Certified area of the MIS for TSPs only – PLWG has agreed on current language as in the 6/22/2015 PLWG report – IA of less than $5k and will be absorbed in O&M – Recommended action is to approve PGRR040

CDR/Planning Model White Paper Assigned to PLWG in July 2014 Describe the load and generation assumption methodologies utilized in the CDR and transmission planning models Explain why different assumption methodologies may be appropriate for certain assumptions Identify assumptions where it may be appropriate to eliminate the differences

CDR/Planning Model White Paper - Purpose CDR Report Transmission Planning Models SSWG ModelsRTP Reliability ModelsRTP Economic Models Purpose Provide an estimate of the planning reserve margin during summer and winter peak load seasons Provide a range of power flow cases with a common reference point for ERCOT and Market Participants Provide power flow cases for use in developing the reliability portion of the ERCOT Regional Transmission Plan (RTP) Provide a power flow case for use in developing the economic assessment portion of the ERCOT Regional Transmission Plan (RTP)

CDR/Planning Model White Paper – Load Assumptions CDR Report Transmission Planning Models SSWG ModelsRTP Reliability ModelsRTP Economic Models PreparerERCOTTSPsERCOT and TSPsERCOT SeasonSummer and Winter  Four seasons for current year  Summer peak for next 6 years  Minimum load and high wind for a future year Summer peak for future Years 1, 3, 5, and 6 Full year hourly analysis for Future Years 3 and 6 Weather Assumptions Average weather (expect actual load to exceed forecast one out of two years) Varies by TSP, see Appendix A Higher of:  Summed TSP SSWG case loads in each weather zone; or  ERCOT 90 th percentile forecast by weather zone (expect actual load to exceed forecast one out of ten years) “Average” weather in each weather zone (expect actual load to exceed forecast one out of two years) Load Coincidence Coincident (single peak load hour for ERCOT Region) Based on ALDR forecast, TSPs use varied methods for populating loads by individual substation (see Appendix A for description by TSP) Peak load by individual substation for each weather zone (non-coincident), with exceptions made depending on the case Non-Coincident by weather zone Load Resource and other Demand Response Programs Included (shown as separate line item) Not IncludedNot includedNot Included Self-Serve Load Net to the grid (self-serve load minus self-serve generation) Gross (no reduction for self-serve generation) Gross (no reduction for self-serve generation) Gross (no reduction for self-serve generation) Load AdjustmentsNone No adjustments from TSP provided loads are made Within a region of study the higher of: SSWG load in each weather zone or ERCOT 90 th percentile load forecast by weather zone Adjustments may be made outside of study region None

CDR/Planning Model White Paper – Generation Assumptions CDR Report Transmission Planning Models SSWG ModelsRTP Reliability ModelsRTP Economic Models PreparerERCOTTSPsERCOT and TSPsERCOT Extraordinary Dispatch Methods – a method of adding capacity to a model Not applicable  As needed, see Appendix B of SSWG manual. Has been used for years 4, 5, and 6 in recent years Yes, a combination of extraordinary dispatch and load scaling outside of the region being studied may occur Not applicable Thermal Generation Seasonal Net Maximum Sustainable MW Rating from RARF Seasonal Net Maximum Sustainable MW Rating from RARF and Reactive curve gross MVAR less auxiliary Load MVAR Ratings from RARF  Seasonal Net Maximum Sustainable MW Rating from RARF and Reactive curve gross MVAR less auxiliary Load MVAR Ratings from RARF Seasonal Net Maximum Sustainable MW Rating from RARF Wind Generation Capacity contribution based on average of recent peak-season output (top 20 load hours) 100% of capacity modeled. Units dispatched according to CDR Report unless needed in extraordinary dispatch 100% of capacity modeled. Units dispatched at varying levels, depending on the case Units dispatched based on representative hourly patterns appropriate for weather assumptions Solar Generation 100% of capacity reported 100% of capacity modeled. Units dispatched based on review of historic seasonal output 100% of capacity modeled. Units dispatched at 70% of capacity Units dispatched based on representative hourly patterns appropriate for weather assumptions; using vendor profiles DC-Ties Output levels based on average of recent peak-season output (top 20 load hours) 100% of capacity modeled. Units dispatched based on review of historic seasonal operating levels Units dispatched based on historical hourly patterns

CDR/Planning Model White Paper – Generation Assumptions Cont. CDR Report Transmission Planning Models SSWG ModelsRTP Reliability ModelsRTP Economic Models PreparerERCOTTSPsERCOT and TSPsERCOT Hydro Generation Output levels based on average of recent peak-season output (top 20 load hours) 100% of capacity modeled. Units modeled offline Units dispatched based on historical hourly patterns Requirements for Including Planned Generation  Signed interconnection agreement;  Air permits (if needed); and Cooling water attestation Planning Guide 6.9.  Signed interconnection agreement;  Air permits (if needed);  Cooling water attestation; and  Full financial commitment and notice to proceed given to TSP Planning Guide 6.9.  Signed interconnection agreement;  Air permits (if needed);  Cooling water attestation; and Full financial commitment and notice to proceed given to TSP Planning Guide 6.9.  Signed interconnection agreement;  Air permits (if needed);  Cooling water attestation; and Full financial commitment and notice to proceed given to TSP Self-Serve Generation Net to grid during peak hours of recent peak season Full capacity available Switchable Units Capacity contracted to other region is not included Capacity contracted to other region is considered unavailable Mothball Generation Capacity is included if unit owner states likelihood of return is greater than 50% Designated as a mothball unit and status set to “out-of-service” unless needed for extraordinary dispatch Mothball units not available (new for 2015 as a result of TPL-001-4) Mothball units not available

CDR/Planning Model White Paper - Recommendations In the CDR, make a clear delineation which resources have met Planning Guide 6.9 requirements and which have not and lack only financial commitment RTP Reliability Models should match CDR for calculating hydro-electric unit dispatch SSWG base case models and RTP Reliability Models should adopt the methodology for DC tie import/export levels utilized in the CDR

CDR/Planning Model White Paper – Recommendations Cont. For extraordinary dispatch for SSWG base case models and RTP Reliability Models, wind generation output level should be consistent with the CDR As more solar is developed, consistency between the CDR and Planning Models should be reviewed and modified, if necessary

CDR/Planning Model White Paper Vote accepting the White Paper? Vote to rectify the inconsistencies between the CDR and Planning Models?

PGRRs under review PGRR042 – Regional Transmission Plan Model Reserve Requirement and Load-Generation Imbalance Methodology PGRR045 – Alignment with NPRR705, Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process

Assignments to PLWG Generation Deliverability Criteria – ERCOT staff is working on draft PGRR language for consideration.