The Equality Standard: A Framework for Sport English National Governing Bodies Self Assessment Survey Report prepared for Sport England By Chris Hudson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Equality Standard Pilot Project Steering Group
Advertisements

Equality Standard UK NGB Pilot Self Assessment Survey Draft 1 of findings 25 responses recorded to date.
The Equality Standard A Framework for Sport March 05 The Equality Standard for Sport A brief overview.
Equality Impact Assessments Amy Bryant Senior Policy Adviser 13 November 2008 Into the Professions Conference.
Working Together in Faith, Hope and Love
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
Equality impact assessments: a tool for change? Ellen Pugh Senior policy adviser.
Area Officer Skills for Care – Surrey
A Framework of Quality Assurance (FQA) for Responsible Officers and Revalidation Ahead of the Curve RO conference 4 June 2014.
Heriot Watt University Athena SWAN Open Session 28 March 2013.
Business Excellence within The University of Bolton Strategic Planning Process 17 th October 2006.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Ethnicity and health research: the Research Governance Framework and the new health research strategy C Marc Taylor Department of Health
Developing, Implementing, and Evaluating Cultural Competency and Equality IN Nurse Training : What Are We Learning? Results From an Action Research Project.
Equality and Inspection – an Ofsted perspective of Impact NATSPEC/LSIS June 2011.
Partnership between the NYCI, the Health Service Executive and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs National Youth Health Programme Kevin O’ Hagan.
NCH Embedding Diversity Proposal for an Employee Mentoring Scheme Raj Patel Head of Change Management & Development.
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE 715 (MD-715)
Welcome Maria Hegarty Equality Strategies Ltd. What ? Equality/Diversity Impact Assessment A series of steps you take that enable you to assess what you.
CHCCD412A Cluster 1.  s/pdf_file/0006/54888/CHAPS_Community- Services-Pathway-Flyer_v 4.pdf
National Governing Bodies (NGBs)
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
Impact assessment framework
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Using data to improve the disabled student experience UK research project undertaken by Skill for ECU, looking at how HEIs encourage disabled student disclosure.
Vaga Associates The Equality Standard A Framework for Sport Nikki Enoch Director - Vaga Associates Overview of the Pilot The Equality Standard A Framework.
Sport England Matt Hugo & Jordan Brown. What are their main Objectives? Protect Existing Facilities: Sport England aims to help protect sports and recreational.
Foundation Level of the Equality Standard. Overview Background UK Equality Standard Foundation Level Requirements Timeline.
Volunteering Code of Practice 2 nd Annual Sunderland Compact Conference.
Athena SWAN Charter James Lush Athena SWAN Adviser Equality Challenge Unit.
“Helping business to build an inclusive workplace” A Proposal for Membership of UK Council for Access and Equality.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
THE GOOD CLUB GUIDE EXTRA: FOR A CHAIRPERSON. GETTING STARTED The following sections will provide additional help and support for a Club Chairperson in.
Equalities Action Planning: Shifts and Continuities Dr Meena Dhanda HLSS Equality & Diversity Coordinator 29 April 2008.
Workshop 1 IABA Club Development Ulster Workshop 1 Funding – Getting your club ready.
The equality and diversity maze – gaining the edge Dr Ian Gittens Lead on Equality and Diversity.
The Equality Standard for Sport January 2005 The Equality Standard for Sport A brief overview.
“Sustaining Momentum & Growing the Game” – WSP II 2009/13 February 2009.
CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY OVERVIEW REPORT PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION 09 APRIL 2003.
1 DED Action Plan Review Taking on the Duty NADP Annual Conference 2007 Honey Lucas ECU Projects Officer.
SPORT CLUB SYSTEM PILOT PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE November 2014.
Lecture 1 code version Copyright © BSAC 2007 BSAC Clubmark The ‘How to’ guide..
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
SOLGM Wanaka Retreat Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 Ready? 4 February 2016 Samantha Turner Partner DDI: Mob:
Equality Information Session 2 March Purpose What is the Equality Standard Raise awareness of importance of equality for sporting organisations.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Safe space to think, safe space to grow Lucy Faulkner Ltd Briefing to the Welsh Boxing General Council on Equality and the Equality Standard 3 November.
Legal Basis of Equality Impact Assessments (EQIAs)  Requirement in Scotland under Equality Act 2010 to:  Assess the impact of applying a new or revised.
ASCCC Cultural Competency and Advocacy Plan Update Cleavon Smith, Berkeley City College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Leicestershire – April 2013 Local Area Club & Volunteer Forums.
National Quality Standards Framework
Hampshire FA Equality Action Plan Overview
SOUTHERN AFRICA INCLUSIVE EDUCATION STRATEGY FOR LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES (SAIES) 23rd November 2016 Coastland Hotel - Durban.
Business in the Community Race Equality Campaign
The What Works Centre for Crime Reduction: An evaluation
National Quality Standards Framework
Equality and Human Rights Exchange Network
CILIP Performance Framework – Business metrics & KPI
Single Equality Scheme Headline summary
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
The Public Sector Equality Duty
BAI Gender Action Plan 27th April 2018 IFI - Spotlight Stephanie Comey.
The Public Sector Equality Duty
The Early Help Assessment Journey. How to Assure a Quality Journey.
The Early Help Assessment Journey. How to Assure a Quality Journey.
Strategy April 2018 – March 2022.
Presentation transcript:

The Equality Standard: A Framework for Sport English National Governing Bodies Self Assessment Survey Report prepared for Sport England By Chris Hudson and Maxine Barlow Sport Industry Research Centre at Sheffield Hallam University tel: April 2005

2 Contents Slide No. The Equality Standard for Sport3 Research Aims4 Outline of Methodology5 Project Outputs6 SURVEY FINDINGS7 Section 1. Current position of NGBs (Survey questions 1 – 7) Section 2. Demographic Profiles (Survey questions 8 – 10) Section 3. Perceived benefits of gaining the Standard (Survey question 11) Section. Challenges faced and assistance required (Survey questions 12 – 15)

3 The Equality Standard for Sport Sports equality is about fairness in sport, equality of access, recognising inequalities and taking steps to address them. It is about changing the culture and structure of sport to ensure that it becomes equally accessible to all members of society, whatever their age, ability, gender, race, ethnicity, sexuality or socio-economic status. The aim of the Standard is to provide a framework for sport to achieve equality and to assist agencies to develop structures and processes, assess performance and ensure continuous improvement. Achieving this aim will help to realise the vision of fair, accessible and high quality sport and physical activity for all. Source: Equality Standard for Sport. Sport England 2004.

4 Research Aim The purpose of the survey was to gather the thoughts of the Chief Executive of each National Governing Body (NGB) on the current standing of their organisation with regards to equality. The survey was designed to assess how well NGBs are placed to undertake the work necessary to achieve the Equality Standard in the coming months. Each Chief Executive provided an insight into the biggest challenges for the NGB individually and any assistance required in working towards the Standard. Finally, the respondents were asked to consider any possible benefits their organisation might derive from achieving the Equality Standard.

5 Outline of Methodology Specific sports identified by Sport England as priority development sports have been tasked with achieving the Equality Standard preliminary award by April This provided a sample of 24 NGBs for the research. The survey was undertaken by telephone with all those English NGBs. This was to ensure the best possible response rate from the small number of NGBs in the sample. As a result of the pro-active efforts of everyone involved a 100% responses rate was achieved. The Chief Executive of each NGB was asked to take part. They were first sent a covering letter and a copy of the survey questions in advance. A Researcher then contacted them by or telephone to arrange a convenient date and time to undertake the survey by telephone, which then took place on the agreed date. SPSS was the statistical package used to code and analyse the data and produce the headline findings presented in this report.

6 Project Outputs The outputs of the survey are twofold: This summary report of the findings provides a statement of the current position and perceptions of the 24 English NGBs as reported by them. An individual self assessment statement for each of the participating NGBs has also been produced and provided separately to Sport England. These can be used to ensure the support available to assist NGBs working towards the Equality Standard is tailored and targeted where most needed. In addition, the survey results form the basis for a repeat of the same survey to be conducted in two years time (i.e. after the participating NGBs have gained the Standard). This will allow a comparison of the impact the Equality Standard has had to be made.

7 Survey Findings The findings are structured into four sections which present the following: Section 1. The current position of NGBs Section 2. The demographic profiles of the membership, staff and National Council/Board Section 3. Any perceived potential effects and benefits of gaining the Equality Standard Section 4. Challenges to overcome and assistance required All quantitative responses were measured on a scale of 1 – 4 1 represents ‘not at all’ and 4 represents ‘greatly’

8 Section 1 The current position of National Governing Bodies regarding equality and the implementation of the Equality Standard

9 Chart 1. Desire to ensure NGB operates equitably

10 Chart 2. Necessary knowledge to ensure NGB operates equitably

11 Chart 3. Necessary human resources to ensure NGB operates equitably

12 Chart 4. Necessary financial resources to ensure NGB operates equitably.

13 Chart 5. How equitable is your NGB?

14 Chart 6. To what extent is your NGB committed to equality?

15 Chart 7. Understanding issues faced by under-represented groups

16 Chart 8. Comparison of responses from Questions 1 – 7

17 Summary of current position of NGBs NGBs expressed a high level of desire to work equitably, a high commitment to equality and an encouraging level of knowledge to ensure they operated equitably. This was balanced by fewer NGBs having the available human and financial resources. The area of greatest need is lack of available of financial resources to assist with implementing the standard – as indicated by over two thirds of NGBs (67%) Overall, the reported position of English NGBs can be stated as being very committed to equality, fairly well informed, but lacking resources to make it happen. It is notable that 76% of NGBs stated they are fairly (i.e. score 3) or greatly equitable at this moment in time. This contrasts with the findings regarding demographic profile in the next section.

18 Section 2 The demographic profiles of NGBs membership, staff and National Council/Board with regard to gender, ethnicity and disability

19 Chart 9. To what extent does the demographic profile of your Membership reflect the population as a whole? Some significant gender representation (38% ‘greatly’ represented) Low levels of disability membership (19% ‘not at all’ represented) Lowest level of membership representation amongst ethnic groups Over a quarter of NGBs did not have disability/ethnicity information available

20 Chart 10. To what extent does the Demographic profile of your National Council/Board reflect the population as a whole? A majority of NGBs stated that people with a disability and people from ethnic groups were ‘not at all’ represented on their National Council/Board. Gender representation varied significantly across NGBs.

21 Chart 11. To what extent does the Demographic profile of your staff reflect the population as a whole? Very low levels of ethnicity and disability representation amongst staff High gender representation – 62% ‘greatly’ represented

22 Chart 12: Demographic profile in terms of disability Low levels of disability representation, particularly on National Council and amongst staff.

23 Chart 13: Demographic profile in terms of gender 62% of NGBs reported that females were ‘greatly’ represented on their staff Proportionately lower levels of female representation at National Council/Board level

24 Chart 14: Demographic profile in terms of ethnicity Low levels of ethnicity representation across all three categories with the highest representation amongst NGB staff and the lowest at National Council/Board level

25 Demographic Profile Summary Gender: There are some encouraging levels of gender representation: –amongst NGB membership, ‘greatly’ represented in 38% of NGBs –amongst NGB staff, almost two thirds of NGBs (62%) ‘greatly’ represented However, there are proportionately lower levels of female representation at National Council/Board level Disability: Low levels of disability membership ('not at all’ represented in 19% of NGBs) 62% of NGBs stated that people with a disability were ‘not at all’ represented on their National Council/Board 52% of NGBs stated that people with a disability were ‘not at all’ represented on their staff Ethnicity: Low level of membership representation amongst ethnic groups 57% of NGBs stated that people from different ethnic groups were ‘not at all’ represented on their National Council/Board Varied ethnicity representation amongst NGB staff ranging from 33% ‘not at all’ represented to 19% ‘greatly’ represented Over a quarter of NGBs did not have disability/ethnicity information available.

26 Section 3 The reported potential effects and benefits of the working towards gaining the Equality Standard

27 Chart 15: Providing a framework

28 Chart 16: Ensuring democracy

29 Chart 17: Increase participation

30 Chart 18: Meet legal duties

31 Chart 19: Enhance skills & knowledge

32 Chart 20: Increase active involvement

33 Chart 21: Improve equality through monitoring/evaluation

34 Chart 22: Access funding & sponsorship

35 Chart 23: Build on good practice

36 Chart 24: Review current policy

37 Chart 25: Review equality achievements

38 Chart 26: Comparison of responses to Question 11 – Anticipating the impact of the Standard

39 Section 4 The challenges to be overcome in working towards the Equality Standard and assistance required

40 What are the major challenges that National Governing Bodies face in working towards the Standard? Some NGBs face difficulties in engaging volunteers with the principles of equality and compliance with the standard. This is made particularly difficult since NGBs do not have direct access to this group and rely on dissemination of information via clubs. There appears to be difficulties associated in ensuring that equality is a priority at a variety of levels: NGB board, clubs, individual members. Resources appeared to be a barrier to implementation of the policy both in terms of finance and officer time. There is a need for the collation of accurate data on membership and demographic profile in order to establish a baseline against the standard. There exists a current lack of clarity in both the articulation of the targets and the availability of specific data to monitor compliance e.g. ethnicity and gender. In addition some NGBs seem to be finding it difficult to influence changes in the demographics of their membership and staffing, especially in relation to ethnicity and gender.

41 What assistance do NGBs require in order to address the challenges? 1. There is a demand from the NGBs for: - External assistance through central guidance and specialist advise at a local level. - Centrally produced materials and supporting resources including generic information, specific information for individual sports (this was acknowledged to be potentially costly) and mechanisms for sharing of good practice 2.The NGBs would like to see better evidence of commitment, direction and guidance from a strategic level, starting with the Government through to UK Sport and Sport England. 3.There appears to be a need for training on a number of issues: awareness of the standard, the audit process and how to inform/influence the membership and volunteers on the issues.

42 What are the benefits that you believe NGBs may accrue from gaining the Equality Standard? Promotional opportunities to increase the profile and importance of equity and diversity in sport among the public at large. Real opportunities to increase participation in sport, especially among poorly represented groups, resulting form the changes in policy and practice. Accessing new funding opportunities which may emerge as a result of our organisations being more inclusive. An increased understanding and awareness of equity and diversity within sport.

43 Chart 27: Level of Equality Standard 33% of NGBs anticipate reaching both the Preliminary and Intermediate levels by March % (3 NGBs) anticipate reaching Advanced level, the remaining 20% did not know.

44 Acknowledgements Sport England would like to place on record their appreciation of all the National Governing Bodies who took part in this survey: All England Netball AssociationAmateur Boxing Association Badminton Association of EnglandBritish Baseball Federation British Mountaineering AssociationEnglish Golf Union England HockeyEngland Squash England BasketballEnglish Lacrosse Association English KarateEnglish Volleyball English Table Tennis AssociationEngland and Wales Cricket Board Lawn Tennis AssociationNational Federation of Anglers National Federation of Sea AnglersRugby Football Union Rugby Football LeagueSalmon and Trout Association The Football Association