Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks Cagliari, 27 th May 2002 Walter Wenzel CEO of KEeLAN project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EGov skills and organisational culture as a key to eGov success.
Advertisements

The European Activities of BR Communication e-CODEX e-Justice Communication via Online Data Exchange Bucharest, June 14 th 2013.
Review of Solar Cities activities: CO 2 balances in cities Chiel Boonstra.
1 S3 Platform: Achievements and outlook on activities for 2014 Moritz Haller JRC, Unit for International, Interinstitutional and Stakeholder Relations.
The Committee of the Regions A political assembly of the European Union, representing local and regional government.
Project overview Serena Andriani LABORATORI GUGLIELMO MARCONI.
THE EU FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATION Didier Boone BE National Contact Point on Integration to the European Commission Brussels Regional Parliament - June 8th.
We’re here for you. “European Exchange of Best Practice in Arson Investigation and Prevention” European exchange of best practice in arson investigation.
E-tax system stages 1.Stage 1 - Information: online information about public services 2.Stage 2 - Interaction: downloading of forms 3.Stage 3: Two-way.
Applying the ISO RM-ODP Standard in e-Government B. Meneklis 1, A. Kaliontzoglou 2,3, D. Polemi 1, C. Douligeris 1 1 University of Piraeus, Department.
Patricia de Suzzoni, Chair of ERGEG Customer Working Group Citizens’ Energy Forum, London, September 2009 Regulatory aspects of smart metering in.
15 April Fostering Entrepreneurship among young people through education: a EU perspective Simone Baldassarri Unit “Entrepreneurship” Forum “Delivering.
The measurement of Innovation An historical perspective The “Frascati Manual” and the “Oslo Manual” S&T indicators Innovation indicators Some evidence.
An introduction to the EU and its legislation. Member States currently 15 –Austria- Ireland –Belgium- Luxembourg –Denmark- Netherlands –Finland- Portugal.
How can citizen’s participate? Purpose and levels of participation: approach, methods, techniques, tools. Technical Assistance for Civil Society Organisations.
European integration 1www.ecb.europa.eu © Progress of European integration 1952ECSC European Coal and Steel Community 1958 EEC and EURATOM European Economic.
Delegations IV KAM Prague 3rd to 7th September 2014.
EGovernment Interoperability: Concepts, research results from the IST EU-Publi.com project and plans for a European study at local and regional level within.
Malta – A Gateway to European Investment Opportunities Malta – A Gateway to European Investment Opportunities March 2010.
European Commission TACIS programme. European Business Registration Survey 2005.
The Common Assessment Framework CAF
A litigious incumbent and a cautious regulator and other reasons why R&E networking is expensive in some countries Marko Bonač ARNES, Slovenia
1 From E-Government to Connected Governance: Harnessing Information & Communication Technologies for Knowledge Acquisition and Sharing Michael G. Mimicopoulos.
EReg Association of European Vehicle and Driver Registration Authorities Fleur Pullen – EReg Secretariat.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 LESSONS FROM THE THEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORIAL EMPLOYMENT PACTS Veronica Gaffey, DG Regional.
E Charter: Charter of Rights of the Citizens in the Information Society ISSS/LORIS/V4DIS Conference, 2-4 Abril 2005, PRAGUE José Ramón Rodríguez, CIO City.
Community of Practice on partnership in the ESF 8 October 2007 Open Days Benedict Wauters Deputy Director Flemish ESF Agency COP partnership coordinator.
Development of Censuses in Europe and Development for EC Statistical Co-operation European Commission (Eurostat) Jurgen Heimann UNFPA/PARIS 21 International.
World Summit on the Information Society Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development Parallel Event Tunis 15 November 2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT.
Institutional autonomy, regulatory frameworks and incentives Enora Bennetot Pruvot Programme Manager Governance, Autonomy & Funding “Governance and Diversification.
Understanding & Use of the Internet E-government Spring 2011 G. F Khan, PhD.
Task Group on development of e-Government indicators (TGEG) 2008 Global Event on Measuring the Information Society Report on e-Government indicators 2008.
A New Start for EUTO Redruth, 29 September 2012 Henk Schüller.
Regional partnership for intercultural exchange, Mostar final conference 1° April 2011 Migration governance in Apulia Region: a pilot action on social.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
TietoEnator©2003 TietoEnator  eStrategy Lorris 2003 KeaTE Strategies for eGovernment in Europe Karl-Erik Andersson, TietoEnator, Sweden.
CAF Resource Centre at EIPA Open Days Patrick Staes Senior Expert European Institute of Public Administration THE COMMON ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK.
1 Antisemitism summary overview of the situation in the European Union
European Commission DG Regional Policy DG Agriculture and Rural Development DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal OpportunitiesDG Fisheries and Maritime.
ENCORA initiative and Public Participation in the coastal management in the EU Case Study compiled for EU-COMET 2 project Alan Pickaver & Wouter Kreiken.
Government portals and Directgov March 2007
Role-play on EU decision-making. The European Union: 500 million people – 28 countries Member states of the European Union Candidate and potential candidate.
UEF Presidency GCM Herning/ Presidency report GCM August 2007 Herning (DK) - Educational matters and exchange activities –
The Euro Area Crisis: Origins, Prospects and Implications for the World Economy and Global Governance Domenico Lombardi UNLV, April 3, 2013.
Three key players The European Parliament - voice of the people Jerzy Buzek, President of of the European Parliament The council of Ministers - voice of.
10 February “FP6 Networks of excellence” Colette Renier Research DG.
Growth of E-Government Services in Macedonia- (Online sophistication of e- Government services) Presentation by Prof. Dr. Marjan Gusev University Sts Cyril.
Monitoring, reporting and evaluating climate change adaptation policies at national level in Europe - An overview of where we stand Stéphane Isoard, EEA.
Community of Practice on partnership in the ESF 10 December 2007 Benedict Wauters Deputy Director Flemish ESF Agency COP partnership coordinator.
Survey on quality and usage of public e-services.
William Heath Chairman, Kable Ltd
European Commission / Taxation and Customs Union June 2009 UNECE REGIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRADE FACILITATION 1 Single Window European Commission.
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
Political Economics Riccardo Puglisi Lecture 4 Content: Welfare State: Facts, Data and Relevant Issues Economic Policies Size and Composition of the Welfare.
USD billion
Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions
The European Investment Advisory Hub Support to CEF Blending
Support to National Helpdesks
European Commission Initiatives for eGovernment
Support to National Helpdesks
ERA-Net Smart Energy Systems
EPAN – DG Meeting eGovernment working group
EUROPEAN UNION the “EU”
Role-play on EU decision-making
Europe & International Real Estate
Outline of the EU greenhouse gas emission trend report
Introduction to the CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide
Rapporteur: Krzysztof PATER
Presentation transcript:

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks Cagliari, 27 th May 2002 Walter Wenzel CEO of KEeLAN project

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks INTRODUCTION Objective of KEeLAN Provide local administrations in Europe and the EC with a relevant tool package for eEurope to develop a vision and a strategic approach towards internet based e-government for local authorities; a tailor-made marching route to stimulate local authorities in their transition process towards modernisation; integrated access platforms and advanced new generation web services to citizens

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks APPROACH Stages of KEeLAN Web-Scan Selection of 50 Case Studies based on front-office performance of service delivery, out of 700 websites of EU local authorities. Benchmark Analysis of the organisation behind the front-office of 50 Case Studies on issues like: business model, workflows, responsibilities, processes and financial, legal, social and cultural considerations. e-Government marching route Drafting of different models for EU local authorities to implement e- Government service delivery based on the organisational characteristics (front- and back-office) of the 50 best-practice web- sites.

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks APPROACH e-Government Model Generation 2 one-way interaction Generation 3 two-way interaction Generation 4 transaction Generation 1 information Generation 0 not online Generation 5 service integration Role of e-Government Degree of change to organisation of local authority enablertransformer

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks Generation 0: not online No web presence of local authority through a proprietary website. e-Government as enabler e-Government implementation does not require redesign of service delivery of local authority e-Government application not integrated in local authority’s organisation Generation 1: information Basic information provided online on relevant themes for interested parties / stakeholders, such as citizens, enterprises and visitors. Generation 2: one-way interaction One-way electronic exchange of information (communication) enabled by means of stand-alone system, not linked to back-office. Example: possibility to download (printable) forms that can be sent by regular mail. APPROACH e-Government Model

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks e-Government as transformer e-Government implementation has resulted in redesign of process of service delivery of local authority e-Government application integrated in authority’s organisation Generation 3: two-way interaction Two-way electronic exchange of information (communication) enabled by means of network linked to back-office. Example: possibility to retrieve personalized information or to monitor personal data / status Generation 4: transaction Online service delivery enabled by means of secured network linked to back-office. Example: possibility to modify personal data (online voting, online electronic banking) Generation 5: service integration Online service delivery enabled by means of secured network linked to different back- offices / service modules. Example: possibility to access and modify personal data in different (shared) databases from one site (online purchase of car, insurance and payment of taxes) APPROACH e-Government Model

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN Scope websites Websites of local authority / / if it is part of the local authority 700 websites of local authorities ANCINET: 205 websites (Greece 20, Italy 90, Portugal 20, Spain 75) LGCSB: 210 websites (UK 90, Ireland 20, France 90, Luxemburg 10) KGSt: 200 websites (Germany 90, Austria 20, Belgium 45, Netherlands 45) Efektia: 85 websites in total (Finland 20, Sweden 45, Denmark 20) Websites at least of ‘Generation 3’

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks Usability Policy Making Economic Development Personal Documents Credits and Loans Information Education Building Permits Environment Culture and Leisure WEB-SCAN Scope services scanned

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN Methodology Web-Scan Tool Request / Application: level of interactivity Handling: response to external demand Help: interactivity and modality of support Modality of appearance: accessibility BenchMark Net PWC Consulting Tool On-line questionnaire / database On-line handling and processing of data

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks Web-Scan Considerations Considerations on results: Results do not describe status of e-Government in Member State Results describe quality of service delivery of ‘top’-websites. Caution when comparing results between Member States No random selection: at least ‘Generation 3’ No equal distribution of websites over generations Differences in scanned fraction per Member State Still, it gives a good indication!

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks Web-Scan Considerations On the basis of selection of Case Studies: some modification required to optimise tool: Self-Assessment Tool Overall correlation: 0,63 Correlation high for ‘real services’ Problems with ‘Generation 1’ and ‘Generation 2’ ServiceCorrelation Generation Calculated and Generation Estimated Usability0,53 Policy making0,52 Information0,49 Culture & leisure0,62 Economic development0,66 Personal documents0,61 Credits & loans0,70 Education0,77 Building permits0,67 Environment0,57

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN RESULTS 50 Case Studies Selection of 100 best-practices With the help of the Web-Scan Tool Per Country First per Service (sometimes second) Selection of 50 Case Studies Analysis of 100 best-practices Exploration knowledge / experience of expert team selection of 35 Case Studies based on excellent service delivery selection of 15 Case Studies based on overall functionalities and outstanding strategic and technical approaches good spread over services and Member States

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN RESULTS European Union Member States

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN RESULTS European Union Member States

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks ‘Culture & Leisure’, ‘Information’ and ‘Policy Making’ are offered most often by the websites of the local authorities, ‘Education’ almost nowhere. The average level of maturity of the services lies between Generation 2 and Generation 3. There is no correlation between size of local authority and generation, which means that bigger does not automatically is not better. The variation in generations is high in Italy, France and Belgium, which means that there are big differences in level of service delivery between the different local authorities. The variation is low in Sweden, Denmark and Luxemburg (low spread) indicating small differences in level of service delivery between the different local authorities. WEB-SCAN RESULTS European Union Member States

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN RESULTS

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN RESULTS

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN RESULTS Selected Case Studies

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks WEB-SCAN RESULTS Selected Case Studies

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks NEXT STEPS Benchmark Contact 50 Case Studies Meeting at EISCO 2002 Cagliari Benchmark based on EFQM Model Site Visits (period July – September 2002) Conclusions

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks NEXT STEPS Roadmaps Preparation of Roadmaps based on Benchmark Related to: Organisational Aspects Financial Aspects Leadership Aspects Technological Aspects

Key Elements for electronic Local Authorities’ Networks More info Tomorrow meeting at am