An Introduction to Rigorous Reading Comprehension PK-3 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1 Rigorous Reading Comprehension.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Addressing Common Core Standards Using
Advertisements

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 5: Academically Productive Talk Tennessee Department of Education Science Supporting Rigorous Science Teaching and.
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
© 2013 University of Pittsburgh Academically Productive Talk in ELA PK-K with a Focus on English Learners Supporting Implementation of Rigorous Speaking.
Scaffolding Students’ Comprehension of Text Article written by Kathleen F. Clark & Michael F. Graves Summarized by Kristine Barrett.
1 © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1 Using the content-focused Coaching® Model to Support Early childhood Literacy and Language Development How to Teach.
Dream, Design, Deliver Elementary PD Plan Courtney Bitar Tonya Cox Jay Nocco Barb Walker Suzanne Whaley.
1 Vocabulary and Comprehension: Read Alouds and Story Structure Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Training December 2007.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Breakfast PL April, Teacher read-alouds are planned oral readings of a range of texts. They are a vital part of daily literacy instruction in all.
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Learning to Use Descriptive Language When Giving Feedback Quality Feedback from.
Small-Group Instruction Targeting Vocabulary and Comprehension Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Sharon Walpole University of Delaware.
Elementary Balanced Literacy: Read Alouds. Read Aloud minutes Research has found: The single most important activity for building knowledge for.
Read Aloud with Accountable Talk. Norms Courtesy  Be on time  Cell phones on silent, vibrate, or off  Be mindful of side- bar conversations  Focus.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Introduction to Direct Vocabulary Instruction With a Focus on English Learners.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
August 1, 2012 Diane Foley, Network Leader Shirley Rouse-Bey, Achievement Coach Debbie White, Achievement Coach Marsha Volini, Achievement Coach.
Learning Objectives Participants will discuss ways to integrate themes throughout their classroom. Participants will come up with their own ideas to increase.
General Considerations for Implementation
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
You don’t have to be an English teacher to support reading and writing in CTE Linda Affholder.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Reflection As a review from the last PLC session, discuss your.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Common Core State Standards. Instructional Shifts Implementation of the Common Core State Standards College & Career Ready Students Data.
1 © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1 Using the content-focused Coaching® Model to Support Early childhood Literacy and Language Development Pre and Post.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Enhancing Student Mathematical Thinking through Conversation LISET GONZALEZ ACOSTA MANDY BREITENSTEIN.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Foundational Ideas Module How Can the Principles of Learning Help Preschoolers.
Module 2 Planning an Integrated Common Core Literature Lesson.
DEVELOPING ART LESSONS WITH AT-RISK YOUTH AND ELLS IN MIND Delanie Holton Art Teacher Fletcher Primary and Intermediate Aurora, CO.
Unit 5: Science: A Setting for English Language Development Learning Objectives Learn strategies that incorporate CA CCSS for ELA/Literacy and the California.
Accountable Talk Malden Public Schools. What is Accountable Talk “Accountable talk sharpens students' thinking by reinforcing their ability to use and.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
A Collaboration between: Los Angeles Unified School District University of California, San Diego San Diego State University University of California, Irvine.
ACCOUNTABLE TALK PRESENTATION Local District G Elementary Principals’ Team Meeting October 16, 2002.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Reflection As a review from the last PLC session, discuss your.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous English Language Arts Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
August 19, The current situation Fall 2008 – incoming college students needing writing remediation: 36.7% of incoming students in 2 year institutions.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Bridge to Practice Reflection As a review from the last PLC session, discuss your.
Content Objective: - Participants will be able to distinguish between facts and myths of language acquisition Language Objective: -Participants will be.
MATH COMMUNICATIONS Created for the Georgia – Alabama District By: Diane M. Cease-Harper, Ed.D 2014.
Teaching Reading Comprehension
READING STRATEGY: Question-Answer Relationship Preparing for the arrival of Common Core Standards in Social Studies.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Five Dimensions of Quality Math Instruction. SD Counts-Mini Foundations Summer Welcome! During today’s session, you will… 1.…develop an understanding.
Philosophical Chairs. Welcome Sign In Introductions Parking Lot Logistics Materials.
Interactive Read Aloud Thinking and Talking, Within, Beyond, and About the Text Sarah Toa, MENA Conference, Dubai, October 2015.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 University of Pittsburgh Becoming Familiar with the Core Issues.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 2: Engaging in Rigorous CTE Lessons Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Fostering Vocabulary Development and Deeper Conceptual Understanding in the Mathematics Classroom Melissa Christie September 16, 2013.
Debate and World Languages THE ROLE OF SPEAKING AND LISTENING IN THE HIGH SCHOOL CLASSROOM.
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Supporting Literacy for Students with Developmental Disabilities Being a Literacy Partner.
In the Age of Common Core. Close Reading of text involves an investigation of a short piece of text, with multiple readings done over multiple instructional.
ORAL COMMUNICATION By: Jouanna Marie L. Uy.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
COMMON CORE AND THE LIBRARIAN
Common Core Aligned Writing
English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS)
Previously Implemented Instructional Approaches
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
Read Aloud with Accountable Talk
Fishbowl Discussion Directions:
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to Rigorous Reading Comprehension PK-3 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 1 Rigorous Reading Comprehension with a focus on English Learners (ELs)Supporting Implementation of High Standards

Goals LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Understand the relationship among text, task, and talk. Study one model of rigorous reading comprehension instruction for the support it provides to English learners. Learn how to use a rigorous read aloud lesson to support reading comprehension of age- appropriate complex text for ELs Understand some of the issues faced by students learning to read in English when it is not their first language

Norms for Participation 3 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Be respectful No side-bar conversations See others point of view No judgments of others Provide useful feedback Provide opportunity for all to speak Support each other and collaborate Cell phones and should be set on vibrate No talking or texting on cell phones at study group table Come prepared to contribute to the conversations Feel a collective responsibility for each others learning and for adhering to the norms

Lauren Resnick,Founder IFL LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

“Accountable talk is talk that is orchestrated by LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH teachers so that students learn to formulate responses to problems, interpretations of text that are correct in disciplinary terms and go beyond what was actually written there.” Lauren Resnick 5

Goal of IFL Rigorous Reading Comprehension Lessons LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Rigorous reading comprehension lessons are an approach to read alouds that are designed to enhance young children’s ability to construct meaning from decontexualized language.The goal of the IFL Rigorous Reading Comprehension lessons include not only promoting comprehension, but also expanding language and vocabulary development.

Research Finding 7 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH One of the most persistent findings in reading research is the direct link between the depth of students’ vocabulary knowledge and their reading comprehension. Baumann, Kame’enui, et al., 2003 and McKeown, Beck, Omanson,& Perfetti, 1983

Task 1: An Introduction to Rigorous Reading Comprehension Article Study 8 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Task 1: An Introduction to Rigorous Reading Comprehension Article Study: Quick Write 9 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Beck, I. L. & McKeown, M.G. (2001). Text Talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, (55), Quick write: Review the pre-reading text respond to the question, “What are the authors are saying support students’ reading comprehension?”

Task 1: An Introduction to Rigorous Reading Comprehension Article Study: Quick Write 10 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Read your quick write to a partner. Prepare to share your partner’s thinking with the large group

Task 1: An Introduction to Rigorous Reading Comprehension Article Study: Significant Quotes LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Select a significant quote from the text that you think is important to the argument made by Beck and McKeown.Say why you think the quote is significant to the argument the authors are making. If you can, tie this significance to how it affects English Learners (ELs).Study the Example and model yours similarly. Turn to a Partner once you complete the assignment. Read your significant quote to your partner and say why you thought it was significant to the argument. Be prepared to share with the large group. 11

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Significant QuoteWhy Significant to Argument “Researchers suggest that the most valuable aspect of the read-aloud activity is that it gives children experience with decontextualized language, requiring them to make sense of ideas that are about something beyond the here and now (Cochran-Smith, 1984; Heath, 1983; Snow, 1993; Snow & Dickinson, 1991; Snow, Tabors, Nicholson, & Kurland, 1995). As Donaldson (1978) pointed out,children come to school well able to think and reason about the world in situations that make human sense to them. What they have to learn to do in school is to think and reason in “disembedded contexts”...to use symbol systems and deal with representations of the world.” (pp. 88–89) Page 1. This quote is significant to the argument Beck and McKeown make because the importance of intensive, interactive English language development instruction for all English learners is critical. The focus on developing academic language (the decontextualized language of the schools, the language of academic discourse, of texts, and of formal argument). This area has been neglected, and essential for providing English learners access to the Common Core State Standards.

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Text Based Discussions Help Students: –Learn to use knowledge in “creative and critical” ways to solve open-ended problems, develop and defend interpretations, and write their own texts. –Have higher levels of achievement on standardized tests. –Find their experiences more fun and engaging. 1313

14 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task 2: An Introduction to Rigorous Reading Comprehension Standards Study

Task 2: An Introduction to Rigorous Reading Comprehension: Standards Study 1515 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH –What do you notice about the skills and habits that New Standards values in terms of literacy?

Whole Group Discussion New Standards Speaking & Listening 1616 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH –According to the New Standards, what do students need to know and be able to do as participants in reading comprehension? –Why are those habits and skills important for college and career readiness? –From your experience, how much practice and expertise do EL students have in understanding complex text?

8 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Text, Task, and Talk

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Text Based Discussions are Rare –Questions most typically asked of students by teachers and textbooks are recitation questions. –Predominate pattern in the I-R-E. 1818

NAEYC on this Model of Read Aloud LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH “What these and other studies have found is that the effectiveness of a read-aloud depends on a number of factors. Successful read- alouds rely on active engagement in the reading by both adults and children. They also involve careful selection of high-quality texts; open-ended questions asked by adults and children; discussions about the book, building from what children already know; predictions by children of what they think might happen or come next in the book; and talk that ties the book to life beyond the classroom or the here and now. This is called using decontextualized language. It can mean, for example, relating the book to something that might happen in the future or something that happened in the past.” NAEYC,

Task 3: Rigorous Reading Comprehension PK-3 Video Study 10 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Norms for Collaborative Study 20 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Goal of all conversations: To advance our own learning, not to “fix” the practice of others. –Facilitator chooses lens for study. –Agree to read/watch through the designated lens. –Cite specific examples from text or video. –Build on others’ ideas. –Use language that is respectful of those in the video and in the group.

Context of The Wolf’s Chicken Stew Video 19 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Content:Comprehension of a fiction text in a shared reading lesson using a rigorous comprehension approach Text:The Wolf’s Chicken Stew byKeiko Kasza Teacher:Ms. Yvette Celorio Reyes Coach: School: Ms. Gloria Sullivan Wooldrige Elementary School Principal: Ms. Linda Purvis Austin ISD, Austin, Texas

23 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Video Study In what ways does this lesson embody the principles of rigorous comprehension instruction for English speakers and English learners? How does this discussion align to the expectations of rigorous standards for reading?What do you notice about how students are building skills and habits that the are valued by rigorous reading comprehension standards? What else can be done to scaffold the understanding of English Learners? 2424 Task 3: Rigorous Reading Comprehension PK-3:

Video Study What did the teacher do to engage students in focusing on the story?What did students do? 25 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task 3: Rigorous Reading Comprehension PK-3:

Video Study How does this lesson support students to engage in rigorous reading comprehension? How does it support the teacher? 26 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task 3: Rigorous Reading Comprehension PK-3:

Ways in Which This Lesson Enacted Principles of 27 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Rigorous Reading Comprehension Instruction Students were: Engaged in a rigorous task, with an appropriate text and open-ended questions that promoted long answers Given time to talk to each other, and with the teacher Required to cite the text and engage in Accountable Talk ®

Ways in Which This Lesson Enacted Principles of 28 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Rigorous Reading Comprehension Instruction Building meaning as the story was read. Addressing confusing issues as they came up in the story. Using background knowledge to support comprehension. Agreeing and disagreeing to clarify understanding. Using wait time to formulate their thoughts and find the words to express their intent. Building vocabulary in the context of classroom work. Discussing the story meaning in Spanish first.

Academically Productive Talk 36 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

Reflection 40 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH What did you learn and/or what insights did you gain about rigorous reading comprehension from our work today? What are the implications of your insights for your role? How will you structure and facilitate rigorous reading comprehension?

Bridge to Practice for Principals 31 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH By _, observe at least two classrooms where teachers are working with students on rigorous reading comprehension using and interactive read aloud approach. Collect evidence on the Evidence Sheets provided. Write a reflection on,“What worked for the students? How was the teacher handling the pictures? How was that going? What questions do you have?Be prepared to share your reflection with your colleagues on.

Bridge to Practice for Teacher 32 LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH By _, select a short text to read aloud to the students and pre-select the vocabulary you think will may give the students difficulty understanding the text. Create student friendly definitions for the vocabulary.Decide where you will stop to discuss text and formulate the questions and follow up questions you will ask.Read the text to students. Then, reflect in writing on your experience conducting a rigorous read-aloud.What went well?What did not? What questions do you have?Be prepared to share your reflection with your colleagues on _.