FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
SUZANNE CHILDRESS, ERIK SABINA, DAVID KURTH, TOM ROSSI, JENNIFER MALM DRCOG Focus Activity-Based Model Calibration/Validation Innovations in Travel Modeling.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Transportation Planning Modeling with EMME/2. Interconnectedness.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Transportation Planning CE 573 Course Introduction and Four-Step Travel Demand Moding (FSTDM)
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Building and Learning Activity-Based Models Erik Sabina Jennifer Malm Jennifer Malm Suzanne Childress John Bowman DeVon Culbertson.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What,
 Focus Model Application to Colfax Ave  Initial Contact with FTA  Evaluation Process and Results  Next Steps.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
September, 2012An Activity Based Model for a Regional City1.
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
Calgary Commercial Movement Model Kevin Stefan, City of Calgary J.D. Hunt, University of Calgary Prepared for the 17th International EMME/2 Conference.
Dowling Associates, Inc. 19 th International EMME/2 Users’ Conference – 21 October 2005 Derivation of Travel Demand Elasticities from a Tour-Based Microsimulation.
Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Methodological Considerations for Integrating Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Activity-Based Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Srinivasan Sundaram.
May 8, 2009 SERPM65 Subarea Model-Corradino 1 SERPM65 Highway-Only Subarea Modeling Process Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FOUR Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Demand Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
13 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference May 8-12, Reno, Nevada Rosella Picado Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Aktivitetsbaseret modellering af transportefterspørgsel
Transportation Engineering Mode Choice January 21, 2011
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Transportation Engineering Trip Distribution January 19, 2011
Making Activity-Based Models Easier to Use
Transportation Engineering Wrap-up of planning February 2, 2011
TransCAD Vehicle Routing 2018/11/29.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Presentation transcript:

FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011

Tentative Schedule Model StepsJuly 28 Model Steps & More about Applicationto unconfuse you August 4

Focus Model Duality  SQL Server Database and TransCAD files (bin, matrix)  T-SQL/C# Code And GISDK Code

Focus Model Flow: 28 Steps FEEDBACK

Focus Model Flow STAGE 1: Make Population And Network STAGE 2: Run GISDK to Mode Choice STAGE 3: C# Logit Models to Create Trips STAGE 4: GISDK Assignment FEEDBACK

Review  We have represented and skimmed the network.  We have created external DIA and commercial trips.  People have a regular workplace and school.  Households have a number of cars.  We know how tours a person makes. What is a tour again? What is a half-tour? What is an intermediate stop? How is a half-tour stop different from an intermediate stop?

Review  We know where the tour is going, what mode it uses, and it times.  Now it’s time to make stops on the tour.  Why do you stop places instead of leaving your house and coming back again?  When you stop what is guiding what time you stop at and what mode you use?

Intermediate Stop Generation  Choice: Applied to Each Half Tour, if daily activity pattern includes a stop, Predicts work, school, escort, personal business, meal, shop, social/rec or no more stops  Model Type: Multinomial Logit  Inputs: (What do you think predicts?) Tour Purpose Person Type Number of Stops already made Tour Mode

Can Now Create Trips and Half Tour Stops: Fill These Tables

Here’s what the trip table looks like

Trip Time of Day Simulation  We need a time of day on each intermediate stop to pick which skim to use.  Use the distribution of observed times for intermediate stops by purpose, and monte carlo.  For example, 15% of meal stops happen between 12 pm – 1 pm

Intermediate Stop Location  We know the anchoring locations of home and primary destination. We know how many stops they will make.  Where will the person stop?  Model Type: Multinomial Logit  Choices: Zones, Point Locations  Inputs: (What do you think predicts this?) - Distance Out of Direction the stop will take you - Stop Purpose - Number of Jobs in Each Zone - Mixed Use Density

Now we know where the stops are.

Trip Mode Choice  Choice: Drive Alone, Shared Ride 2, Shared Ride 3+, Walk to Transit, Drive to Transit, Walk, Bike School Bus  Known: Tour Mode  Model Type: Multinomial Logit (separate by purpose)  Inputs: (What do you think?) Tour Mode Trip Purpose Travel Time Time of Day Income Destination Density

Only Certain Trip Modes allowed by Tour Mode Tour Mode DTWTSBSR3+SR2DABW Trip mode DT X WT XX SB XXX SR3+ XXXX SR2 XXXXX DA XXXXXX B XXXXXXX W XXXXXXXX

Trip Time of Day  Predicts: Time of Day for Intermediate Stops (we already know for primary destination  Choice: twenty four one-hour increments 12 AM- 1 AM..etc; A little tricky Predict Stop Departure Time On Inbound Half Tour

We don’t know time we left home, so Predicts Stop Arrival Time on Outbound Half Tour

Trip Time of Day Choice Model Type: Multinomial Logit  Inputs: (What do you think?) Previously Scheduled Tours and Stops (Process is Iterative) Trip Purpose Travel Mode Age Worker Status Constants by Time of Day

Finally we have a full set of trips: we’re done with stage 3  We know:  Trip Origin, Destination X, Y  Trip Time Period to Within an Hour  Trip Mode  Trip Purpose For Each Person, For Each Trip in the Region

Here’s what the trips look like (again)

Focus Model Flow STAGE 1: Make Population And Network STAGE 2: Run GISDK to Mode Choice STAGE 3: C# Logit Models to Create Trips STAGE 4: GISDK Assignment FEEDBACK

Write Trips to TransCAD  We take these flat table trips and write them into matrices by mode by purpose. Thisw ill have all integer values.  We combine these trips with internal-external trips, external-external trips, and DIA trips by replacing the appropriate rows and columns in the matrices.  Now we can assign the  Trips Finally!

Aggregate Trips into Assignment Periods  TIMES OF DAY  Highway Times of DayTransit Times of Day  AM1: 6:30 – 7:00 AM; AM: 6:30- 9:00 AM  AM2: 7:00 – 8:00 AM;  AM3: 8:00 – 9:00 AM;  OP2: 9:00 – 11:30 AM; MD: 9:00 AM- 3:00 PMPM  OP3: 11:30 AM – 3:00 PM;  PM1: 3:00 – 5:00 PM; PM: 3:00 PM -7:00 PM  PM2: 5:00 – 6:00 PM;  PM3: 6:00 – 7:00 PM;  OP4: 7:00 – 11:00 PM.EL: 7:00 PM – 6:00 AM  OP1: 11:00 PM – 6:30 AM;

Trip Time – Distance Matrix Copier  Take the Skimmed Travel Times and Distances and Write Them Back Into the Database  Looks like this:

Stage 4: GISDK Assignment  Run Highway Assignment for 10 time periods  Run Transit Assignment for 4 time periods  Remember those DIA trips, external trips, and commericial trips from way long ago: they get thrown in. Then we know: Model Assignment Outputs And we can feed the speeds back to the trip-making. So people can choose daily activity patterns with the updated speeds. People may travel less due to congestion or switch modes

Cool Outputs  VMT for an individual person, or group of people living in a neighborhood  Number of Bike or Walk Trips Originating in a buffer around a bike path  The usual: Boardings by Route, Traffic Volumes by ten time periods  Can you think of something we can do now???  We know about each person and where they go on a point level.

Focus Model Flow: 28 Steps FEEDBACK